techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 15, 2008, 11:10 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Zotac Ready with GeForce GTX 260 (216 SP) Amp˛!

NVIDIA is preparing the launch of a revised GeForce GTX 260 graphics processor that has 216 shader units. Early performance evaluations show that the card is NVIDIA's sharp retaliation to the Radeon HD 4870 GPU, and it manages to outperform it comprehensively (covered here). Zotac is ready with a factory overclocked card based on the new GPU, The Zotac GeForce GTX 260 AMP˛!. One way to differentiate this from the Amp! model based on the older GTX 260 core is the superscript "˛" next to "AMP".

The card continues to use two 6-pin PCI-Express power connectors, it continues to have 896 MB of GDDR3 memory across a 448-bit wide memory bus. Clock speeds are stepped up. The speeds are 650 MHz / 1400 MHz / 1000 MHz (core/shader/memory) against the reference speeds of 576 MHz / 1242 MHz / 999 MHz. This product should be out by the end of this month.



Source: Donanimhaber

Last edited by btarunr; Sep 15, 2008 at 06:37 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 11:49 AM   #2
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts

System Specs

so if this GTX260 wtfpwns a 4870... damn. ATI must be behind in the single card sector.

896MB of 448 bit ram = WTH MAKE MY BRAIN HURT.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 11:49 AM   #3
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Well it comes with GRID that's cool. Speaking of this retaliation from Nvidia, I wonder if ATi will just come out with 4880 or something?
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 11:50 AM   #4
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,211 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 473
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

I dont think ati are as petty as nvidia.

Who cares anyway i am happy with the card i have.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:00 PM   #5
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,796 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,677
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger69 View Post
I dont think ati are as petty as nvidia.

Who cares anyway i am happy with the card i have.
Don't think ATI like doing pointless updates to there cards, well not when there short on cash at least.

There's that many Nv cards now it makes me not want one lo.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:05 PM   #6
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts

System Specs

lol ATI and NV have always done these pointless refreshes, its all good because we slowly get faster cards for the same price.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:22 PM   #7
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,796 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,677
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
lol ATI and NV have always done these pointless refreshes, its all good because we slowly get faster cards for the same price.
Always ?. ATI are not doing it now for over a year now. However it does look like NV is doing ATI's refreshes as well as there own now lol...

Maybe we should not say pointless as it must make them money right ?..
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:31 PM   #8
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts

System Specs

if they havent done it yet, its most likely because they cant, not because they dont want to.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:37 PM   #9
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

It just means the origional GTX260 will probably be EOL sometime soon, once sufficient numbers of the new ones are on the shelves, same card, just less SP's disabled and probably slightly more voltage fed to the GPU for the extra stock speeds, not really any great expense to get to this point, you could just say that ATi got it right first time around but lets not forget, there are as many cards in the HD4000 series (well more actually) then there are in the 200 series!
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:38 PM   #10
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
if they havent done it yet, its most likely because they cant, not because they dont want to.
Or the fact they don't need to.
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:39 PM   #11
crow1001
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 361 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Early performance evaluations show that the card is NVIDIA's sharp retaliation to the Radeon HD 4870 GPU, and it manages to outperform it comprehensively
Errr, no it does not, i think you need to get your facts straight before posting info that is clearly wrong. Even in the dodgy screens posted it up it wins by 1-2fps and gets beat by the 4870 in another, hardly comprehensive now is it, its got a few extra shaders, that is it, its a few FPS better than the original.
crow1001 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 12:43 PM   #12
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,559 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,693 Times in 6,392 Posts

System Specs

crow1001, bta merely posted someone elses information. take it up with the source and not the messenger if you have a problem with it, sounds like you're getting narky at the wrong person.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:03 PM   #13
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by crow1001 View Post
Errr, no it does not, i think you need to get your facts straight before posting info that is clearly wrong. Even in the dodgy screens posted it up it wins by 1-2fps and gets beat by the 4870 in another, hardly comprehensive now is it, its got a few extra shaders, that is it, its a few FPS better than the original.
He is quoteing a news source which he has linked, he leaves it upto you to agree or disagree with what you read in that link, he shouldnt be interfering or manipulating with the source and therefore his facts are not wrong.....and even if they were, your tone is un-necessary.....be nice, play good, have fun! but most of all........stay calm
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:08 PM   #14
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
so if this GTX260 wtfpwns a 4870... damn. ATI must be behind in the single card sector.

896MB of 448 bit ram = WTH MAKE MY BRAIN HURT.
You have the HD 4850 X2 (supposedly outperforms GTX 280) coming soon to take care of that.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:12 PM   #15
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
You have the HD 4850 X2 (supposedly outperforms GTX 280) coming soon to take care of that.
Ha I somehow forgot about the 4850 X2, sorry Nvidia, you lose this round.
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:13 PM   #16
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
You have the HD 4850 X2 (supposedly outperforms GTX 280) coming soon to take care of that.
I thought the 4870x2 already did that, I think the 4850x2 is perhaps going to struggle against the 280....IDK, maybe he meant "single GPU".....???
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:14 PM   #17
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbunch07 View Post
Ha I somehow forgot about the 4850 X2, sorry Nvidia, you lose this round.
Lol it's not arrived yet so they dont
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:15 PM   #18
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatty_One View Post
Lol it's not arrived yet so they dont
ha, sorry correction, sorry Nivida you WILL lose this round.

Last edited by jbunch07; Sep 15, 2008 at 01:21 PM.
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:21 PM   #19
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatty_One View Post
I thought the 4870x2 already did that, I think the 4850x2 is perhaps going to struggle against the 280....IDK, maybe he meant "single GPU".....???
We buy video cards, not GPUs.

HD 4850 X2 is already announced by AMD in their PR to come out in this time-frame. Run two HD 4850 1 GB cards in Crossfire and you'll have an idea, it is expected to outperform GTX 280. HD 4870 X2 is enjoying its $550-worthiness moment meanwhile, people rant about its $550 price tag while forgetting about the $650 tag 8800 Ultra carried in its days. So I personally see the equation somewhat like 8800 GTX and Ultra, with the HD 4850 X2 falling around that $400 mark. Hopefully its entry would slide down the HD 4870 X2's price.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 01:53 PM   #20
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
We buy video cards, not GPUs.

HD 4850 X2 is already announced by AMD in their PR to come out in this time-frame. Run two HD 4850 1 GB cards in Crossfire and you'll have an idea, it is expected to outperform GTX 280. HD 4870 X2 is enjoying its $550-worthiness moment meanwhile, people rant about its $550 price tag while forgetting about the $650 tag 8800 Ultra carried in its days. So I personally see the equation somewhat like 8800 GTX and Ultra, with the HD 4850 X2 falling around that $400 mark. Hopefully its entry would slide down the HD 4870 X2's price.
Lol, I was referring to his post and what it appeared he was getting at not what are my thoughts on the subject. On the subject of the 4850x2, if you look at the performance margins between the 4870 and the 4850, then look at the margins between the 4870x2 and the 280, I dont see clearcut statements to expect better performance from the 4850x2 there, dont get me wrong, I am not saying I think it wont better it, I just actually like to see it for myself when the cards become available, anything beforehand is speculation albeit perhaps informed speculation to a degree. but at my age my eyesight isnt what it used to be so who knows As to your referral to past pricing points for the 8800Ultra etc, fair point but again that is the past.......I remember when the 1950XTX 1gb GDDR4first came out and how much they cost in the UK

@ JBunch, if you want to be completely accurate......NVidia WILL lose the NEXT round
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 02:19 PM   #21
Selene
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 223 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

All NV has to do is makea GTX 260GX2 and its all over but the crying for ATI and their 4870X2.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

"In our evaluation the only game GeForce GTX 260 SLI did not provide a better gameplay experience in was Call of Duty 4, and that is mostly due to a game limitation. GeForce GTX 260 SLI is both faster and cheaper than a Radeon HD 4870 X2."
Selene is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 02:52 PM   #22
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

Would they be able to make a 2x0GX2? Wouldn't the GPUs be to big?
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 02:57 PM   #23
Selene
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 223 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

not sure, but from the roadmap thing posted the other day showing die shrinks im sure it will be posible after that.
Selene is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 03:40 PM   #24
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

>.<

That's true, I forgot about the 55nm (or is it 45nm) die shrinks. Cider rots my brains as well my guts.

:P
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2008, 04:46 PM   #25
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,704 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 587
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selene View Post
All NV has to do is makea GTX 260GX2 and its all over but the crying for ATI and their 4870X2.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

"In our evaluation the only game GeForce GTX 260 SLI did not provide a better gameplay experience in was Call of Duty 4, and that is mostly due to a game limitation. GeForce GTX 260 SLI is both faster and cheaper than a Radeon HD 4870 X2."
Honestly I don't understand what they did in the testing, the settings seems to be all over the place to me.
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nVIDIA ForceWare 177.66 wolf2009 NVIDIA 46 Jul 24, 2008 06:06 PM
Point of View GeForce GTX 260 W1zzard Reviews 44 Jul 7, 2008 06:17 PM
[XF] nVIDIA ForceWare 174.93 hicookie NVIDIA 33 Jun 21, 2008 01:12 AM
Zotac Unleashes Water-Cooled GeForce 9800 GTX Graphics Card malware News 4 Jun 13, 2008 04:03 AM
Nvidia 175.70 beta drivers out Solaris17 NVIDIA 1 May 14, 2008 04:36 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts