techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:55 PM   #1
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

"Athlon X2 5000" Anyone seen this Proc before?

Looks to be some kind of K10. The guy said he got it for around $400 HK thats $50 US.
Its 45nm I guess is some revision of the Denub


http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/c.../SNC12124A.jpg

Unlocked to 4 cores.


Its from a local fourm:
http://computer.discuss.com.hk/viewt...extra=page%3D1
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard

Last edited by Zubasa; Oct 9, 2009 at 12:17 AM.
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zubasa For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 8, 2009, 11:58 PM   #2
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts

System Specs

No! 1.080v with four cores at just over 2.8ghz is amazing!
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:01 AM   #3
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
No! 1.080v with four cores at just over 2.8ghz is amazing!
What can this be? Some new K10?
Or some kind of revision.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:02 AM   #4
angelkiller
1000 Posts
 
angelkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,228 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 446
Thanked 225 Times in 201 Posts

Kuma/Agena are 65nm Phenom I based. I doubt AMD is using those cores anymore.

I think it's more likely these are cut back Phenom II parts until AMD transitions to their monolitic dualies. (ie get rid of failed Phenom II parts then introduce a new core)
angelkiller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:06 AM   #5
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Well, I guess I might rush out to buy th first batch that unlocks.
$50 Quad will make me crap my pants
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:08 AM   #6
Polarman
1000 Posts
 
Polarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Posts: 1,575 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 300 Times in 199 Posts

System Specs

I say Photoshoped trickery.
__________________
http://forums.techpowerup.com/image.php?u=55205&type=sigpic&dateline=1220312009
Polarman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:09 AM   #7
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarman View Post
I say Photoshoped trickery.
Not exactly sure about this.
At lease the package is real, a local store actually is selling these chips, and they are rated as low TDP parts.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:14 AM   #8
Reefer86
1000 Posts
 
Reefer86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,381 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 191 Times in 160 Posts

System Specs

why do you keep editing pics to hide the........... gfx card i guess?
__________________


Reefer86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:16 AM   #9
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefer86 View Post
why do you keep editing pics to hide the........... gfx card i guess?
These pics are not mine, so I don't know.
The card seems to be a HD 5770 or something.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:44 AM   #10
MohawkAngel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,814 (1.15/day)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 128 Times in 116 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MohawkAngel

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
These pics are not mine, so I don't know.
The card seems to be a HD 5770 or something.


You know you pass way too much time jerking off on computer websites when you can recognize a video card by a small part of a rainbow in the corner of the box !!
MohawkAngel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:57 AM   #11
enaher
200 Posts
 
enaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 380 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 85 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

I actually noticed that 5000+ as a 45nm Dual Core, seemed like a typo at the time really interesting, why would they use the 5000+ again on a new core
enaher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 12:59 AM   #12
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Only that it is not a 5000+ its a X2 5000.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 01:03 AM   #13
MohawkAngel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,814 (1.15/day)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 128 Times in 116 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MohawkAngel

System Specs

Its a 939 socket its ans old model of athlon x2 if we base on that but on the box its different...strange
MohawkAngel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 01:37 AM   #14
unibrow1990
75 Posts
 
unibrow1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 193 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 31 Times in 31 Posts
Send a message via AIM to unibrow1990

System Specs

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...=athlon%205000


It's a 5000+ with some photoshopped screenshots making it look like something new.

EDIT: The box in the picture even shows "1 MB total cache" while the screenshots show 6 MB like a deneb.
__________________
Backup Rig: Compaq prebuilt with AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Single Core and NVIDIA Geforce 7300GT 256MB
Laptop: HP DV2845SE

Last edited by unibrow1990; Oct 9, 2009 at 01:51 AM.
unibrow1990 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 01:46 AM   #15
A Cheese Danish
1000 Posts
 
A Cheese Danish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: At your local vending machine
Posts: 1,914 (0.81/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 419 Times in 368 Posts
Send a message via AIM to A Cheese Danish

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
These pics are not mine, so I don't know.
The card seems to be a HD 5770 or something.
The graphics is an HD5870. It is sitting at idle, which makes the clocks rather low.
But 2.8GHz at 1.08V is pretty nice for a "quad"
__________________
My FS/FT Thread
HEATWARE Xfire Steam ID
Certs: MCTS, MCITP, HP APS
Server: AMD Opteron 170 @2.95GHz | 4GB DDR 3-3-2-7 | 1x Samsung SPT 500GB, 2x WD Black 2TB, 2x 1.5TB Western Digital MyBook
A Cheese Danish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:02 AM   #16
enaher
200 Posts
 
enaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 380 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 85 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by MohawkAngel View Post
Its a 939 socket its ans old model of athlon x2 if we base on that but on the box its different...strange
It's not the old 939, if I recall correctly modern am3 has also 939 pins, Newegg list this proc as Athlon x2 5000+ 2.2Ghz 1mb cache 45nm Dual Core, as I said before though it was nothing more than a typo but the OP has shown images of it Unlocked to a Quad with 6mb L3 cache so it might be a Deneb core, still rather curious the purpose of the naming and if the core derives from deneb.
enaher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:10 AM   #17
KieranD
Eligible for custom title
 
KieranD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,460 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 1,640
Thanked 821 Times in 712 Posts
Send a message via MSN to KieranD

System Specs

yeah well it looks like a nice voltage but the lack of cache kinda ruines it, depends on what your using it for

i thought at first it was one of those X2 5000+ i used to have that were popular back for AM2

how can a 1mb cache cpu unlock to 6mb?
KieranD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:14 AM   #18
enaher
200 Posts
 
enaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 380 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 85 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KieranD View Post
yeah well it looks like a nice voltage but the lack of cache kinda ruines it, depends on what your using it for

i thought at first it was one of those X2 5000+ i used to have that were popular back for AM2

how can a 1mb cache cpu unlock to 6mb?
It's 512 kb per core and 6 of L3 cache as off lately not strange in amd land Athlon II X4 has 512 per core and some can unlock to a full deneb with 6mb of L3
enaher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:16 AM   #19
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,744 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts

System Specs

It is a new processor for sure, based of Deneb.

I believe they went with Athlon X2 5000 name because this is an AM2+ processor, meaning the DDR3 memory controller has been disabled. The Athlon II processors are AM3 with the DDR3 memory controller enabled.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:16 AM   #20
unibrow1990
75 Posts
 
unibrow1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 193 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 31 Times in 31 Posts
Send a message via AIM to unibrow1990

System Specs

Why would they make it am2+ when am3 is backward compatible, it would make no sense.
__________________
Backup Rig: Compaq prebuilt with AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Single Core and NVIDIA Geforce 7300GT 256MB
Laptop: HP DV2845SE
unibrow1990 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:18 AM   #21
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,744 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by unibrow1990 View Post
Why would they make it am2+ when am3 is backward compatible, it would make no sense.
Same reason they did it with the Phenom II x4 940, because the DDR3 memory controller is defective. So they disable it, and call it an AM2+ processor, since the only reason for AM3 is DDR3. No DDR3 memory controller means, no AM3 support, so it would have to be an AM2+ processor.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:18 AM   #22
KieranD
Eligible for custom title
 
KieranD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,460 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 1,640
Thanked 821 Times in 712 Posts
Send a message via MSN to KieranD

System Specs

im looking at the box and it says 1.0mb total cache so wtf is going on
KieranD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:18 AM   #23
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by unibrow1990 View Post
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...=athlon%205000


It's a 5000+ with some photoshopped screenshots making it look like something new.

EDIT: The box in the picture even shows "1 MB total cache" while the screenshots show 6 MB like a deneb.
Funny enough, that newegg page you posted kind of proves that his chip exists.
It even says "Manufacturing Tech 45nm", find me a 45nm K8 then we are talking.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:20 AM   #24
KieranD
Eligible for custom title
 
KieranD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,460 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 1,640
Thanked 821 Times in 712 Posts
Send a message via MSN to KieranD

System Specs

wait would 1mb cache be 512bm each for the cores, 2 cores means 1mb

but what about the 6mb L3 where did that come from?
KieranD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2009, 02:20 AM   #25
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts

System Specs

Low TDP chips are supposed to be here right about at this time, so yes. I mean YES! If I can get a 1.1v PII 955, I will get one.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone got this yet or seen benchmarks on this motherboard? WarEagleAU Motherboards & Memory 3 Aug 18, 2008 11:06 PM
I have never seen this chip before trt740 General Hardware 11 Apr 2, 2008 12:54 AM
anyone seen this before,is interesting? tigger General Hardware 3 Dec 7, 2007 04:47 PM
Cat driver install error.. anyone ever seen it before.. trog100 Graphics Cards 16 Nov 23, 2007 12:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts