techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:27 PM   #51
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company?

So I'm guessing that's a yes then, since they can produced things on a 45nm scale.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:32 PM   #52
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,289 Times in 3,175 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company?

So I'm guessing that's a yes then, since they can produced things on a 45nm scale.
yes that's tsmc. yes tsmc has a 40 nm node. nvidia has been with tsmc for ages
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:33 PM   #53
Nemo~
25 Posts
 
Nemo~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: in the matrix -.-
Posts: 25 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nemo~

this is just wicked sick :O
Nemo~ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:35 PM   #54
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
those chiphell performance figures are against the gtx 285, at least thats what it says there
One of those shows 5870 vs gtx295.

Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:35 PM   #55
InTeL-iNsIdE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
PhysX does not have a hit on game performance. Yes, the FPS goes down because there are more object to render. However, the big performance improvemnt comes with the game physics. If the same level of physics was done without hardware acceleration, the game would slow to a crawl.

So for a benchmark to show this, it is entirely representitive of real life.
Its simply because
Physx is an Nvidia trademark, and in case you havent noticed it is dying and will be dead and gone when DX11 games start to come out. There where very few titles that used physx and it was a non starter from the get go, the score from an nvidia card running physx is not comparable to a ATI card of roughly the same perf cause the phyics tests in vantage were supposed to be done by the cpu and were not specifically for the Physx API. So saying a Nvidia card that got 40% more than a comparable ATI card in vantage is not representative of real life benchmarks and games, it was a bug that got fixed, end of.



Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Yes, it is soooooo outragous that nVidia pays for development time to make the game optimized better. Developement time costs money, and nVidia paying game devs to spend extra time optimizing the game to run better for the customer is a good thing. I wish ATi cared as much about their customers and making them happy. They had a similar program, and all but dropped it...
Wrong again, development my ass, what about the .Exe names that could be changed to give ATI users the same performance that nvidia users were getting in these so called " optimised for Nvidia" games, its marketing BS and it is wrong for game devs to bend over for a quick buck from Nvidia when the games shouldnt run any worse on ATI hardware
 
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:37 PM   #56
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Don't Nvidia have greater market share?

Devs will make games that work with the majority everytime.

If ATI take the lead then dev will make things work better with ATI.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:44 PM   #57
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,533 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,609 Times in 1,288 Posts

System Specs

time to trade in my 2 4870's.....
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 05:50 PM   #58
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

mastrdrver posted these in the HD5 series discussion thread.

Edit: see my below post.

Last edited by pantherx12; Sep 14, 2009 at 06:05 PM.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:00 PM   #59
mastrdrver
2000 Posts
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,346 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 495 Times in 398 Posts

System Specs

Thanks panther but your links don't work.

Just watch XS and B3D. Stuff is just popping up left and right on those two forums. There will be nothing left to reveal by the time the NDA is up.
mastrdrver is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:01 PM   #60
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,761 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
You think Nvidia's going to have their answer to the 5000 series out before December? Everything I've ever heard around here says no.
I think there is a possibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
...fixed that for you there.

If you think Nvidia isn't "encouraging" developers to design in ways that only makes it faster on their hardware while simultaneously making it slower on other brands, you're fooling yourself. It's business, and if they can make money off of it, you can bet they're doing it.

There is no such thing as a conspiracy in the business world if there's money to be made.

I'd rather the game run the same speed on ALL hardware, and not have to buy a certain company's products to get full speed.
That isn't true, and there isn't a single thing even indicating it. When you show me a sliver of proof, I'll talk to you about this, until then, don't spread lies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InTeL-iNsIdE View Post
Its simply because
Physx is an Nvidia trademark, and in case you havent noticed it is dying and will be dead and gone when DX11 games start to come out. There where very few titles that used physx and it was a non starter from the get go, the score from an nvidia card running physx is not comparable to a ATI card of roughly the same perf cause the phyics tests in vantage were supposed to be done by the cpu and were not specifically for the Physx API. So saying a Nvidia card that got 40% more than a comparable ATI card in vantage is not representative of real life benchmarks and games, it was a bug that got fixed, end of.
When DX11 comes out, I'll be glad, as a unified physic API is what the industry needed.

However, DX11 and PhysX dying has nothing to do with Vantage, a DX10 benchmark. Vantage was not just a benchmark to give raw graphical performance, it was a benchmark to give overall computer performance. The PhysX API was included, and meant to be used. Futuremark even allowed it entirely using dedicated PhysX cards. All the world records were set with Ageia cards in the machines, it was perfectly acceptable.

The PhysX tests in Vantage were meant to test PhysX performance, it didn't matter where it was calculated at, until nVidia started doing it on the GPUs, and the ATi fans started freaking out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InTeL-iNsIdE View Post
Wrong again, development my ass, what about the .Exe names that could be changed to give ATI users the same performance that nvidia users were getting in these so called " optimised for Nvidia" games, its marketing BS and it is wrong for game devs to bend over for a quick buck from Nvidia when the games shouldnt run any worse on ATI hardware
Show me this, because I doubt it ever happened. What you are saying isn't possible. Changing the EXEs improves performance for ATi for several reasons, but not the reason you are stating. Usually it is done to invoke optimizations from and older game for a new game, in the drivers that were applied by ATi. It has noething to do with the game devs at all. Changing the name of the EXE fools outside programs(drivers), but it doesn't change the what the program runs itself. The in game optimizations won't be change if you rename the EXE.

But I fear we are going way off topic here, so I'll end it here. I think if you want to discuss it further, a dedicated topic would be best.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:01 PM   #61
gumpty
500 Posts
 
gumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 564 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Your links appear to be broken, sir.

EDIT: I am so slow.
__________________
"It's going to install and overwrite the OS. It will kill all your family pets and everything in the 'fridge will go bad. The shingles on your roof will curl and ants will infest your underwear drawer."Kreij

gumpty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:05 PM   #62
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Bollocks!

Sorry guys

Fixed in this post

http://tweakimg.net/g/forum/template...com/oho6qa.png

http://tweakimg.net/g/forum/template...om/2gt16v5.png

http://tweakimg.net/g/forum/template...com/wj9ru9.png
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pantherx12 For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:22 PM   #63
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
That isn't true, and there isn't a single thing even indicating it. When you show me a sliver of proof, I'll talk to you about this, until then, don't spread lies.
Prove that it's not.

It's a mechanism by which Nvidia could reap higher profits at absolutely zero risk, even if they're found out. Therefore, in the business world, trust me -- it's being done.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:24 PM   #64
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,761 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
Prove that it's not.

It's a mechanism by which Nvidia could reap higher profits at absolutely zero risk, even if they're found out. Therefore, in the business world, trust me -- it's being done.
You made the negative claims, it is your responsibility to prove them. It isn't a persons responsibility to prove they didn't commit murder, just because someone else says they did. The person making the accusations bears the burden of proof.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:25 PM   #65
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

according to this is not a big "leap" older cards are still good enough
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	5870.JPG
Views:	1501
Size:	126.0 KB
ID:	28526  
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:26 PM   #66
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

What are you talking about thats a huge leap!

the 295 has two gpus! the 5870 one gpu.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:30 PM   #67
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
You made the negative claims, it is your responsibility to prove them. It isn't a persons responsibility to prove they didn't commit murder, just because someone else says they did. The person making the accusations bears the burden of proof.
Yeah, well this isn't a criminal claim I'm making, either. It's civil -- and in that case, as long as there is a "preponderance of the evidence," the burden of proof is on Nvidia to prove that they're not guilty.

And I think the fact that they could make millions is all the "preponderance" I (and anyone else) need.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:33 PM   #68
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

But will the 5870 fix the G-D DAMN SHADOWS IN BF2??!
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:34 PM   #69
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,698 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 465 Times in 382 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
according to this is not a big "leap" older cards are still good enough
its big enough for me it outperforms the highest end consumer card available(not including the mars) at high res with AA based on what ive seen
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:38 PM   #70
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,761 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
Yeah, well this isn't a criminal claim I'm making, either. It's civil -- and in that case, as long as there is a "preponderance of the evidence," the burden of proof is on Nvidia to prove that they're not guilty.

And I think the fact that they could make millions is all the "preponderance" I (and anyone else) need.
Hardly a preponderance of evidence. "They could make money if they did" isn't evidence of any kind. It is still up to the accuser to provide evidence, and motive is not evidence and certainly not enough to be considered a preponderance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by laszlo View Post
according to this is not a big "leap" older cards are still good enough
It is a big leap for the single GPU, but more importantly a very good sign. It is the first time in a long while that ATi has managed to put out a next generation single GPU card that can top all the cards from a previous generation. This is what the industry/consumer needs.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:44 PM   #71
araditus
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 139 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts

Newtekie, you troll hardcore bro, gotta always get the last word, this is a news thread, input your news,or specific facts and chill, toast a bagel or go for a run to get the saratonin levels up
araditus is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to araditus For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:52 PM   #72
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,698 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 465 Times in 382 Posts

System Specs

newtekie is right, I don't think he's trolling

Some games aren't optimized for ATI cards because game developers in general aren't going to optimize the games unless they are paid to do so. . . . because they can make money, its all about the money, its the money game as usual.

and certain games are faster after being renamed because ATI does optimizations every now and then for games by having the drivers hook onto the games filename, but if the game has no fixes or whatnot the game will run without them and might run like crap, so you rename the exe to a filename thats the drivers can recognize and hook to and then the game loads with those optimizations, nvidia tries to avoid this by saying here take this money and optimize this game for our cards, . . . . . done, . . . . . and ATI does the same thing sometimes.

Theres nothing evil about it, thats ATI's fault for not playing the game.

I can say this and I will be one of the first in line to get me a HD5870 in two weeks no matter what.
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KainXS For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 14, 2009, 06:52 PM   #73
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Hardly a preponderance of evidence. "They could make money if they did" isn't evidence of any kind. It is still up to the accuser to provide evidence, and motive is not evidence and certainly not enough to be considered a preponderance.
All a business does is try to make more money -- that's the motive. The stupid "Way It's Meant to Be Played" is the evidence. End of line.

But that's all I'm going to bother saying -- it's not worth it.

Another reason why they've got nothing to lose is that they've got people like you, ready to defend anything they do.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 07:04 PM   #74
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,761 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,118 Times in 3,708 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by araditus View Post
Newtekie, you troll hardcore bro, gotta always get the last word, this is a news thread, input your news,or specific facts and chill, toast a bagel or go for a run to get the saratonin levels up
Because you obviously don't know the definition of trolling /\/\/\//\/\That/\/\/\/\/\ is trolling...how ironic.

Being in a discussion doesn't make me a troll, no matter how much your disagree with my opinions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
All a business does is try to make more money -- that's the motive. The stupid "Way It's Meant to Be Played" is the evidence. End of line.

But that's all I'm going to bother saying -- it's not worth it.

Another reason why they've got nothing to lose is that they've got people like you, ready to defend anything they do.
Hardly evidence to support your claims. Come on, at least try. Again, when you can back up your claims, then we'll talk. Show me at least a little hard evidence, and not just conspiracy BS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KainXS View Post
newtekie is right, I don't think he's trolling

Some games aren't optimized for ATI cards because game developers in general aren't going to optimize the games unless they are paid to do so. . . . because they can make money, its all about the money, its the money game as usual.

and certain games are faster after being renamed because ATI does optimizations every now and then for games by having the drivers hook onto the games filename, but if the game has no fixes or whatnot the game will run without them and might run like crap, so you rename the exe to a filename thats the drivers can recognize and hook to and then the game loads with those optimizations, nvidia tries to avoid this by saying here take this money and optimize this game for our cards, . . . . . done, . . . . . and ATI does the same thing sometimes.

Theres nothing evil about it, thats ATI's fault for not playing the game.

I can say this and I will be one of the first in line to get me a HD5870 in two weeks no matter what.
Thank you. There is really no use stating logic though, mdm-adph and others like him don't care. They believe nVidia is evil, with no evidence of any wrong doing, and nothing you can say will change that. mdm-adph, is the first person to bash nVidia as much as possible, and then call everyone else that disagrees with him a fanboy because they don't agree that ATi is god's gift to video card.

You say negative things about ATi, and your an instant nVidia fanboy to mdm-adph. Doesn't matter that you say something postive in the same post, or even that you say negative things about nVidia also...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2009, 07:08 PM   #75
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,958 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,793
Thanked 12,320 Times in 7,832 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by araditus View Post
Newtekie, you troll hardcore bro, gotta always get the last word, this is a news thread, input your news,or specific facts and chill, toast a bagel or go for a run to get the saratonin levels up
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Because you obviously don't know the definition of trolling /\/\/\//\/\That/\/\/\/\/\ is trolling...how ironic.

Being in a discussion doesn't make me a troll, no matter how much your disagree with my opinions.
Stop... Now. Use the report button. Infractions are given for trolls and those who troll, trolls. Keep on topic. Don't feel the need to explain yourself. Don't derail the subject at hand. State your case and move along.

Thank you.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radeon HD 5870 Aggressively Priced: Report btarunr News 197 Sep 22, 2009 08:38 AM
Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity Edition Spotted btarunr News 63 Sep 16, 2009 04:56 PM
AMD Cypress ''Radeon HD 5870'' Stripped btarunr News 163 Sep 14, 2009 12:19 PM
First PCI Express 3 Rumors Surface zekrahminator News 28 Aug 12, 2007 03:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts