techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:01 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Intel Responds to Phenom II X2 BE with Pentium E6500K

With the 45 nm Phenom II AM3 architecture, AMD is able to offer two highly competitive mainstream dual-core processors: the Phenom II X2 (Callisto), and Athlon II X2 (Regor). The Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition chips not only serves as a notable sub-$100 choice for mainstream consumers, but also offers good value to overclockers with an unlocked bus multiplier, and with the right tools, the potential to unlock disabled physical cores. With its prime competitor from the blue camp being Pentium Dual-Core E5000 and E6000 series, Intel decided to up the stakes with a low-cost overclocker-friendly dual-core processor labeled Pentium Dual-Core E6500K, the company's first FSB multiplier-unlocked 45 nm dual-core chip.

Based on the 45 nm Wolfdale-2M core, the E6500K boasts of a default clock speed of 2.93 GHz (11.0 x 266 MHz). The bus multiplier is unlocked, leaving room to play with it. Placed in the Pentium E6000 series, the chip has a FSB frequency of 1066 MHz, compared to its E5000 cousins that sport 800 MHz FSB. Aided with a 2 MB L2 cache, the E6500K is expected to go head-on against competing AMD chips. Currently available in China for RMB 1299 (converts to $190) as part of bundle with Biostar T-Series TP45E motherboard, the E6500K is expected to retail soon for US $89. Incidentally, the "K" in E6500K refers to "black" in digital imaging jargon.



Source: Expreview

Last edited by btarunr; Aug 7, 2009 at 10:19 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:03 PM   #2
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.81/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

My new proc? or should i go 9550? or wait til 850 i7?
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:07 PM   #3
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

$90 for a cpu that could likely be the best dualcore OCer ever?
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:15 PM   #4
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 585
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitseries3 View Post
$90 for a cpu that could likely be the best dualcore OCer ever?
Or grab a PII 550BE that can protentially unlock to a quad and also with unlock multi?
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:16 PM   #5
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

nope. not me.

i dislike AMD sorry.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:18 PM   #6
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 585
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Interesting how someone can hate a company.
All they care is your cash anyways.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:24 PM   #7
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,919 (3.51/day)
Thanks: 1,597
Thanked 2,044 Times in 1,600 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

Its not that he hates AMD, his experience with them has lead him to make his own choice.


Personally for $90 this chip could definitely impact quite a few MidRange builds. The E5200 was everyone's choice for a budget chip, well not any more!
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:26 PM   #8
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

seriously...

unlocked multi on a 45nm wolfdale...

watch the F___ out

some serious OCing ensues

Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:27 PM   #9
selway89
200 Posts
 
selway89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 364 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts

System Specs

Hmm might be interested in this. Can't get my E4500 past 3.2GHz, wonder if I could get one of those higher. Don't really want to splash out on new board and memory, and dual core does me fine at the moment. At that price point I am very tempted for when it's available.
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
If it ain't working, don't panic...
selway89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:30 PM   #10
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

i bet this chip does 6ghz easy with decent cooling.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:33 PM   #11
human_error
1000 Posts
 
human_error's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 1,443 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 421 Times in 322 Posts

System Specs

Nice to see budget enthusiast chips from both camps - makes getting insane overclocks more affordable
__________________
Steam id: human_error/XBOX Live: human error/PS3 id: tom_will
Human_error's guide to USB IR receivers and media center remotes
My BF3 stats | BF3 name: "human_error" - add me!
human_error is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:33 PM   #12
AltecV1
1000 Posts
 
AltecV1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Republic of Estonia
Posts: 1,248 (0.78/day)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 175 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

i would still prefer the 550 Black Edition ! it might unlock extra cores and has more cache nice try intel but you fail
AltecV1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:34 PM   #13
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

AMD fails to OC as far as intel on reasonable cooling setups though.
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:35 PM   #14
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AltecV1 View Post
i would still prefer the 550 Black Edition ! it might unlock extra cores and has more cache nice try intel but you fail
I wouldn't say Intel fails...

On the contrary, this is good news all around. It shows that Intel is finally feeling some pressure from AMD after all these years. Thus, more and better choices for the consumer!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devguy For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:36 PM   #15
Cheeseball
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 598 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 66 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

Holy shit. If this was $90 and was released like... NOW. I'd sell my ASRock 780G/SB710 motherboard and 5000+ BE for this and a G45/P45.
Cheeseball is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 06:36 PM   #16
selway89
200 Posts
 
selway89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 364 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts

System Specs

I have a sneaky feeling this won't be available in the UK anytime soon and will have a price hike deffinatly looks like it will give the AMDs a run for their money!
__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
If it ain't working, don't panic...
selway89 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:06 PM   #17
tastegw
200 Posts
 
tastegw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 273 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 139 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

if your looking for performance and can afford a few extra bucks, i still think the E8400 is a better option.
__________________
tastegw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:08 PM   #18
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,737 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,112 Times in 3,703 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
Or grab a PII 550BE that can protentially unlock to a quad and also with unlock multi?
I wouldn't gamble on unlocking. Despite what it seems like, it is rare to be sucessful. And even more rare to be sucessful and stable, especially on a chip with two of the cores disable. The chances of having a defective core are enormous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AltecV1 View Post
i would still prefer the 550 Black Edition ! it might unlock extra cores and has more cache nice try intel but you fail
The extra cache doesn't really help it. With the E6300 already nipping at the heels of the 550BE with a lower clock speed, this E6500K at stock should equal or surpass a 550BE, and out overclock it also. Seems like hardly a fail to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by devguy View Post
I wouldn't say Intel fails...

On the contrary, this is good news all around. It shows that Intel is finally feeling some pressure from AMD after all these years. Thus, more and better choices for the consumer!
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\This/\/\/\/\/\/\ Competition = win for consumers.

I'm just happy to see Intel releasing unlocked chips at budget prices...not that they have really needed to...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:10 PM   #19
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,876 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 12,246 Times in 7,802 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitseries3 View Post
i bet this chip does 6ghz easy with decent cooling.
It could very well do only 3.6ghz with decent cooling too. I guess it all depends on the chip itself as none are ever the same.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:18 PM   #20
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
It could very well do only 3.6ghz with decent cooling too. I guess it all depends on the chip itself as none are ever the same.
E5000s already do 3.6 GHz with decent cooling. This chip could do ~4.5-ish GHz with the right tools. Cheap thrills.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:21 PM   #21
Darren
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,896 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 550
Thanked 355 Times in 318 Posts

System Specs

The E6500 is a good idea from Intel however they have made a slight flaw in my opinion, the new CPU would have a bigger impact on socket 1366, despite the E6500s cheap price on socket 775 Intel are beating a dead horse, a lot of people with low end E-series will probably hit up to 3.5 GHz anyways. Even if the E6500 is able to reach 4 GHz on stock cooling will its performance benefit be any more beneficial than a E5200 at 3.7 GHz?, most probably not.

On socket 775 I could only see this chip benefiting people with pre-core 2 CPUs, for example upgrading from an existing Pentium D to the E6500 with the sole intention of overclocking to near 4 GHz, but for people with core 2s or for new builds this CPU offers very little.


Fitseries3, you dislike AMD or do you dislike AMD's SEO's bank balance, numerous luxury pent houses across the country, 4-5 super cars and a hot Latina wife.

All seriousness go for the bang for your buck, if AMD offers that go that route, if Intel offers than go that route.
Darren is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:25 PM   #22
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

if you like AMD then fine.

i have had many AMDs in my time and i dont like them.

sorry this makes you guys feel like attacking me.

this E6500K will do very well IMHO.

its a 45nm wolfdale chip with an unlocked multi.

what about that doesnt sound like some great OCs will come from thsi cpu?

its kin to the e7XXX and e8XXX cpus that have hit upwards of 5-6ghz.

why so much doubt in this cpu?

amd ppl need to GTFO of this thread if they are going to come in here and flame.

i've had both intel and amd, ati and nvidia so dont talk about my favoritism if you yourself havent had both sides
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:30 PM   #23
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.15/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

Was looking at makin the switch out to the 550BE, but this will definitely sway my decision IF MSI can put cpu support for this in the bios. Me like!
JrRacinFan is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:30 PM   #24
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren View Post
The E6500 is a good idea from Intel however they have made a slight flaw in my opinion, the new CPU would have a bigger impact on socket 1366
Wolfdale is not possible on LGA-1366, it's not as like porting Prescott from s478 to LGA-775. LGA-1366 platform won't see a sub-$100 processor. Currently less than 1% of Intel's users use LGA-1366, so it wouldn't have made a bigger impact even if it was possible. The cheapest motherboard starts around the $160 mark.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren View Post
Fitseries3, you dislike AMD or do you dislike AMD's SEO's bank balance, numerous luxury pent houses across the country, 4-5 super cars and a hot Latina wife.
Do not get down to blatant flaming.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 7, 2009, 07:35 PM   #25
Darren
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,896 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 550
Thanked 355 Times in 318 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitseries3 View Post
if you like AMD then fine.

i have had many AMDs in my time and i dont like them.

sorry this makes you guys feel like attacking me.

this E6500K will do very well IMHO.

its a 45nm wolfdale chip with an unlocked multi.

what about that doesnt sound like some great OCs will come from thsi cpu?

its kin to the e7XXX and e8XXX cpus that have hit upwards of 5-6ghz.

why so much doubt in this cpu?

amd ppl need to GTFO of this thread if they are going to come in here and flame.

Nobody is attacking you, they are attacking your narrow views, its your right to dislike AMD but you've offered no justifiable reason to dislike the company. For example if you said "I dislike AMD because they do not offer enough value for money" one could argue this to be correct and perhaps agree with you to a certain extent. But know one can/will agree with you if you offer no explanation.

I'm pretty natural, I've had AMD and Intel amongst other CPU manufactures in the past, I couldn't give a rats ass whether AMD or Intel is the favourite, I want cheap value for money, even those Intel are not offer value for money today in comparison to AMD I still respect Intel and I have no hate for the company, once they get the value for money together I'd be happy to jump ship to Intel.

Like I said, I like the E6500k, but I would love to see it on socket 1366, Intel already have many overclockable and respectable cheap CPUs on socket 775 already, let the dead socket die. At least if this was on socket 1366 money conscious people could buy it now, then upgrade to the i7 in a year when prices come down.

Edit:

btarunr, so saying that you dislike AMD or any other company without a "valid expanation", correct without an explanation period isn't flaming too?

Last edited by Darren; Aug 7, 2009 at 07:56 PM.
Darren is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel EOL's Pentium 4/Pentium D Series zekrahminator News 27 Aug 14, 2007 09:01 PM
Intel Responds to EU Charges malware News 6 Jul 28, 2007 04:45 PM
Intel responds to Barcelona benchmarks DanTheBanjoman News 94 May 27, 2007 05:56 PM
Intel Responds to AMD’s Quad FX Jimmy 2004 News 59 Jan 18, 2007 02:54 AM
Intel Pentium M 780 as desktop CPU with ASUS CT-479 adapter Dark Ride News 2 Aug 9, 2005 02:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts