techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:19 AM   #26
DigitalUK
200 Posts
 
DigitalUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK South
Posts: 489 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts

System Specs

and the plot thinkens, if nvidia are really behaving in that way (Very unprofessional). could we see more vendors dropping nvidia.
it would be nice for big companys these days to just drop the BS and say it like it is, if its shortage of supply or internal difference say it , i could respect that.
DigitalUK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:24 AM   #27
crow1001
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 361 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

FUD are fubar.

XFX know the score, they realize a loss is in the making with selling the 400 cards, so they stick with ATI for the high performance GPU market and enjoy life.

Last edited by crow1001; Mar 30, 2010 at 11:29 AM.
crow1001 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:34 AM   #28
jagd
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TR
Posts: 417 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 90 Times in 82 Posts

System Specs

Funny ,i dont care about xfx(asus is king for warranty in my country ) , but they are populer in US because their warranty and not losing your warranty when you install aftermarket cooler .

Fudzilla is nvidia's green knight take with a truck load of salt what fud says .dont forget nvidia forcing companies to buy old crap (210/220/240 etc ) if they want to buy gtx480/470 cards
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOnlyHero View Post
I dont care about XFX, its there choice. There a lot of companys like xfx ( Asus,Inno3d,Galaxy...) ho makes Nvidia videocards , so it isnt a big shock for me .XFX goes against mother nature
jagd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:42 AM   #29
rpsgc
500 Posts
 
rpsgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 675 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 128 Times in 93 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Lobster View Post
Fudzilla is saying that it was Nvidia who's breaking up with XFX and not the other way around
Yeah... I don't think NVIDIA can afford to do that right now.
rpsgc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:42 AM   #30
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Bad news for nVidia. they are slowly slipping away. if nVidia continues on this path they will end up as 3DFX did
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mtosev For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:48 AM   #31
DigitalUK
200 Posts
 
DigitalUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK South
Posts: 489 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
Bad news for nVidia. they are slowly slipping away. if nVidia continues on this path they will end up as 3DFX did
amen to that, i used to love voodoo and glide back then was amazing
DigitalUK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:49 AM   #32
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,847 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

question is, when this will happen, who will buy them?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:50 AM   #33
Fourstaff
TPU Janitor
 
Fourstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Science Museum, Londinium
Posts: 5,971 (4.70/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 1,461 Times in 1,210 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
question is, when this will happen, who will buy them?
Nah, Nvidia will not sink. It has alot of other things like Tegra and CUDA seems to be a hit with scientists who cannot afford a proper supercomputer.
Fourstaff is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:52 AM   #34
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
question is, when this will happen, who will buy them?
Intel, who else is there?
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:58 AM   #35
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,847 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

there are masses of hardware producers... maybe Samsung suddenly has the itch to sell VGA´s?
they own so much more, it would be not too difficult for them to pay

regarding CUDA etc.
surely these technologies have advances... if you have the proper hardware to execute them
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:59 AM   #36
filip007
75 Posts
 
filip007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 151 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

You can't sell two good different products under one roof that's the problem and like XFX is selling only the best 4870X2,5850,5870,5970...
filip007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 11:59 AM   #37
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

This type of thing pleases me greatly.

One: Nvidia will have to work damn hard in getting them back
Two: A nice little f'you to Nvidia to bring them back dow to earth.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 12:02 PM   #38
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Velvet Wafer View Post
there are masses of hardware producers... maybe Samsung suddenly has the itch to sell VGA´s?
they own so much more, it would be not too difficult for them to pay

regarding CUDA etc.
surely these technologies have advances... if you have the proper hardware to execute them
Intel wanted to buy ATi but didn't have a chance. so the only logical buyer is Intel. plus intel has a LOT of money.
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 12:03 PM   #39
DigitalUK
200 Posts
 
DigitalUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK South
Posts: 489 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts

System Specs

i would buy a samsung graphics card, in the high gloss curvy finish there tvs have would be nice.
DigitalUK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 12:09 PM   #40
Velvet Wafer
3500 Posts
 
Velvet Wafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North of Germany
Posts: 3,847 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 2,286
Thanked 1,025 Times in 838 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Velvet Wafer Send a message via MSN to Velvet Wafer

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
Intel wanted to buy ATi but didn't have a chance. so the only logical buyer is Intel. plus intel has a LOT of money.
Intel wants technology. New technology! Nvidia has its problems with that, since a few years
surely it would be possible, but i somehow dont believe they will buy Nvidia, if they really fail.
im not sure on that tho, its just a "stomach feel"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalUK View Post
i would buy a samsung graphics card, in the high gloss curvy finish there tvs have would be nice.
if they would produce VGA´s like they produce marvellous Flatscreens, ATI/AMD would have a serious business opponent. One which has even more gigantic resources,than intel
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Velvet Wafer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 12:57 PM   #41
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

Ouch -- just a short time ago XFX made nothing but Nvidia cards, right?

The GTX 400 series is looking like the FX5000 series, if they had actually had the performance to back up the heat and power requirements.

The GTX 400 series isn't a flop, but it's very, very close.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by mdm-adph; Mar 30, 2010 at 01:08 PM.
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:05 PM   #42
qwerty_lesh
500 Posts
 
qwerty_lesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 515 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to qwerty_lesh

System Specs

regarding the talk about Intel buying out nVidia. I doubt such a thing would ever happen. Prior to AMD buying out ATi, nVidia and Intel weren't and still aren't on good terms.

In its most simple form, AMD & ATi (usually the underdog friends ((sorry if it sounds fanboyish)) ) where Intel and nVidia are the big (and oddly more seemingly evil) rivals on the other side of the make believe fence. That made sense right?
qwerty_lesh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:19 PM   #43
DarthCyclonis
25 Posts
 
DarthCyclonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 69 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

I could see Intel buying Nvidia. Let's be honest. Everything Nvidia has is leaps and bounds ahead of Intel and it's GPU development. Nvidia does have good engineers. It's the management that is killing the company with it's anti-consumer polcies.

Also Nvidia's short sighted management was banking on GPGPU computing to be bigger then what it is when they started the Fermi project. GPGPU could very well be big for them. Just not for a couple of generations of GPU's from now. But they need cash today.
DarthCyclonis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:25 PM   #44
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,751 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

It isn't surprising, a lot of these companies' fame is thanks solely to nVidia's series of good GPUs that outclassed ATi's. They rode the nVidia dominance wave, and it isn't surprising that some of them are switching now that it is ATi's turn to start dominate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gumpty View Post
I think the 'shocking' thing about this is that ... iirc ... XFX were an Nvidia-only company as little as 12 months ago. To wholly switch teams so quickly, within one new generation of GPUs, is the surprising part. For me at least.
XFX started selling ATi cards with the introduction of the HD4800 series, so its been about 18 months, and two generations.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:27 PM   #45
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,531 (3.39/day)
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,607 Times in 1,286 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalUK View Post
there has to be a very good reason to drop NV now like a bad smell.
Theyve seen the pittyful 470/480 benchmarks & decided it was such an event worthy of many epic facepalms & facedesks that they said this shit wont fly!

the 480 is the top range but compare to the 5970 the 480 hasnt got shit on it. the 5970 just thrashes the 480 in 99% of benchmarks.

any noob lokking to buy a new GPU, does a litte re-search would know to go with the 5970, compared to 480 its more efficient GPU overall.

a very bold move by XFX - they probably knew they might have trouble selling the cards since Nvidias top end isnt really top end anymore
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:32 PM   #46
arnoo1
500 Posts
 
arnoo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 708 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

there goes one of the best
damn i don't like that
i always have had xfx I never had one crappy card of them

it will evga from now on

damn those fermi cards are expensive 340euro's i will not buy one if there are not around 250euro's

gtx275 wil stay for now
arnoo1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:32 PM   #47
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,290 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 558
Thanked 600 Times in 438 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

XFX - We are now Nvidia GTX 400 clean, we finally got rid of the Nvidia drug thanks to ATI's "Quit Nvidia" helpers club.

ATI - We are so pleased that we were able to help XFX, we hope to help other company's that are addicted to Nvidia. In the mean time try out are sweet gaming cards! That's the first step

Im so happy!
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:35 PM   #48
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Whilst funny this is also not good news, nvidia NEED partners in order to compete with ati, no competition = high prices.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:36 PM   #49
leonard_222003
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 241 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

I can believe Fudzilla scenario that Nvidia kicked XFX because they sided with Ati , if you look at Nvidia's history dealing with the world they have been kind of not so diplomatic , at war with Intel and provoking them constantly , at war with rambus not paying linceses , at war with AMD/ATI but this is understandable because it's the competition , at war with integrators , blamed them for not cutting production costs when AMD was killing them with low cost cards , forcing integrators to take the loss when things didn't worked that well ( the time when price war started bettwen AMD and Nvidia and Nvidia had expensive to produce g92 and GT200 cards ).
Actually that was the time when brand name integrators got tired of Nvidia and started producing Ati cards , other integrators had to speak now with fermi launching and probably said , WTF , we loyal and others not so , fu..ck them and give us priority , we suffered with you , xfx didn't , we get Fermi and they don't PERIOD , what can Nvidia say to this ? it's Nvidia's fault because they didn't took the loses when they had too , they treat integrators very badly.
leonard_222003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 01:38 PM   #50
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,202 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 473
Thanked 950 Times in 779 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Who cares if evga make the best nvidia cards,who would actually want to pay for one of the heaters/gtx 480/70 cards anyway.
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EVGA Unleashes Full-Fledged Lineup of GeForce GTX 400 Series Graphics Cards btarunr News 26 Mar 30, 2010 08:39 AM
Leadtek Ready with GeForce GTX 400 Series Graphics Cards btarunr News 26 Mar 28, 2010 04:20 AM
GeForce GTX 400 Series Clock Speeds and Other Details Surface btarunr News 82 Mar 21, 2010 04:03 PM
GeForce GTX 400 Series Performance Expectations Hit the Web btarunr News 114 Feb 28, 2010 01:02 PM
NVIDIA To Unveil GeForce GTX 400 Series at PAX btarunr News 73 Feb 24, 2010 09:34 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts