techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 8, 2009, 08:25 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Radeon HD 5700 Series Specs Surface

The beans are spilled on the final specifications of AMD's "Juniper" mid-range GPU architecture, and the two SKUs based on it, namely the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon HD 5750. Leaked alleged company slides on XtremeSystems Forums, reveal exactly how Juniper is a 50% downsizing of Cypress' machinery, in having half of nearly all its vital-statistics, if you may. Juniper features 10 SIMD engines physically, amounting to 800 stream processors. It holds 40 texture memory units (TMUs), and 16 raster operation units (ROPs). With a 128-bit memory interface churning out up to 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth by utilizing 4.8 GT/s GDDR5 memory chips, the fact that Juniper is half of what Cypress stands for specs-wise, becomes clear.

In the next two slides are pictured and detailed the two SKUs based on the GPU. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 is the top-end implementation, which makes use of all the components present on the GPU. With a core clock-speed of 850 MHz, and memory speed of 1200 MHz, the GPU churns out a shader compute power of 1.36 TFLOPs. The idle and max board powers are rated by AMD at 18W and 108W, respectively. It becomes clear that AMD is eying the US $150 price point with this part. The Radeon HD 5750 on the other hand, has one SIMD engine disabled, and eds up with 720 available stream processors. It comes with 1 GB or 512 MB of GDDR5 memory, and clock speeds of 700 MHz core, and 1150 MHz memory (4.6 GT/s). With these, the Radeon HD 5750 manages a shader compute power figure of 1.008 TFLOPs. The rated board power consumption figures have also come down on this one, with 16W idle, and 86W max. This one targets the $109 (512 MB) and $129 (1 GB) price points. Both accelerators are DirectX 11 compliant, and support ATI Eyefinity technology supporting up to three 2560 x 1600 pixel display heads. According to the slides, they should be unveiled this Tuesday the 13th.



Source: XtremeSystems Forums
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 08:40 AM   #2
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,715 (4.13/day)
Thanks: 3,098
Thanked 2,314 Times in 1,558 Posts

System Specs

Interesting clock speeds on the 5770, is this thing going to be faster than the 5850? Whats it missing? Because those numbers seem unreal.
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 08:48 AM   #3
Phxprovost
Xtreme Refugee
 
Phxprovost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,148 (0.76/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 264 Times in 190 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Phxprovost

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Interesting clock speeds on the 5770, is this thing going to be faster than the 5850? Whats it missing? Because those numbers seem unreal.
about 640sp's
Phxprovost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 08:50 AM   #4
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

wow and these have the ATI Eyefinity technology as well. ATI is making it hard not to up-grade...
__________________
But they are useless. They can only give you answers. ~Pablo Picasso, about computers
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 08:58 AM   #5
mystikl
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 93 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxprovost View Post
about 640sp's
He meant the 4850.
mystikl is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mystikl For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:08 AM   #6
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Interesting clock speeds on the 5770, is this thing going to be faster than the 5850? Whats it missing? Because those numbers seem unreal.
As far as it looks, spec wise it looks like a 40nm HD 4890 + DX11
Minus the 128-bit memory bus that is.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard

Last edited by Zubasa; Oct 8, 2009 at 09:18 AM.
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:19 AM   #7
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

i really like the power figures.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:23 AM   #8
REVHEAD
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney/ Australia
Posts: 304 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 28 Times in 21 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to REVHEAD

System Specs

I have 2 4870s at the moment, and holding out to see what the X2 5870s perform like, I have a 30 inch dell and thinking a bit about maybe saving some coin for another 30 inch dell, and running two for gaming. Do you guys think running 32 30 inch screens for gaming would be better than one, and nearly as good as running say 3 x 24 inch monitors?

I can't afford 3 30 inch monitors, and I like the one I have now, but the option of running 2 sounds awsome, can you guys let me kno0w if this is a stupid idea.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
REVHEAD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:25 AM   #9
inferKNOX
500 Posts
 
inferKNOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SouthERN Africa
Posts: 880 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to inferKNOX

System Specs

@ 1Kurgan1
It seems to me like 5750 & 5770 are supposed to have power of the 4850 & 4870, but with the benefits of Eyefinity, DX11, lower power use, lower price, smaller PCB, +++, wow... the list is just going on and on.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
inferKNOX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:26 AM   #10
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by inferKNOX View Post
@ 1Kurgan1
It seems to me like 5750 & 5770 are supposed to have power of the 4850 & 4870, but with the benefits of Eyefinity, DX11, lower power use, lower price, smaller PCB, +++, wow... the list is just going on and on.
they do seem like an actual succesor/replacement this generation.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:42 AM   #11
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

Well the 5770 will have less bandwith than the 4870, that could pose a problem and this would also open quite the gap between it and the 5850. 5 days untill we find out i guess
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:45 AM   #12
inferKNOX
500 Posts
 
inferKNOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SouthERN Africa
Posts: 880 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 77
Thanked 118 Times in 93 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to inferKNOX

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by REVHEAD View Post
I have 2 4870s at the moment, and holding out to see what the X2 5870s perform like, I have a 30 inch dell and thinking a bit about maybe saving some coin for another 30 inch dell, and running two for gaming. Do you guys think running 32 30 inch screens for gaming would be better than one, and nearly as good as running say 3 x 24 inch monitors?

I can't afford 3 30 inch monitors, and I like the one I have now, but the option of running 2 sounds awsome, can you guys let me kno0w if this is a stupid idea.
2x5870 review: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...870_CrossFire/
I'd hate having the devide in the middle and would prefer a single or triple set-up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
they do seem like an actual succesor/replacement this generation.
It would make sense for them to make the previous generation power(-level) cards now be the number 2's in their line-up, with all the new features to make them preferable over the previous gen, so yeah, I'm thinking these are the HD4800s replacements. And pretty excellent ones at that.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
inferKNOX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 09:56 AM   #13
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

Yep, well the transistor count will probably be in the same ballpart of <1bil and when you consider that 55nm>40nm is a ~89% reduction in size, then the die area will be around 135-50mm^2 . That's gonna be one cool core
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 10:30 AM   #14
Ghiltanas
25 Posts
 
Ghiltanas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 51 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Ok, also in the middle and middle-low range ati will probably dominates. 108w of powerfull consumption for hd5770 is very good, and finally excellent also in idle 18w
Ghiltanas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 10:41 AM   #15
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghiltanas View Post
Ok, also in the middle and middle-low range ati will probably dominates. 108w of powerfull consumption for hd5770 is very good, and finally excellent also in idle 18w
oh god yeah, i was sold to upgrade to these the second i saw the power consumption.

the laptop versions should be incredible too.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 10:54 AM   #16
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Theese are slightly faster than 4890 in shader power.

The specs are in numbers a 4890 on 40 NM with DX11 and 128Bit GDDR5 bus.
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:04 AM   #17
NeSeNVi
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 92 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

HD 5750 - this is exactly what I was looking forward.
NeSeNVi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:17 AM   #18
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.41/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

Wow, ATi's assault continues rapidly.
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:20 AM   #19
Ghiltanas
25 Posts
 
Ghiltanas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 51 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
oh god yeah, i was sold to upgrade to these the second i saw the power consumption.

the laptop versions should be incredible too.
it's very interesting also the audio hd in bistream over hdmi, with the 5000s series. They could be very indicated also in htpc system, linked to an avr
Ghiltanas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:24 AM   #20
Ghiltanas
25 Posts
 
Ghiltanas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 51 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
Theese are slightly faster than 4890 in shader power.

The specs are in numbers a 4890 on 40 NM with DX11 and 128Bit GDDR5 bus.
We need to see if 5770 could be bandwidth limited in certain situations
Ghiltanas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:26 AM   #21
adrianx
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bucharest ROMANIA
Posts: 321 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to adrianx

System Specs

soon will se the hd 5xxx mobile ...
adrianx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:27 AM   #22
Imsochobo
500 Posts
 
Imsochobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
Posts: 514 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Imsochobo

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghiltanas View Post
We need to see if 5770 could be bandwidth limited in certain situations
it certanly wont do the performance of a 4890, but they outperform a 4850 by far !

And the price seems fair too
Imsochobo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:40 AM   #23
DaC
500 Posts
 
DaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DaC Send a message via MSN to DaC Send a message via Yahoo to DaC Send a message via Skype™ to DaC

System Specs

Hunh.......
Seems like HD 5670 Will be:
- 400 SP
- 512 / 128 bit / GGDR3 or 64 bit (GDDR 5 ?)
- Very low power (less than 50w full / 9w idle ?)
- Low profile format ?
- Under $70.00

Well at least this is what I hope it to be...
DaC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:42 AM   #24
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.41/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaC View Post
Hunh.......
Seems like HD 5670 Will be:
- 400 SP
- 512 / 128 bit / GGDR3 or 64 bit (GDDR 5 ?)
- Very low power (less than 50w full / 9w idle ?)
- Low profile format ?
- Under $70.00

Well at least this is what I hope it to be...
I was thinking Very similarly.

400 sp for sure
very low power.
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 AM   #25
DaC
500 Posts
 
DaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DaC Send a message via MSN to DaC Send a message via Yahoo to DaC Send a message via Skype™ to DaC

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf View Post
I was thinking Very similarly.

400 sp for sure
very low power.
Yeah.... well... actually if the pull something like HD 4550 power consumption... wow... it will be nasty!
Which is 6W idle and 19w max.
DaC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PowerColor Radeon HD 5700 Series Graphics Cards Listed btarunr News 25 Oct 9, 2009 02:49 PM
AMD Juniper Early Specs Surface btarunr News 28 Sep 29, 2009 01:16 AM
ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series Video Cards Specs Leaked malware News 278 May 18, 2008 05:27 PM
ATI HD4000 specs surface xmountainxlionx AMD / ATI 13 Feb 17, 2008 05:22 AM
ATI Radeon HD 3800 Series Specs, Photos and Logos malware News 80 Nov 2, 2007 08:22 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts