The first review ASUS GTX 465 !!!

bakalu · May 28, 2010, 11:08 AM

Here I will compare the performance of ASUS GTX 465 and ASUS GTX 285 TOP

My system
CPU Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 3.6GHz
Mainboard ASUS Rampage II Gene
RAM 3x2GB DDR3
VGA ASUS GTX 465, ASUS GTX 285 TOP
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit RTM
Driver NVIDIA 257.15 beta 64bit

Update Result benchmark game of GTX465 @ 700/925

Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS GTX 285 TOP

ASUS GTX 465 default

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP

ASUS GTX 465 default

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP No Tessellation

ASUS GTX 465 default, Tessellation=ON

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840, Tessellation=ON

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, Tessellation=ON

Demo benchmark Dirt 2. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 9

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 9

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 11

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11

Benchmark Bad Company 2. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP

Quote:

2010-05-25 18:57:15 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8695 - Time: 161628ms - Avg: 53.796 - Min: 38 - Max: 88

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-25 18:14:36 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8577 - Time: 171133ms - Avg: 50.119 - Min: 38 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-27 08:27:34 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 8405 - Time: 156023ms - Avg: 53.870 - Min: 40 - Max: 78

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-28 14:20:58 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-27 16:00:47 - metro2033
Frames: 6498 - Time: 223249ms - Avg: 29.107 - Min: 14 - Max: 56

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-27 09:04:54 - metro2033
Frames: 8281 - Time: 248076ms - Avg: 33.381 - Min: 15 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-27 08:41:48 - metro2033
Frames: 8123 - Time: 234365ms - Avg: 34.660 - Min: 16 - Max: 69

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-28 14:42:53 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76

ASUS GTX 285 TOP DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-27 16:07:33 - metro2033
Frames: 6323 - Time: 231673ms - Avg: 27.293 - Min: 15 - Max: 54

ASUS GTX 465 default DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-27 08:58:03 - metro2033
Frames: 6400 - Time: 227293ms - Avg: 28.157 - Min: 13 - Max: 58

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-27 08:33:43 - metro2033
Frames: 6891 - Time: 230879ms - Avg: 29.847 - Min: 15 - Max: 64

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-28 14:28:09 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70

ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840 DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-27 08:49:10 - metro2033
Frames: 4943 - Time: 243604ms - Avg: 20.291 - Min: 11 - Max: 35

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-28 14:36:06 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38

GTX465 runs very stable at core/memory of GTX480. . I use furmark to test the temperature of GTX465@700/925. Furmark run 26'. Room temp 30oC, fan set 87%

Max Temp 79oC.
.......to be continued

Source : http://forum.amtech.com.vn/overclock...tml#post691389

MoonPig · May 28, 2010, 11:13 AM

Hmmm not bad. nVidia might re-gain some users.

lyndonguitar · May 28, 2010, 11:33 AM

I think its not worth the price.

Benetanegia · May 28, 2010, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lyndonrakista

I think its not worth the price.

I think that will depend on the actual street price. afaik MSRP is $250-300. If it's closer or below $250 (many 470 and 480's are selling below MSRP) it's totallly worth it IMO. At $300 obviously not.

Performance wise it's pretty solid. Much better than previews that were showing below GTX275 performance. This results show an average performance close to HD5850, so like I said at prices closer to $250 than $300, it's going to be very well positioned.

phanbuey · May 28, 2010, 03:34 PM

meh... the performance just isnt here this generation...

And how is that at all close to HD5850? its close to the 285, which gets beat by a STOCK 5850.

Benetanegia · May 29, 2010, 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phanbuey

meh... the performance just isnt here this generation...

And how is that at all close to HD5850? its close to the 285, which gets beat by a STOCK 5850.

because GTX285 is extremely close to HD5850...

OnBoard · May 29, 2010, 03:45 AM

Aah, you ran much more that just the FurMark and OC I linked here couple days back

Doesn't seem that bad with those new drivers and seems it depends heavily on the game where the extra shaders help.

I bet NVIDIA releases 256.xx WHQL and announces GTX 465 the same day, they seem to go well together.

Does it come with the GTX 470 cooler?

Zubasa · May 29, 2010, 03:47 AM

Saying the 285 is extremely close to a 5850, is like saying a 5870 is extremely close to a 480...

kid41212003 · May 29, 2010, 03:58 AM

It's pretty close indeed, 10% It is.

Zubasa · May 29, 2010, 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kid41212003

It's pretty close indeed, 10% It is.

I know.
What I don't understand is whats the point?

phanbuey · May 29, 2010, 04:54 AM

10% is noticeably faster.

not to mention, thats at stock... since 5850's reference can hit 950-1000mhz core and start matching/beating a 5870. That's pretty much a 285 beatdown.

fact of the matter is... their last gen card is coming close to their new gen card. Hell the 285 is even a bit close to the 470 and ive seen benches where an OC'd 285 beats a 470 soundly.

thats cool and all since this is a new architecture, but unless the 465 overclocks like a monster (800 core) and sells for less than $250, like you said, the upgrade will not be worth it.

Triton.se · May 29, 2010, 03:18 PM

One thing surprised me, Lowest FPS in Dirt2 DX9 increased with 20fps (55fps -> 75fps = 36%) with GPU OC...but then again, that was using very low resolution 1680x1050.

EDIT ///

I think, cards like GTX465, GTX280, GTX275 and some super oc GTX260 models (Gigabyte's GTX260 runs @ 680/1512/2500, 230€) run about the same... I bet all cards are capable of running same DX10 games at equal settings @ 19x12 rez. Then why pay 50% more for GTX465...

WSP · May 29, 2010, 04:01 PM

no photos of the card?

OnBoard · May 29, 2010, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phanbuey

thats cool and all since this is a new architecture, but unless the 465 overclocks like a monster (800 core) and sells for less than $250, like you said, the upgrade will not be worth it.

It does, see the source link, but price might not be that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WSP

no photos of the card?

In source link there is, It's GTX 470 inside out (not counting core/memory of course)

douglatins · May 29, 2010, 04:59 PM

3way sli support?

OnBoard · May 29, 2010, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglatins

3way sli support?

Would think so yes, as it's just a GTX 470 gone too often on plastic surgeon

extrasalty · May 29, 2010, 11:33 PM

Disappointing performance. Not sure if it changes anything, but GTX285 seems to be on 2nd gen PCIe.

Benetanegia · May 29, 2010, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phanbuey

10% is noticeably faster.

not to mention, thats at stock... since 5850's reference can hit 950-1000mhz core and start matching/beating a 5870. That's pretty much a 285 beatdown.

fact of the matter is... their last gen card is coming close to their new gen card. Hell the 285 is even a bit close to the 470 and ive seen benches where an OC'd 285 beats a 470 soundly.

thats cool and all since this is a new architecture, but unless the 465 overclocks like a monster (800 core) and sells for less than $250, like you said, the upgrade will not be worth it.

The 470 ocerclocks to 850 just as easily as 5850 gets to 1000 (it's about same % OC for the record), so why wouldn't a card with less SPs enabled not reach those clocks? And the performance gain from overclocking is better on Fermi cards, almost lineal, so I don't see your point.

10% is enough difference (not a big one) but 5% is much less of a difference and I said that since the 465 is faster than 285 it has to be close to 5850 and it is indeed, at least in OP's tests. So 5% difference between 285 and 5850 and the GTX465 sits in the middle.It IS close.(unless it is faster with the new drivers, which I can't be sure tbh, I'm only basing my argument in that the OP's 465 at stock is slightly faster on average than the 285 at stock).

The 465 are already listed for $280, as is said in the front page, middle price, so it's not either a bad nor a good deal. It's just competitive at this point. 5% slower than 5850, 5% cheaper...

Black Panther · May 30, 2010, 12:13 AM

Nice work you did there bakalu

bakalu · Jun 1, 2010, 02:08 AM

To compare the performance of ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 and ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, GTX465 and HD5850 run stable at that clock without having to increase voltage, driver ATI 10.5a hotfix. Some benchmark results are as follows :

3DMark Vantage Performance

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings, Tessellation=ON

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11

Benchmark Bad Company 2 DX11. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

Quote:

2010-05-31 16:13:00 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 10247 - Time: 151026ms - Avg: 67.849 - Min: 44 - Max: 95

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Quote:

2010-05-28 1458 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-31 16:34:46 - metro2033
Frames: 10943 - Time: 228982ms - Avg: 47.790 - Min: 18 - Max: 95

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 9

Quote:

2010-05-28 1453 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-31 16:28:21 - metro2033
Frames: 8433 - Time: 225717ms - Avg: 37.361 - Min: 18 - Max: 80

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 10

Quote:

2010-05-28 1409 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-31 16:21:28 - metro2033
Frames: 5452 - Time: 229603ms - Avg: 23.745 - Min: 14 - Max: 37

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11

Quote:

2010-05-28 1406 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38

Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super High

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=ON, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

Quote:

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4

Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3589
Average Frame Time: 29.2ms
Average FPS: 34.2

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

Quote:

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4

Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3034
Average Frame Time: 34.6ms
Average FPS: 28.9

HD5850 @ 800/1150 is much stronger than GTX465 @ 700/925, however HD5850 @ 800/1150 can not play DX11 Metro 2033 at resolution 1680*1050 .

laszlo · Jun 1, 2010, 11:09 AM

a few of these cards can be unlocked....

http://translate.google.com/translat...70&sl=ro&tl=en

Tatty_One · Jun 1, 2010, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phanbuey

10% is noticeably faster.

not to mention, thats at stock... since 5850's reference can hit 950-1000mhz core and start matching/beating a 5870. That's pretty much a 285 beatdown.

fact of the matter is... their last gen card is coming close to their new gen card. Hell the 285 is even a bit close to the 470 and ive seen benches where an OC'd 285 beats a 470 soundly.

thats cool and all since this is a new architecture, but unless the 465 overclocks like a monster (800 core) and sells for less than $250, like you said, the upgrade will not be worth it.

Thats a little unfair, you mean "their last BEST single GPU offering is coming close to their current WORST nexgen offering" that in itself is pretty good in my book...... whether it is worth the dosh is a different matter, as has been said, if it is 5-10% cheaper than an HD 5850 then it might be..... certainly to some.

assaulter_99 · Jun 1, 2010, 12:22 PM

I read somewhere that it'll sell for $279, since nvidia sees it sitting confortably between the 5830 and the 5850. So for those like me, hoping that competition would bring prices down, we're screwed.

claylomax · Jun 1, 2010, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by laszlo

a few of these cards can be unlocked....

http://translate.google.com/translat...70&sl=ro&tl=en

The fact that a reference GTX 465 can be unlocked to a GTX 470 is a bonus in my opinion.

phanbuey · Jun 1, 2010, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tatty_One

Thats a little unfair, you mean "their last BEST single GPU offering is coming close to their current WORST nexgen offering" that in itself is pretty good in my book...... whether it is worth the dosh is a different matter, as has been said, if it is 5-10% cheaper than an HD 5850 then it might be..... certainly to some.

Yes but their BEST 285 offering was close to a 275... which was around $249 over a year ago. Now they come out with a $280 card that performs within 5-10% of the old one only with DX11.

The price/performance really hasn't moved a whole lot in the last year on the nvidia side.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benetanegia

The 470 ocerclocks to 850 just as easily as 5850 gets to 1000 (it's about same % OC for the record), so why wouldn't a card with less SPs enabled not reach those clocks? And the performance gain from overclocking is better on Fermi cards, almost lineal, so I don't see your point.

10% is enough difference (not a big one) but 5% is much less of a difference and I said that since the 465 is faster than 285 it has to be close to 5850 and it is indeed, at least in OP's tests. So 5% difference between 285 and 5850 and the GTX465 sits in the middle.It IS close.(unless it is faster with the new drivers, which I can't be sure tbh, I'm only basing my argument in that the OP's 465 at stock is slightly faster on average than the 285 at stock).

The 465 are already listed for $280, as is said in the front page, middle price, so it's not either a bad nor a good deal. It's just competitive at this point. 5% slower than 5850, 5% cheaper...

this is just not true. It is 5% slower in SOME benchmarks... if you take everything and put them together, it performs between a 275 and a 285, which is closer to 15% slower than a 5850. Not to mention, as the resolution increases, the card eats it faster than all ATI and all old-gen cards. Overall this is not a 'performance' card even though its priced like one.

basically the best thing about this card is that it can unlock (if it really can)... then the price is justified. 470 is a much better buy IMO.

May 28, 2010, 11:13 AM	#2
MoonPig Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Wakefield, UK Posts: 4,085 (2.33/day) Thanks: 715 Thanked 903 Times in 621 Posts System Specs	Hmmm not bad. nVidia might re-gain some users. __________________ My DeskMod Log \| My Heatware \| My SteamID \| My For Sale \| My Want to Buy

System Name:	[Insert Witty Name Here]
Processor:	Intel Core i7 3930K
Motherboard:	Asus P9X79 Pro
Cooling:	Noctua NH-D14
Memory:	Corsair XMS3 4x4GB @ 1600MHz
Video Card:	MSI GTX560Ti Twin Frozr II
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility 3 60GB + WD20EARS 2TB
CRT/LCD Model:	Iiyama ProLite X2775HDS-1
Case:	Silverstone FT02
PSU:	Corsair AX750
Software:	Windows 7 Premium 64bit
Benchmarks:	QPad MX50 + Steelseries Ikari Laser

System Name:	Xtreme-III \| Legendary \| Supernova
Processor:	Intel Core i7-2600K @ 4.5 GHz \| AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2ghz \| Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.1GHz
Motherboard:	Asus P8P67-M \| Asus M4N68T-M \| ECS H61H2-M2
Cooling:	Corsair H50 \| Stock \| Stock
Memory:	Memory: G.Skill Sniper 8gb (dual) ddr3 1600 \| 6gb ddr3 1333 \| 4gb DDR3-1333
Video Card:	AMD Radeon HD 6870 Toxic Edition \| ATI Radeon HD 5750 1 GB \| Nvidia Geforce GT 430 1 GB
Hard Disk:	500 Gb SATA, 1 TB SATA, 1.5 TB SATA, 2 TB SATA \| 500 Gb SATA \| 500 Gb SATA
Optical Drive:	LG DVD Drive \| LG DVD Drive \| LG DVD Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	32" HDTV + 2 X 19" Monitor \| 19" Monitor \| 19" Monitor
Case:	CM Storm Sniper Mesh Edition \| Powerlogic 2000 \| Intex Supernova
Sound Card:	Onboard \| Onboard \| Onboard
PSU:	ST50F-ES 500W Silverstone Strider Essential \| Epsilon 80Plus 600W \| Generic 500W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate \| Windows 7 Ultimate \| Windows 7 Ultimate

System Name:	LoLBoX
Processor:	Core i5 750 at 3.33 Ghz 21x159bclk @1.15v
Motherboard:	Gigabyte H55-ITX
Cooling:	Corsair H50
Memory:	8GB Samsung ECO 4GBx2 - 1590Mhz 8-8-8-21 1T @ 1.4v
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 570 @ 785/1570/2020
Hard Disk:	500GB WD Caviar Black 32MB
Optical Drive:	Slimline +/- DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	22" Viewsonic 1080P LED
Case:	Silverstone SG08
Sound Card:	Yes
PSU:	Silverstone SG08 600W
Software:	Windows 7 64 Bit

May 29, 2010, 03:45 AM	#7
OnBoard Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Finland Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day) Thanks: 302 Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts System Specs	Aah, you ran much more that just the FurMark and OC I linked here couple days back Doesn't seem that bad with those new drivers and seems it depends heavily on the game where the extra shaders help. I bet NVIDIA releases 256.xx WHQL and announces GTX 465 the same day, they seem to go well together. Does it come with the GTX 470 cooler? __________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

May 28, 2010, 11:33 AM	#3
lyndonguitar I play games Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Philippines Posts: 1,254 (1.09/day) Thanks: 264 Thanked 262 Times in 182 Posts System Specs	I think its not worth the price.

May 28, 2010, 03:34 PM	#5
phanbuey Eligible for custom title Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Miami Posts: 5,010 (2.48/day) Thanks: 1,484 Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts System Specs	meh... the performance just isnt here this generation... And how is that at all close to HD5850? its close to the 285, which gets beat by a STOCK 5850.

Processor:	Core i5-750 @ 3.6GHz 1.136V 24/7
Motherboard:	Gigabyte P55A-UD3, SATA 6Gbit/s & USB3.0 baby!
Cooling:	Alpenföhn Brocken HeatpipeDirectTouch
Memory:	Geil Ultra Series 4GB 2133MHz DDR3 @ 1440MHz 7-7-7-24
Video Card:	Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB OC (mostly stock speeds)
Hard Disk:	OS: Samsung F3 500GB Games: Samsung F1 640GB
Optical Drive:	Samsung SH-S203B 20x DVD-RW SATA
CRT/LCD Model:	new! Samsung P2350 23" FullHD 2ms / Mirai DTL-632E500 32" LCD
Case:	new! Xigmatek Midgard/Utgard side window with red cathodes, 1x140mm & 3x120mm fans
Sound Card:	new! ASUS Xonar DG & JVC HA-RX700 headphones
PSU:	Cougar CM 700W Modular
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium x64
Benchmarks:	Logitech UltraX Premium & G5 laser v2 + Ulti-mat Breathe X2 for fragging

May 29, 2010, 03:47 AM	#8
Zubasa Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hong Kong, China Posts: 3,703 (1.53/day) Thanks: 586 Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts System Specs	Saying the 285 is extremely close to a 5850, is like saying a 5870 is extremely close to a 480... __________________ ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ “but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard

Processor:	AMD FX-8150
Motherboard:	MSI 990FXA-GD80
Cooling:	Noctua NH-D14
Memory:	Team Xtreeem Dark 1600 @1866 4GBx2
Video Card:	PowerColor HD7970 3GB V3
Hard Disk:	OCZ Vertex 3 120G + Max IOPS 120G + Seagate 7200.12 250GB 2 Raid 0 + Samsung HD103UJ 1TB 2 RAID 0
Optical Drive:	HP 1260i 24x Multi-Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung SyncMaster S24B370
Case:	SilverStone Raven RV01
PSU:	Corsair TX850W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

May 29, 2010, 03:58 AM	#9
kid41212003 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: California Posts: 2,558 (1.43/day) Thanks: 312 Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts System Specs	It's pretty close indeed, 10% It is. __________________

System Name:	Transformer III
Processor:	Core i5 3570k
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z77 UD3
Cooling:	Noctua NH-U12P SE
Memory:	Corsair Mainstream 2GBx2 kit default timing.
Video Card:	EVGA GTX570
Hard Disk:	Intel 510 128 GB SSD,3x 250GB Seagate RAID 0, 1.5TB Seagate Xtreme Media storage.
Optical Drive:	LG Black 6X Blu-ray GGC-H20L, SAMSUNG 22X DVD±R DVD Burner SH-S223Q
CRT/LCD Model:	Westinghouse 24" L2410NM and Samsung 226BW 22"
Case:	Cooler Master HAF-XM
PSU:	HX1000
Benchmarks:	3DMark 2006: 23295 8800GT SLI, 21812 GTX280, 25197 9800GTX+ SLI.

May 29, 2010, 04:54 AM	#11
phanbuey Eligible for custom title Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Miami Posts: 5,010 (2.48/day) Thanks: 1,484 Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts System Specs	10% is noticeably faster. not to mention, thats at stock... since 5850's reference can hit 950-1000mhz core and start matching/beating a 5870. That's pretty much a 285 beatdown. fact of the matter is... their last gen card is coming close to their new gen card. Hell the 285 is even a bit close to the 470 and ive seen benches where an OC'd 285 beats a 470 soundly. thats cool and all since this is a new architecture, but unless the 465 overclocks like a monster (800 core) and sells for less than $250, like you said, the upgrade will not be worth it.

May 29, 2010, 03:18 PM	#12
Triton.se Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 234 (0.14/day) Thanks: 27 Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts System Specs	One thing surprised me, Lowest FPS in Dirt2 DX9 increased with 20fps (55fps -> 75fps = 36%) with GPU OC...but then again, that was using very low resolution 1680x1050. EDIT /// I think, cards like GTX465, GTX280, GTX275 and some super oc GTX260 models (Gigabyte's GTX260 runs @ 680/1512/2500, 230€) run about the same... I bet all cards are capable of running same DX10 games at equal settings @ 19x12 rez. Then why pay 50% more for GTX465... Last edited by Triton.se; May 29, 2010 at 03:26 PM.

System Name:	Hendrix Inside
Processor:	Q9650 @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard:	EP45 UD3P v1.1 F10
Cooling:	TRUE Black
Memory:	OCZ Blade PC9200 2x2GB Low Voltage
Video Card:	SLI @ MSI Hawk GTX460 1GB
Hard Disk:	Samsung F1 1TB
Optical Drive:	2x DVDRW SATA
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell SP2309W (23", 2048x1152)
Case:	Antec 900
Sound Card:	Onboard ALC889A
PSU:	Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software:	Windows 7 x64 Home Premium (SLI Patch 0.9b + 260.99)
Benchmarks:	3DMark Vantage (Performance) P25000 (s775, SLI GTX260 216SP) ..\|.. 3DMark Vantage (High) H24045 (s77

May 29, 2010, 04:01 PM	#13
WSP Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Indonesia Posts: 101 (0.07/day) Thanks: 4 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts System Specs	no photos of the card?

Processor:	AMD PII X4 950BE \| E5300
Motherboard:	MSI 770-G45 \| Asus P5N32-E SLI bios 1903
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme (mod) \| stock
Memory:	2x1Gb V-GEN PC10600 \| 2gb kit Mushkin EM silverline
Video Card:	9800GT+9600GT \| GTX260+GTS250
Hard Disk:	Hitachi 160GB+Seagate 320GB \| WD 160GB+Hitachi 160GB RAID 0
Optical Drive:	iHAS 324 A + HL-DT-ST GH22NS50 \| Lite-On 16x DVDRW
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer X193HQ \| LG 710S
Case:	Enlight \| caseless
Sound Card:	Audigy SB0090 w/ ATP3 \| no sound
PSU:	Toughpower 650W \| VenomRX Boomslang modular 700W
Software:	Win7 x64
Benchmarks:	14001 3DMark06 score with Manli 9600GT OCed 775-1175

May 29, 2010, 04:59 PM	#15
douglatins Join Date: May 2008 Location: Brasil Posts: 2,608 (1.42/day) Thanks: 295 Thanked 268 Times in 204 Posts System Specs	3way sli support? __________________ \|\| My Heatware \|\| My WIP Custom Case \|\| My Steam Profile \|\|

System Name:	Sovereign // HTPC
Processor:	i7 3770k 4.2 // i7 3770k 4.2
Motherboard:	Maximus V Gene // Sabertooth Z77
Cooling:	Noctua D14 // Intel HSF
Memory:	16GB Samsung // 16GB VengeanceLP
Video Card:	Deciding // 660 DC2
Hard Disk:	OS (X25-M), Data (Seagate 1TB) // Samsung 840 120GB & bunch of drives
Optical Drive:	None // None
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung T240HD // LG TV
Case:	TJ08e // Grandia GD08
Sound Card:	DT880 Pro 250 ohm // TV speakers
PSU:	Seasonic Plat 1000 // Seasonic Gold 760
Software:	Windows 8 Pro x64 // Windows 7 Pro x64

May 29, 2010, 11:33 PM	#17
extrasalty Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 174 (0.12/day) Thanks: 13 Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts System Specs	Disappointing performance. Not sure if it changes anything, but GTX285 seems to be on 2nd gen PCIe. __________________

Processor:	Core i7 @ 3.5GHz stock voltage
Motherboard:	MSI Eclipse
Cooling:	Noctua NH-12P SE
Memory:	6 GB 1066MHz
Video Card:	2x GTX260 @ 701/1506
Hard Disk:	Raptor 74 GB
Optical Drive:	Plextor PX-760A
CRT/LCD Model:	NEC MultiSync 2080UX+
PSU:	Corsair HX620
Software:	Win7

May 30, 2010, 12:13 AM	#19
Black Panther Senior Moderator™ Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,059 (3.23/day) Thanks: 2,169 Thanked 1,837 Times in 1,103 Posts System Specs	Nice work you did there bakalu __________________ *My Great White Bengal build* Join the techPowerUp! Official Group on Facebook.

System Name:	BlackPanther -- Great White Bengal
Processor:	E8400 @ 4Ghz 1.28V -- i7 930 @ 4Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P5B -- Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R
Cooling:	Zalman CNPS9500 LED -- Scythe Yasya
Memory:	2x2048 DDR2 Apacer 890Mhz -- 3 x 2048 DDR3 Mushkin black line
Video Card:	Sapphire OC 5970 --Zotac 670 4GB
Hard Disk:	Intel 160GB SSD, eSata Seagate 250GB -- 240GB SSD Sandisk Extreme
Optical Drive:	LG DVD-RAM -- Sony BWU-500S-WW
CRT/LCD Model:	22" 1680x1050 LG Flatron -- 27" 2560x1440 Dell U2711
Case:	Aeroengine Jr -- NZXT Switch 810 White
Sound Card:	X-Fi Xtreme Music 5.1 -- Onboard sound & Z5500 Speakers
PSU:	Corsair HX850W Modular -- NZXT HALE90 850W PSU
Software:	Windows 7 x64 on both systems

Jun 1, 2010, 11:09 AM	#21
laszlo Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: 66 feet from the ground Posts: 825 (0.27/day) Thanks: 66 Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts System Specs	a few of these cards can be unlocked.... http://translate.google.com/translat...70&sl=ro&tl=en __________________

System Name:	AMD reborned
Processor:	Amd Toledo x2 4200+@2740
Motherboard:	DFI NF4 Inf.
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory:	2 GB G.Skill F1-4000USU2
Video Card:	MSI HD6850 Cyclone;860/1100 Mhz
Hard Disk:	Excelstor 160Gb;Seagate 500Gb
Optical Drive:	Teac DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 2032BW
Case:	UTT ME09AL - B - Air
Sound Card:	Audigy SE soft modded to X-Fi Extr.Audio with Z-5500
PSU:	Cooleer Master RP M520
Software:	win7 sp1
Benchmarks:	3dmark 2006-10250

System Name:	The Black & White
Processor:	Core i7 930@4.3Gig 24/7
Motherboard:	Gigabyte GA58 UD4P
Cooling:	Corsair Hydro H80i/Viper140's/Apache120's
Memory:	12GB Team Xtreem LV 2133Mhz CL8 in triple
Video Card:	Gigabyte HD7870 2GB Windforce3X@1250mhz
Hard Disk:	Crucial RealSSD M4 64+Spinpoint F4 320Gig
Optical Drive:	LG BluRay/HD and LG SuperMulti writer
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung S24B750V 24inch IPS@1080
Case:	BitFenix Shinobi Black/White
Sound Card:	Xifi Elite Pro/VideoLogicZXR550's
PSU:	Thermaltake ToughPower 750W modular
Software:	Win 7 x64
Benchmarks:	Retired

Jun 1, 2010, 12:22 PM	#23
assaulter_99 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,634 (1.29/day) Thanks: 53 Thanked 284 Times in 266 Posts System Specs	I read somewhere that it'll sell for $279, since nvidia sees it sitting confortably between the 5830 and the 5850. So for those like me, hoping that competition would bring prices down, we're screwed. __________________ "I assault bases, not women!" : @ssaulter_99

System Name:	Old Skool
Processor:	E6750 @ 3.6 ghz
Motherboard:	GA P35 DS3L
Cooling:	Xigmatek Dark Knight S1283v
Memory:	4gb Kingston DDR2 @ 900mhz
Video Card:	XFX 9800GT 512MB
Hard Disk:	SAMSUNG 320gb
Optical Drive:	SAMSUNG SH-S223B
CRT/LCD Model:	VIEWSONIC vx2260wm
Case:	HAF 922
Sound Card:	Realtek (on board) + Logitech x540
PSU:	CM 550w
Software:	W7 Ultimate 64

System Name:	Jaspe
Processor:	i7 3820 4.62Ghz 1.36v
Motherboard:	BIOSTAR TPower X79
Cooling:	Thermalright Archon Rev. A
Memory:	16Gb G.Skill Ripjaws 2000mhz
Video Card:	ATI HD7970
Hard Disk:	WD 600Gb Velociraptor
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 2433BW
Case:	Silverstone FT01B-W
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	Antec Signature 650w
Software:	Windows 7 64

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 465 1024M	W1zzard	Reviews	94	Jun 5, 2010 01:36 PM
GTX 465 out Monday 24th?	OnBoard	NVIDIA	24	May 27, 2010 04:38 AM
GTX 465 Preview @ Xbit Labs	Xazax	NVIDIA	13	May 25, 2010 12:54 PM
More GeForce GTX 465 Details Surface	btarunr	News	44	May 19, 2010 03:24 PM
First Official GTX 280 Review	wolf2009	NVIDIA	72	Jun 15, 2008 07:59 AM