techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Software > Games

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:36 PM   #1
OrbitzXT
1000 Posts
 
OrbitzXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,734 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 359
Thanked 61 Times in 56 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OrbitzXT

System Specs

Red Alert 3 Performance?

I don't have a key to try the beta but am curious if anyone here has been playing it, and what performance they get with their video cards. I have a 9600 GT right now and haven't been playing many newer games, so its worked fine on my 1920x1080 screen. But now two games I couldn't wait to play are coming out on the same day, Fallout & Red Alert 3. I'd love to max these games out and will likely upgrade my video card around the time they do, unless I get news of something new coming out and really worth waiting for.
OrbitzXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:42 PM   #2
Darren
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,896 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 550
Thanked 355 Times in 318 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitzXT View Post
I don't have a key to try the beta but am curious if anyone here has been playing it, and what performance they get with their video cards. I have a 9600 GT right now and haven't been playing many newer games, so its worked fine on my 1920x1080 screen. But now two games I couldn't wait to play are coming out on the same day, Fallout & Red Alert 3. I'd love to max these games out and will likely upgrade my video card around the time they do, unless I get news of something new coming out and really worth waiting for.
I played a game or two this afternoon on my current system (see spec) and played very well. I tried 1440x900 full detail AA Off, I also tried 1280x1024 full detail with AA. In both situations I got a solid 30 FPS in both settings according to fraps and the frame rate would of been higher but EA have locked the FPS to 30. You do not need a new graphics card the 9600 GT is enough to play the latest games at high for another year or so calm down life isn't always about buying new hardware every two minutes

PS. The beta didn't impress me much. Looked good, just wasn't fun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by candle_86 View Post
Did you try forcing vsync off in drivers?
Good idea.

Last edited by Darren; Aug 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM.
Darren is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:44 PM   #3
candle_86
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,642 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 237 Times in 200 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitzXT View Post
I don't have a key to try the beta but am curious if anyone here has been playing it, and what performance they get with their video cards. I have a 9600 GT right now and haven't been playing many newer games, so its worked fine on my 1920x1080 screen. But now two games I couldn't wait to play are coming out on the same day, Fallout & Red Alert 3. I'd love to max these games out and will likely upgrade my video card around the time they do, unless I get news of something new coming out and really worth waiting for.
runs fine on my HD3850 @ 12x10 maxed with AA and AF to give you an idea, it gets about 35FPS average, not sure if its GPU or the CPU holding back but for RTS 20+ FPS is playable
candle_86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:45 PM   #4
Kursah
Eligible for custom title
 
Kursah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 6,558 (2.72/day)
Thanks: 727
Thanked 1,349 Times in 1,118 Posts

System Specs

I get a solid FPS with 9600GT and GTX260 with 1440x900 everything turned on and maxed in RA3 beta...it's got that 30FPS limiter tho...doesn't matter the game plays great, looks damn good (imo).

C&C3 kicked ass on my x1950pro...RA3 using a similar graphics engine that's more tuned than changed should play just fine man.

Kursah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:49 PM   #5
candle_86
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,642 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 237 Times in 200 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursah View Post
I get a solid FPS with 9600GT and GTX260 with 1440x900 everything turned on and maxed in RA3 beta...it's got that 30FPS limiter tho...doesn't matter the game plays great, looks damn good (imo).

C&C3 kicked ass on my x1950pro...RA3 using a similar graphics engine that's more tuned than changed should play just fine man.

fraps reported 33-36 FPS for me playing, odd. Did you try forcing vsync off in drivers?
candle_86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to candle_86 For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 23, 2008, 10:58 PM   #6
Kursah
Eligible for custom title
 
Kursah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Missoula, Montana, USA
Posts: 6,558 (2.72/day)
Thanks: 727
Thanked 1,349 Times in 1,118 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by candle_86 View Post
fraps reported 33-36 FPS for me playing, odd. Did you try forcing vsync off in drivers?
No...I was also using EVGA Precisons OSD (rivatuner OSD). I don't really care as long as the game plays well...RTS games don't usually need more than 30FPS anyways...RA3 plays great, I can fold at damn near full speed and play RA3 beta at the same time w/o issues. Even w/Vsync on, I'm at 60hz on my monitor, "shouldn't" that be a 60fps limit? I know some games scale differently...but that's how I used to understand it, I usually don't tick to allow vsynk as I don't see page-tearing in games usually.

Kursah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 11:14 PM   #7
OrbitzXT
1000 Posts
 
OrbitzXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,734 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 359
Thanked 61 Times in 56 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OrbitzXT

System Specs

Thats good to hear about RA3, but from screenshots it doesn't seem like a graphics intensive game...so I didn't think I'd need an upgrade for that. I do have World in Conflict which I kind of enjoy and can't really play at my resolution with all the eye candy turned up...so that along with Fallout 3, which I imagine will need a better video card, is worth an upgrade.
OrbitzXT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2008, 11:19 PM   #8
candle_86
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,642 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 237 Times in 200 Posts

its Sage Engine V3 but Sage was used in Generals, Sage V2 for Battle for Middle Earth 1 and 2 and Sage v3 for CnC3 and now RA3. Its an old engine, had alot of growing time
candle_86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HIS Radeon HD 3870 X2 1 GB W1zzard Reviews 201 Dec 11, 2008 11:20 PM
Dell and Microsoft Support (PRODUCT) RED Jimmy 2004 News 24 Jul 25, 2008 05:12 AM
Unreal Tournament 3 - Nvidia CP-Settings Performance & Quality Review Jelle Mees Games 15 Jun 21, 2008 09:29 PM
ATI Unleashes the New Performance King for Gamers: Introducing the Radeon X1950 XTX malware News 5 Aug 24, 2006 12:16 AM
Corsair Announces Immediate Adoption of Enhanced Performance Profiles (EPP) malware News 3 May 16, 2006 01:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts