techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:07 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,896 Times in 5,648 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Pentium E6500K Cracks 5.00 GHz Mark

Barely a week since its availability in the Chinese markets, Intel's Pentium Dual-Core E6500K processor that aims to be overclocker-friendly at a low-cost, set its first speed milestone, becoming one of the fastest Wolfdale-2M processors. Overclockers from IT168 community achieved 5.068 GHz on the processor. Details include a FSB multiplier of 24.0x (24 x 211.2 MHz), and a high vCore of 1.736V. The feat was conducted on an ASUS P5E3 Premium motherboard with 2x 1 GB of Corsair DDR3-1333 memory. The validation can be viewed here. This should give you a good idea of what to (or what not to) expect from this $89 chip.



Source: IT168
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:24 AM   #2
kyle2020
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

$89 for 5Ghz . . . so your standard desktop overclocker should do 4+. Not bad for such a cheap chip!
 
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:44 AM   #3
EnglishLion
200 Posts
 
EnglishLion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 435 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 45 Times in 45 Posts

System Specs

I'm not surprised and would actually expect more under extreme (LN2) conditions. I believe ~5GHz was achieved with the E2160 IIRC. Which started with a lowly 1.8GHz and had a locked 9x multi.

The average overclocker should do well with this chip too of course. I would like to buy one, pity I'm not chinese hey!
__________________
My site - Mods n Clocks - Latest update 19th August 2010 - See the new design layout.

Latest: Review: Canyon iPhone holder – bike
Also: Review: ASUS M4A785D-M Pro uATX motherboard
Most Popular: Review: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H Motherboard
EnglishLion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:48 AM   #4
REVHEAD
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney/ Australia
Posts: 304 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 28 Times in 21 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to REVHEAD

System Specs

Nothing to write home about, 1.736V is awfully high, I wonder how long it would last on that vcore with 24/7 usage? I doubt it would be long before degradation sets in, as 99% of E8400, E8500 and E8600 can do 4.5 ghz with as little as 1.40or 1.45 vcore 24/7.

We E8 series users should give this chip the cold shoulder, this OC result seems pretty normal for the Wolfdale architecture, I think its had its day as for monster OCs, I mean it pretty much reached its peak with thE E8600 series release.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
REVHEAD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:50 AM   #5
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

Any idea as to what cooling they used?
__________________
But they are useless. They can only give you answers. ~Pablo Picasso, about computers
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:57 AM   #6
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

the lower cache chips always clock high, but they need it to match performance.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:00 AM   #7
Assassin48
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 95350
Posts: 2,760 (1.65/day)
Thanks: 286
Thanked 518 Times in 460 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HossHuge View Post
Any idea as to what cooling they used?
my guess is LN2
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Assassin48 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:23 AM   #8
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

i don't think they used LN2 because the chip at 4000 Mhz is at 55 C:http://publish.it168.com/2009/0807/20090807057504.shtml
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:31 AM   #9
Assassin48
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 95350
Posts: 2,760 (1.65/day)
Thanks: 286
Thanked 518 Times in 460 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
i don't think they used LN2 because the chip at 4000 Mhz is at 55 C:http://publish.it168.com/2009/0807/20090807057504.shtml
thats @ 1.2v but for 1.7v they had to of used it
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Assassin48 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 12:02 PM   #10
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Meh. Personally, I find OC on LN2 very boring compared to silent passively cooled 2x Nelahem-EP/EX.

If you can afford an LN2 cooling solution, you can afford a Nehalem-EP/EX and get 24/7 silent.

But then reason and logic arent relevant to "record breakers".

OC was more fun when you took a great CPU even higher. But OC bottom end CPUs that cant even compete with their OC against their big brothers is like 2-stroke motorbikes pretending to be motogp superbikes.

Even an "old tech" Q6600/6700 gives you better performance per dollar.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 12:03 PM   #11
Paintface
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 374 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 74 Times in 48 Posts

System Specs

unlocked multiplier is nice cause you dont need expensive ram or mainboard, but i dont think you will get it past the 3.7ghz on stock voltage from my experience with the E5200 even with the unlocked multiplier.
Phenom II 955 pulls 4ghz easy without any crazy voltages 24/7, which is real good knowing its a quadcore with alot of cache on it.
Paintface is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 12:38 PM   #12
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

impresive
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 01:23 PM   #13
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

Wahey! P5E3!
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 03:18 PM   #14
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Like others have said here, nice, if that was on air. :P On water, meh. On LN2, that's not high enough.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 05:28 PM   #15
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.47/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

This is why AMD can't have nice things...
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 08:43 PM   #16
R_1
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 449 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 39 Times in 26 Posts

Not high enough on LN2.
+1
PS.
I think that if you put 1.736V on this CPU with air cooling , it will die in minutes at 5GHz under 100% load.
R_1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 09:13 PM   #17
EnglishLion
200 Posts
 
EnglishLion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Peterborough, UK
Posts: 435 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 45 Times in 45 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by R_1 View Post
Not high enough on LN2.
+1
PS.
I think that if you put 1.736V on this CPU with air cooling , it will die in minutes at 5GHz under 100% load.
No one said anything about 100% load. None of the overclocking champions run more than CPUz when they've booted into windows.
__________________
My site - Mods n Clocks - Latest update 19th August 2010 - See the new design layout.

Latest: Review: Canyon iPhone holder – bike
Also: Review: ASUS M4A785D-M Pro uATX motherboard
Most Popular: Review: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H Motherboard
EnglishLion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:09 PM   #18
aj28
200 Posts
 
aj28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 352 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Has the stated price of $89 been verified at all, or are we still getting it based on the currency-converted price of a Biostar bundle which may-or-may-not have been on sale but certainly wasn't a volume shipment from Intel? They are too greedy to compete with AMD directly. They'll price it higher and play the "better quality" card or some nonsense like that. And processor be damned, if you haven't got a halfway decent chipset to pair it with...
aj28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 01:15 PM   #19
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EnglishLion View Post
No one said anything about 100% load. None of the overclocking champions run more than CPUz when they've booted into windows.
Really? http://game.amd.com/us-en/landings/Zeitgeist.aspx?p=1
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 17, 2009, 10:38 AM   #20
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,860 (2.62/day)
Thanks: 388
Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
the lower cache chips always clock high, but they need it to match performance.
+1
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Responds to Phenom II X2 BE with Pentium E6500K btarunr News 98 Aug 14, 2009 12:29 AM
MSI N260GTX Lightning Strikes 1.1 GHz Core Clock Speed Mark btarunr News 38 Jul 20, 2009 06:40 AM
Atom Z500 Series Makes it to 2.00 GHz Mark, Features Dynamic Clock-Speed btarunr News 20 Mar 24, 2009 08:37 AM
3.2 ghz 478pin pentium 4 ? NONYA General Hardware 8 Dec 29, 2007 12:35 AM
Intel Pentium D @ 3.7 GHz Glitched System Overclocking & Cooling 15 May 13, 2007 09:54 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts