75% of TOP 500 Supercomputers Now Intel-based

Polaris573 · Jun 21, 2008, 03:55 AM

The just released TOP 500 Supercomputing ranking list verifies that the wide majority of today's systems are based on Intel multi-core processors and able to evaluate and calculate large volumes of data and complex algorithms very rapidly. 375 or 75 percent of the ranked supercomputers are based on Intel processors -- more than ever before. In the year 2000, only four – yes four – systems were based on Intel architecture, illustrating just how rapidly the leading processor architecture for supercomputers has been embraced. Intel's push into quad-core based systems is also well represented. In just over one and a half years since the first quad core processor, more than half (257 systems) now contain four-brained Intel chips.

Source: Intel

Wile E · Jun 21, 2008, 04:13 AM

This doesn't seem surprising to me at all. The Core2 microarchitecture was an amazing leap forward.

Triprift · Jun 21, 2008, 04:31 AM

Just illustrates the huge movement forward the core2 duos and quad cores have been for Intel and AMD'S poor showing with the Phenom's.

Polaris573 · Jun 21, 2008, 04:33 AM

I think in the past most super computers were built around IBM processors.

imperialreign · Jun 21, 2008, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wile E

This doesn't seem surprising to me at all. The Core2 microarchitecture was an amazing leap forward.

indeed it was . . . but we've been starting to see Intel becoming highly complacent like they were back in the day before AMD gave them a kick-in-the-nuts by GoodSwift.

Back then, Intel was running "recycled & revamped" architecture under the name NetBurst, and TBH, as much as it looked great on paper, it was really a brute force CPU architecture; and Intel milked the crap out of it in their Gigahertz war.

It wasn't until AMD took the limelight that Intel went back to the drawing board, as they intended to continue the NetBurst architecture for at least a few more CPU families:

But, now that they've reclaimed the king of the hill status, they're beginning to show their complacency again - through their sandbaggin tactics, and the fact that they're milking the crap out of the Core2 architecture now.

ktr · Jun 21, 2008, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polaris573

I think in the past most super computers were built around IBM processors.

And still are...well the fast ones are.

Look at the list: http://www.top500.org/

The top 6 are non intel...they are AMD or IBM or both (both being the fastest supercomputer).

1) Roadrunner - Opteron and Cell Broadband Engine (PS3 cpu) <--- first to break the petaflop barrier (it peaks out at 1.7 petaflops). It two times faster than second place.
2) BlueGene/L - PowerPC
3) Blue Gene/P (Argonne National Laboratory) - PowerPC
4) Ranger - Opteron
5) Jaguar - Opteron
6) JUGENE - PowerPC

then comes an intel...

7) Encanto - Xeon
8) EKA - Xeon
9) Blue Gene/P (IDRIS) - PowerPC
10) SGI Altix ICE - Xeon

Viscarious · Jun 21, 2008, 04:49 AM

Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.

imperialreign · Jun 21, 2008, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viscarious

Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.

TBH, I'm not too surprised at all by it - but, for me, it has to do with growing up around computers . . .

a decade ago, the majority of CPUs in personal computers were Intel; every now and then you might've run across someone running AMD or IBM, or even a VIA. AMD was the second fastes growing personal computer CPU at the time, though, whereas IBM was headed towards workstations and corporate/industrial use.

I have to say, though, considering how long AMD has been around compared to Intel's history, AMD have come a very long and respectable way.

suraswami · Jun 21, 2008, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viscarious

Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.

Good Man. I too a strong supporter of AMD. Just time will tell if they will come back. Last time they tackled a not so big monster and that monster has grown beyond control.

Viscarious · Jun 21, 2008, 05:10 AM

Yea, I think that the AMD and ATI merger took too much attention away from working on processor development. Although, seeing the scores for ATIs new cards do show that the merger was sort of a good move. Just hope the AMD half catches up.

imperialreign · Jun 21, 2008, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viscarious

Yea, I think that the AMD and ATI merger took too much attention away from working on processor development. Although, seeing the scores for ATIs new cards do show that the merger was sort of a good move. Just hope the AMD half catches up.

Give them time . . . they are up against:

I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics

) . . .

[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made!

]

Viscarious · Jun 21, 2008, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperialreign

Give them time . . . they are up against:

I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics

) . . .

[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made!

]

Arg! I've heard this before ... or read it... I just dont know. PM it to me plox.

mikek75 · Jun 21, 2008, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperialreign

Give them time . . . they are up against:

I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics

) . . .

[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made!

]

J.R.R.Tolkein? The Hobbit or Lord Of The Rings?

From_Nowhere · Jun 21, 2008, 08:04 AM

75% of super computers use Intel? Amazing, since the FSB scales so badly with many processors.
__________
and that pic reference... Shrek?

Laurijan · Jun 21, 2008, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikek75

J.R.R.Tolkein? The Hobbit or Lord Of The Rings?

The pic is from The Hobbit

SheetCake · Jun 21, 2008, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperialreign

Give them time . . . they are up against:

I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics

) . . .

[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made!

]

smog/smaug the dragon from the hobbit, not lotr there wasnt a dragon in lotr

DanTheBanjoman · Jun 21, 2008, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by From_Nowhere

75% of super computers use Intel? Amazing, since the FSB scales so badly with many processors.

They're mostly clusters.

Basard · Jun 21, 2008, 11:25 AM

I wonder, if they just make a huge motherboard, that holds like 100x new "video" cards... chain a bunch of them together... 800 stream processors each... hehe.

Anybody ever hear anything about the "neural network" computers or "creativity machines"? computers that pretty much mimic the way the brain works.... pretty neat stuff. One day, when we die, we will all live forever in cyber heaven, and I will be your god, MUA HAHAHAHA.

WarEagleAU · Jun 21, 2008, 01:02 PM

alot of interesting info. I didnt know AMD was in the top 6 of the super computers.

and as its been said by Wile E and others, it goes to show how revolutionary the Core2 architecture really was.

panchoman · Jun 21, 2008, 01:44 PM

too bad the strongest supercomputers are composed of amd opertons, cells and ppc processors

spearman914 · Jun 21, 2008, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperialreign

indeed it was . . . but we've been starting to see Intel becoming highly complacent like they were back in the day before AMD gave them a kick-in-the-nuts by GoodSwift.

Back then, Intel was running "recycled & revamped" architecture under the name NetBurst, and TBH, as much as it looked great on paper, it was really a brute force CPU architecture; and Intel milked the crap out of it in their Gigahertz war.

It wasn't until AMD took the limelight that Intel went back to the drawing board, as they intended to continue the NetBurst architecture for at least a few more CPU families:

But, now that they've reclaimed the king of the hill status, they're beginning to show their complacency again - through their sandbaggin tactics, and the fact that they're milking the crap out of the Core2 architecture now.

ROFL look at the yellow box. They want to go prescott all the way to nehalem.

KainXS · Jun 21, 2008, 02:07 PM

I remember those willamette,s they were HORRIBLE, P3's were faster than themand they were horrible overclockers

massive waste o money at the time, unbelievable failures

but those northwoods were some very good overclockers against amd's bartons

lemonadesoda · Jun 21, 2008, 02:21 PM

For a total NUTKICK to Intel, you can look at the statistics another way:

Intel is the main processor "in" 75% of the top 500 supercomputers.
But it represents only 39% of the PROCESSORS in use.
And represents only 50% of the supercomputing POWER as represented by Rmax.

Statistics. Dangerous things.

The POWER LIST is represented by "Rmax share / Processor share" and shown in green in the table below:

PowerPC450
Opteron Quad Core
PowerXCell 8i

These are the 3 most powerful processors in the top 500. And they aint intel.

0elemental0 · Jun 21, 2008, 02:30 PM

i 100 % dont care.. i have always built amd.. my first intel machine since the 086 286 386 486 days was a laptop...and it does scream.. (9k in 3d06)

lemonadesoda · Jun 21, 2008, 04:57 PM

9k in 3d06 is NOTHING to brag about.

I have 11k3 with an Intel AGP system.

Jun 21, 2008, 03:55 AM	#1
Polaris573 Senior Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Little Rock, USA Posts: 3,284 (1.09/day) Thanks: 68 Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts System Specs	75% of TOP 500 Supercomputers Now Intel-based The just released TOP 500 Supercomputing ranking list verifies that the wide majority of today's systems are based on Intel multi-core processors and able to evaluate and calculate large volumes of data and complex algorithms very rapidly. 375 or 75 percent of the ranked supercomputers are based on Intel processors -- more than ever before. In the year 2000, only four – yes four – systems were based on Intel architecture, illustrating just how rapidly the leading processor architecture for supercomputers has been embraced. Intel's push into quad-core based systems is also well represented. In just over one and a half years since the first quad core processor, more than half (257 systems) now contain four-brained Intel chips. Source: Intel

Processor:	LGA 775 Intel E6550 Core2 Duo "Conroe" 2.33Ghz 4MB L2 Cache
Motherboard:	Abit IX38 QuadGT -- Intel X38 Chipset
Cooling:	Arctic Freezer
Memory:	6GB G.Skill DDRII 800 4-4-3-5
Video Card:	Sapphire HD 4850 512 MB PCI-E
Hard Disk:	1 TB Seagate 32MB Cache, 250 GB Seagate 16MB Cache
Optical Drive:	Asus DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer X203w
Case:	Coolermaster Centurion 5
Sound Card:	Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Music
PSU:	OCZ StealthXStream 600 Watt
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Jun 21, 2008, 04:13 AM	#2
Wile E Power User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs) Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day) Thanks: 450 Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts System Specs	This doesn't seem surprising to me at all. The Core2 microarchitecture was an amazing leap forward. __________________ Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo “And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL

System Name:	The ClusterF**k
Processor:	980X @ 4212Mhz 24/7
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling:	MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory:	3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24
Video Card:	Evga GTX 580
Hard Disk:	Seagate 7200.10 320GB x2 RAID0; 2 x Samsung F2 1.5TB; 1 x F1 1TB; 1 x F4 2TB
Optical Drive:	LG WH10LS30K 10X Blu-ray Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case:	Technofront Bench Station
Sound Card:	Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
PSU:	ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software:	Win7 Ultimate N x64

Jun 21, 2008, 04:31 AM	#3
Triprift Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Adelaide Australia Posts: 4,258 (2.14/day) Thanks: 520 Thanked 946 Times in 787 Posts System Specs	Just illustrates the huge movement forward the core2 duos and quad cores have been for Intel and AMD'S poor showing with the Phenom's. __________________ Welcome to the lost chicken helpline if you have lost your chicken press 1, if you have found a lost chicken press 2, if you would like to adopt a chicken press 3, if you would like to sponsor a chicken press 4 for all other enquiries press 5 Graphic Artists United™ Solaris utility DVD 4.0 ---General nonsense 2.0--- How to post pics at TPU

System Name:	Becca 2
Processor:	AMD A10 4600m quad core @ 2.3 ghz
Motherboard:	dunno
Cooling:	Logitech alto connect
Memory:	16 Gig ddr3 1600mhz
Video Card:	Ati HD 7660G + & 7470M
Hard Disk:	1 TB
Optical Drive:	6x Blue ray
Sound Card:	onboard crap
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit with sp1

Jun 21, 2008, 04:33 AM	#4
Polaris573 Senior Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Little Rock, USA Posts: 3,284 (1.09/day) Thanks: 68 Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts System Specs	I think in the past most super computers were built around IBM processors. __________________ Lector benevole, legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus. Accipere quam facere praestat injuriam Fold for Techpowerup!

System Name:	УльтраФиолет
Processor:	Intel Kentsfield Q9650 @ 3.8GHz (4.2GHz highest achieved)
Motherboard:	ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi; X38 NSB, ICH9R SSB
Cooling:	Delta V3 block, XPSC res, 120x3 rad, ST 1/2" pump - 10 fans, SYSTRIN HDD cooler, Antec HDD cooler
Memory:	Dual channel 8GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 @ 1800MHz @ 7-7-7-20 1T
Video Card:	Quadfire: (2) Sapphire HD5970
Hard Disk:	(2) WD VelociRaptor 300GB SATA-300; WD 320GB SATA-300; WD 200GB UATA + WD 160GB UATA
Optical Drive:	(2) I/O Magic "LightScribe" SATA DVD ± R/RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" (16:10)
Case:	Cooler Master Stacker 830
Sound Card:	Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCI-E x1
PSU:	Kingwin Mach1 1200W modular
Software:	Windows XP Home SP3; Vista Ultimate x64 SP2
Benchmarks:	3m06: 20270 here: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12313

System Name:	Gateway P7811FX (laptop)
Processor:	Intel Centrino2 C2D T9600 sktP 2.8Ghz 6mb Cache
Motherboard:	Foxconn made systemboard w/ Intel PM45 "Montevina" Chipset
Cooling:	Two Laptop Fans (one for GPU, other for CPU)
Memory:	SuperTalent Micron 8GB (2x4GB) PC3-8500 DDR3
Video Card:	Nvidia 9800M GTS 512MB discrete (1750mb shared) PCI-E
Hard Disk:	WD Scorpio Black 500GB Sata2 16MB 7200 & Samsung 830 series 128GB SSD
Optical Drive:	Optiarc 8x Multi-Format Dual Layer DVDRAM
CRT/LCD Model:	17.0" AUO WUXGA Ultrabright 1920x1200 Wide Screen Glossy
Case:	Laptop Chassis Orange and Black w/ Brushed Metal
Sound Card:	Creative X-FI Notebook ExpressCard
PSU:	120watt AC Adapter & 9cell Battery 86WHr
Software:	Windows 7 Professional 64Bit

Jun 21, 2008, 04:49 AM	#7
Viscarious Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 930 (0.51/day) Thanks: 224 Thanked 149 Times in 140 Posts System Specs	Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture. Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help. On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.

Processor:	AMD Phenom 9850BE
Motherboard:	ASUS M3A32MVP Deluxe 790FX
Cooling:	ZALMAN CNPS9700
Memory:	Crucial Ballistix Tracers 4G (1G x 4) 800Mhz CAS4
Video Card:	VisionTek HD3870 + a VisionTek HD3870 OC Edition Xfire'd
Hard Disk:	320G WD SATA + 160G
Optical Drive:	Sony DVD-R/RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Gateway HD 19" 4ms
Case:	Raidmax Ninja
Sound Card:	Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer
PSU:	650W Antec Earthwatts
Software:	Windows Vista 64bit SP1
Benchmarks:	candle_86 is a fanboi

System Name:	Red Spy
Processor:	Phenom II X6 1045T @ 3.4 Ghz with 1.34v
Motherboard:	Gigabyte MA790GP-UD4H
Cooling:	SilenX DT 4 Pipe + 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 140mm Green LED, 'CRAB' LED Ram cooling Fan.
Memory:	Crucial DDR2 800 4GB + Kingston DDR2 800 4GB
Video Card:	Sapphire 6970 2GB
Hard Disk:	Patriot TorqX 2 64GB SSD - OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Optical Drive:	1 Samsung 18X DVDRW + 1 Asus 12X BluRay Writer
CRT/LCD Model:	AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case:	Xion Case with 140mm Green LED Fan
Sound Card:	Built-in RealTek
PSU:	ULTRA X3 600W Modular
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmarks:	Benchmark - who cares, Plays BF3 @ High settings with Avg 65 fps.

Jun 21, 2008, 05:10 AM	#10
Viscarious Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 930 (0.51/day) Thanks: 224 Thanked 149 Times in 140 Posts System Specs	Yea, I think that the AMD and ATI merger took too much attention away from working on processor development. Although, seeing the scores for ATIs new cards do show that the merger was sort of a good move. Just hope the AMD half catches up.

System Name:	As easy as falling off a lorry
Processor:	Core I5 2500K auto tuned to 4.2ghz
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Cooling:	Corsair H80 sealed water cooler
Memory:	16gb Gskill Ripjawz 1600mhz
Video Card:	XFX 6970 2GB
Hard Disk:	Corsair 120GB Force 3 SSD, OCZ 60 GB Agility 3 SSD, Seagate 500GB, 2x80gb Maxtors
Optical Drive:	HP Blue-ray DVD rewriter drive
CRT/LCD Model:	DELL 2309w 23" Widescreen 1920x1080+ LG M2294D 22" 1680x1050 LCDtv/monitor
Case:	Zalman Z9 Plus
Sound Card:	X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Fatal1ty Pro
PSU:	PC Power&Cooling 750w Silencer Quad PCIe
Software:	Windows 7 x64 Home Premium

Jun 21, 2008, 08:04 AM	#14
From_Nowhere Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 293 (0.16/day) Thanks: 50 Thanked 78 Times in 64 Posts	75% of super computers use Intel? Amazing, since the FSB scales so badly with many processors. __________ and that pic reference... Shrek?

System Name:	Enslaver :)
Processor:	Intel i5 3570K Ivy Bridge
Motherboard:	ASRock Z77 Extreme4
Cooling:	CPU: Noctua NH-D14, Case: 4x12cm Noctua
Memory:	8GB DDR3 Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3
Video Card:	ASUS GTX560Ti DirectCUII TOP 1GB
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility 3 120GB SSD for OS, Seagte internal 500GB Download-cache, Seagate external 2TB for Media
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD-RW/RAM, LG DVD-RW/RAM
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung UE40D6200 Full-HD 3D LED LCD TV
Case:	Antec P182, Gunmetal Black Edition
Sound Card:	Razer Barracuda AC-1 soundcard, Logitech Z-5450 5.1 speakers
PSU:	Termaltake Thoughpower 750W, Cable management
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64

Processor:	Dual Xeon 5506
Motherboard:	Asus Z8NA-D6
Cooling:	2x Thermalright HR-01 X/passive
Memory:	6GB Corsair something
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 260 Core 216
Hard Disk:	None
Optical Drive:	None
CRT/LCD Model:	24" Asus
Case:	Thermaltake Swing
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	620W CM
Software:	Win2k8

Jun 21, 2008, 11:25 AM	#18
Basard Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Oshkosh Posts: 529 (0.23/day) Thanks: 12 Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts System Specs	I wonder, if they just make a huge motherboard, that holds like 100x new "video" cards... chain a bunch of them together... 800 stream processors each... hehe. Anybody ever hear anything about the "neural network" computers or "creativity machines"? computers that pretty much mimic the way the brain works.... pretty neat stuff. One day, when we die, we will all live forever in cyber heaven, and I will be your god, MUA HAHAHAHA. __________________ Heatware.

System Name:	Tandy 1000
Processor:	Phenom 955 BE @ 3800Mhz
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 970A-UD3
Cooling:	Xigmatek HDT-S1283
Video Card:	Powercolor 3870
Hard Disk:	250Gb Seagate Barracuda
Optical Drive:	Asus 18X DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell 22" Widescreen
Case:	Xion Stacker
Sound Card:	Realtek
PSU:	Rosewill Hive 550
Software:	Win 7 Pro

Jun 21, 2008, 01:02 PM	#19
WarEagleAU Bird of Prey Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Gurley, AL Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day) Thanks: 3,810 Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts System Specs	alot of interesting info. I didnt know AMD was in the top 6 of the super computers. and as its been said by Wile E and others, it goes to show how revolutionary the Core2 architecture really was. __________________ =-TheEagle-= http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity

System Name:	Boddha Getta
Processor:	AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.401V
Motherboard:	ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling:	Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory:	2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card:	XFX Radeon HD 6870 900/1050 (no OC yet)
Hard Disk:	WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Optical Drive:	Samung SH22SL 22X Lightscribe DVD+/-R/RW LG BDRE Reader/Burner Lite ON Max Burner for burning Xbox
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case:	NZXT White Phantom
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek 5.1
PSU:	NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software:	Windows 7 Pro 64 bit.
Benchmarks:	5.9 Windows Index rating 3D06 - 17472

Jun 21, 2008, 01:44 PM	#20
panchoman Sold my stars! Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day) Thanks: 339 Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts System Specs	too bad the strongest supercomputers are composed of amd opertons, cells and ppc processors __________________ Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United! R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel

Processor:	Amd Athlon X2 4600+ Windsor(90nm) EE(65W) @2.9-3.0 @1.45
Motherboard:	Biostar Tforce [Nvidia] 550
Cooling:	Thermaltake Blue Orb-- bunch of other fans here and there....
Memory:	2 gigs (2x1gb) of patriot ddr2 800 @ 4-4-4-12-2t
Video Card:	Sapphire X1950pro Pci-E x16 @stock@stock on stock
Hard Disk:	Seagate 7200.11 250gb Drive, WD raptors (30/40) in Raid 0
Optical Drive:	Lite-on 20x SATA DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	ANCIENT 15" sony lcd, bought it when it was like 500 bucks
Case:	Apevia X-plorer blue/black
Sound Card:	Onboard- Why get an sound card when you can hum??
PSU:	Antec NeoHe 550-manufactured by seasonic -replacement to the discontinued smart power series
Software:	Windows XP pro SP2 -- vista is still crap

System Name:	Mine \| Dad + Mom
Processor:	E8500 E0 Wolfdale @ 4.6GHz 1.5V \| E2180 M0 Allendale @ 3.0GHz 1.3V
Motherboard:	Asus Maximus Formula (X48) w/ Rampage BIOS \| Asus P5Q Pro (P45)
Cooling:	Xigmatek Rifle HDT-S1283 w/ SFF21F Fan \| Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro
Memory:	G.Skill Pi Black 2x2GB 1.02GHz CL5 \| OCZ Reaper 2x2GB 1.05GHz CL5
Video Card:	Sapphire 4870X2 2GB 820/1020MHz \| Sapphire 4850 1GB 700/1100MHz
Hard Disk:	WD VR 150GB 10K RPM + WD 500GB 7.2K RPM \| WD 200GB 7.2K RPM
Optical Drive:	Samsung Black DVD Burner \| Lite-On Black DVD Burner w/ Lightscribe
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer P243WAID 24" 1920x1200 LCD \| Acer V193W 19" 1440x900 LCD
Case:	Cooler Master HAF 932 Full-Tower \| Antec Twelve Hundred Mid-Tower
Sound Card:	Fatal1ty Xtreme Gamer w/ Z-5500 5.1 \| On-Board Audio w/ S-220 2.1
PSU:	PC Power and Cooling 750W Non-Modular \| Corsair HX-520W Modular
Software:	Windows Vista Home Premium X64 \| Windows Vista Home Premium X64
Benchmarks:	Not Wasting Time!

Jun 21, 2008, 02:07 PM	#22
KainXS Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,688 (2.27/day) Thanks: 181 Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts System Specs	I remember those willamette,s they were HORRIBLE, P3's were faster than themand they were horrible overclockers massive waste o money at the time, unbelievable failures but those northwoods were some very good overclockers against amd's bartons

System Name:	GhetO.O
Processor:	Core2Quad Q8400@4.1Ghz/2500K
Motherboard:	MSI P35 Neo 2 FR/Sabertooth
Cooling:	GEMINII+2 120MM fans/Corsair
Memory:	8GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 1066/16GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card:	ASUS GTX460 SliFire/GTX680 SLI
Hard Disk:	1TB Spinpoint/2 SSD + 1 500GB WD
Optical Drive:	Lite On DVD+DL/None
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer 22 inch/ IPS Asus 26inch
Case:	Antec 300/CM HAF
Sound Card:	Xonar Essence
PSU:	Thermaltake 600
Software:	Windows 7

Jun 21, 2008, 02:21 PM	#23
lemonadesoda Eligible for custom title Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day) Thanks: 749 Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts System Specs	For a total NUTKICK to Intel, you can look at the statistics another way: Intel is the main processor "in" 75% of the top 500 supercomputers. But it represents only 39% of the PROCESSORS in use. And represents only 50% of the supercomputing POWER as represented by Rmax. Statistics. Dangerous things. The POWER LIST is represented by "Rmax share / Processor share" and shown in green in the table below: PowerPC450 Opteron Quad Core PowerXCell 8i These are the 3 most powerful processors in the top 500. And they aint intel.

System Name:	ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor:	Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory:	2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card:	HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
CRT/LCD Model:	2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Sound Card:	Audigy 2
Software:	Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation

Jun 21, 2008, 02:30 PM	#24
0elemental0 Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 109 (0.05/day) Thanks: 3 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts System Specs	i 100 % dont care.. i have always built amd.. my first intel machine since the 086 286 386 486 days was a laptop...and it does scream.. (9k in 3d06) __________________ [img disabled]http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1774/teamfortressclubhousebn1.jpg[/IMG]

Processor:	athlon 4800+ x2 (s939)
Motherboard:	ms-7093 (oem hp) by msi
Cooling:	freezer 64, arctic af9 x2
Memory:	2 gig gskill 2.5-3-3-6
Video Card:	sapphire hd 3870 w/zalman vf900
Hard Disk:	250 gig sata, 320 gig sata
Optical Drive:	2x samsung dvd burners
CRT/LCD Model:	acer 22'' at 1680x1050
Case:	oem hp, i love hidden drive bays
Sound Card:	soundblaster xtreme gamer x-fi
PSU:	antec trio 650
Software:	xp pro

Jun 21, 2008, 04:57 PM	#25
lemonadesoda Eligible for custom title Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day) Thanks: 749 Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts System Specs	9k in 3d06 is NOTHING to brag about. I have 11k3 with an Intel AGP system.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Computex 2007: Intel Introduces '3-Series' Chipsets	malware	News	5	Jun 5, 2007 05:15 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006	djbbenn	Articles	37	Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
Cebit 2006: Day 2	W1zzard	Reviews	11	Mar 20, 2006 07:26 PM
New Intel P4 CPUs	W1zzard	News	5	Mar 4, 2005 07:21 AM
Intel 3rd quarter revenue: $8.5B	W1zzard	News	0	Oct 13, 2004 08:58 AM