techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 21, 2008, 03:55 AM   #1
Polaris573
Senior Moderator
 
Polaris573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Little Rock, USA
Posts: 3,284 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polaris573

System Specs

75% of TOP 500 Supercomputers Now Intel-based

The just released TOP 500 Supercomputing ranking list verifies that the wide majority of today's systems are based on Intel multi-core processors and able to evaluate and calculate large volumes of data and complex algorithms very rapidly. 375 or 75 percent of the ranked supercomputers are based on Intel processors -- more than ever before. In the year 2000, only four – yes four – systems were based on Intel architecture, illustrating just how rapidly the leading processor architecture for supercomputers has been embraced. Intel's push into quad-core based systems is also well represented. In just over one and a half years since the first quad core processor, more than half (257 systems) now contain four-brained Intel chips.

Source: Intel
Polaris573 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:13 AM   #2
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.47/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

This doesn't seem surprising to me at all. The Core2 microarchitecture was an amazing leap forward.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:31 AM   #3
Triprift
3500 Posts
 
Triprift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide Australia
Posts: 4,258 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 520
Thanked 946 Times in 787 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Triprift

System Specs

Just illustrates the huge movement forward the core2 duos and quad cores have been for Intel and AMD'S poor showing with the Phenom's.
__________________

Welcome to the lost chicken helpline if you have lost your chicken press 1, if you have found a lost chicken press 2, if you would like to adopt a chicken press 3, if you would like to sponsor a chicken press 4 for all other enquiries press 5

Graphic Artists United™ Solaris utility DVD 4.0 ---General nonsense 2.0---
How to post pics at TPU
Triprift is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:33 AM   #4
Polaris573
Senior Moderator
 
Polaris573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Little Rock, USA
Posts: 3,284 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 765 Times in 451 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polaris573

System Specs

I think in the past most super computers were built around IBM processors.
__________________

Lector benevole, legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus. Accipere quam facere praestat injuriam

Fold for Techpowerup!
Polaris573 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:46 AM   #5
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
This doesn't seem surprising to me at all. The Core2 microarchitecture was an amazing leap forward.
indeed it was . . . but we've been starting to see Intel becoming highly complacent like they were back in the day before AMD gave them a kick-in-the-nuts by GoodSwift.

Back then, Intel was running "recycled & revamped" architecture under the name NetBurst, and TBH, as much as it looked great on paper, it was really a brute force CPU architecture; and Intel milked the crap out of it in their Gigahertz war.

It wasn't until AMD took the limelight that Intel went back to the drawing board, as they intended to continue the NetBurst architecture for at least a few more CPU families:




But, now that they've reclaimed the king of the hill status, they're beginning to show their complacency again - through their sandbaggin tactics, and the fact that they're milking the crap out of the Core2 architecture now.


__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:48 AM   #6
ktr
Eligible for custom title
 
ktr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth
Posts: 6,158 (2.36/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polaris573 View Post
I think in the past most super computers were built around IBM processors.
And still are...well the fast ones are.

Look at the list: http://www.top500.org/

The top 6 are non intel...they are AMD or IBM or both (both being the fastest supercomputer).

1) Roadrunner - Opteron and Cell Broadband Engine (PS3 cpu) <--- first to break the petaflop barrier (it peaks out at 1.7 petaflops). It two times faster than second place.
2) BlueGene/L - PowerPC
3) Blue Gene/P (Argonne National Laboratory) - PowerPC
4) Ranger - Opteron
5) Jaguar - Opteron
6) JUGENE - PowerPC

then comes an intel...

7) Encanto - Xeon
8) EKA - Xeon
9) Blue Gene/P (IDRIS) - PowerPC
10) SGI Altix ICE - Xeon

Last edited by ktr; Jun 21, 2008 at 05:04 AM.
ktr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ktr For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:49 AM   #7
Viscarious
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 930 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 224
Thanked 149 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.
Viscarious is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:55 AM   #8
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viscarious View Post
Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.
TBH, I'm not too surprised at all by it - but, for me, it has to do with growing up around computers . . .

a decade ago, the majority of CPUs in personal computers were Intel; every now and then you might've run across someone running AMD or IBM, or even a VIA. AMD was the second fastes growing personal computer CPU at the time, though, whereas IBM was headed towards workstations and corporate/industrial use.

I have to say, though, considering how long AMD has been around compared to Intel's history, AMD have come a very long and respectable way.
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imperialreign For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:59 AM   #9
suraswami
Eligible for custom title
 
suraswami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,143 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 851
Thanked 602 Times in 533 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viscarious View Post
Just realize this. If Intel gets its way, and pushes AMD out of the processor market, new technology will take exponentially longer to come out. Intel will no longer need to try to put out new processors and architecture.

Last year AMD only had 13% of the processor market. When I recently built my new computer, I could of bought Intel. I knew Intel was better. I knew I'd gimp myself if I got a phenom over any Intel but I bought AMD in hopes that I could help.

On the other hand, its awesome to see how well Intel has succeeded.
Good Man. I too a strong supporter of AMD. Just time will tell if they will come back. Last time they tackled a not so big monster and that monster has grown beyond control.
__________________
2 Servers Multiple VMs including WHS on VM, capacity 3.5 TB HDD
Family Machine - W7 Ultimate 64bit, ECS 780G, Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.1Ghz- 1.38V, 4GB DDR2 800 ram, Sapphire 4670 512MB, 600W Ultra X pro, Xigmatek HDT-S1283

"Oh please, the only thing more resilient than an Indian is a cockroach. Not even nukes can stop their immune systems" - TheMailMan78
suraswami is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 05:10 AM   #10
Viscarious
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 930 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 224
Thanked 149 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

Yea, I think that the AMD and ATI merger took too much attention away from working on processor development. Although, seeing the scores for ATIs new cards do show that the merger was sort of a good move. Just hope the AMD half catches up.
Viscarious is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 05:15 AM   #11
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viscarious View Post
Yea, I think that the AMD and ATI merger took too much attention away from working on processor development. Although, seeing the scores for ATIs new cards do show that the merger was sort of a good move. Just hope the AMD half catches up.
Give them time . . . they are up against:










I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics ) . . .



[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made! ]
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imperialreign For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 21, 2008, 05:24 AM   #12
Viscarious
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 930 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 224
Thanked 149 Times in 140 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imperialreign View Post
Give them time . . . they are up against:

I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics ) . . .



[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made! ]
Arg! I've heard this before ... or read it... I just dont know. PM it to me plox.
Viscarious is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 07:49 AM   #13
mikek75
1000 Posts
 
mikek75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chippenham, Wilts, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,171 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 121 Times in 115 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imperialreign View Post
Give them time . . . they are up against:










I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics ) . . .



[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made! ]
J.R.R.Tolkein? The Hobbit or Lord Of The Rings?
__________________
Untutored carnage is useless in the face of an educated bullet

The penalty for masturbation in Indonesia is decapitation
mikek75 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 08:04 AM   #14
From_Nowhere
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 293 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 50
Thanked 78 Times in 64 Posts

75% of super computers use Intel? Amazing, since the FSB scales so badly with many processors.
__________
and that pic reference... Shrek?
From_Nowhere is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 08:05 AM   #15
Laurijan
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
Posts: 1,935 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 352 Times in 282 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Laurijan Send a message via Skype™ to Laurijan

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikek75 View Post
J.R.R.Tolkein? The Hobbit or Lord Of The Rings?
The pic is from The Hobbit
__________________


If you want to quit smoking tobacco this is a must see:
☆☆☆The Electronic-Cigarette Club☆☆☆ @ GN.net

Laurijan´s Heat
My worldwide sales thread
Laurijan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 08:57 AM   #16
SheetCake
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by imperialreign View Post
Give them time . . . they are up against:










I have faith in AMD though; they'll end up surprising us at some point.

In the meantime, Intel will stay at the top of heap (I wonder, though, how much of their success over the last 8 years has been due to their marketing tactics ) . . .



[BTW, bonus points to whoever gets that reference I just made! ]
smog/smaug the dragon from the hobbit, not lotr there wasnt a dragon in lotr
SheetCake is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 09:37 AM   #17
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by From_Nowhere View Post
75% of super computers use Intel? Amazing, since the FSB scales so badly with many processors.
They're mostly clusters.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 21, 2008, 11:25 AM   #18
Basard
500 Posts
 
Basard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oshkosh
Posts: 529 (0.22/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts

System Specs

I wonder, if they just make a huge motherboard, that holds like 100x new "video" cards... chain a bunch of them together... 800 stream processors each... hehe.

Anybody ever hear anything about the "neural network" computers or "creativity machines"? computers that pretty much mimic the way the brain works.... pretty neat stuff. One day, when we die, we will all live forever in cyber heaven, and I will be your god, MUA HAHAHAHA.
__________________
Heatware.
Basard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 01:02 PM   #19
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

alot of interesting info. I didnt know AMD was in the top 6 of the super computers.

and as its been said by Wile E and others, it goes to show how revolutionary the Core2 architecture really was.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 01:44 PM   #20
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

too bad the strongest supercomputers are composed of amd opertons, cells and ppc processors
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 01:54 PM   #21
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imperialreign View Post
indeed it was . . . but we've been starting to see Intel becoming highly complacent like they were back in the day before AMD gave them a kick-in-the-nuts by GoodSwift.

Back then, Intel was running "recycled & revamped" architecture under the name NetBurst, and TBH, as much as it looked great on paper, it was really a brute force CPU architecture; and Intel milked the crap out of it in their Gigahertz war.

It wasn't until AMD took the limelight that Intel went back to the drawing board, as they intended to continue the NetBurst architecture for at least a few more CPU families:




But, now that they've reclaimed the king of the hill status, they're beginning to show their complacency again - through their sandbaggin tactics, and the fact that they're milking the crap out of the Core2 architecture now.


ROFL look at the yellow box. They want to go prescott all the way to nehalem.
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 02:07 PM   #22
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,695 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 465 Times in 382 Posts

System Specs

I remember those willamette,s they were HORRIBLE, P3's were faster than themand they were horrible overclockers

massive waste o money at the time, unbelievable failures

but those northwoods were some very good overclockers against amd's bartons
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 02:21 PM   #23
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

For a total NUTKICK to Intel, you can look at the statistics another way:

Intel is the main processor "in" 75% of the top 500 supercomputers.
But it represents only 39% of the PROCESSORS in use.
And represents only 50% of the supercomputing POWER as represented by Rmax.

Statistics. Dangerous things.

The POWER LIST is represented by "Rmax share / Processor share" and shown in green in the table below:

PowerPC450
Opteron Quad Core
PowerXCell 8i

These are the 3 most powerful processors in the top 500. And they aint intel.

lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 02:30 PM   #24
0elemental0
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 109 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

i 100 % dont care.. i have always built amd.. my first intel machine since the 086 286 386 486 days was a laptop...and it does scream.. (9k in 3d06)
__________________
[img disabled]http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1774/teamfortressclubhousebn1.jpg[/IMG]
0elemental0 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 21, 2008, 04:57 PM   #25
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

9k in 3d06 is NOTHING to brag about.

I have 11k3 with an Intel AGP system.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computex 2007: Intel Introduces '3-Series' Chipsets malware News 5 Jun 5, 2007 05:15 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
Cebit 2006: Day 2 W1zzard Reviews 11 Mar 20, 2006 07:26 PM
New Intel P4 CPUs W1zzard News 5 Mar 4, 2005 07:21 AM
Intel 3rd quarter revenue: $8.5B W1zzard News 0 Oct 13, 2004 08:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts