techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards

View Poll Results: Which ones faster and what would you buy as a single card solution
EVGA 512-P3-N877-AR GeForce 9800 GTX SSC 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP 25 51.02%
ASUS EAH3850X2/HTDI/1G Dual Radeon HD 3850 1GB 512-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready 25 51.02%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 18, 2008, 10:50 PM   #1
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

which card is faster and as a single card solution

what card of these two would you buy.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814121245
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130349
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 10:52 PM   #2
dark2099
3500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: where everyone wants to be
Posts: 4,152 (2.16/day)
Thanks: 472
Thanked 751 Times in 624 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dark2099 Send a message via MSN to dark2099

System Specs

um...what cards do we have to choose from/
__________________
Heatware
Check out Gomez Peer on how to make your PC work for you. Referred by dark2099 please!
Mini Rig: Biostar TP67XE / i5 2500k / Corsair H55 / 2x4GB PNY / XFX 7770 / Corsair CX500M / Win 8 64 bit / Thermaltake V9 Blackwidow
dark2099 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 10:55 PM   #3
Azza17
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 16 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

If I had to pick, it would be the 9800GTX. But wait until HD4870 IMO.
Azza17 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:00 PM   #4
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

Resolution? For 1650 x 1080 or lower 9800 GTX. For 1440 x 900 or higher 3870X2
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:03 PM   #5
hat
Maximum Overclocker
 
hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts

System Specs

The asus is a 3870x2 so... go with it
__________________
My Heatware
“Inb4 smartphone LN2 overclocking.” -radrok
hat is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:06 PM   #6
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

I think alot of you are overlooking something, that's a 3850X2 not 3870X2.

I say the GTX.. the X2 is probably faster in a few games that are well optimized for crossfire.
__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:08 PM   #7
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

That 3850x2 when oced matches or exceeds a 3870x2 for added info.Plus has a non stock cooler and is about 50.00 cheaper than a stock heatsink mounted 3870x2
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:15 PM   #8
MrW
75 Posts
 
MrW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 191 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Yes this is a 3850 not 3870. Basically the only difference is lower clocks, but it is still a very fast card. Their performance is nearly the same.

So...
The X2. It uses less power.
__________________
MrW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:18 PM   #9
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

They're close, but actually i think the 9800 uses less power.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid...=expert&pid=13

If you can clock that 3850 to 800+ core i think it'd be a great choice.

Looks to be splitting haird in terms of performance, it basically comes down to whether or not you want to deal with a dual or single gpu setup.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MrW View Post
Yes this is a 3850 not 3870. Basically the only difference is lower clocks, but it is still a very fast card. Their performance is nearly the same.

So...
The X2. It uses less power.
__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:23 PM   #10
MrW
75 Posts
 
MrW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 191 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychoholic View Post
They're close, but actually i think the 9800 uses less power.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid...=expert&pid=13

If you can clock that 3850 to 800+ core i think it'd be a great choice.

Looks to be splitting haird in terms of performance, it basically comes down to whether or not you want to deal with a dual or single gpu setup.
My mistake. Got it mixed with up the 9800GX2. So in that case I reverse my origional conclusion and would go for the GTX.
__________________
MrW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:24 PM   #11
marsey99
500 Posts
 
marsey99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 952 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 148
Thanked 132 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by spearman914 View Post
Resolution? For 1650 x 1080 or lower 9800 GTX. For 1440 x 900 or higher 3870X2
you do know that 14x9 is lower res than 16x10 right??

i hope you was being ironic.


trt

i would go with the 98 as it will give better fps in most games (bar those with xfire support) as nvidias is buying up the games indusrty support 1 game at a time.

i cant remmeber the last game i bought that didnt have the nvidia logo on it?


but i would not buy any card today tbh, with teh 4xxx next month and the 99xx not long after both of those cards will lose value faster than enron(or northern rock for the uk massive).

i would get a 96gt or 38xx and save the rest to put towards one of those.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
marsey99 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:31 PM   #12
Paulieg
The Mad Moderator
 
Paulieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wherever I can find the iron.
Posts: 11,448 (5.00/day)
Thanks: 2,519
Thanked 3,054 Times in 2,098 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Paulieg

System Specs

There are reviews that say the 3850 crossfire and 9800GTX are VERY close in terms of performance, so I would imagine the 3850 would fair about the same. That being said, I think both cards are overpriced, since a 8800GTS is VERY close in performance to the 9800GTX.
Paulieg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:34 PM   #13
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

ATI takes the most advantage when playing Oblivion, dunno why. This is why you better get the 9800 GTX instead to average framerates in games.
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:35 PM   #14
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

I would go with a 9800GTX because it uses less power and is cheaper if you go with a non-oc one.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...800GTX%2bPALiT
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:42 PM   #15
selway89
200 Posts
 
selway89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 364 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts

System Specs

Why 9800? Get a 8800GTS 512MB: pretty much identical, just the 9800GTX is pricier. And as others have said, newer cards and TRUE 9 series cards are coming.
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
If it ain't working, don't panic...
selway89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:46 PM   #16
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by selway89 View Post
Why 9800? Get a 8800GTS 512MB: pretty much identical, just the 9800GTX is pricier. And as others have said, newer cards and TRUE 9 series cards are coming.
Agreed with 8800 GTS. 9800 GTX has the same GPU (G92) but the only difference is it clocks higher. You can easily keep up the clocks by overclocking and the 9 series tend to suck for heat which makes it useless for never-ending gamers.
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:50 PM   #17
JC316
Knows what makes you tick
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DFW/ Texas
Posts: 6,047 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 714
Thanked 912 Times in 696 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to JC316

System Specs

I would say the 9800GTX.
__________________
Core 2 Duo Overclocking guide
Athlon 64 overclocking guide
“If I were to do this, it'd be my luck that the door would rip off the hinges, burst into flames, and rape my face with fiery hot death.” -El Fiendo
JC316 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 11:57 PM   #18
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by selway89 View Post
Why 9800? Get a 8800GTS 512MB: pretty much identical, just the 9800GTX is pricier. And as others have said, newer cards and TRUE 9 series cards are coming.
Actually the true 9 series are already out. GTX 200 series are pretty close though.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:13 AM   #19
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

The 8800gts is a great card but some 9800gtx cards can be had as low as 255.00 after a rebate and they do overclock on average a bit higher than the 8800 gts plus the cooler is better . I wonder how well the 3870/3850x2 cards will compete with the 4870 cards.
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:25 AM   #20
VroomBang
75 Posts
 
VroomBang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 163 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

Wait for the soon to be released 99xx and HD4xxx.

If I absolutely had to buy now, I'd go for the 9800. While both cards offer a similar performance, the 9800 seems to be less power hungry. My latest electricity bill was quite high and I've become more power saving conscious.
__________________
We want quantum processors now!
VroomBang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:25 AM   #21
selway89
200 Posts
 
selway89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 364 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkMatter View Post
Actually the true 9 series are already out. GTX 200 series are pretty close though.
By TRUE I meant that a new chip design....Personally I think that the 9800 cards at the moment should have been a 8900 or something like that.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Unless you want maximum performance and blow to your wallet at this very moment in time go for the 9800, but otherwise it's best to stick with a 8800GTS or even a GT there practically the same.

End of the day the choice is yours...
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
If it ain't working, don't panic...
selway89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:31 AM   #22
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

well I need a card that will last a while just sold my current card and was thinking of getting the 3850x2 but wonder how it will fair against the new 4000 series in performance and price wise. It depends on the review you read the 3870x2 and 9800 seem to go back and fourth . I think the 3850x2's 512bit interface and 1 gb of ram might make a difference in the future.
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:39 AM   #23
Psychoholic
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 479 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

I think its 256bit X 2, which is still just 256bit. as for the memory, I think its just two 512MB Frame buffers, which games still see as 512mb. I'm sure someone will correct me if im wrong.
__________________
Psychoholic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:43 AM   #24
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740 View Post
well I need a card that will last a while just sold my current card and was thinking of getting the 3850x2 but wonder how it will fair against the new 4000 series in performance and price wise. It depends on the review you read the 3870x2 and 9800 seem to go back and fourth . I think the 3850x2's 512bit interface and 1 gb of ram might make a difference in the future.
No the 4000 series will pwn all the 3000 series due to the 1 GHz core clock.
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2008, 12:44 AM   #25
trt740
Eligible for custom title
 
trt740's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,186 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 1,578
Thanked 1,135 Times in 960 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychoholic View Post
I think its 256bit X 2, which is still just 256bit. as for the memory, I think its just two 512MB Frame buffers, which games still see as 512mb. I'm sure someone will correct me if im wrong.
I don't believe thats correct I think the interface is 512bit
trt740 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts