![]() |
|
|
#51 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,497 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 46 Times in 29 Posts
|
Fixed... W1zzard put it in order off lowest to highest performance, it can't be perfect.
-Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i'd preffer them sorted by number. ibelieve that this kind of sorting is non subjective and more logical when u search for a gpu. though, the idea of having them sorted by performance is not bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
|
95np has indeed 256bit ndand 95pro has 128bit .. that information is correct
we are working on a cpu database like the gpudb right now .. should be up in the near future |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i momentarily own a rdeon 9500non pro made by gigabyte and it has 128bit wide memory bus. it's the version with 8pixel pipelines but with only 4 active. don't know about the r9500 pro. keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 789 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 72 Times in 49 Posts
|
Yeah, a CPU database would be cool W1zz! What are you going to add? Default and stable voltages? Part numbers and steppings?
__________________
![]() Intel Extreme DX58SO | i7 920 @ 4.0GHz | 16GB Corsair DDR3-1333 8-8-8-19 | HD4870 @ 780/1000 | 8600GT 256MB | GeForce 210 lol
Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD | 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x22" Samsung 2253GW's LCD + 1x19" B91D LCD | CoolerMaster CM690 | Corsair TX750 PSU | Logitech Z-5500 Join The Core i7 Overclockers Club [Core i7 Overclocking Basics] [Logitech Z-5500 Digital Soundroom] [Katy Towells' Childrin R Skary] |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,497 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 46 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 789 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 72 Times in 49 Posts
|
lol, it's been a while since I've been on the main site instead of the forums...
Thanks.
__________________
![]() Intel Extreme DX58SO | i7 920 @ 4.0GHz | 16GB Corsair DDR3-1333 8-8-8-19 | HD4870 @ 780/1000 | 8600GT 256MB | GeForce 210 lol
Intel 520 240GB + Intel X25-M 80GB + 4TB Seagate/WD | 24" Samsung SA350 + 24" BenQ G2410HD + 2x22" Samsung 2253GW's LCD + 1x19" B91D LCD | CoolerMaster CM690 | Corsair TX750 PSU | Logitech Z-5500 Join The Core i7 Overclockers Club [Core i7 Overclocking Basics] [Logitech Z-5500 Digital Soundroom] [Katy Towells' Childrin R Skary] |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Gigabyte card missing
I could not find Gigabyte X800 Agp card in your database. Here is information fetched by Ati tray tools:
General Display adapter Radeon X800 (554F) Core Name R430 SubVendor GigaByte (1458) SubDevice 2124 BUS 1 Device 0 Function 0 Base Address 0 E0000008 Base Address 1 00009001 Base Address 2 F9000000 Base Address 3 00000000 Catalyst Registry Path System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{CADABCD9-5A2A-4096-B03B-87A8B75AFCDB}\0000 ______________________________ Clock Information BIOS VPU 390.00 Current VPU 391.50 BIOS MEM 450.00 Current MEM 452.25 ______________________________ This value is def, not overclocked gpu neither memory. Is possible to mod my card, and unlocked +4pipelines? My card has a silent pipe, but at the upper side I mounted P2 cooler. Now Gpu"s temperature is: in idle 37C, after F.E.A.R game max gpu temp was 68C. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 184 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Why G70 models have Pixel-fillrate calculated by [GPU clock] * [number of pixel shaders]? Even though there are 20/24 PS units, the G70 has still only 16 ROPs. So, the correct formula would be [GPU clock] * [number of ROPs]. And this applies to any other GPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK,Surrey,Guildford
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The GPU database is an excellent source of information ,as is most of the site
Btw 2 missing cards X800 GT AGP,128MB version & the AGP,128MB version of the X800GTO Why do they have to cripple AGP versions???
__________________
Team Anandtech - S@H2,DPAD,Dimes & F@H |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 184 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
to sell the so called magnificent pci express cards so one could believe that agp is worthless. they do this kind of crap all the time. one example was with the fx5700 card from leadtek. when the 6000 family appeared they lowerd on purpose the clocks on 5700 version with 50hz or something like that. giving the 6000 family a false higher performance rating.
it's like the transition from the agp4x to agp8x only now the new standard is not compatible with the old one. maybe some of u remember when the agp4x went to agp8x. the was almost no difference between the agp4x card and the 8x. maybe 1 or 2% because the bandwidth wasn't used then. same is now. pci express is 4 times faster than agp8x. in practice it's only 2 times faster because there are diffrent channel for transmitin g and reciving and only the channel reciving data are important. the agp8x has a badwidth of 2gb/s, pci express has 8gb/s but significant are only 4gb/s beacause the are 4gb/s for reciving and 4gb/s for transmiting and only the reciving channels are mostly used, the transmiting ones are almost not signifiant in traffic. the doubled bandwidth doesn't means too much (almost nothing) above agp8x because the heavy traffic is done internally, between the gpu and video ram. conclusion? pci express is in theory and in practice better than agp but at the moment it brings nothing to performance. agp8x bandwidth is sufficient at the moment and maybe not entirely used. viva la marketing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 184 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
If you'are comparing AGP4x vs. AGP8x and PCIe vs. AGP8x, the situation if pretty different. There were never different AGP4x and AGP8x versions, but PCIe and AGP8x yes. But I still don't understand HOW are the AGP versions of current GPU's crippled in someway. What is crippled or worse in AGP versions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK,Surrey,Guildford
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yea my bad, you are right about the 800's ,I should of said 'why do they cripple the 128MB versions?' ,but some other cards are crippled for AGP
__________________
Team Anandtech - S@H2,DPAD,Dimes & F@H |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
a video card is not crippled for the moment just because it uses the agp interface. the agp is (for the moment as far as i can see) more than enough for any video card. the crippling is done otherways. they disable perfectly good pixel pipelines, use slow memory chips, drivers etc.
i believe that the x800gto is not crippled in any way. in the contrary it is made to do it's best because now it has serious opponents and the people who made the chip are trying to keep it competitive and for the time being they are succeding making a decent video card for a good price. it has 16pixel pipes, pretty fast memory for it's category, pretty fast core clock (slighly lower than xt) but it has good overclockin potential. it is a recent article in THG that tests x800gto vs xfx 6600 with 256mb ddr2 memory. they also compare it to very high end video card and it seems both cards deserve the money. http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/01/...wer_end_cards/ who wants to read?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK,Surrey,Guildford
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
a video card is not crippled for the moment just because it uses the agp interface. the agp is (for the moment as far as i can see) more than enough for any video card. the crippling is done otherways. they disable perfectly good pixel pipelines, use slow memory chips, drivers etc.
I know that ,that is what I meant Btw GTOs were all 12 pipes ,many still are ,but some are now 16 pipes
__________________
Team Anandtech - S@H2,DPAD,Dimes & F@H |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hello!
Those GPUs/IGPs are missing: Code:
S3 Graphics: ChromeS27 ChromeS2X PCIe 128/256 MB GDDR3/GDDR2 700 700 128 Bits 2 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 ChromeS27 ChromeS2X PCIe 64/128/256 MB GDDR2/DDR 600 450 64/128 Bits 2 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 GammaChrome S18 Ultra Metropolis PCIe 128/256 MB DDR 500 450 128 Bits 1 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 GammaChrome S18 Nitro Metropolis PCIe 128/256 MB DDR 450 400 128 Bits 1 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 GammaChrome S18 Pro Metropolis PCIe 128/256 MB DDR 400 400 128 Bits 1 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 DeltaChrome S4 Nitro Columbia AGP 128/256 MB DDR 325 325 128 Bits 1 / 4x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 DeltaChrome S8 Nitro Columbia AGP 128/256 MB DDR 325 325 128 Bits 2 / 8x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 DeltaChrome S8 Columbia AGP 128/256 MB DDR 300 300 128 Bits 2 / 8x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 DeltaChrome S8 CE Columbia AGP 128/256 MB DDR 250 250 64/128 Bits 2 / 8x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 VIA Technologies: K8M890 DeltaChrome IGP AGO 128 MB UMA ? 200 128 Bits 1 / 2x1 DX9.0, PS2.0, VS2.0 Last edited by stickexy; Jan 21, 2006 at 10:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 179 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
|
Sapphire x800gto 256mb AGP 400/490, r430 core. 12pipes 1.6ns memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK,Surrey,Guildford
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
256MB AGP version? cool!
,where did you get that from?
__________________
Team Anandtech - S@H2,DPAD,Dimes & F@H |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 179 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK,Surrey,Guildford
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks
,wrong country
__________________
Team Anandtech - S@H2,DPAD,Dimes & F@H |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have an ATI All-In-Wonder X800XL.
According to ATITool, it uses an R420, is AGP, has 256MB of DDR3 memory, has a 256-bit memory bus width, has 16 active pipelines, has a GPU clock of 400mhz and a memory clock of 490mhz. I also have a few ancient video cards that I can dig up, if you want to add them as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
![]() |
Great work!. May be a "power requirements" or a TPD, as in the CPU database, at full 3D load could be fine. Anyway is a very usefull database!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
|
i doubt you can find tdp or power requirements info online
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 184 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Own pages for each graphic card would be nice, just like in CPU Db... I know they've mouseovers, but they don't work with Firefox. Works with Opera and IE (which I don't have), but I'm too lazy to start Opera just to look mouseovers..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Temperature: GPU: 1.$°C GPU environment: 1.$°C | bazzar | ATITool | 21 | Dec 4, 2007 10:04 PM |
| Crashing in game | binladenpl | Graphics Cards | 47 | Nov 28, 2007 09:27 PM |
| Tell me whats the problem | binladenpl | Graphics Cards | 5 | Nov 28, 2007 01:04 AM |
| 0.27 Beta 1 | W1zzard | ATITool Beta Area | 269 | Nov 2, 2007 04:31 PM |
| .26 with BFG 7800GTX OC | Mordekainen | ATITool Bug Reports | 0 | Aug 23, 2007 06:12 AM |