techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 2, 2008, 05:02 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.72/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

NEC Display Solutions Launches Premium 22-inch MultiSync EA221WM Display

NEC Display Solutions of America launched today the new 22-inch MultiSync EA221WM widescreen display aimed towards high-end users and professionals. The MultiSync EA221WM comes with top-performing panel that boasts a 5ms response time, a 1000:1 contrast ratio, a brightness of 250 cd/m², wide-viewing angles of 176 degrees and the tipical 22-inch 1680x1050 WSXGA resolution. The new LCD is also enhanced with a 4-way adjustable stand (height, tilt, swivel, pivot), 4-port USB hub, and NEC's robust NoTouch Auto Adjust. On top of that the EA221WM comes with down-firing speakers with headphone jack, a DVI with HDCP and one analog inputs. NEC ships the MultiSync EA221WM display with a three-year parts, labor and backlight warranty, an extended warranty is available too. The display will be available for September 2008 shipment at an estimated street price of $399.99.



Source: Nec
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 05:17 PM   #2
IcrushitI
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 106 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Ho Hum must be a slow day.The description sounds like any 22in display on the market today.
IcrushitI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 05:26 PM   #3
pentastar111
500 Posts
 
pentastar111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles...U.S.A
Posts: 615 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 155
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts

System Specs

Why would you pay that amount for a 22" when you can get 24" inchers for the same or less?
pentastar111 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 09:31 PM   #4
Polarman
1000 Posts
 
Polarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Posts: 1,575 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 300 Times in 199 Posts

System Specs

Looks nice.
__________________
http://forums.techpowerup.com/image.php?u=55205&type=sigpic&dateline=1220312009
Polarman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 11:48 PM   #5
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,399 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Exactly, 24" for 350 or so. If it had 120 hz refresh....but still too high.
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 11:53 PM   #6
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

With a viewing angle of 176, this thing most likely has either an S-PVA or S-IPS panel. Far superior in image quality compared to a $400 24" monitor. $400 24" monitors use Tn Film panels, and look like shit.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2008, 11:56 PM   #7
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,399 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
With a viewing angle of 176, this thing most likely has either an S-PVA or S-IPS panel. Far superior in image quality compared to a $400 24" monitor. $400 24" monitors use Tn Film panels, and look like shit.
True, but cmon, 90% of the ppl won't see the difference. And who wants 1680 when you can have 1920? Especially for professional needs. They should offer just a good priced 24".
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 12:38 AM   #8
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuruStud View Post
True, but cmon, 90% of the ppl won't see the difference. And who wants 1680 when you can have 1920? Especially for professional needs. They should offer just a good priced 24".
I beg to differ about not seeing the difference. Judge both panel types side by side, and the difference is unmistakable.

For professional needs, the better panel is more important. Color accuracy is far more important then resolution for pro photographers and the like.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 01:07 AM   #9
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,399 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
I beg to differ about not seeing the difference. Judge both panel types side by side, and the difference is unmistakable.

For professional needs, the better panel is more important. Color accuracy is far more important then resolution for pro photographers and the like.
I didn't say we couldn't tell Joe blows would be hard pressed, I imagine (remember refresh rates and 720p/i vs 1080p/i). They crack me up, but of course, I guess this isn't aimed at them.

I sure as hell wouldn't want 1680 for pro needs, though. I haven't got an LCD precisely b/c I don't want 1680. I'm holding out for a nice 1920. Not that I do much photo or vid stuff, though (mostly just gaming and HD TV/Movie watching).
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 04:13 AM   #10
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,594 (10.89/day)
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 8,714 Times in 6,407 Posts

System Specs

Guru: if you do movies and gaming, get a 1920x1080 screen not a 1920x1200. The little black bars on top and bottom of 1080P movies on 16:10 PC screens will probably annoy you.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 3, 2008, 04:29 AM   #11
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,399 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
Guru: if you do movies and gaming, get a 1920x1080 screen not a 1920x1200. The little black bars on top and bottom of 1080P movies on 16:10 PC screens will probably annoy you.
Slightly more gaming real estate I have a 22" crt right now, so I'm used to big black bars lol.
If bleeding is a problem, then it would be annoying... you have a point, sir
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEC Extends Award-Winning MultiSync 70 Series with 24-inch Widescreen Display malware News 2 Sep 27, 2007 11:53 PM
Violate the laws of physics:Windows Vista DRM SpoonMuffin General Software 43 Jan 19, 2007 02:46 AM
NEC Launches New 37-Inch Multi-Purpose LCD Display malware News 6 Oct 28, 2006 02:37 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts