![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
|
ATI Radeon HD 5670 Pictured, Detailed, and Tested
AMD's lower-mainstream DirectX 11 compliant graphics card slated for Q1-2010, the ATI Radeon HD 5670 has been pictured and detailed, sourced from a [H]ardOCP HardForum community member. The HD 5600 series is based on a 40 nm GPU codenamed "Redwood". From the specifications the GPU-Z screenshot shows, it has a 50% downscaled SIMD engine, with 400 stream processors, while it retains the 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, with 16 ROPs. Assuming the clock speeds shown in the screenshot to be the reference speeds, they are 775 MHz for the core, and 1000 MHz for the 1 GB of memory (resulting in 64 GB/s of memory bandwidth).
An engineering-sample of the card has also been pictured, revealing a red-colored PCB breaking away from the black PCB scheme of the rest of the HD 5000 series. The card draws all its power from the PCI-Express slot. The GPU cooler consists of a simple heatsink with radially-projecting metal fins, in which is nested a fan. Output connectivity includes DVI, HDMI, and D-Sub, though the leads behind the D-Sub connector shows that offering a DisplayPort in its place might be possible. ![]() The user also put the card through two tests, in a performance comparison with the Radeon HD 4670 512 MB, the card this one replaces. The test-bed comprised of a Intel Core i5 750 @ 2.66 GHz, Gigabyte P55M-UD2, and 4 GB of OCZ DDR3-1333 memory. The first test was Street Fighter 4 1600 x 1200, no AA, 16x AF. The HD 5670 scored 10,473 points, with average frame-rate of 95.35 fps. The HD 4670 on the other hand, scored 8,559 points with average frame-rate of 65.35 fps. Next was Unigine Heaven Demo v1.0 DirectX 10 (SM 4.0) 1024 x 768, windowed. With the CPU running at 2.53 GHz (according to the screenshot), the HD 5670 scored 859 points with 34.1 fps frame-rate, while the HD 4670 with the CPU running at 2.66 GHz scored 699 points with 27.8 fps. ![]() Source: HardForum |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,415 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 2,482
Thanked 740 Times in 527 Posts
|
Awesomeness, looks like ATI are leading the DX11 market, keep it up ATI
![]() Its like having a better version of the HD3870
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,585 (1.48/day)
Thanks: 4,300
Thanked 1,091 Times in 622 Posts
|
Methinks this will go in the G/F comp when it comes out.
__________________
Crunching Badges ![]() Crunching Hardware CPU: i5 3570K and i5 2400 = 8 cores GPU: 7870 (8 wu's) and 7770 (4 wu's) = 1920 GCN cores (no GPU wu's atm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DrPepper For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dawn
Posts: 859 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 118
Thanked 102 Times in 79 Posts
|
This looks like it will be my recommendation to people for a video card, when they want to add one to a bland OEM computer to help them play games on it now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
can't wait til wiz gets his hands on it and test it on games i play, that and see what kind of headroom it has.
any idea on price? ~$100 hopefully shy of the 3 digit mark... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() This will finally destroy the 9600GT and should take on the 9800GT. This little sucker has 16 ROPs and 128-bit GDDR5 dude. ![]() I always wonder what happen if the HD4670 has more, now we get it.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indonesia ku tercinta
Posts: 1,465 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 231
Thanked 116 Times in 94 Posts
|
so this meant it will regain the fastest-non-pcie-power-card crown from GT 240
__________________
visit indonesia 2010 , dangerously beautiful btw if you really like a very cool music then please go to this site :dangdut "i love opencl and would love to see applications for it. i love porn too, but didnt install it and didnt benchmark it. stop complaining and suggest opencl applications to use" ~W1zzard~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Just that it looks kinda odd with only 400SP but 16ROPs, it is just out of sync from the rest of the cards. I guess the ATi engineers know what they are doing, since the 4770 did so well even against the 4850. ![]() I guess this should stop the 5670 from spanking the 5750 in the ass.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
I would appreciate a single-slot cooler on this one if possible. It seems like the TDP ought to be low enough... Gotta start saving space in my SFF -.-'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts
|
Quote:
Seriously? ![]() God damn I need some current cards.
__________________
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=68840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
I might be using the same cooler as the reference 4670. This means no Baby Batmobile
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
Eh, only 80 Shaders up from the 4670's 320. I was expecting 500 or 600.
I was planning to get ATI's next non PCI-E reliant card, but this doesn't seem like a big enough boost from my 4670. I guess I'll step up to the 57xx series. [edit] Wikipedia's Evergeen article is stating 560 SPs for the 5600 series. I can't find any other source though, and none is cited in the article. If this 5670 is 400, maybe there'll be a 5690?
__________________
Last edited by Roph; Dec 2, 2009 at 09:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Performance Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.41/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts
|
Nice to see, they are filling up the market nicely with their cards, should whip a 3870 tho.
get them in fast ATI! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,125 (2.30/day)
Thanks: 386
Thanked 1,185 Times in 801 Posts
|
Now all we need is an AGP version and you'd have an HD3850 killer.
__________________
Intel Crunchers (30 threads): 2x 3770K 4.3G (12t), 2600K 4G (6t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G AMD Crunchers (13 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X3 8550 2.5G, X2 4400+ & 4200+, T64 ML-37 AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000 HEATWARE |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Zubasa For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: indonesia ku tercinta
Posts: 1,465 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 231
Thanked 116 Times in 94 Posts
|
Quote:
i can't wait to see the review from wizzz WTH nvdia doing right now, it's start to get boring, we want some nice competition
__________________
visit indonesia 2010 , dangerously beautiful btw if you really like a very cool music then please go to this site :dangdut "i love opencl and would love to see applications for it. i love porn too, but didnt install it and didnt benchmark it. stop complaining and suggest opencl applications to use" ~W1zzard~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think that Radeon HD 5670 will perform between 9600gt and 9800gt but closer to the second one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
ATi need to defeat it to ensure that the 5670 do well. In this performance grade, DX11 doesn't really matters anymore, because by the time DX11 is the norm, lower end cards like these will be on their knees. Customers that buy cards in this market segment usually looks for a card that can play their current games.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 3,572 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 511
Thanked 570 Times in 527 Posts
|
Nice, hopefully this will come in a low profile variant. My low-profile 4650 just cant cut it in newer games if i turn the resolution up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maryland, Dundalk
Posts: 1,792 (1.00/day)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 97 Times in 80 Posts
|
* buying it the first day its release *
ThankS OP
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
i too amn hoping for a low profile version, that would be great as it doesn't use much power and has gddr5 on it, be worlds better than the 4650
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
|
80 more stream processors, and double the memory bandwidth, double the ROP count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts
|
If these are as good as 3870 as people are saying then one of these cards can play most games at pretty decent fps.
Two of them and you could play most games with decent fps on a high res monitor. damn
__________________
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=68840 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
|
Come on Nvidia, we are waiting on your stuff....
Come with SOMETHING worth a nickel please?
__________________
This electronic post is encrypted in the 'English language method', any attempt to decipher meaning from these symbols is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. This includes, but is not limited to: interpreting the symbols through use of biological, visual decryption devices, translating the symbols into another language encryption scheme, and digital processing the symbols into a form conducive to oral interpretation. HWBOT HEATWARE |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Radeon HD 5750 Pictured, Tested | btarunr | News | 35 | Oct 3, 2009 06:49 AM |
| Clarkdale IGP Detailed, Tested | btarunr | News | 28 | Aug 20, 2009 05:20 PM |
| Another Radeon HD 4770 Pictured, Tested | btarunr | News | 54 | Apr 26, 2009 08:52 AM |
| ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 CrossFireX Tested | Jimmy 2004 | News | 24 | Feb 6, 2008 01:48 PM |
| ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 CrossFire Tested | malware | News | 40 | Feb 4, 2008 07:59 AM |