techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 23, 2010, 12:42 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

ITC Administrative Law Judge Rules in Favor of Rambus in Matter Reg: NVIDIA Products

Rambus Inc., one of the world’s premier technology licensing companies, today announced that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for its U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) action against NVIDIA Corp. and other respondents issued an Initial Determination finding them in violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The ALJ determined that three of Rambus’ five asserted patents are valid, enforceable, and infringed by the respondents. The ALJ also determined that there was no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for the remaining two asserted patents. The action is Investigation Number 337-TA-661.

Any of the parties may request the ITC’s full Commission to review the ALJ’s Initial Determination. If the Commission grants a petition for review, it may affirm, modify, reverse, set aside, or remand all or part of the ALJ’s decision in developing the ITC’s final determination.

“Following an extensive hearing process, we are pleased with the ALJ’s determination that three of our patents are valid and infringed,” said Tom Lavelle, senior vice president and general counsel at Rambus. “We are obviously disappointed with the result for the other asserted patents and intend to request the Commission’s review of the corresponding portions of the Initial Determination. We will continue to vigorously protect our patented inventions for the benefit of our shareholders and in fairness to our paying licensees.”

History of the case: On November 6, 2008, Rambus filed a complaint with the ITC requesting an investigation pertaining to NVIDIA products. The complaint sought an exclusion order barring the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of products that infringe nine of Rambus’ patents. The accused products are products that incorporate certain NVIDIA memory controllers, including graphics processors and media and communications processors. The complaint named NVIDIA as a proposed Respondent, as well as companies whose products incorporate the accused NVIDIA products and are imported into the United States. These respondents include: Asustek Computer Inc. and Asus Computer International, BFG Technologies, Biostar Microtech and Biostar Microtech International Corp., Diablotek Inc., EVGA Corp., G.B.T. Inc. and Giga-Byte Technology Co., Hewlett-Packard, MSI Computer Corp. and Micro-Star International Co., Palit Multimedia Inc. and Palit Microsystems Ltd., Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., and Sparkle Computer Co. Four of the asserted patents were withdrawn from the investigation. An evidentiary hearing on the remaining asserted patents was held before the ALJ on October 13-20, 2009.
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 12:45 PM   #2
Vagike
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 76 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts

System Specs

oooo burn!!!
Vagike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 01:05 PM   #3
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 6,131 (4.73/day)
Thanks: 267
Thanked 1,492 Times in 1,231 Posts

System Specs

GT300 is going to cost a bit more than expected,
Fourstaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 01:47 PM   #4
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
We will continue to vigorously protect our patented inventions for the benefit of getting the most money we dont deserve because were greedy bastards.”
Fixed
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 01:56 PM   #5
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.77/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

bere losings nvidia deh pon of late, i'm almost sorry for them.
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 02:17 PM   #6
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
Fixed
Unfix it. You'll know when someone stole your patented cookie recipe and made 10x your earnings.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 02:22 PM   #7
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

They are just whining cause Nvidia and friends (see what i did there ) are taking what they supposedly did and made it 5x better raking in the cash. Its the typical jealous company thing to do. Sorta like AMD and Intel and the anti-trust BS. Im all for AMD but geez its gettin old with the were gonna sue you cause you do things better than us attitude.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PP Mguire For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 02:56 PM   #8
dr emulator (madmax)
1000 Posts
 
dr emulator (madmax)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: the uk that's all you need to know ;)
Posts: 1,107 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 758
Thanked 181 Times in 169 Posts

System Specs

my thoughts
dr emulator (madmax) is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 03:28 PM   #9
jjFarking
200 Posts
 
jjFarking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 244 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 94 Times in 82 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
They are just whining cause Nvidia and friends (see what i did there ) are taking what they supposedly did and made it 5x better raking in the cash. Its the typical jealous company thing to do. Sorta like AMD and Intel and the anti-trust BS. Im all for AMD but geez its gettin old with the were gonna sue you cause you do things better than us attitude.
Whilst that's true, the point remains that something that nVidia & friends did not own made them mega $$$ and they 'forgot' to pay the actual inventor/owner the appropriate fee..
__________________
Earth.com Corrupted.
Reboot Universe (y/n)?
jjFarking is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 03:50 PM   #10
TheLostSwede
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little green island far far away
Posts: 847 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 153 Times in 114 Posts

System Specs

Except most of what Rambus owns patents of wasn't actually made by them, they just ponied up for a bunch of patents...
Rambus is more or less a patent troll...
TheLostSwede is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 04:02 PM   #11
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,650 (6.23/day)
Thanks: 1,786
Thanked 2,632 Times in 1,986 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
They are just whining cause Nvidia and friends (see what i did there ) are taking what they supposedly did and made it 5x better raking in the cash. Its the typical jealous company thing to do. Sorta like AMD and Intel and the anti-trust BS. Im all for AMD but geez its gettin old with the were gonna sue you cause you do things better than us attitude.
By law, you have to protect your patents or your patents fall to public domain. It is not necessarily an issue of jealously; it is a topic of necessity to keep your competitive edge.


The anti-trust lawsuit was mostly silly nonsense, I agree, but that involves trade practices, not patent infringement like this does.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 04:22 PM   #12
DaedalusHelios
3500 Posts
 
DaedalusHelios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,262 (2.19/day)
Thanks: 829
Thanked 817 Times in 699 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLostSwede View Post
Except most of what Rambus owns patents of wasn't actually made by them, they just ponied up for a bunch of patents...
Rambus is more or less a patent troll...
Yeah, companies in the USA are notorious for paying off patent officials to use the courts to do extortion. Patent law in the USA is extremely corrupt. Every lawyer I know that I have spoken with about it agrees including my uncle. Every country has its corruption, and some are a good portion more corrupt than others like: China and Russia.
DaedalusHelios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 04:27 PM   #13
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,719 (4.31/day)
Thanks: 4,216
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,970 Posts

System Specs

The patent troll wins again.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to qubit For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 04:32 PM   #14
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,813 (2.24/day)
Thanks: 532
Thanked 859 Times in 684 Posts

System Specs

They'll get over it, just don't expect the prices of any video card to come down for the next month or two.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 04:45 PM   #15
Duffman
500 Posts
 
Duffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mt. Pocono, PA
Posts: 812 (0.40/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Duffman Send a message via MSN to Duffman Send a message via Yahoo to Duffman

System Specs

yeah, Nvidia will buy their way out of it.

can we merge this thread with THIS one?
__________________

My Rig,Black Knight.
Buy My Silverstone TJ09
Duffman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 05:39 PM   #16
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,732 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 473 Times in 389 Posts

System Specs

its like painting a picture and someone stealing it and selling it for a 500 bucks when you were gonna sell it for 50.

they're just gonna pay out of it.

hopefully this dosen't lead to a delay for the GT300 series.
KainXS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 05:45 PM   #17
DaedalusHelios
3500 Posts
 
DaedalusHelios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,262 (2.19/day)
Thanks: 829
Thanked 817 Times in 699 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KainXS View Post
its like painting a picture and someone stealing it and selling it for a 500 bucks when you were gonna sell it for 50.

they're just gonna pay out of it.

hopefully this dosen't lead to a delay for the GT300 series.
They probably didn't even know it would be considered a violation. Companies get patents in as vague of a topic as possible, and then sue when anything falls under the topic generally. Its extortionate policies governed by corruption. It happens all the time.
DaedalusHelios is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 08:10 PM   #18
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,115 (7.28/day)
Thanks: 3,062
Thanked 5,500 Times in 3,959 Posts

System Specs

The way I heard this story was that a group of guys got together and developed a product with intentions on working together in the long term.

They started throwing sand in each others panties and eventually broke apart.

In this time the "group" developed patents and no one ever filed.

After Samsung broke away they continued on what was rightfully theirs, as they had a hand in developing.

Now the fat lazy guy who caught all the sand in his panties was obviously chaffing and decided to cure his issue by filing for a patent, he himself didnt rightfully own, thus curing his chaffing by rubbing almost a billion US dollars on it (samsungs 5 year settlement).

Obviously the money from samsung must not have cured his itch, and is now (being backed by a settlement in court) seeing of other dollar bills may sooth his scratches.
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sneekypeet For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 08:28 PM   #19
Bundy
1000 Posts
 
Bundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 1,070 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 189
Thanked 165 Times in 141 Posts

System Specs

I must admit that I'm having a bit of trouble comprhending the patent system and how it functions. e.g. I search for the term "heat pipe patent" and get 430,000 hits. There are patents on top of patents. "memory controller patent" provides 1,7M hits.

Virtually everything we are using has been patented to death and I'm sure that not all of these "inventors" are paid for their efforts. It seems to me that patent action is more likely to be taken by well financed patent holding companies than individual inventors.

I agree with them being labelled patent trolls - not much different to ambulance chasers (tort lawyers).
Bundy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 08:42 PM   #20
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
They are just whining cause Nvidia and friends (see what i did there ) are taking what they supposedly did and made it 5x better raking in the cash. Its the typical jealous company thing to do. Sorta like AMD and Intel and the anti-trust BS. Im all for AMD but geez its gettin old with the were gonna sue you cause you do things better than us attitude.
that case is done with, Intel Settled on it.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
yeah, Nvidia will buy their way out of it.

can we merge this thread with THIS one?
that topic was already closed


And all this news for Nvidia, First the Faulty Mobility parts, then hearing about G92s failing, rebagging the GF9 Series, now the GF 300 Series being delayed. The Storm cloud is a storm wave for Nvidia now. Ever Since Intel with Rambus got their asses handed to them by AMD with DDR and then eventually Intel with DDR, Rambus has been sending out patent infringements left and right. Id like to see some DDR tech from them actually.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 08:51 PM   #21
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,127 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 847
Thanked 929 Times in 759 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bundy View Post
Virtually everything we are using has been patented to death and I'm sure that not all of these "inventors" are paid for their efforts. It seems to me that patent action is more likely to be taken by well financed patent holding companies than individual inventors.

I agree with them being labelled patent trolls - not much different to ambulance chasers (tort lawyers).
Too true.

How this ultimately pans out will be interesting. Remember RIM/Blackberry and NTP? $600 Million settlement.
__________________
"It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing milkbone underwear.” ― Norm
Heatware
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 23, 2010, 09:35 PM   #22
DaedalusHelios
3500 Posts
 
DaedalusHelios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,262 (2.19/day)
Thanks: 829
Thanked 817 Times in 699 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
that case is done with, Intel Settled on it.






that topic was already closed


And all this news for Nvidia, First the Faulty Mobility parts, then hearing about G92s failing, rebagging the GF9 Series, now the GF 300 Series being delayed. The Storm cloud is a storm wave for Nvidia now. Ever Since Intel with Rambus got their asses handed to them by AMD with DDR and then eventually Intel with DDR, Rambus has been sending out patent infringements left and right. Id like to see some DDR tech from them actually.
At the time Duffman commented, it was not closed yet to my knowledge.

You tend to be anti-Nvidia with your posts, so no surprise with that comment really. Just look at earnings if you want to know how well companies are doing. Many more decisions effect a companies profitability than we all can track without being within the company. Negative press alone does not govern a company's success in the market.

(Abuse of patent law = legal extortion)
DaedalusHelios is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DaedalusHelios For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 10:58 PM   #23
Rexter
75 Posts
 
Rexter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 194 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Rambus Inc., one of the world’s premier technology licensing companies

why did that part make me laugh?
__________________
Rexter is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rexter For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 23, 2010, 11:00 PM   #24
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,719 (4.31/day)
Thanks: 4,216
Thanked 3,334 Times in 1,970 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sneekypeet View Post
The way I heard this story was that a group of guys got together and developed a product with intentions on working together in the long term.

They started throwing sand in each others panties and eventually broke apart.

In this time the "group" developed patents and no one ever filed.

After Samsung broke away they continued on what was rightfully theirs, as they had a hand in developing.

Now the fat lazy guy who caught all the sand in his panties was obviously chaffing and decided to cure his issue by filing for a patent, he himself didnt rightfully own, thus curing his chaffing by rubbing almost a billion US dollars on it (samsungs 5 year settlement).

Obviously the money from samsung must not have cured his itch, and is now (being backed by a settlement in court) seeing of other dollar bills may sooth his scratches.
From what I remember when this whole f* fiasco started several years ago now, was that Rambass used submarine patents to try and extort money from the members of the JPEG working group, Samsung, Kingston etc. They either created the patents afterwards and somehow backdated them, or already had the patents and kept quiet about them until the SDR/DDR specs were finalised and then put a legal gun to their buddy's heads and said "Hey everybody, give us your money or else!". This was just another way of doing extortion and fraud.

The second scenario is the more likely one and is strictly against the working group's rules - which makes sense, as otherwise it's not a working group! Apparently, the idea is whatever tech one company develops, they share with the others and eventually a standard based on it, with suggestions and tech by everybody is thrashed out by committee (yes, committee ).

Also, there was evidence that Rambass disappeared a lot of incriminating paper documents and emails, which really weakened their case. Why this didn't nail them, I can only think is down to corruption ie payoffs to the courts/judges.

This case sounds weirdly similar to the continuing SCO fiasco: they are miraculously still around, despite never showing any proof of Linux infringement, in a very damaged state, but still there and able to fight another day - why wasn't the case thrown out when they didn't show the proof demanded by the court by the deadline way back in 2003/4 sometime? However, Rambass has been considerably more successful in its extortion campaign than SCO, but I wouldn't put it past SCO to somehow prevail as well.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2010, 12:02 AM   #25
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaedalusHelios View Post
At the time Duffman commented, it was not closed yet to my knowledge.

You tend to be anti-Nvidia with your posts, so no surprise with that comment really. Just look at earnings if you want to know how well companies are doing. Many more decisions effect a companies profitability than we all can track without being within the company. Negative press alone does not govern a company's success in the market.

(Abuse of patent law = legal extortion)
If you hadn't noticed look at my motherboard, and I'm as Anti Nvidia as you are Anti AMD, so technically your statement is hypocritical. I'm just stating that Nvidia has a uphill battle on their hands now. They need to pull through to keep competition moving but when you start hearing so many people trying to downplay one company as being inferior and want one to be best all the time makes me sick, sometimes you have to hand the crown over and not be greedy ya know.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA Responds to the Rambus Allegation malware News 9 Nov 12, 2008 06:30 PM
Rambus Files Complaint Against NVIDIA malware News 21 Nov 12, 2008 12:24 AM
[Case Gallery] NVIDIA RULES ;) knickislow Case Mod Gallery 8 Sep 2, 2008 05:51 PM
Rambus Files Patent Infringement Suit Against NVIDIA malware News 17 Jul 14, 2008 04:58 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts