techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 23, 2010, 01:51 AM   #26
HillBeast
200 Posts
 
HillBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 407 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
1.1Kgs isn't that bad, the TRUE Copper weighed in at 1.9Kgs and it didn't have problems with broken boards. The backplate spreads the load out over more surface area of the board, and makes heavy heatsinks like this not an issue.
I still don't like the idea though. I'd rather use a large heatsink like this in a bench system.
__________________
Intel Core i7 930 @ 3.6GHz with HT on @ 1.17V - 8GB OCZ Extreme DDR3-1333 @ 7-7-7-18 timings (still tuning) - Gigabyte X58A-UD3R - Intel X58 Chipset - Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev.2 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX285 for PhysX - Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W - 2x WD Green 1TB in RAID - Windows 7 Professional - Onboard Realtek 889 HD Audio
HillBeast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 02:24 AM   #27
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,767 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,121 Times in 3,710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HillBeast View Post
I still don't like the idea though. I'd rather use a large heatsink like this in a bench system.
That certainly is a valid preference. To each his own.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 03:00 AM   #28
pr0n Inspector
1000 Posts
 
pr0n Inspector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 139 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
1.1Kgs isn't that bad, the TRUE Copper weighed in at 1.9Kgs and it didn't have problems with broken boards. The backplate spreads the load out over more surface area of the board, and makes heavy heatsinks like this not an issue.
Backplates are for eliminating warping by redirecting pressure to directly under the socket. if the cooler is too heavy it could still warp the board by pulling the PCB within the four screw holes.
__________________
Are you sure you want to cancel this action?

OK / Cancel
pr0n Inspector is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 03:01 AM   #29
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,767 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,121 Times in 3,710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0n Inspector View Post
Backplates are for eliminating warping by redirecting pressure to directly under the socket. if the cooler is too heavy it could still warp the board by pulling the PCB within the four screw holes.
The backplate spreads the weight out over the back of the board, the PCB will not warp with a proper backplate.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 03:09 AM   #30
pr0n Inspector
1000 Posts
 
pr0n Inspector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 139 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
The backplate spreads the weight out over the back of the board, the PCB will not warp with a proper backplate.
A proper backplate should not "spread the weight out over the back of the board", it's suppose the "concentrate" the mounting pressure directly under the socket to avoid warping.
__________________
Are you sure you want to cancel this action?

OK / Cancel
pr0n Inspector is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 05:00 AM   #31
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,563 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,698 Times in 6,395 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechtech View Post
"heatpipes are the same as watercooling, it just moves the heat away from the CPU so it can be dissipated elsewhere"

Well not entirely, water cooling does not involve phase change, where as heat pipes usually do, hence their good heat transfer properties.

Heat pipes usually have some liquid and a wick, and the liquid will evaporate when heated, and then when it cools it condenses on the wick and returns to the heat source to start the cycle all over. It's the phase change that produces the best heat transfer.
its the exact same principle. a fluid is used to absorb the heat and transfer it it to a radiator/heatsink so that the heat dissipation occurs further away from the CPU.
Mussels is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 05:32 AM   #32
stevednmc
500 Posts
 
stevednmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nebraska
Posts: 890 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 84
Thanked 85 Times in 80 Posts

System Specs

It seems to me that the only way to have a more efficient AIR heatsink and not be HUGE would be through metalurgy. If they come up with new materials with better thermal conductivity and lighter weight. Otherwise, they just get bigger and bigger, surface area is the name of the game here. Maybe come up with something dense like a car radiator? With all the twists and folds the surface area increases and therefore can dispirse more heat. Thats the only thing i can think of. Or...water cool!
stevednmc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 02:02 PM   #33
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Kind of favors my Scythe Mugen two just a little bit, and I mean a little bit. I like it though.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 23, 2010, 02:21 PM   #34
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,767 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,121 Times in 3,710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0n Inspector View Post
A proper backplate should not "spread the weight out over the back of the board", it's suppose the "concentrate" the mounting pressure directly under the socket to avoid warping.
Have you ever looked at a backplate? They touch the entire back of the board, not just under the socket. They are not to concentrate the mounting pressure directly under the stocket, they are to spread the weight and pressure out over a greater area of the board. If they wanted to concentrate the pressure behind the socket, the only place the backplate would touch would be behind the socket(think xbox x-clamp), but that isn't the case.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2010, 01:17 AM   #35
HillBeast
200 Posts
 
HillBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 407 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
Have you ever looked at a backplate? They touch the entire back of the board, not just under the socket. They are not to concentrate the mounting pressure directly under the stocket, they are to spread the weight and pressure out over a greater area of the board. If they wanted to concentrate the pressure behind the socket, the only place the backplate would touch would be behind the socket(think xbox x-clamp), but that isn't the case.
The thing is, when have you even seen a backplate larger than the size of the area of the mounting holes. IT's worse on AMD boards because they usually have thinner backplates. The thing people keep refering to as to how tough CPUs are is Intels guidelines which is around 600N, which people assume is 60kgs, but when you put it in a tower you are applying torques to the CPU, and the socket equal to [the height of the cooler] * [the mass of the cooler] and also there is the pressure applied by the mounting system. It doesn't add up to 600N but it will be getting up there.

The backplate is supposed to put the pressure of the cooler onto the CPU so that it doesn't mount unevenly and makes sure it touches the CPU properly. It may spread it, but not much. The backplate still only has about 9-10cm of coverage.
__________________
Intel Core i7 930 @ 3.6GHz with HT on @ 1.17V - 8GB OCZ Extreme DDR3-1333 @ 7-7-7-18 timings (still tuning) - Gigabyte X58A-UD3R - Intel X58 Chipset - Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev.2 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX285 for PhysX - Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W - 2x WD Green 1TB in RAID - Windows 7 Professional - Onboard Realtek 889 HD Audio
HillBeast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2010, 01:54 AM   #36
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,767 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,121 Times in 3,710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HillBeast View Post
The thing is, when have you even seen a backplate larger than the size of the area of the mounting holes. IT's worse on AMD boards because they usually have thinner backplates. The thing people keep refering to as to how tough CPUs are is Intels guidelines which is around 600N, which people assume is 60kgs, but when you put it in a tower you are applying torques to the CPU, and the socket equal to [the height of the cooler] * [the mass of the cooler] and also there is the pressure applied by the mounting system. It doesn't add up to 600N but it will be getting up there.

The backplate is supposed to put the pressure of the cooler onto the CPU so that it doesn't mount unevenly and makes sure it touches the CPU properly. It may spread it, but not much. The backplate still only has about 9-10cm of coverage.
Well on an Intel setup, the entire weight of the cooler is on the 4 holes, and only the 4 holes. That is almost no surface area of the board, I'll give you maybe 1cm^2 of surface. The backplate covering 9-10cm gives 9-10 times the surface area on the board that the weight is applied to. So, yes, the weight is spread out a lot accross the board.

With an AMD setup, there is already a backplate, however the coolers normally connect to the weak plastic frame. This is why I said a bold-thru kit is needed, as it eliminates the weak plastic, and puts the weight directly on the backplate.

If the backplates were designed only to put preassure on the CPU, then the only place they would touch on the motherboard would be the back of the CPU. This obviously isn't the case. In face, for the 775 and AM2 backplates, they actually are cut out so they don't touch behind the CPU socket, because there are components back there that would break if they did. Backplates are used to increase mounting pressure, I'm not denying that, but they are also used to spread the weight of the cooler out over more area of the board.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate

Last edited by newtekie1; Jun 24, 2010 at 02:33 AM.
newtekie1 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2010, 05:07 AM   #37
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,563 (10.96/day)
Thanks: 3,700
Thanked 8,698 Times in 6,395 Posts

System Specs

newtekie has it right.


intel use the stupid push pins which put the pressure on the mobo, AMD use a backplate but due to the lever/hook design the pressure is on that, not the backplate.
Mussels is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 24, 2010, 11:57 AM   #38
HillBeast
200 Posts
 
HillBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 407 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
newtekie has it right.


intel use the stupid push pins which put the pressure on the mobo, AMD use a backplate but due to the lever/hook design the pressure is on that, not the backplate.
They use push pins on the stock coolers. Hardly any tower coolers (none of the high end ones) use push pins. The only tower I've seen (but I haven't researched this) with push pins is the Freezer 7 PRo, but that's a feather It doesn't need a mounting system. This is 1.1KGs. IT needs a bracket, but that wasn't my point. My point is even with the bracket in place it is still too much pressure on the motherboard and CPU for my liking. I'd personally only use a tower this big on a bench system. Other people can go ahead and use something massive on their computers, but I won't.

Until we go back to like the early P4s where the heatsink was screwed onto mounting holes on the case rather than a bracket attached to the motherboard which will make sure there is no movement at all (unless your cases flexes because you're in a volcano), I have no intention of putting a big cooler like this in my computer.
__________________
Intel Core i7 930 @ 3.6GHz with HT on @ 1.17V - 8GB OCZ Extreme DDR3-1333 @ 7-7-7-18 timings (still tuning) - Gigabyte X58A-UD3R - Intel X58 Chipset - Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev.2 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX285 for PhysX - Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W - 2x WD Green 1TB in RAID - Windows 7 Professional - Onboard Realtek 889 HD Audio
HillBeast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zalman Shows off Core i5-ready CNPS10X Extreme CPU Cooler malware News 29 Sep 6, 2009 05:18 PM
Thermalright Shows off New CPU Coolers, Special Cases & Cogage brand Darksaber News 24 Jun 4, 2009 04:43 AM
Massive Thermalright CPU Cooler numlock2.0 Overclocking & Cooling 4 Jun 7, 2007 02:38 PM
A-DATA Shows off Massive 128GB Solid State Drive malware News 12 Jan 18, 2007 07:08 PM
Cooler Master shows off new CPU cooler Darksaber News 15 Jun 25, 2006 10:35 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts