techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 10, 2009, 09:06 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

2.5 TB HDD a Reality by Late 2009

TDK Japan, a supplier of read-write heads for hard-drive manufacturers predicts that 2.5 hard drives will be a reality by late 2009, and will reach markets by early 2010. The company presented a roadmap to the press late last week, that shows that it will have the technology available to produce 3.5 inch disk platters with 640 GB data density. Four such platters will go into making 2.5 TB drives. On the 2.5 inch drive front, the roadmap shows a jump to 320 GB per platter density, which allows 640GB 2-platter SFF drives to be announced by manufacturers towards the end of this year.

Hard Drive manufacturers had reached the 2 TB milestone earlier this year. Seagate and Western Digital used four 500 GB platters in their products. At this rate of data density increases, a 5 TB hard drive in 2010, as predicted by Hitachi's Yoshihiro Shiroishi last year, sounds a little more realistic.

Source: Register Hardware
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 09:44 AM   #2
human_error
1000 Posts
 
human_error's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 1,443 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 421 Times in 322 Posts

System Specs

Awesome - as long as the only drives at that capacity aren't the slow-as WD green series. Gimme a samsung spinpoint/seagate/WD black 2.5TB drive and i'll be a very happy man.
__________________
Steam id: human_error/XBOX Live: human error/PS3 id: tom_will
Human_error's guide to USB IR receivers and media center remotes
My BF3 stats | BF3 name: "human_error" - add me!
human_error is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 10:22 AM   #3
qwerty_lesh
500 Posts
 
qwerty_lesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 515 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to qwerty_lesh

System Specs

" a supplier of read-write heads for hard-drive manufacturers predicts that 2.5 TB hard drives"
Missing TB mate
I read it and thought the sentance was talking about 2.5inch and was like wtf
qwerty_lesh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:05 AM   #4
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

its no surprise, they just need to slap another platter in really.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:44 AM   #5
nafets
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 610 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 134 Times in 107 Posts

Eh. Let mechanical HDDs die.

I'd be more impressed with a cheap and fast 1TB SSD by late 2009/early 2010...
nafets is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 11:46 AM   #6
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

I have little interest in a 2.5TB HDD over a 2.0TB HDD except for the pressure it puts on 2.0TB prices.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 12:13 PM   #7
DanTheBanjoman
Seņor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by human_error View Post
Awesome - as long as the only drives at that capacity aren't the slow-as WD green series. Gimme a samsung spinpoint/seagate/WD black 2.5TB drive and i'll be a very happy man.
These drives are mostly for storage, average performance is just fine for that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
its no surprise, they just need to slap another platter in really.
That's one solution. Though TDK increased density here. I do wonder why they don't make higher drives with more platters, or 5,25" ones, like the Bigfoots (which were quite unreliable ) back in the days. I believe the market is there.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 03:21 PM   #8
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

I wonder how big mechanical hard drives will get before SSD's fully take over.

I predict... 10TB?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 03:41 PM   #9
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
I wonder how big mechanical hard drives will get before SSD's fully take over.

I predict... 10TB?
SSD's are doubling every year, if not more.

HDDs are increasing about 50% a year - with setbacks (for example, the latest large drives are all 5,400 RPM)


largest commercially viable right now SSD is 512GB, within a year that should be 2TB or more - while mechanical drives will be around the 3-3.5TB mark.

Give it another year after that, and we'll be close. mechanical drives will still have the better pricing at this point.

1-2 years after that, SSDs will dominate.




The simple fact is, SSD's are still 2.5" - once they're cheaper they can slap them in a 3.5" enclosure, quadruple the size and call it a day.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 03:47 PM   #10
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Prediction? I think we will see "performance" HDDs die out. They cant compete with SDD. And at slower speeds, HDDs can store at higher density at lower power.

Next step? 4500rpm 5TB HDD 3.5" format. With slower read/write speeds. Whereas SSD will get faster, and the standard size will become 320MB rather than 80/160 as it is now.

10TB? While in theory you could manuf. a double height drive like the old SCSI drives... due to manuf. and reliability costs (they were horribly unreliable and prone to damage from small knocks)... more likely peeps will just RAID array them.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 05:10 PM   #11
Static~Charge
200 Posts
 
Static~Charge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 420 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 76 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nafets View Post
I'd be more impressed with a cheap and fast 1TB SSD by late 2009/early 2010...
Don't hold your breath waiting for that to happen....
Static~Charge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 07:38 PM   #12
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
10TB? While in theory you could manuf. a double height drive like the old SCSI drives... due to manuf. and reliability costs (they were horribly unreliable and prone to damage from small knocks)... more likely peeps will just RAID array them.
...and much like Intel sticking two Pentium 4's into one chip to keep up with AMD, we'll probably see double-height mechanical drives. They'll have to.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2009, 07:41 PM   #13
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,921 (3.51/day)
Thanks: 1,597
Thanked 2,047 Times in 1,602 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

Bow before the God's of the Gigabyte Age. The Megabyte's feeble Demi-Gods are no match for my platters!
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 03:53 AM   #14
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlee49 View Post
Bow before the God's of the Gigabyte Age. The Megabyte's feeble Demi-Gods are no match for my platters!
wrong generation. this is the terabyte age.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 05:37 AM   #15
a_ump
2000 Posts
 
a_ump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts
Send a message via AIM to a_ump

System Specs

isn't there a limit to the density of the process they currently use on HDD? i can't recall what limit i read but it wasn't too high in the T, like 5 or seomthing. could be wrong. i also read that they may take a route of using multi faced disc's as well as multi heads for faster read times and double the memory space per platter. could be wrong and i doubt we'll see this since SDD is going to take hold.
__________________
My Heatware

MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”
a_ump is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 06:03 AM   #16
CyberDruid
1000 Posts
 
CyberDruid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: On top of a mountain
Posts: 1,947 (0.94/day)
Thanks: 818
Thanked 1,120 Times in 659 Posts

System Specs

I'm betting on Petabyte drives before mechanical drives are historical.
__________________

returning to hibernation
CyberDruid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 06:04 AM   #17
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid View Post
I'm betting on Petabyte drives before mechanical drives are historical.
i'll take you up on that, $10 USD?
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 01:09 PM   #18
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberDruid View Post
I'm betting on Petabyte drives before mechanical drives are historical.
Only if some other method for storing data on mechanical platters is developed -- there's a physical limit to it, and it's far, far short of a petabyte right now.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 03:49 PM   #19
a_ump
2000 Posts
 
a_ump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts
Send a message via AIM to a_ump

System Specs

yep, something with how small the magnetic particles get or something and room temperature will mess it up due to the size. course previous estimated limits have already been broken so i'm sure something will be thought up to continue HDD size, course as i said i'm betting SDD becomes mainstream before that happens
__________________
My Heatware

MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”
a_ump is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 03:51 PM   #20
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

HRD's - one free cookie* to whoever links to the TPU news article first



*Cookie, like cake, is a lie.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2009, 04:44 PM   #21
Easo
500 Posts
 
Easo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Latvia
Posts: 801 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 137
Thanked 79 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

All i can say is MOAR, I DEMAND MOAR!
__________________
His will be done.

Easo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel 32 nm Silicon Technology On Course for Late 2009 btarunr News 21 Feb 7, 2009 09:23 PM
[Case Gallery] Reality Bytes BigJunit Case Mod Gallery 18 Nov 19, 2008 06:15 AM
Mobile Nehalem Chips Not Expected Until Late 2009? malware News 10 Oct 21, 2008 11:44 AM
Reality Bytes BigJunit Project Logs 76 Apr 16, 2008 04:40 PM
Xbox 360 Could Get 32nm Chips by Late 2009 malware News 6 Dec 11, 2007 10:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts