techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 10, 2009, 11:34 AM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Zotac GeForce GT 220 1 GB

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z...eForce_GT_220/

Last edited by W1zzard; Oct 12, 2009 at 03:18 PM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 03:49 PM   #2
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,116 (2.29/day)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 1,177 Times in 799 Posts

System Specs

I wonder why the GT220 with 48sp/8 ROPS/GDDR3 is only as fast, and sometimes slower than the 9500 GT (32sp/8 ROPs/DDR2). Are the current drivers really that horrendous?
__________________
Intel Crunchers (30 threads): 2x 3770K 4.3G (12t), 2600K 4G (6t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (13 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X3 8550 2.5G, X2 4400+ & 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:09 PM   #3
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 181
Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

the 9500GT has GDDR3 by default, sometimes DDR2 is used in its place but in this review the 9500GT has DDR2, the results are what I expected from this card though

its more of a card for a HTPC

The 9600GT had some feature that affected performance by means of the PCI-E bus speed, does anyoneknow if this card has it, that would be nice.
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:12 PM   #4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,742 (6.49/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,114 Times in 3,705 Posts

System Specs

Interesting, GPU-Z reads it as DDR2, I'm sure it is just a bug, just wanted to point that out.

@Jstn7477: The 9500GT uses GDDR3 with a default clock of 900MHz, which this card couldn't even overclock to. The memory bandwidth is likely why this card is so close in performance. More Shaders, with less memory bandwidth yeilds similar performance.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:32 PM   #5
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,116 (2.29/day)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 1,177 Times in 799 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Interesting, GPU-Z reads it as DDR2, I'm sure it is just a bug, just wanted to point that out.

@Jstn7477: The 9500GT uses GDDR3 with a default clock of 900MHz, which this card couldn't even overclock to. The memory bandwidth is likely why this card is so close in performance. More Shaders, with less memory bandwidth yeilds similar performance.
I was also thinking of a memory bandwidth issue. My GeForce 210 is starved for bandwidth by 64bit DDR2, while the 9400 GT has a nice, wide 128bit DDR2 bus for the same amount of shaders (16) and ROPs (4). NV probably just intended these for OEM usage, and hacked down the memory performance to drive down costs and because OEM PC users probably don't look at benchies.
__________________
Intel Crunchers (30 threads): 2x 3770K 4.3G (12t), 2600K 4G (6t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (13 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X3 8550 2.5G, X2 4400+ & 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:37 PM   #6
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

yes gpuz memory detection on these boards is bugged
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:54 PM   #7
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,678 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 181
Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

These cards are not OEM only anymore, Nvidia pushed them to retail production

http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_family.html
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 04:55 PM   #8
tonyd223
200 Posts
 
tonyd223's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 202 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

as I'm thinking HTPC perhaps bench running Blu-ray movie at 1080p? also the sound capability via HDMI - any loss from sound device please?
__________________
"thinking about a Cooler Master Elite 360..."
tonyd223 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 05:25 PM   #9
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,208 Times in 3,157 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyd223 View Post
as I'm thinking HTPC perhaps bench running Blu-ray movie at 1080p? also the sound capability via HDMI - any loss from sound device please?
bd decode sits comfortably below 50% with any movie on any gpu on any recent processor

the transfer over the pcie bus and over hdmi is uncompressed digital - no quality loss
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 12, 2009, 06:19 PM   #10
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

performance per dollar the red team kills this card at $79, mebey at $59 or so.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 07:57 PM   #11
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Performance per watt is excellent. This card has a winning chance as a desktop/workstation winner, so long as price comes down a bit. Great upgrade for an Atom based system.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 11:12 PM   #12
captainskyhawk
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 54 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
Performance per watt is excellent. This card has a winning chance as a desktop/workstation winner, so long as price comes down a bit. Great upgrade for an Atom based system.
Holy crap you can put these in a netbook
__________________
My blood runs red and green.
captainskyhawk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 12, 2009, 11:53 PM   #13
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

kind of funny that these Cards support DX10.1 when NV stated that they would not support it, guess AMD forced their hand on that one.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 14, 2009, 04:09 PM   #14
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,286 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 557
Thanked 597 Times in 437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

wow thats insane for the watts that is so low! but if watts dont matter for you i would think the 4670 would be a better buy just becasue its cheaper and out performs on most things but for a HTPC this would rock! i mean surrisly it didnt go over like 30watts!? thats crazy
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MSI GeForce GT 220 1 GB OC Pictured btarunr News 12 Oct 8, 2009 01:43 PM
NVIDIA GeForce G210 and GeForce GT 220 Now Official malware News 17 Jul 10, 2009 02:14 PM
GeForce G 210 and GT 220 Surface btarunr News 9 Jun 30, 2009 09:27 PM
Zotac Prepares New GeForce 9600 GT Green and GeForce GTX 285 With Water Cooling malware News 3 Mar 1, 2009 05:17 AM
ZOTAC Launches GeForce 9600GT and GeForce 9800GT Synergy Edition malware News 1 Sep 18, 2008 05:43 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts