techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > System Builder's Advice

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:31 PM   #26
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,964 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,460 Times in 1,210 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by drdeathx View Post
Can you F'in read. I am going to pit them up against each other later.
Well you posted faster than I manage to come up with my replies so ...

Also, I can feel tempers are rising from various participants. Any further there will be infractions
Fourstaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fourstaff For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:33 PM   #27
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,562 (10.02/day)
Thanks: 2,146
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Well I am done in this thread. camoxiong hopefully has enough info that he needs to pick whatever build suits him the best. It goes to show that DrDipshit can go to great lengths to argue something many other people have proved positive.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brandonwh64 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:47 PM   #28
drdeathx
1000 Posts
 
drdeathx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,478 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 326 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Trinity takes over i3's with multi threading when I reviewed the A10-5800K.

As mentioned, I will enjoy pitting the 3220 against the A10-5800K. remember, the 2120 is NOT the 3220K. In real world benchmarks, the A10-5800K did very good against the i3 3220 when I tested both.....

Last edited by HammerON; Feb 18, 2013 at 04:50 PM. Reason: Merged
drdeathx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:48 PM   #29
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Regardless of if the A10 can outperform the i3 at stock, I'd always take the A10 because it overclocks like mad compared to the i3. Actually, I'd go with the A8-5600K since it is about $20 cheaper than the A10, but overclocks pretty much just as well. Both will do ~4.4GHz on the stock cooler with little to no voltage bump. And since the OP said he was using a S1283, he could bump the voltage and probably hit 4.8GHz with ease. Even if the i3 beats the Trinity setup at stock, the Trinity will win when you consider overclocking.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:50 PM   #30
drdeathx
1000 Posts
 
drdeathx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,478 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 326 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Regardless of if the A10 can outperform the i3 at stock, I'd always take the A10 because it overclocks like mad compared to the i3. Actually, I'd go with the A8-5600K since it is about $20 cheaper than the A10, but overclocks pretty much just as well. Both will do ~4.4GHz on the stock cooler with little to no voltage bump. And since the OP said he was using a S1834, he could bump the voltage and probably hit 4.8GHz with ease. Even if the i3 beats the Trinity setup at stock, the Trinity will win when you consider overclocking.
Excellent point on the $20 savings plus motherboards are cheaper too. OP can cut the cost down more and have a better cost per performance solution. I got 5GHz out of A10-5800K
drdeathx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 04:59 PM   #31
camoxiong
500 Posts
 
camoxiong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fresno, CA Central Valley
Posts: 536 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 44 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

dont know which one to pick now
camoxiong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 05:01 PM   #32
lyndonguitar
I play games
 
lyndonguitar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,254 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 264
Thanked 262 Times in 182 Posts

System Specs

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/artic...Review/1646/19

AMD is better in gaming without discrete graphics card(its faster than GT 440)

Intel is faster in general processing performance. so pair any discrete card higher than GT 440(in both cpus) and Intel is your choice.

EDIT: by the way, this is the i3-3220, the a10 might actually be better than i3-2105. im not sure

EDIT2: indeed the a10 is better according to this site. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i...-AMD-A10-5800K

EDIT3: based on what i've read i3-3220 > A10-5800K > i3-2xxx
__________________

Steam - lyndonguitar
Origin - lyndonguitar Battlefield 3 Profile
Battle.net - lyndonguitar#1663 Diablo III Profile
Guild Wars 2 - lyndonguitar.6947

Last edited by lyndonguitar; Feb 18, 2013 at 05:06 PM.
lyndonguitar is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lyndonguitar For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 18, 2013, 05:14 PM   #33
drdeathx
1000 Posts
 
drdeathx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,478 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 326 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyndonguitar View Post
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/artic...Review/1646/19

AMD is better in gaming without discrete graphics card(its faster than GT 440)

Intel is faster in general processing performance. so pair any discrete card higher than GT 440(in both cpus) and Intel is your choice.

EDIT: by the way, this is the i3-3220, the a10 might actually be better than i3-2105. im not sure

EDIT2: indeed the a10 is better according to this site. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i...-AMD-A10-5800K

EDIT3: based on what i've read i3-3220 > A10-5800K > i3-2xxx
In everday benchmarks, A10-5800K trades blows with the i3 3220. The i3 2120 is not as good so A10-5300K is better all around...... IMO

A10-5800K traded blows with the 3220K, In PC Mark, excel, Photoshop, Cinebench, passmark, the A10-5800K won. It will beat the i3 2120 even more with more L2 Cache.

Either choice won't be bad but Trinity will do pretty damn good with multithreading with the new Piledriver cores and the new instruction set. If you want to hold tight, I could have a handful of real world and synthetic benchmarks done against the 3220 by Wed. evening. If you can't wait, I will still run them... Don't get me wrong, I am not an AMD fanboy. 2 of my main rigs are Intel 3770K and 3930K. I have the A10-5800K as a home theater and tested/reviewed it. I was pretty dam impressed for a $129 APU.

Last edited by drdeathx; Feb 18, 2013 at 05:21 PM.
drdeathx is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to drdeathx For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 18, 2013, 05:59 PM   #34
camoxiong
500 Posts
 
camoxiong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fresno, CA Central Valley
Posts: 536 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 44 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by drdeathx View Post
In everday benchmarks, A10-5800K trades blows with the i3 3220. The i3 2120 is not as good so A10-5300K is better all around...... IMO

A10-5800K traded blows with the 3220K, In PC Mark, excel, Photoshop, Cinebench, passmark, the A10-5800K won. It will beat the i3 2120 even more with more L2 Cache.

Either choice won't be bad but Trinity will do pretty damn good with multithreading with the new Piledriver cores and the new instruction set. If you want to hold tight, I could have a handful of real world and synthetic benchmarks done against the 3220 by Wed. evening. If you can't wait, I will still run them... Don't get me wrong, I am not an AMD fanboy. 2 of my main rigs are Intel 3770K and 3930K. I have the A10-5800K as a home theater and tested/reviewed it. I was pretty dam impressed for a $129 APU.

I'm not in a hurry to build one yet, because my cousin haven't pay me yet. Thank you, I will wait for the benchmarks.
camoxiong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 06:38 PM   #35
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by camoxiong View Post
A lot of people were talking about the A10-5800K. However, I would shoot for the Piledriver X6 FX 6300. Performs equivalent to the i3 Ivy Bridge in games, whilst demonishing it in everything else.
  1. Costs the same as the i3 Ivy Bridge
  2. Has better upgrade path than Intel's lineup
  3. Performs virtually the same as the i3 Ivy Bridge in todays games
  4. Will perform better than i3 Ivy Bridge in future games
  5. Will demolinish the i3 virtually all non-gaming tasks
  6. Overclocks further and easier

The FX 6300 is the sensible choice. IMO.

Last edited by Dent1; Feb 18, 2013 at 06:49 PM.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 06:51 PM   #36
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

Have you considered the el-cheapo pentium G series based on Ivy? I recently tried the g2020 and as long as you pair it with dedicated graphics it should do you fine. it's like an i3 minus the HT. Still has the 3mb l3 cache.

Intel Pentium G2020 Ivy Bridge 2.9GHz LGA 1155 55W...
__________________
smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 07:08 PM   #37
d1nky
500 Posts
 
d1nky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: england
Posts: 821 (6.82/day)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 286 Times in 176 Posts

System Specs

gaming is his main aim so why not better gfx and cheaper cpu? (like me lol) p.s I had the 7770 for a couple weeks and returned it, it crawled through new 3dmark and 7950 breezes it, especially mild oc
__________________

“its a card! its a plane! its a MODAFUNKING CHOPPA!” -de.das.dude
d1nky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 10:27 PM   #38
Jetster
2000 Posts
 
Jetster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,875 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 935
Thanked 864 Times in 632 Posts

System Specs

Ether one would be fine.
Jetster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2013, 11:19 PM   #39
camoxiong
500 Posts
 
camoxiong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fresno, CA Central Valley
Posts: 536 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 44 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HalfAHertz View Post
Have you considered the el-cheapo pentium G series based on Ivy? I recently tried the g2020 and as long as you pair it with dedicated graphics it should do you fine. it's like an i3 minus the HT. Still has the 3mb l3 cache.

Intel Pentium G2020 Ivy Bridge 2.9GHz LGA 1155 55W...
will the Pentium G Series bottleneck a 7770 or a 7850?
camoxiong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2013, 06:11 PM   #40
tokyoduong
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 414 (3.46/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 101 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by camoxiong View Post
will the Pentium G Series bottleneck a 7770 or a 7850?
7850 is much faster than 7770. 7850 can also OC better. 7850 have 256 bit memory vs 128 on 7770. The difference is huge especially if you want AA.

Yes Pentium will bottleneck on some games but not all.

Go for i3/5 3xxx if you got the funds, go with AMD 5600k/5800k if you want to OC + integrated GPU, go with FX 6xxx if you want no GPU and more processing power.

If you are satisfied with playing games on medium settings then just go with the 5800k, OC your RAM as high as you can along with your CPU and GPU. That'll save you the most money.
tokyoduong is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tokyoduong For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 21, 2013, 03:38 AM   #41
camoxiong
500 Posts
 
camoxiong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fresno, CA Central Valley
Posts: 536 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 44 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tokyoduong View Post
7850 is much faster than 7770. 7850 can also OC better. 7850 have 256 bit memory vs 128 on 7770. The difference is huge especially if you want AA.

Yes Pentium will bottleneck on some games but not all.

Go for i3/5 3xxx if you got the funds, go with AMD 5600k/5800k if you want to OC + integrated GPU, go with FX 6xxx if you want no GPU and more processing power.

If you are satisfied with playing games on medium settings then just go with the 5800k, OC your RAM as high as you can along with your CPU and GPU. That'll save you the most money.
I switch my mind to a amd phenom ii x4 965
__________________
My Heatware doesn't have anything, but my Ebay does.
Heatware - http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=73415
Ebay - http://myworld.ebay.com/camoxiong
camoxiong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2013, 12:33 PM   #42
tokyoduong
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 414 (3.46/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 101 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by camoxiong View Post
I switch my mind to a amd phenom ii x4 965
Great CPU and should hit 4 ghz or more too
I think the only problem with the Phenom II that I encountered was it didn't run Star Craft 2 as good as Intel but was still very playable.
tokyoduong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2013, 07:58 PM   #43
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by camoxiong View Post
I switch my mind to a amd phenom ii x4 965
$30-$40 more gets you a newer architecture and two more cores (Piledriver FX 6300). Phenom II X4 965 isn't a move I'd recommend if your budget can stretch $30-40.

If you look hard enough, you could can even find the Phenom II X6 cheaper than the Phenom II X4 965 too.


AMD Phenom II X6 1055T $89.99
AMD Piledriver FX X6 6300 $129.99
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...952&CatId=4431
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...562&CatId=7339

Last edited by Dent1; Feb 22, 2013 at 08:06 PM.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New build, budget around $500 techtard System Builder's Advice 39 May 1, 2012 01:09 AM
Budget Gamer Build 500$ lucasweir System Builder's Advice 24 Oct 27, 2009 02:30 AM
Low Budget Build - $500/£300 adilking System Builder's Advice 10 May 15, 2009 03:16 PM
Help with $500-600 budget rig build mk86 System Builder's Advice 30 Aug 14, 2008 11:12 PM
500$ budget build for my friend ShadowFold System Builder's Advice 34 Mar 22, 2008 02:31 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts