techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 15, 2008, 11:35 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

AMD Aims Higher, 50% Market-share in Discrete-graphics in Sight

Following the release of the R700 Spartan, the most powerful graphics card till date, AMD has noted that the ATI Radeon HD 4800 series products has boosted the company's market share in the discrete graphics industry from 30% to 40%. This has triggered optimism with the company, it expects to achieve the 50% mark against rival NVIDIA corporation, and that's as soon as late 2008, continuing the introduction of its products, surpass NVIDIA in 2009.

AMD also noted that it expects its discrete graphics card to IGP ratio in notebook shipments will be 35:65 in 2009. Meaning there will be growth in the sales of notebooks with discrete graphics in general against integrated graphics. NVIDIA rubbished AMD's comments saying it has the performance lead with its GeForce 200-series graphics products, while AMD claimed its Radeon HD 4800-series were clearly the more advanced lot.

Source: DigiTimes
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 11:43 AM   #2
NamesDontMatter
500 Posts
 
NamesDontMatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut, United States
Posts: 758 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 27 Times in 19 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NamesDontMatter Send a message via MSN to NamesDontMatter Send a message via Yahoo to NamesDontMatter

System Specs

One of the reasons I purchased one was to support ATI as the underdog! Go ATI!
NamesDontMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NamesDontMatter For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 11:56 AM   #3
Andy_007
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Auckland,New Zealand
Posts: 149 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Andy_007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NamesDontMatter View Post
One of the reasons I purchased one was to support ATI as the underdog! Go ATI!
Same here, Im sure they can get 50% as long as they do well with the 4400/4600 series cards.
Andy_007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 11:57 AM   #4
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

Recent screenys of Deneb make it seem like a reasonable contender on the CPU front as well. So that will help with their revenue if its as good as its looking.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 12:01 PM   #5
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

wow, if only they could do the same in CPU market
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 12:11 PM   #6
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

Well like i said, Deneb's engineering samples are looking good for performance and overclocking. Heres hoping.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 12:43 PM   #7
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 650 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 127 Times in 95 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees Send a message via Skype™ to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NamesDontMatter View Post
One of the reasons I purchased one was to support ATI as the underdog! Go ATI!
Same reason why I am going to buy one. Go ATI!
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 12:59 PM   #8
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Well, competition is always good, but you know what I'd really like to see on the discrete graphics market?

25% ATI, 25% Nvidia, 25% Intel, and 25% 3dfx (or someone new).

Now, that's a formula for innovation and great prices.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:19 PM   #9
v-zero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

How can nVidia claim it has the performance lead when it doesn't? Are they blind or just stupid?

nVidia PR department:

PR guy no.1: "Right ATi are actually faster, what can we do to battle this"
PR guy no.2: "We could lie?"
PR guy no.1: "lie?"
PR guy no.2: "Yes, we pretend it's faster even though it isn't"
PR guy no.1: "Brilliant, that's brilliant - let's take the rest of the day off"

 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:21 PM   #10
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by v-zero View Post
How can nVidia claim it has the performance lead when it doesn't? Are they blind or just stupid?
Perhaps it's the "3x GeForce GTX 280 > 2x Radeon HD 4870 X2" equation they're talking about.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:29 PM   #11
cool_recep
200 Posts
 
cool_recep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 353 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 64 Times in 38 Posts

System Specs

I was going to say the same. How the hell can say say that their pathetic GTX 280 has the crown?

/not a fan
cool_recep is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:30 PM   #12
v-zero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Perhaps it's the "3x GeForce GTX 280 > 2x Radeon HD 4870 X2" equation they're talking about.
ATi can do Octo-Crossfire....
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:34 PM   #13
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by v-zero View Post
ATi can do Octo-Crossfire....
Nope. We won't see that happen, at least it's impossible now, NVIDIA still stands correct.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:34 PM   #14
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 650 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 127 Times in 95 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees Send a message via Skype™ to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cool_recep View Post
I was going to say the same. How the hell can say say that their pathetic GTX 280 has the crown?

/not a fan
Because it does. Look, I am not an Nvidia fan. But when it comes to single-GPU performance Nvidia wins. The ATI 4870X2 is faster, but look at the amount of power it uses.

I don't know in wich country you live in, but where I live electricity is not cheap. If you own the 4870X2 for a year or more, then the Nvidia GTX280 is a lot cheaper, a lot.
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:45 PM   #15
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by v-zero View Post
How can nVidia claim it has the performance lead when it doesn't? Are they blind or just stupid?

They don't even need to claim it -- they have legions of zealots to do it for them.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mdm-adph For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:47 PM   #16
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelle Mees View Post
Because it does. Look, I am not an Nvidia fan. But when it comes to single-GPU performance Nvidia wins. The ATI 4870X2 is faster, but look at the amount of power it uses.

I don't know in wich country you live in, but where I live electricity is not cheap. If you own the 4870X2 for a year or more, then the Nvidia GTX280 is a lot cheaper, a lot.
Your argument has a bit of a problem, though -- if electricity is such a problem, it doesn't matter who has the fastest card, and that factor doesn't even come into play. You should be looking for something low-end like a 9500GT or a HD 3650, anyway.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 01:58 PM   #17
Jelle Mees
500 Posts
 
Jelle Mees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium ⇒ Limburg
Posts: 650 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 127 Times in 95 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jelle Mees Send a message via Skype™ to Jelle Mees

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
Your argument has a bit of a problem, though -- if electricity is such a problem, it doesn't matter who has the fastest card, and that factor doesn't even come into play. You should be looking for something low-end like a 9500GT or a HD 3650, anyway.
I am just saying that Dual-GPU solutions is not for everyone. We are not poor, it's not like we can't afford it, but when you talk about "performance crown" you have to look at GPU's and not 2 GPU's.

You really think I would have the PC that I have if we couldn't pay our bills

Two slightly slower cards are faster then one, but that doesn't give it "the peformance crown".
Jelle Mees is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:10 PM   #18
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.83/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelle Mees View Post
I am just saying that Dual-GPU solutions is not for everyone. We are not poor, it's not like we can't afford it, but when you talk about "performance crown" you have to look at GPU's and not 2 GPU's.

You really think I would have the PC that I have if we couldn't pay our bills

Two slightly slower cards are faster then one, but that doesn't give it "the peformance crown".
Except it is one card, with dual gpu's. Yes it has 2 gpu's used in the 4870, but 2 4870s does not equal the 4870x2. Why can't people wrap their heads around this? It's one card, and does indeed take the performance crown, albeit while using a very large amount of power and costing a lot of money.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to farlex85 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:14 PM   #19
waver_01
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelle Mees View Post
but when you talk about "performance crown" you have to look at GPU's and not 2 GPU's.
oh riiiight

I don't know about you but I buy cards, not just the GPU's. And as it stands now ATI has strongest card out there so obviously they have the performance crown
waver_01 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to waver_01 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:20 PM   #20
v-zero
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Nope. We won't see that happen, at least it's impossible now, NVIDIA still stands correct.
Incorrect.
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:24 PM   #21
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by v-zero View Post
Incorrect.
Which part is incorrect? Regarding 8x RV770, it's currently not possible.

Regarding 3x G200 > 2x R700, prove I'm wrong.

Sure, the fastest graphics card one can possibly buy now is the R700, but the fastest graphics setup one can own now is 3-way SLI of 3 GTX 280 cards, unless proven otherwise.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:31 PM   #22
waver_01
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Which part is incorrect? Regarding 8x RV770, it's currently not possible.

Regarding 3x G200 > 2x R700, prove I'm wrong.
2xR700 is faster than 3x GTX 280 in most benchmarks and cheaper

http://techreport.com/articles.x/15293/5
waver_01 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to waver_01 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:35 PM   #23
Widjaja
3500 Posts
 
Widjaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wangas, New Zealand
Posts: 4,023 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 241
Thanked 617 Times in 534 Posts

System Specs

AMD has a better price vs performance this round which is why they are better this time.
In my circumstance it was to do with card size and a bout of bad luck with 8800GTs.
I was asked if I wanted to replace my 8800GT with a 9800GTX but since my case would not allow it and the bad luck with the 8800GTs put me off I went back to AMD.

I hope AMD become superior over nVidia just for a change.

I'd just like to see them doing thier marketing thing like they did when they were in the lead with the X800 series.
Widjaja is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:39 PM   #24
GPUCafe
GPU Cafe Representative
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 50 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

Alienware seems to think 4870X2 CF is the fastest:

http://image.alienware.com/Images/mi...oblivion_b.jpg
http://image.alienware.com/Images/mi...eofconan_b.jpg
http://image.alienware.com/Images/mi...t_crysis_b.jpg

In Crysis, three GTX280s in SLI would still top the 4870X2 CF.
GPUCafe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 02:40 PM   #25
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by waver_01 View Post
2xR700 is faster than 3x GTX 280 in most benchmarks and cheaper

http://techreport.com/articles.x/15293/5
no see this is QFT

I mean seriously where have you all been? tri sli doens't scale well at all on the gtx280 in fact in most settings it's maybe only a frame or two above regular sli.

2x 4870x2 is currently the fastest gpu solution on the planet. (except for crysis, which yeah is nvidia's baby and is proibabaly what they're basing their performance crown claims on wow one game.) nvidia may release a driver that fixes tril sli, but then again amd could also release a driver to enable the sideport on the 4870x2 potentially increasing scaling.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to yogurt_21 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD launches Turion™ 64 X2 CPUs Darksaber News 4 Jan 30, 2009 10:08 AM
Which AM2 CPU should I buy DaMulta General Hardware 48 Aug 15, 2007 03:50 PM
AMD Introduces New LIVE! PCs malware News 0 Oct 11, 2006 12:24 PM
AMD Announces Next Generation Native Quad-Core Opterons malware News 8 Aug 16, 2006 06:30 PM
ATI #1 in discrete graphics W1zzard News 0 Oct 27, 2004 11:24 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts