ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1024 MB

W1zzard · Jul 7, 2010, 09:39 AM

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z..._GTX_460_1_GB/

kid41212003 · Jul 12, 2010, 06:30 AM

It's as good as the GTX465 (faster in some caces) with lower CUDA cores. Interested.

DrPepper · Jul 12, 2010, 07:09 AM

It's more efficient than the GF100 according to anand as well, interesting.

CounterZeus · Jul 12, 2010, 07:56 AM

looks like nvidia got a winner here. ty for the review!

HillBeast · Jul 12, 2010, 08:52 AM

Well looking at the other 460s, this is definately the worst. I'd rather have the Gigabyte or MSI or something. The rubbish fan and pretty poop temperatures (compared to the other 460s) makes this a definate no go for me. I was thinking maybe the blower fan would give the best cooling but obviously not. I guess blower fans just aren't as good as we would be lead to think. Maybe this is why the Vapor-X uses a normal fan.

Imsochobo · Jul 12, 2010, 10:56 AM

Well, the problem is still.
Ineffecient compared to ATI.

But look at those idle numbers!

A leap in the right direction nvidia! but unfortunately its not able to really match ati yet....

But yay for the OC potential!

KainXS · Jul 12, 2010, 11:35 AM

it looks like the 32 rop one slightly, just slightly, edges out a GTX465

lol i said it before, the top end GTX460 will be faster than the GTX465

Quote:

Originally Posted by KainXS

well going by every other card in the GTX4XX series this card should have a max of 32 tmu's and 24 rops, I think this card will trade blows with the GTX260 and but if they can pull off a core clock of 675mhz then this will be right behind the GTX465, it will actually have more shader power than the GTX465 but the raster will be a little lower, if it really does have 32 tmu's and a 675mhz core clock, this card could even be faster than the GTX465 even including the memory bottleneck.

mdm-adph · Jul 12, 2010, 05:02 PM

Not bad -- good to see Nvidia back in the game! Competition is always good.

Aleksander · Jul 12, 2010, 11:23 PM

Still power consumption is worse than ATI

DrPepper · Jul 12, 2010, 11:34 PM

At idle the power consumptio is better than all the ATi cards its faster than. Also its pretty fast for its max power consumption which is lower than alot of cards its faster than as well.

Delta6326 · Jul 13, 2010, 02:28 PM

i would rather get the msi oc cyclone lower fan noise lower power on some and better performance out of box

Aleksander · Jul 13, 2010, 02:30 PM

Well, this card is just like 7600GS in its old good days

trt740 · Jul 13, 2010, 02:32 PM

W1zzard these still have lower texture units than say a gtx 285 correct? If so can you explain why the performance is as high as a 465? Is it true the 460 has more texture units than the 465? The reason I asked this is because the gtx 275 and gtx 285 seem to hang right with this card or beat it.

W1zzard · Jul 13, 2010, 02:50 PM

gtx 460 has 56 tmus, 470 has 44 tmus

everything above 1280x1024 is 4xaa 16xaf when available in the game

trt740 · Jul 13, 2010, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W1zzard

gtx 460 has 56 tmus, 470 has 44 tmus

everything above 1280x1024 is 4xaa 16xaf when available in the game

The 285 gtx has 80 or so correct?

W1zzard · Jul 13, 2010, 02:57 PM

yep

Benetanegia · Jul 13, 2010, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trt740

I wonder why the Geforce boys did that doesn't make sense to me but I'm no expert.

I don't quite remember which specific differences exist, but the TMUs in Fermi are different. I do remember two important differences, but there were some more.

1- Well, first one is not a difference in TMUs themselves, it's on the much improved caches, so that the utilization (efficiency) is better. In the past textures had to be local (because chaches we local), so if different threads (running in completely different shader cluster) needed the same texture, that texture needed to be loaded twice or as many times as required. In Fermi cahces are global, every shader multiprocessor has access to everything, so they just need to load it once.

2- The second difference of lesser importance now, but still important for shadows and some other effects is the hardware jittering acceleration in Fermi's texture units. It's basically the ability to fetch four texels in one texture operation. Future games will see a greater improvement from this feature than now, but there is a small improvement even today.

BetA · Jul 15, 2010, 12:59 AM

hmmm,

i didnt saw any gtx 460 with Vram chip Cooling...
is there a card that has good cooling and cooling on vram?
i really love zotac, great cards, but this is kinda strange..

wich one would be the best to buy?
i want vram cooling, vrm cooling and overall a good cooling...

greetz ViruS

MN12BIRD · Jul 15, 2010, 02:01 AM

Might be because it uses DDR5 and should run cooler than DDR3?

Card looks awesome. NVidia is definitely back in the game with this one!

Aleksander · Jul 15, 2010, 02:15 AM

Ram cooling is not needed anymore

DrPepper · Jul 15, 2010, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aleksander Dishnica

Ram cooling is not needed anymore

I'd say its still needed to reach higher clocks.

ktr · Jul 18, 2010, 06:56 PM

Did Zotac forgot to place the thermal pad for the memory? Some body got their hands on a EVGA GTX460 with the same exact cooler, and it had the thermal pad.

http://www.overclock.net/10024932-post3.html (scroll to bottom)

Also, the EVGA suffers the same thermal performance as the Zotac, bummer.

Jul 7, 2010, 09:39 AM	#1
W1zzard Benevolent Dictator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 13,873 (4.17/day) Thanks: 184 Thanked 10,454 Times in 3,219 Posts System Specs	ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1024 MB To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z..._GTX_460_1_GB/ Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 12, 2010 at 03:54 PM.

Processor:	Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.4 GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS P8Z68-V Pro
Memory:	3x 2048 MB Mushkin DDR3
Video Card:	ASUS GeForce GTX 670 Direct CU II TOP
Hard Disk:	Crucial C300 128 GB, WD6400AAKS 640 GB, WD15EADS 1.5 TB
Optical Drive:	BenQ DW1640
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell U3011 30", 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Case:	NZXT H2
Sound Card:	On-board Realtek HD
PSU:	Kingwin Absolute Platinum 550 W
Software:	Windows 7 64-bit

Jul 12, 2010, 06:30 AM	#2
kid41212003 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: California Posts: 2,560 (1.41/day) Thanks: 312 Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts System Specs	It's as good as the GTX465 (faster in some caces) with lower CUDA cores. Interested. __________________

System Name:	Transformer III
Processor:	Core i5 3570k
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z77 UD3
Cooling:	Noctua NH-U12P SE
Memory:	Corsair Mainstream 2GBx2 kit default timing.
Video Card:	EVGA GTX570
Hard Disk:	Intel 510 128 GB SSD,3x 250GB Seagate RAID 0, 1.5TB Seagate Xtreme Media storage.
Optical Drive:	LG Black 6X Blu-ray GGC-H20L, SAMSUNG 22X DVD±R DVD Burner SH-S223Q
CRT/LCD Model:	Westinghouse 24" L2410NM and Samsung 226BW 22"
Case:	Cooler Master HAF-XM
PSU:	HX1000
Benchmarks:	3DMark 2006: 23295 8800GT SLI, 21812 GTX280, 25197 9800GTX+ SLI.

System Name:	Rusky
Processor:	Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P6T
Cooling:	Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory:	12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card:	GTX470 1280MB
Hard Disk:	OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Optical Drive:	Pioneer 20X DVDRW
CRT/LCD Model:	Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case:	Silverstone Raven RV01
PSU:	Corsair 650 Watt
Software:	Windows 7 x64
Benchmarks:	3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg

Jul 12, 2010, 07:09 AM	#3
DrPepper The Doctor is in the house Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Scotland (It rains alot) Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day) Thanks: 977 Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts System Specs	It's more efficient than the GF100 according to anand as well, interesting.

Jul 12, 2010, 07:56 AM	#4
CounterZeus Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Belgium Posts: 159 (0.12/day) Thanks: 40 Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts System Specs	looks like nvidia got a winner here. ty for the review! __________________ Nazgul: Lenovo Thinkpad X121e, 11.6", Intel Core i3 2367M, 8GB DDR3, Intel HD 3000, 320GB HDD

System Name:	Ezreal
Processor:	Intel Core i5 2500K
Motherboard:	Asus P8P67 LE B3
Cooling:	1x200mm + 1x160mm case fans + Scythe Mugen 3 PCGH
Memory:	16GB DDR3
Video Card:	Asus GTX560 Ti DirectCU II TOP
Hard Disk:	Samsung 830 128GB + 2xSamsung F3 1TB
Optical Drive:	LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ASUS VH242H + BenQ E2400HD
Case:	CoolerMaster HAF 912 Plus
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek 7.1
PSU:	OCZ StealthXStream 2 600W
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Jul 12, 2010, 08:52 AM	#5
HillBeast Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: New Zealand Posts: 407 (0.33/day) Thanks: 13 Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts System Specs	Well looking at the other 460s, this is definately the worst. I'd rather have the Gigabyte or MSI or something. The rubbish fan and pretty poop temperatures (compared to the other 460s) makes this a definate no go for me. I was thinking maybe the blower fan would give the best cooling but obviously not. I guess blower fans just aren't as good as we would be lead to think. Maybe this is why the Vapor-X uses a normal fan. __________________ Intel Core i7 930 @ 3.6GHz with HT on @ 1.17V - 8GB OCZ Extreme DDR3-1333 @ 7-7-7-18 timings (still tuning) - Gigabyte X58A-UD3R - Intel X58 Chipset - Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev.2 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX285 for PhysX - Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W - 2x WD Green 1TB in RAID - Windows 7 Professional - Onboard Realtek 889 HD Audio

System Name:	Kuja
Processor:	Intel Core i7 930
Motherboard:	Gigabyte X58A-UD3R
Cooling:	Corsair H50 HB.o Special Edition with Koolance CHC-122 NB Block
Memory:	OCZ Extreme Edition 4GB Dual Channel
Video Card:	Sapphire Radeon 5870 Vapor-X Rev. 2
Hard Disk:	2x 1TB WD Green in RAID
CRT/LCD Model:	BenQ V2400W
Case:	Lian Li PC-A17 HB.o Special Edition
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek 889A
PSU:	Gigabyte Odin Pro 800W
Software:	Windows 7 Professional
Benchmarks:	93632 sysPoints in sysTest '09 47 FPS in Star Tales Benchmark

Jul 12, 2010, 10:56 AM	#6
Imsochobo Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud. Posts: 514 (0.33/day) Thanks: 3 Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts System Specs	Well, the problem is still. Ineffecient compared to ATI. But look at those idle numbers! A leap in the right direction nvidia! but unfortunately its not able to really match ati yet.... But yay for the OC potential! __________________ Last edited by Imsochobo; Jul 12, 2010 at 11:05 AM.

System Name:	My system, my servers are faster :(
Processor:	Amd phenom II 1055 (10 bucks LOL!)
Motherboard:	MSI GD65
Cooling:	Air.
Memory:	4 GB 1866 mhz corsair dom GT
Video Card:	5850- Crossfire
Hard Disk:	Samsung 1tb/NAS 500Mb/SEC
Optical Drive:	Some blueray drive
CRT/LCD Model:	42" Toshiba TV/26"mon/Projector
Case:	Silverstone GD04B
Sound Card:	ATI HDMI.
PSU:	Corsair HX1000
Software:	UBuntu win7 etc.
Benchmarks:	running esxI cluster for my server needs :) 24 cores in total!

System Name:	GhetO.O
Processor:	Core2Quad Q8400@4.1Ghz/2500K
Motherboard:	MSI P35 Neo 2 FR/Sabertooth
Cooling:	GEMINII+2 120MM fans/Corsair
Memory:	8GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2 1066/16GB Crucial Ballistix
Video Card:	ASUS GTX460 SliFire/GTX680 SLI
Hard Disk:	1TB Spinpoint/2 SSD + 1 500GB WD
Optical Drive:	Lite On DVD+DL/None
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer 22 inch/ IPS Asus 26inch
Case:	Antec 300/CM HAF
Sound Card:	Xonar Essence
PSU:	Thermaltake 600
Software:	Windows 7

Jul 12, 2010, 05:02 PM	#8
mdm-adph Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Your house. Posts: 2,426 (1.07/day) Thanks: 401 Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts System Specs	Not bad -- good to see Nvidia back in the game! Competition is always good. __________________ CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

System Name:	The Black Vulcan!
Processor:	Phenom II X4 B50 (X2 550 unlocked)
Motherboard:	Asus M4A87TD-EVO (870)
Cooling:	Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro
Memory:	8GB DDR3 (4GBx2) Mushkin Blackline @ 1600MHz
Video Card:	ATI HD 4870 X2 2GB
Hard Disk:	Seagate 250GBx2 RAID0
Optical Drive:	ASUS DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Spectre 19-in LCD
Case:	Rosewill R103A
Sound Card:	Onboard HD
PSU:	Thermaltake TR650
Software:	Windows 7
Benchmarks:	Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.

Jul 12, 2010, 11:23 PM	#9
Aleksander Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day) Thanks: 653 Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts System Specs	Still power consumption is worse than ATI

System Name:	Mercury
Processor:	Phenom II x4 B50
Motherboard:	ASUS M4A89GTD PRO
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory:	6GB Ram (4GBx1 Corsair 2GBx1 Nanya)
Video Card:	PowerColor AX6770 V2.0
Hard Disk:	1TB Hitachi, 500 GB WD Blue
Optical Drive:	DVD-RAM
CRT/LCD Model:	Philips 247E-LPH 24" 1920x1080
Case:	Mercury
Sound Card:	Integrated Realtek
PSU:	Corsair 750TX
Software:	Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmarks:	Maybe it is time to benchmark :D

Jul 12, 2010, 11:34 PM	#10
DrPepper The Doctor is in the house Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Scotland (It rains alot) Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day) Thanks: 977 Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts System Specs	At idle the power consumptio is better than all the ATi cards its faster than. Also its pretty fast for its max power consumption which is lower than alot of cards its faster than as well.

Jul 13, 2010, 02:28 PM	#11
Delta6326 Join Date: May 2008 Location: Iowa, USA Posts: 3,363 (1.81/day) Thanks: 570 Thanked 616 Times in 451 Posts System Specs	i would rather get the msi oc cyclone lower fan noise lower power on some and better performance out of box __________________ Diablo III- Delta6326#1894 TechPowerUp WCG Forum Skyrim Skill Perks By Delta6326

System Name:	THE CUBE
Processor:	Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield V1.28
Motherboard:	ASUS P5Q Pro Bios 2102
Cooling:	XIGMATEK S1283 w/crossbow(120mm x4 Left, Back, Back, HSF)
Memory:	Mushkin Blackline 4GB (2 x 2GB) 800Mhz @ 1Ghz 5-5-5-15
Video Card:	2x SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 4850 1GB.
Hard Disk:	WD Black 500GB/WD EXT 2TB/ Toshiba 250GB Test Drive
Optical Drive:	SAMSUNG 22X DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	ASUS VH226H 1080p Black 21.5" 2ms LCD
Case:	"THE CUBE" Custom built pure Red Alder wood
Sound Card:	Onboard/ Logitech Z-2300 200 watts 2.1
PSU:	XION AXP Lan-Party AMP Edition 146A 800W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro x64

Jul 13, 2010, 02:30 PM	#12
Aleksander Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day) Thanks: 653 Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts System Specs	Well, this card is just like 7600GS in its old good days

Jul 13, 2010, 02:32 PM	#13
trt740 Eligible for custom title Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 10,186 (3.92/day) Thanks: 1,578 Thanked 1,136 Times in 961 Posts System Specs	W1zzard these still have lower texture units than say a gtx 285 correct? If so can you explain why the performance is as high as a 465? Is it true the 460 has more texture units than the 465? The reason I asked this is because the gtx 275 and gtx 285 seem to hang right with this card or beat it. Last edited by trt740; Jul 13, 2010 at 03:05 PM.

Processor:	Intel 2500K Sandy Bridge 4.9ghz 1.384v 24/7 5.0ghz whenever
Motherboard:	Asus Sabertooh 1155 motherboard rev.3.0
Cooling:	Pro Meg 79CF120mm x2 fans,200mm front intake fan, 200 mm top fan, 120mm rear fan,140 mm PSU fan
Memory:	8GB Mushkin Redline 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 6 8 6 24 t1
Video Card:	OEM GTX660 1.5GB
Hard Disk:	Wester Digital Black Edition 32MB 7200 RPM 1TB SATA 3.0 ,CAVALIER SE 16MB 640GB SATA 3.0 DRIVE
Optical Drive:	1 BLACK LG DVD BURNERS
CRT/LCD Model:	BLACK ASUS LCD 24 inch monitor 1080P x1920
Case:	Corsair Obsidian Series 650D black brushed aluminum and steel case
Sound Card:	Sound Blaster Live 24 bit 7.1
PSU:	Thermaltake 850 watt SLI 140mm silent fan Tough Power
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64

Jul 13, 2010, 02:50 PM	#14
W1zzard Benevolent Dictator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 13,873 (4.17/day) Thanks: 184 Thanked 10,454 Times in 3,219 Posts System Specs	gtx 460 has 56 tmus, 470 has 44 tmus everything above 1280x1024 is 4xaa 16xaf when available in the game

Jul 13, 2010, 02:57 PM	#16
W1zzard Benevolent Dictator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Stuttgart, Germany Posts: 13,873 (4.17/day) Thanks: 184 Thanked 10,454 Times in 3,219 Posts System Specs	yep

Jul 15, 2010, 12:59 AM	#18
BetA Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: US and Germany Posts: 33 (0.02/day) Thanks: 11 Thanked 25 Times in 11 Posts System Specs	^^ hmmm, i didnt saw any gtx 460 with Vram chip Cooling... is there a card that has good cooling and cooling on vram? i really love zotac, great cards, but this is kinda strange.. wich one would be the best to buy? i want vram cooling, vrm cooling and overall a good cooling... greetz ViruS

System Name:	BetA´s RiG
Processor:	Q9550@3,8Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus P5Q Ket´s mBIOS
Cooling:	OCZ Vendetta 2 @ Arctic MX-2
Memory:	4x2048 MB - OCZ-REAPER HPC @ 1066Mhz
Video Card:	GTX460 OC 950/1900/4250 @ Accelero Xtreme Plus
Hard Disk:	2TB 4xSata2-Seagate Baraccuda 7200.12
Optical Drive:	LG DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	AOC CRT (clearview and Flat) + HDTV Phillips 1920x1080p
Case:	CM HAF 932 Advanced
Sound Card:	CreativeX-FI X-tremeGamer
PSU:	Corsair VX550W 550 Watt
Software:	Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Benchmarks:	.....coming soon......

Jul 15, 2010, 02:01 AM	#19
MN12BIRD Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 444 (0.28/day) Thanks: 10 Thanked 78 Times in 72 Posts System Specs	Might be because it uses DDR5 and should run cooler than DDR3? Card looks awesome. NVidia is definitely back in the game with this one!

System Name:	AMD Black Dragon
Processor:	AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition
Motherboard:	Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Memory:	4GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum (2x2GB)
Video Card:	ATi Radeon HD4870 512MB GDDR5 w AC Twin Turbo
Hard Disk:	Crucial C300 64GB SSD, 500GB and 2TB Drives
Optical Drive:	Pioneer SATA DVR-212D
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 2494hm, Dell (Samsung?) 1907FP
Case:	Lancool (Lian-Li on a budget) K7
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek ALC889A, M-Audio Fast Tracks
PSU:	OCZ Mod-X-Stream Pro 600W
Software:	Windows 7 Home Premium x64, XP Pro

Jul 15, 2010, 02:15 AM	#20
Aleksander Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day) Thanks: 653 Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts System Specs	Ram cooling is not needed anymore

Jul 18, 2010, 06:56 PM	#22
ktr Eligible for custom title Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Bay Area, California, USA, Earth Posts: 6,158 (2.34/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 708 Times in 595 Posts System Specs	Did Zotac forgot to place the thermal pad for the memory? Some body got their hands on a EVGA GTX460 with the same exact cooler, and it had the thermal pad. http://www.overclock.net/10024932-post3.html (scroll to bottom) Also, the EVGA suffers the same thermal performance as the Zotac, bummer. Last edited by ktr; Jul 18, 2010 at 07:02 PM.

System Name:	Gateway P7811FX (laptop)
Processor:	Intel Centrino2 C2D T9600 sktP 2.8Ghz 6mb Cache
Motherboard:	Foxconn made systemboard w/ Intel PM45 "Montevina" Chipset
Cooling:	Two Laptop Fans (one for GPU, other for CPU)
Memory:	SuperTalent Micron 8GB (2x4GB) PC3-8500 DDR3
Video Card:	Nvidia 9800M GTS 512MB discrete (1750mb shared) PCI-E
Hard Disk:	WD Scorpio Black 500GB Sata2 16MB 7200 & Samsung 830 series 128GB SSD
Optical Drive:	Optiarc 8x Multi-Format Dual Layer DVDRAM
CRT/LCD Model:	17.0" AUO WUXGA Ultrabright 1920x1200 Wide Screen Glossy
Case:	Laptop Chassis Orange and Black w/ Brushed Metal
Sound Card:	Creative X-FI Notebook ExpressCard
PSU:	120watt AC Adapter & 9cell Battery 86WHr
Software:	Windows 7 Professional 64Bit

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
MSI GeForce GTX 460 Cyclone OC 1024 MB	W1zzard	Reviews	16	Jul 25, 2010 03:15 PM
EVGA Announces GeForce GTX 460	btarunr	News	1	Jul 12, 2010 09:11 PM
AXLE GeForce GTX 460 768 MB	W1zzard	Reviews	19	Jul 12, 2010 04:26 PM
ZOTAC Unleashes New GeForce GTX 460 Series	btarunr	News	0	Jul 12, 2010 07:02 AM
NVIDIA Designs GeForce GTX 460	btarunr	News	58	Apr 11, 2010 04:54 PM