techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 28, 2010, 12:01 PM   #26
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

The launch seems to match Intel's launch of the i7 980X, which is kinda worrying. This thing will barely compete with the current i7 lineup, not to mention Intel's six-core.

Something else that gets me worried about the release date, being close to Intel's is that they may have some sort of under the table agreement for that. It hasn't been that long since their "settlement"
__________________
smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:09 PM   #27
saikamaldoss
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: India (Chennai)
Posts: 197 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 28 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saikamaldoss

System Specs

Hmmm I dont know how long it will take for AMD to start doing what ATI is doing.

power/performance than power/watt hmmm.

why cant they give 3.2 Ghz//4ch DDR3 1800//14MB L3 cache x8 core system instead.
saikamaldoss is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:12 PM   #28
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,950 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,208 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
That's Magny-Corus ...
Isn't it Magny-Cours? Just nitpicking here. I wonder how well these chips perform.
Fourstaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:18 PM   #29
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 976
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Isn't it Magny-Cours? Just nitpicking here. I wonder how well these chips perform.
They won't be any better in games than their quad equivelants. Especially if the game isn't threaded for at least 3 core's. Nothing exciting in that department but if they are low power and good crunchers then that is a potential market. Also if they are cheaper than intel's hex core which they probably will be then they would make a nice workstation cpu on a budget.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:25 PM   #30
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,950 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,208 Posts

System Specs

Is it possible to make 2 cores look like 1 thread but with insane clocks? I figured that since most apps use only 1 or 2 threads, it would be better for a reverse hyperthreading to occur, with controls to disable that when more threads are needed.
Fourstaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:31 PM   #31
dir_d
500 Posts
 
dir_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 775 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

If the these chips OC well they will be great in DX11 games since DX11 forces multi-threading i bet these could be the next great gaming chip if priced well.
dir_d is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 02:45 PM   #32
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Is it possible to make 2 cores look like 1 thread but with insane clocks? I figured that since most apps use only 1 or 2 threads, it would be better for a reverse hyperthreading to occur, with controls to disable that when more threads are needed.
Not that I know of. It's physically impossible to force a thread to jump around between two cores fast enough to get a significant increase in performance.
__________________
smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 03:04 PM   #33
johnnyfiive
2000 Posts
 
johnnyfiive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,975 (1.60/day)
Thanks: 740
Thanked 856 Times in 537 Posts

System Specs

I'll definitely be saving money just to run this platform, going to be fun to play with.
__________________
[o_0] - GO BUCKEYES!
------------------------------------------------------
HEATWARE /MY KEYBOARD / VIDEO OF MY LGA 2011 RIG

------------------------------------------------------
Steam: johnnyfiive
ORIGIN: johnny5iive
League of Legends: 5iive
johnnyfiive is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 03:05 PM   #34
Kitkat
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 767 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 77 Times in 54 Posts

lol should i wait for the 2000 hahahha looks cool.
Kitkat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 03:05 PM   #35
demonkevy666
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 23 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HalfAHertz View Post
Not that I know of. It's physically impossible to force a thread to jump around between two cores fast enough to get a significant increase in performance.
sure it is, it was implemented in vista it's uses a timer to distribute thread processes.

it's also in amd's dual core optimizer.
demonkevy666 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 04:26 PM   #36
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Nice, might be able to use the low TDP models in an ITX board. Come on Zotac, bring out some 890G minis!
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 04:58 PM   #37
theorw
500 Posts
 
theorw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Athens GREECE
Posts: 702 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

If they cost less than 230EUR they ll be a WINNER!
I definately am going to buy one!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
theorw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 04:58 PM   #38
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.31/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

For some dumb reason i have a feeling when this chip comes out it will be a lol compared to the current i7s and i5s.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 05:03 PM   #39
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
For some dumb reason i have a feeling when this chip comes out it will be a lol compared to the current i7s and i5s.
Likely. But it'll likely also be super cheap compared to the Intel i7 hex core offering.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:09 PM   #40
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,880 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 12,251 Times in 7,805 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by devguy View Post
Likely. But it'll likely also be super cheap compared to the Intel i7 hex core offering.
Exactly which is why these really aren't competing with i7. I will take one. I can live with a $300-$400 6 core but $1000+ no thank you.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:19 PM   #41
El_Mayo
2000 Posts
 
El_Mayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 2,100 (1.40/day)
Thanks: 1,262
Thanked 193 Times in 155 Posts

System Specs

AM2+ support?
El_Mayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:23 PM   #42
HalfAHertz
1000 Posts
 
HalfAHertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,739 (1.18/day)
Thanks: 364
Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
sure it is, it was implemented in vista it's uses a timer to distribute thread processes.

it's also in amd's dual core optimizer.
that's just moving the thread from a busy core to a less strained core. If I understand correctly, what he was asking for was two cores running a single thread simultaneously or close to it. Like for example one core does all the FP calculations while the second core does all the integer calculations.
__________________
smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...

Last edited by HalfAHertz; Jan 28, 2010 at 06:43 PM.
HalfAHertz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:23 PM   #43
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,880 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 12,251 Times in 7,805 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by El_Mayo View Post
AM2+ support?
No. It's all in the article. Sell your DDR2 while it's worth something.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:29 PM   #44
werez
200 Posts
 
werez's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 298 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts

looks like a winner to me ...
werez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:31 PM   #45
Kantastic
3500 Posts
 
Kantastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 4,976 (3.39/day)
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 930 Times in 739 Posts

System Specs

Don't know if I should upgrade until Bulldozer...
__________________
Heatware
Kantastic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:48 PM   #46
Kei
1000 Posts
 
Kei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,733 (0.91/day)
Thanks: 1,936
Thanked 618 Times in 507 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Kei

System Specs

For some strange reason I'm excited about these processors coming out...I've already got a blazin' quad, and only use the four cores when I actually need them. I think my lust for hardware is just kickin in or something, because these just have a special allure to them right now.

I'm very curious to see the clock speeds for the other models, and more importantly than anything to me...how well with these undervolt! The mad scientist in me is hungry again, I'm curious as to how well you could run a game or heavy program with these underclocked since there are 6 to use now. With that many cores you're bound to have plenty of free cpu to use which in turn would allow you to use lower clock speeds to accomplish the same task...which in turn would allow you to use less voltage...which in turns means less heat.....which means yea you get my point.

Depending on the pricing (more like timing) I just might do something crazy and pick one of these up.

Another thing that we can imply from the information that we're given already is that the Northbridge/memory controller will have to be default at 2400Mhz! With the current architecture of the Phenom you cannot have the HT Link set to higher than the Northbridge, and I assume without any doubts that it will be the same for these. Now I'm wondering whether or not the voltage requirements will be larger for the memory controller or be just like the pattern we have now.

Previous Phenom models needed more voltage to achieve the same Northbridge speeds than their later counterparts, which hasn't changed patterns since the introduction of the Phenom. If things stay that way we could very likely see some TREMENDOUS flexiblity with the Northbridge on these processors. Board dependant on each Phenom II I've owned/tested I can set 2400Mhz NB @ 1.10v-1.15v (for lower specced chipsets). That is totally unheard of for previous model Phenoms to have the voltage set that low achieving that kinda speed. If the voltage is indeed lowered (1.10v is current default) slightly that could be truly exciting. It may also push us closer/above the 3000Mhz NB mark without needed larger amounts (1.3-1.45v+) which may potentially help us enormously as well depending on system ram configurations.

Processor speed and voltage I imagine will also be roughly as flexible as we have now with the Phenom II series. Each generation/revision has given us the ablity to run higher clocks with less voltage, or more importantly to me the stock clocks with FAR FAR FAR lower voltage. Each Phenom I've tested since the very first models has been able to dramatically lower the voltage needed to run the stock speed, even the latest Phenom II 955 C2 stepping in my case is able to run it's default 3.2Ghz @ 1.168v which is simply staggering dropping from 1.35v. These X6's of course will have their own requirements, but if we are able to run them at default speeds (or better) while dropping the voltage roughly 10-18% like that would be truly insane! That's the range I've been able to drop all previous Phenom processors from their default voltage at stock speeds (13-18% actually), which is pretty fantastic I'd say. It helps an enormous amount with keeping the processors cool (which already isn't a problem), and allowing you to run even a stock cooler on low fan settings without any worries whatsoever. Depending on the cooler you can choose to not run the fan at all honestly, my V8 if I set fan control to enabled on the board doesn't even run the fan until it hits a certain temp (~25C) and the speed never needs to run more than ~400 - 500 rpm.

I totally should've never posted this....now I'm getting even more excited just with the possiblities!

Kei
__________________
"I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody."

- Bill Cosby

Last edited by Kei; Jan 28, 2010 at 06:59 PM.
Kei is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:53 PM   #47
Assimilator
200 Posts
 
Assimilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 425 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourstaff View Post
Is it possible to make 2 cores look like 1 thread but with insane clocks? I figured that since most apps use only 1 or 2 threads, it would be better for a reverse hyperthreading to occur, with controls to disable that when more threads are needed.
That's exactly what Intel's newest CPUs offer with the Turbo Boost function - the chip can turn off some of its cores and overclock the remainder. Hence, apps that aren't heavily multi-threaded (and don't benefit from more cores) get a nice speed increase.

As for hex-core CPUs... meh, there are still precious few apps that can even take advantage of more than 2 cores, so adding another 2 into the mix isn't going to help things for the most part. That's why AMD have had these processors in servers for ages now and are only now bringing them to the desktop - servers can actually make good use of 6 cores, desktops, not so much.

Also, I just have to say... considering how long AMD has been harping on about Fusion, it's somewhat ironic that Intel is first to market with a GPU integrated in the CPU.
__________________
<html> <code> <style>

The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4
4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5)
Assimilator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:57 PM   #48
El_Mayo
2000 Posts
 
El_Mayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 2,100 (1.40/day)
Thanks: 1,262
Thanked 193 Times in 155 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
No. It's all in the article. Sell your DDR2 while it's worth something.
lmao
nah i'll stick with AM2+ for like 4 years... cos i'm lame like that
El_Mayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:58 PM   #49
Kantastic
3500 Posts
 
Kantastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 4,976 (3.39/day)
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 930 Times in 739 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by El_Mayo View Post
lmao
nah i'll stick with AM2+ for like 4 years... cos i'm lame like that
You could probably break even if you sell your DDR2/AM2+ setup for a DDR3/AM3 setup, what with prices nowadays.

And damn, I was under the impression that Bulldozer was coming out and not this PII X6 crap. It makes me wonder if I should even upgrade to 890FX.
__________________
Heatware
Kantastic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 28, 2010, 06:58 PM   #50
Kitkat
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 767 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 77 Times in 54 Posts

i really hope ASUS remakes that Dual socket AMD at some point seeing that evga brings back memories of when i couldn't afford something like that now that i can i wanna buy it. If these can work together they should. (or the opterons)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kantastic View Post
You could probably break even if you sell your DDR2/AM2+ setup for a DDR3/AM3 setup, what with prices nowadays.

And damn, I was under the impression that Bulldozer was coming out and not this PII X6 crap. It makes me wonder if I should even upgrade to 890FX.
This has been on the roadmap before bulldozer for a while. Should look up some roadmaps so u know when to expect it...

Last edited by Kitkat; Jan 28, 2010 at 07:11 PM.
Kitkat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i7 930 Slated for Q1 2010 btarunr News 48 Nov 17, 2009 11:09 AM
Radeon HD 4770 Pictured, Slated for May btarunr News 42 Apr 1, 2009 08:49 AM
Two Phenom II X4 Models Slated for January btarunr News 59 Nov 26, 2008 01:20 PM
Radeon HD 4600 Series Slated for September, Two Models in the Making btarunr News 13 Aug 20, 2008 02:09 AM
Two 45nm Phenom X4 and Ultra-Mobile CPU Slated for Q4 btarunr News 9 Jun 25, 2008 06:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts