![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canuckland
Posts: 4 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
|
SMP2 And Core A3 Released
Stanford has released the new A3 core out into the wild for testing under -advmethods with new SMP2 WU's to got with it. Announcement by Kasson; http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=13038
They have also redone the points system and developed a new benchmark system to go with it. Posted here; http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=13039. Like the -bigadv WU's you need a passkey and to have completed 10 WU's with an 80% success ratio to qualify for the Bonus. Reports on other forums are looking good with ppd equal or better than running a VM on quads with a decent OC, as an example a Q9550 @3.8 ~8000ppd...
Last edited by LCB001; Jan 25, 2010 at 07:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
LOL figures I set up a new VM yesterday and now the Windows client is up to par.
Oh well, will let it finish this A3 unit it just grabbed and will work on it in the morning... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,601 (4.46/day)
Thanks: 2,268
Thanked 3,187 Times in 1,922 Posts
|
This is pretty big news, no?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,772 (1.37/day)
Thanks: 1,009
Thanked 1,048 Times in 644 Posts
|
It seems like 32 bit Windows users are left out.
Edit: http://folding.stanford.edu/English/DownloadWinOther has the beta client Last edited by mstenholm; Jan 25, 2010 at 08:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,846 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 363
Thanked 1,183 Times in 546 Posts
|
Yea, its pretty big. If I'm reading this right, this client makes VM's obsolete as of today if it proves faster and more efficient. In theory it should be faster because there isn't extra overhead of the VM. The VM's will likely update their image if they haven't already, and then we'll have to wait for benchmarks on which is faster to know for certain. I can't see why the VM's would be though if everyone has access to the same cores now. Also, all CPU folding now can get bonuses with this release, regular CPU and -bigadv folding alike.
__________________
“If you don't dip your words in sugar, rainbows and teddy bears people will think you wish to hunt them down to torture and eventually kill them.” -DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
is this available for download yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,708 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 572
Thanked 4,278 Times in 1,070 Posts
|
That was answered above.
![]() High Performance Clients Go down to the 'Windows: V6 Beta SMP/CPU clients'. I believe that we should use the Windows XP/2003/Vista/2008 SMP client console version 6.29 beta for MPICH (32-bit or 64-bit) or the Drop-in binary for current Windows SMP console client (6.29) if we just want to replace v5.92. The question I have is can I use -smp 8 on a Core i7 rig or do I need two clients using -smp 4? |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to msgclb For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
i thought i was looking at the older clients. anyway, this works out of the box for me. should i use any special flag for my q9650 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL. U.S.A.
Posts: 4,047 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 3,376
Thanked 2,907 Times in 1,474 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
“I'll finally be able to drool over 8 gpu in one rig... And get sued by my wallet for violent physical damage...” -Feanor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
hrm, one of the links said q9550 were getting 8000 ppd. ive got a faster and meaner q9650 and im barely pulling 1000ppd. btw, using the -smp flag produces an error. something about cant connect on a certain port and an error running mpiexec.
edit: nvm i didnt follow the directions! f mondays! Last edited by Easy Rhino; Jan 25, 2010 at 04:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
nope, still working very slowly with mpich installed and the -smp flag added to the executable. it works but it is crawling. maybe i am missing something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
P6012 / 470 point unit, getting about 450ppd from a C2D @ 2.8Ghz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
F@H Mod & 4P Enthusiust
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL. U.S.A.
Posts: 4,047 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 3,376
Thanked 2,907 Times in 1,474 Posts
|
I'm guessing after the initial 10 WU run, we will get the work unit that has the early return bonus. It will take me 4.5 days to finish the required 10 WU's.
__________________
“I'll finally be able to drool over 8 gpu in one rig... And get sued by my wallet for violent physical damage...” -Feanor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,772 (1.37/day)
Thanks: 1,009
Thanked 1,048 Times in 644 Posts
|
Quote:
To get the good stuff (the bonus): Again from foldingforum.org - 1. Must use a passkey to receive bonus points 2. Must successfully return >=10 A2 or SMP2 work units with their passkey to receive bonus points 3. Must successfully return >80% of A2 or SMP2 work units to receive bonus points Edit: Buck beat me to this post. See above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,846 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 363
Thanked 1,183 Times in 546 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm not certain if this allows for -bigadv folding yet, I've yet to see anything about it. I can't see why it wouldn't, as I could've sworn it was only an additional drop-in required to get -bigadv working.
__________________
“If you don't dip your words in sugar, rainbows and teddy bears people will think you wish to hunt them down to torture and eventually kill them.” -DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 2,138 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 1,556
Thanked 879 Times in 626 Posts
|
I'm seeing MUCH lower than expected PPD from my S939 4400+. Was used to 800-1100 on my FX60, so I was expecting 80% of that. So far, at 2% it's at 308PPD!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,601 (4.46/day)
Thanks: 2,268
Thanked 3,187 Times in 1,922 Posts
|
This is a an easy question, can someone tell me how to setup a passkey?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,846 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 363
Thanked 1,183 Times in 546 Posts
|
Quote:
Input your name as F@H would see it (El_Fiendo in my case) and your e-mail. They will send it to you, and then you enter it at client setup.
__________________
“If you don't dip your words in sugar, rainbows and teddy bears people will think you wish to hunt them down to torture and eventually kill them.” -DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to El Fiendo For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#20 |
|
habe fidem
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,601 (4.46/day)
Thanks: 2,268
Thanked 3,187 Times in 1,922 Posts
|
Will I have to delete and resinstall my current GPU Folding clients to input the passkey?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
ok so i ran configonly and put in the passkey. now do i execute with the -smp flag and -bigadv ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,708 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 572
Thanked 4,278 Times in 1,070 Posts
|
I switched over my Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R @ 2.66Ghz to the new A3 core. Someday I hope to get this rig in shape to switch to the -bigadv WUs.
I first removed the v5.92 files and did a clean install of the new v6.29 client. Then using Buck's How to set up Windows SMP CPU Client I started from Step 2b. I then set these switches in my shortcut... -configonly -local -advmethods -smp 8 I then started the client and after entering my user name and team number I entered my passkey. I continued with the options in step 6. I then removed -configonly and started the client. The smp client loaded all 8 cores and I haven't got any problems yet. ![]() In fact I just completed 2% 18:37:41 Competed 0 out of 500000 steps (0%) 18:42:33 Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1%) 18:47:21 Complete 10000 out of 500000 steps (2%) I have an ETA of 7h 50min running P6014 484 points and 1452 PPD. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to msgclb For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#23 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
if you set advanced methods to yes in the configonly i dont think you have to set the flag. i could be wrong tho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,846 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 363
Thanked 1,183 Times in 546 Posts
|
Quote:
Apparently the reason these aren't bigadv capable is because Windows still only has access to A1 and A3 coress, while Linux has A1-A3 capability. This is supposed to change over the coming weeks, along with the phasing out of the A1 cores. I'm currently strip mining and trolling around a few forums trying to piece together the puzzle, but apparently if your rig is bigadv capable you should keep the VMs but update their image (in a few weeks time they will no longer get work units on the outdated client version). If your CPU is not -bigadv capable but still folds, then you can switch to this one to try it out. You have a chance to get A1 cores if no A3 cores are available which would mean a hit in your PPD, but A3 should yield about the same as you were getting before due to the bonus system.
__________________
“If you don't dip your words in sugar, rainbows and teddy bears people will think you wish to hunt them down to torture and eventually kill them.” -DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
alright so let me get this straight, according to the instructions after entering the passkey i need to complete 10 work units with an equal to or greater than 80% success rate. then i get the advanced units or something which get points bonus? do i have to have -bigadv set for this to occur?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Plans Core i7 and Core i5 Dual-Core Ultrathin Notebook Processors in 2010 | btarunr | News | 4 | Nov 12, 2009 07:17 PM |
| Intel Introduces Core i7, Xeon 3400 and First Core i5 Processors | btarunr | News | 39 | Sep 12, 2009 06:06 AM |
| AMD Quad-Core and Triple-Core Phenom Production Schedule | malware | News | 13 | Feb 3, 2008 08:09 AM |
| Intel Penryn 3.33GHz Quad-Core Benchmarks Released | malware | News | 13 | Apr 19, 2007 01:37 PM |
| Fedora Core 4 released | W1zzard | News | 0 | Jun 14, 2005 07:10 AM |