techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Motherboards & Memory

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:41 PM   #1
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

PCI-E speeds on G43-G45 chipsets.

Asus says theirs have PCI-E 16X
http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?mo...11&l3=761&l4=0

Giga-Byte says theirs are in PCI-E 4x speed for graphics slot.
http://www.giga-byte.com/Products/Mo...ProductID=2877

My question is: Is the Asus one TRUELY better? Because I remember looking into P35 chipset motherboards with dual slots for crossfire and they advertised theirs with full 16x speed for both slots when in fact they were 8x electrical.
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:50 PM   #2
zithe
2000 Posts
 
zithe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Chili, NY
Posts: 2,645 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 220
Thanked 350 Times in 310 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zithe Send a message via MSN to zithe Send a message via Skype™ to zithe

System Specs

They're 16x full speed if you don't have more than one video card enabled. The board is meant to handle one card at 16x (in either slot) or two cards at 8x. That's pretty normal for midrange crossfire boards. With current video cards, 8x/8x is preferable over 16x/4x. At least in my opinion.

A second 4870/50 would be heavily bottlenecked by the 4x slot and you wouldn't see the same scaling as with 8x/8x, I think.

That gigabyte board is something to stay away from unless you use a 2600xt and NEVER plan to upgrade.
__________________
“Fudzilla Confirms its fake!!! ]” -SammyHayabuza

Last edited by zithe; Aug 15, 2008 at 08:55 PM.
zithe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:54 PM   #3
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

Both of them? I tried to email Giga-byte about that and they only gave me 4x as the answer. I thought same as you at first, but now im not sure.
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:56 PM   #4
zithe
2000 Posts
 
zithe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Chili, NY
Posts: 2,645 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 220
Thanked 350 Times in 310 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zithe Send a message via MSN to zithe Send a message via Skype™ to zithe

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShogoXT View Post
Both of them? I tried to email Giga-byte about that and they only gave me 4x as the answer. I thought same as you at first, but now im not sure.
That gigabyte is a single slot (pcie) board. Did you mix it up with another or is the only VGA slot at 4x? That'd be pretty upsetting.
__________________
“Fudzilla Confirms its fake!!! ]” -SammyHayabuza
zithe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:57 PM   #5
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

Look at the specs page. Im a bit confused here. Il link you my question to them in a moment.
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 08:58 PM   #6
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

My Question:

This question is actually about the capability of the motherboard itself. I havent actually bought it yet. I know sometimes the specs are not the same as whats shown on Asus. It showed me for instance the Intel P35 chipset is incapable of 2 electrical 16x speed PCI-E slots (instead its double 8x). My question is, is there a similar limitation on the G43 and G45 chipsets. Also the same question with the G35,G33, and G31. I noticed you had your motherboards advertised at 4x PCI-E for the graphics slot. WILL IT STILL BE THAT WAY IF I DISABLE THE INTEGRATED VIDEO???

Thanks for your time.


Their answer:
G series chipset are limited for this particular model PCIE slot is x4
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShogoXT For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2008, 09:00 PM   #7
zithe
2000 Posts
 
zithe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Chili, NY
Posts: 2,645 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 220
Thanked 350 Times in 310 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zithe Send a message via MSN to zithe Send a message via Skype™ to zithe

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShogoXT View Post
Look at the specs page. Im a bit confused here. Il link you my question to them in a moment.
WOW. I've never seen a modern (if you can call it that) board with such a limitation. o.o Think of the strongest AGP card ever made. The 3850. That's about the best card you can get and not bottleneck unless there's something I'm not understanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShogoXT View Post
My Question:
Their answer:
G series chipset are limited for this particular model PCIE slot is x4
Their grammar sucks about as much as the board does. The price is horrendous for what you get.
__________________
“Fudzilla Confirms its fake!!! ]” -SammyHayabuza
zithe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 09:04 PM   #8
ShogoXT
500 Posts
 
ShogoXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 935 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 92 Times in 72 Posts

System Specs

I know though Giga-byte wouldnt purposely put that limitation on there if they didnt have to. So im back to thinking since they were correct before, could it be a chipset limitation and Asus is posting wrong specs like they did for the P35 boards?
ShogoXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2008, 09:06 PM   #9
zithe
2000 Posts
 
zithe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Chili, NY
Posts: 2,645 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 220
Thanked 350 Times in 310 Posts
Send a message via AIM to zithe Send a message via MSN to zithe Send a message via Skype™ to zithe

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShogoXT View Post
I know though Giga-byte wouldnt purposely put that limitation on there if they didnt have to. So im back to thinking since they were correct before, could it be a chipset limitation and Asus is posting wrong specs like they did for the P35 boards?
I was about to buy a $50 dollar board yesterday and it had more/better features all around. It was a gigabyte. Full 16x PCIe and 45nm support up to 1600mhz FSB. I went with a foxconn instead as usual.

I'm sure they did that on purpose. Hide this massive thing on the one page that a noobie wouldn't understand and charge them a load for it. Were you going to buy one of those?
__________________
“Fudzilla Confirms its fake!!! ]” -SammyHayabuza
zithe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sapphire PURE Innovation PI-A9RX480 W1zzard Reviews 11 May 8, 2009 08:46 PM
VIA PT880Pro, PT894 & PT894Pro chipset W1zzard News 0 Jan 31, 2005 10:53 PM
VIA Announces K8T890 W1zzard News 0 Sep 24, 2004 03:11 PM
Matrox to make low-profile PCI cards W1zzard News 0 Sep 18, 2004 11:46 AM
Intel introduces new PCI Express Chipsets and CPUs Bastieeeh News 0 Jun 21, 2004 07:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts