techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > System Builder's Advice

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 12, 2010, 07:35 PM   #1
Pikem4n
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 32 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

New pc build (what should i get and go for?)

Hello folks


After years of wanting to build a dedicated pc I originally bought a case 2 years back in hope of starting it then but i never got around to it, anyway i've finally got myself a secondhand (but working) evga 680i mobo,along with a intel c2d cpu and a heatsink fan,all for 70 quid as a basis to build from.

But the problem is i am a bit like a kid in a sweet shop with so many sweets to choose from, my basic needs for the new pc will be gaming and webcasting with view in the future to maybe add a tv tuner to record HD and hooking it all up to a either new lcd monitor or hdtv, my budget now isn't too great it's going to be between 200-300 pounds.

I am thinking about getting a 650W Corsair CMPSU-650TX psu, but apart from that i don't know what exactly to get so can anyone please give me any pointers to what i should really go for?

Regards from Pike
__________________
Pikem4n is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 12, 2010, 08:13 PM   #2
KingPing
500 Posts
 
KingPing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Argentina (South America)
Posts: 749 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 132
Thanked 243 Times in 172 Posts

System Specs

Are you going to use those parts?, if so, then

case - Ok
CPU - Ok Model?
Mobo - Ok

You need RAM, Video card, PSU ( the corsair one is Ok, but maybe a 450w, 500w, 550w woulb be cheaper), and a monitor

If you are going to use a C2D cpu, then i recommend a ATI 5770, buy 4gb of ram, nothing to fancy (DDR2 800 will be fine)

Last edited by KingPing; Jul 12, 2010 at 08:25 PM.
KingPing is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2010, 03:17 PM   #3
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
i've finally got myself a secondhand (but working) evga 680i mobo,along with a intel c2d cpu and a heatsink fan,all for 70 quid as a basis to build from.
That wasnt a smart thing to do, I know it’s cheap but it’s on a dead motherboard socket so the higher end processors are at the end of their life and what's left is rare and overpriced and hence making future upgrades might be difficult. £300 would get you a nice AMD Athlon II X3/X4 on an AM3 socket with DDR3 opposed to DDR2.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
But the problem is i am a bit like a kid in a sweet shop with so many sweets to choose from, my basic needs for the new pc will be gaming and webcasting with view in the future to maybe add a tv tuner to record HD and hooking it all up to a either new lcd monitor or hdtv,
For gaming, the cheapest and fastest video cards that you can buy without bottlenecking a core 2 Duo is the ATI 5750 1GB and Nvidia GTS 250 1GB, and although these cards are powerful but Iam not sure its enough to run new games 1080p if that's your intention, maybe at 1680x1050. All you need now is some decent branded DDR2 memory and a decently branded PSU and you're set to go.

Point of View GTS250 1GB DDR3 DVI VGA HDMI Out PCI...
PowerColor HD 5750 1GB GDDR5, DVI VGA HDMI PCI-E.....
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2010, 06:14 PM   #4
KingPing
500 Posts
 
KingPing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Argentina (South America)
Posts: 749 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 132
Thanked 243 Times in 172 Posts

System Specs

I use a 5770 with a 1080p HDTV (the GTS 250 is also Ok, but i don't own one so i don't know for sure) and it can run most games today but not all of them maxed out: DIRT2 run at 60fps with some graphics options in medium and some in high and no AA, GTA4 mixed settings from ultra to low (because of cpu not the vga), BATMAN AA runs maxed out, METRO 2033 runs at 30fps - 40fps in high in dx9, COD 4 runs maxed out, the same for WaW and MW2, BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 2 runs ok with high settings but no AA. The CPU i use is a C2D e8400 OCed to 3.6Ghz and some games are still bottlenecked by the cpu , like BAD COMPANY 2 or GTA4.

as Dent1 said go for a 5750 or a GTS 250, and 4gb of cheap ram (DDR2 800)
KingPing is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2010, 06:51 PM   #5
Pikem4n
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 32 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Hi guys,thanks for responding


Well the cpu is (i think) a E6400 if that makes sense,compaired to what i am using atm the stuff i've bought will blow it out of the water, whether it was a wise move to buy a 2nd hand mobo and cpu i am not too sure, but i did get it from a very trusted source.


The new pc shall eventually be hooked up to either a 22 inch or 24 inch lcd, not HDTV as i previously stated so playing games and watching films in full HD on a big screen is not a must really.

This is what i've so far opted for -

Corsair TX Series 650W ATX PSU-£84.31 inc.VAT
1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Expres VGA Card-£93.71 inc.VAT
1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm S-ATAII 32MB Hard Drive-£44.59 inc.VAT
Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders-£41.07 inc.VAT
Total price inc VAT-£263.67

Would you say what i've opted for so far are good additions to the mobo, or can i cut corners and find cheaper stuff that is better?

Pike
__________________
Pikem4n is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2010, 10:20 PM   #6
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
Hi guys,thanks for responding


Well the cpu is (i think) a E6400 if that makes sense,compaired to what i am using atm the stuff i've bought will blow it out of the water, whether it was a wise move to buy a 2nd hand mobo and cpu i am not too sure, but i did get it from a very trusted source.

The E6400 is a very old model (July 2006), its has 2MBs of cache opposed to the 6MB of cache the higher end E8xxx Core 2 Duos have, I believe the E6400 is clocked really low @ 2.1GHz. Sitting at stock it will bottleneck most video cards, including the 5750 or GTS 250, that isnt to say games will not run, older games should run at high settings, but it will struggle on to maintain decent frame rates on newer games. I would suggest overclocking the processor, they should reach around 3-3.5GHz on a decent air cooler, this should eliminate some if not all the bottlenecking significantly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post

Corsair TX Series 650W ATX PSU-£84.31 inc.VAT
1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Expres VGA Card-£93.71 inc.VAT
1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm S-ATAII 32MB Hard Drive-£44.59 inc.VAT
Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders-£41.07 inc.VAT
Total price inc VAT-£263.67

Would you say what i've opted for so far are good additions to the mobo, or can i cut corners and find cheaper stuff that is better?

Pike

Which operating system are you using, 2 GBs is not enough these days. If money is an issue buy 1x2GB stick then add another 1x2GB stick in the future when you've got the funds. The Corsair TX series PSU is good, but on a low end gaming rig its overkill, you can shave about £10-20 off the PSU and you'll still have enough for a pretty good branded one.


Recommended branded PSUs for cheap:

Antec Basiq Power 550W PSU £54.99
OCZ Stealth XStream 600W £57.99
OCZ StealthXstream II 600W £61.56
Antec EarthWatts 650W £67.05
OCZ 700W ModXStream Pro Power £67.46

Antec Basiq Power 550W PSU - 6x SATA 2x PCI-E 20+4...
OCZ Stealth XStream 600W PSU - SLI Ready ATX2.2 12...
Antec EarthWatts 650W PSU - 80Plus Certified 12cm ...
OCZ 700W ModXStream Pro Power Supply | Ebuyer.com
OCZ StealthXstream II 600W Power Supply | Ebuyer.c...


If you are buying just 2GBs get one of these 1x2GB modules.

OCZ 2GB DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 CL 5-6-6-15 Value Ser...
Crucial 2GB DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 Ballistix Memory ...
Corsair 2GB DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 Memory CL5 1.8V |...
Crucial 2GB DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 Ballistix Memory ...
Corsair 2GB DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 XMS2 Xtreme.. | E...
Kingston 2gb Ddr2 800mhz Hyperx Memory Non-ecc Cl5...

If you are buying 4 GBs of ram get one of these 2x2GB modules.
Kingston 4gb (2x2gb) Ddr2 800mhz Memory Non-ecc Cl...
OCZ 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 800Mhz/PC2-6400 Memory Unbuff...
Corsair 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 Memory Ki...
Crucial 4GB (2X2GB) DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 Ballistix...

Last edited by Dent1; Jul 13, 2010 at 10:35 PM.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 03:08 PM   #7
dr_dream
25 Posts
 
dr_dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 47 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

My advice is to keep away from DDR2, because it is outdated and for aproximately the same amount of money you get DDR3. However this also involves a newer platform, like the AM3 or LGA1156.

If I were you, I would sell the rest of your PC components and gather money for an AM3 platform, which has cost-efficient CPUs and accessible mobos.

You should also keep your choices for the PSU and HDD ! As for the video card, a Radeon 5750 wouldn't be bad at all.
__________________
PC-Waves.com
dr_dream is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 08:57 PM   #8
bobisgod
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
Hi guys,thanks for responding


Well the cpu is (i think) a E6400 if that makes sense,compaired to what i am using atm the stuff i've bought will blow it out of the water, whether it was a wise move to buy a 2nd hand mobo and cpu i am not too sure, but i did get it from a very trusted source.


The new pc shall eventually be hooked up to either a 22 inch or 24 inch lcd, not HDTV as i previously stated so playing games and watching films in full HD on a big screen is not a must really.

This is what i've so far opted for -

Corsair TX Series 650W ATX PSU-£84.31 inc.VAT
1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Expres VGA Card-£93.71 inc.VAT
1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm S-ATAII 32MB Hard Drive-£44.59 inc.VAT
Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders-£41.07 inc.VAT
Total price inc VAT-£263.67

Would you say what i've opted for so far are good additions to the mobo, or can i cut corners and find cheaper stuff that is better?

Pike
No Way you need 650w 400-500 will be just fine. Get a quality Antec, Corsair, or Seasonic one.
If you can stretch your budget, try to grab the gtx 460. I would recommend 4 gb of ram but 2gb is just fine for games.
bobisgod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 10:54 PM   #9
1nf3rn0x
1000 Posts
 
1nf3rn0x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,707 (1.27/day)
Thanks: 509
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts

System Specs

The GTS 250 is a nice little performer. It can max ALL games at 1680x1050. Even crysis. I know since I have a GTS 250 but it isn't needed now. IF you buy a nice cpu cooler atleast overclock the e6400 to 3ghz+ to limit bottleneck, pair it with some ddr2 ram and your board has alot of fsb so overclocking shouldn't be too hard. Atleast get 4gb of ram, 2gb just doesn't cut it these days.
__________________
1nf3rn0x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 02:29 PM   #10
Pikem4n
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 32 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Hi again folks


Thanks for the suggestions i've done a little bit of looking around to see if i can shave a few pounds off the original price from i originally said i was going for, this is what my current list looks like-


Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders £34.95(£41.07)

1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Express VGA Card £79.75(£93.71)

OCZ 500W StealthXStream PSU, PowerWhisper, Active PFC £35.95(£42.24)

750GB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm 32Mb SATAII Hard Drive £36.50(£42.89)

Total Exc. £187.15 VAT £32.75 Total Inc. £219.90

Would this suffice? The prices are the cheapest i could find(from eclipse computers)
__________________
Pikem4n is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 02:42 PM   #11
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Since your initial budget was up to 300 I would strongly recommend you get a GTX460, since for 50 pounds more you get twice the performance and futureproofing or at least get a HD5770 which costs about 35 pounds more than your the GTS250, but is slightly faster and has DX11.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 03:18 PM   #12
dr_dream
25 Posts
 
dr_dream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 47 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Since your initial budget was up to 300 I would strongly recommend you get a GTX460.
Even if the CPU would be not exactly sufficient, a GTX460 would be a great choice, compared to the GTS250 1GB ! If you think that the GTX460 is too much, go for a HD5750 or a GTS250 512MB (1GB won't bring better performances, same case as for the HD4870 512 vs 1024MB -> minor performance gain at very high resolutions)! I also recomment you to go for a more powerful PSU, if the price difference is little, try to pick a 600W unit, it's more future-proof like that.
__________________
PC-Waves.com
dr_dream is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 03:35 PM   #13
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
Hi again folks


Thanks for the suggestions i've done a little bit of looking around to see if i can shave a few pounds off the original price from i originally said i was going for, this is what my current list looks like-


Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders £34.95(£41.07)

1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Express VGA Card £79.75(£93.71)

OCZ 500W StealthXStream PSU, PowerWhisper, Active PFC £35.95(£42.24)

750GB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm 32Mb SATAII Hard Drive £36.50(£42.89)

Total Exc. £187.15 VAT £32.75 Total Inc. £219.90

Would this suffice? The prices are the cheapest i could find(from eclipse computers)
Looks good, but as I said before I wouldnt get 2x1GB sticks, but instead I would opt for a single stick of 2 GBs, by doing this you'll have more modules available on the motherboard for future ram upgrades.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Since your initial budget was up to 300 I would strongly recommend you get a GTX460, since for 50 pounds more you get twice the performance and futureproofing or at least get a HD5770 which costs about 35 pounds more than your the GTS250, but is slightly faster and has DX11.
The 5770 does not perform much better thanthe GTS 250, the extra 10% performance does not justify the extra £30-40. But I agree the GTX460 768MB is worth buying if the budget can stretch and is a better offer deal price/performance than the 5770. http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Axle/GeFor...es/perfrel.gif

PALIT GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 £144
PALIT GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 VGA DVI HDMI Out PCI-E.....
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 03:39 PM   #14
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr_dream View Post
Even if the CPU would be not exactly sufficient, a GTX460 would be a great choice, compared to the GTS250 1GB ! If you think that the GTX460 is too much, go for a HD5750 or a GTS250 512MB (1GB won't bring better performances, same case as for the HD4870 512 vs 1024MB -> minor performance gain at very high resolutions)! I also recomment you to go for a more powerful PSU, if the price difference is little, try to pick a 600W unit, it's more future-proof like that.
Oh a dual is more than enough: http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpu...o-games-need/5

It's HD5870 and GTX470 they are testing there. Buying a new CPU just for gaming is a complete waste nowadays. A 3 Ghz dual is enough (I'm assuming he will OC). You do loose 10% performance in SOME games, but that does not justify the expense at all.

@Dent1

Sorry man, but you give really bad suggestions overall (EDIT: I backpedal on that statement, the 2GB stick recommendation made the deal. ). I mean, he got a decent CPU+MB+heatsink for 70 pounds and you tell him that was a stupid move, yet you recommend him a 300 pound upgrade which is going to be just as obsolete in 1 year. If he had not bought anything yet I could make half sense of that reccomendation, but as things are now they don't make any sense.

Good PSU recommendations though.

Regarding the 5770 I completely agree, but sometims some people just don't want or simply cannot pay more, that's why I suggested it. Sometimes even a 20 bucks difference is a lot for some people. Especially if they are kids, which we don't know if that's the case here.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Benetanegia For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 15, 2010, 04:16 PM   #15
Pikem4n
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 32 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

Hi again guys

Your making me smile in a wry sort of way atm lol, anyway i will overclock the cpu, not straight away but eventually i will do so as i know the current heatsink would not be that great to Oc a cpu,And i am taking everyone's suggestions onboard (thanks truly for the input) Currently thinking about this - ditching the 500w psu and going for 600w version i think i will stick with the gfx card though as i've just checked out the site that i am looking on and the price difference between the 512mb and 1gb versions of the GTS250 is only 1 pound!

Regarding the memory, i think if i now opt for getting 4gb instead of 2gb my budget will creep up nearer to that 300 pound mark,because i forgot about adding a optical drive and the Os system into the mix! But i will have 4gb,but not straight away and Ok compaired to all the newer pc components out there what i am about to build might be a bit of a backwards step but for 7 years i've been used to a P4 based system so it will be better, but not by most of your standards
__________________
Pikem4n is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 08:21 PM   #16
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Sorry man, but you give really bad suggestions overall (EDIT: I backpedal on that statement, the 2GB stick recommendation made the deal. ). I mean, he got a decent CPU+MB+heatsink for 70 pounds and you tell him that was a stupid move, yet you recommend him a 300 pound upgrade which is going to be just as obsolete in 1 year.
That’s not true, I recommended a Athlon II X3/X4, AM3 motherboard with DDR3, this could have been done from £180, maybe even £150 with the Athlon II X2. When I said £300 I was talking about the "entire build", including the PSU, case, DVD drive and hard disk.

I really do not see how the Athlon II X3 or X4 will be obsolete in a year, it stands a better chance at surviving a year than the E6400, not just because its faster but because its on a supported motherboard socket.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 08:50 PM   #17
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
That’s not true, I recommended a Athlon II X3/X4, AM3 motherboard with DDR3, this could have been done from £180, maybe even £150 with the Athlon II X2. When I said £300 I was talking about the "entire build", including the PSU, case, DVD drive and hard disk.

I really do not see how the Athlon II X3 or X4 will be obsolete in a year, it stands a better chance at surviving a year than the E6400, not just because its faster but because its on a supported motherboard socket.
Oh it will be mostly obsolete, just like almost every PC component is obsolete 1-2 years later, but that's not the reason for what I said. The thing is that he already has those components which is a clear advantage over having to buy them again. Besides an X2 X3 is not going to be any faster than what he got at games.

I am not aware of UK prices, but a quick look at OCUK tells me that making an Athlon X3/AM3 based build for less than 300 pounds is absolutely imposible. CPU+MB+DDR3+heatsink already costs more than 200. Add a quality PSU (always a must), the most subpar case you can find and some cheap HDD and DVD drive and you clearly surpassed 300.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 09:06 PM   #18
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Oh it will be mostly obsolete, just like almost every PC component is obsolete 1-2 years later

The Intel Q6600 processor came out in early 2007, 3 years ago. Its just a bit slower than the 1 year old Athlon II X4 620. So are you saying that everybody that bought the Athlon II X4 620 on its release date bought a obsolete processor?

Just listen to what you're saying, if a component is obsolete in 1-2 years, you are basically admiting the E6400 is obsolete already with it being 4 years old already

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Besides an X2 X3 is not going to be any faster than what he got at games..

You are kidding right? Iam not going to justify this with a response if you can not prove it. - sitting at 2.1GHz its a walking bottleneck.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post

I am not aware of UK prices, but a quick look at OCUK tells me that making an Athlon X3/AM3 based build for less than 300 pounds is absolutely imposible. CPU+MB+DDR3+heatsink already costs more than 200. Add a quality PSU (always a must), the most subpar case you can find and some cheap HDD and DVD drive and you clearly surpassed 300.
It is possible, maybe not @ OCUK, but you can definitely build a rig for £300 give or take.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 09:24 PM   #19
bobisgod
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 39 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pikem4n View Post
Hi again folks


Thanks for the suggestions i've done a little bit of looking around to see if i can shave a few pounds off the original price from i originally said i was going for, this is what my current list looks like-


Corsair TwinX 2Gb DDR2-6400 (2x1Gb) w/ Heat Spreaders £34.95(£41.07)

1024Mb nVidia GeForce GTS 250 PCI-Express VGA Card £79.75(£93.71)

OCZ 500W StealthXStream PSU, PowerWhisper, Active PFC £35.95(£42.24)

750GB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200rpm 32Mb SATAII Hard Drive £36.50(£42.89)

Total Exc. £187.15 VAT £32.75 Total Inc. £219.90

Would this suffice? The prices are the cheapest i could find(from eclipse computers)
Don't skimp on PSU, get Corsair or Antec.
bobisgod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 10:05 PM   #20
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
You are kidding right? Iam not going to justify this with a response if you can not prove it. - sitting at 2.1GHz its a walking bottleneck.
It won't sit at 2.1 Ghz because it will be overclocked and NO it's not going to be a huge bottleneck. Bottleneck is the most stupidly used meme ever. Yes, of course a faster CPU will provide faster fps, but it will never give faster enough frames to justify its price, never. When taklking about gaming a GPU comes first always. A bottleneck GTX460/HD5850 will always be faster than a GTX260 in the fastest CPU in the world. If he is willing to spend 100 pounds more those are much better spent into a GPU, EVEN if it's massively bottlenecked. A bottleneck will never affect the card as much as GPU performance does.






Woaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!! MASSIVE... BOTTLENECK!!

Now let's be fair and let's look at some better 3D engines in a GTX295...



What makes more sense a Core2 @2GHz + "GTX295/GTX470/HD5870" or "GTX275/HD5770" + "fastest CPU in the world OCed"? Look at Wizzards latest review if you are confused by now: HD5770 does half the fps than the GTX295 and no matter how much bottlenecked the latter is it will always be faster.

Now make a thinking effort again and look at the dualies running @3-3.3 Ghz... Oh! They are in the middle of the chart!! Now things look even better.

And just the last effort: we are talking about getting a GTX460 or something even slower. You are not going to see a bottleneck even remotely close to the one in those charts on a GTX460/HD5830. The GTx295 is 2 times faster AND is a dual GPU card which does need a little bit more CPU power than single GPU cards...

Settled?

EDIT: Oh the four extense charts are from this article: http://www.legionhardware.com/articl...gtx_295,1.html

Last edited by Benetanegia; Jul 15, 2010 at 10:12 PM.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Benetanegia For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 15, 2010, 11:00 PM   #21
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
It won't sit at 2.1 Ghz because it will be overclocked and NO it's not going to be a huge bottleneck

I hope it will not sit at stock, I advised the OP strongly to overclock it, so you have agreed with me that the OP should overclock the CPU to eliminate any possible bottleneck, because that is what I advised, and you seem to agree the same thing.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
[What makes more sense a Core2 @2GHz + "GTX295/GTX470/HD5870" or "GTX275/HD5770" + "fastest CPU in the world OCed"? Look at Wizzards latest review if you are confused by now: HD5770 does half the fps than the GTX295 and no matter how much bottlenecked the latter is it will always be faster.

Now make a thinking effort again and look at the dualies running @3-3.3 Ghz... Oh! They are in the middle of the chart!! Now things look even better.


Those dual cores in that review are the high end E8xxx series, they are the newer and tweaked models called "Wolfdale" and feature a massive 6MB of cache on a 45nm die. The E6400 is the older, hotter architecture on a 65nm die with a sluggish 2MB of cache.


You can not compare the old "Allendale" architecture to the new "Wolfdale" architecture as there are performance differences.

The argument at hand which you've seemed to duck was:

-the Athlon II X3/X4, with AM3 motherboard and DDR3 would of cost from >£180
-the Athlon II X2 , with AM3 motherboard and DDR3 would of cost from £150
-Athlon II X3/X4, with AM3 motherboard, DDR3, branded PSU, HD, cheapo case for around £300

oh yeah

- The AM3 is a new socket and has a huge upgrade path ranging from the Phenom IIs X4, Phenom II X6 and possibly the bulldozers. Unlike the dead socket 775 which has a huge list of processors which are very hard to find new or are overpriced, not to mention the fact that some of them are not being manufactured any more.

Last edited by Dent1; Jul 15, 2010 at 11:16 PM.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 11:21 PM   #22
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
Those dual cores in that review are the high end E8xxx series, they are the newer and tweaked models called "Wolfdale" and feature a massive 6MB of cache on a 45nm die. The E6400 is the older, hotter architecture.
Wolfdale was a whooping 5% faster than Conroe clock for clock. You don't have a point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
-the Athlon II X3/X4, with AM3 motherboard and DDR3 would of cost from >£180
180 pounds wasted.

Quote:
-the Athlon II X4 , with AM3 motherboard and DDR3 would of cost from £150
150 pounds wasted.

Quote:
-Athlon II X3/X4, with AM3 motherboard, DDR3, branded PSU, HD, cheapo case for around £300
300 wasted.

oh yeah

Quote:
- The AM3 is a new socket and has a huge upgrade path ranging from the Phenom IIs X4, Phenom II X6 and possibly the bulldozers. Unlike the dead socket 775 which has a huge list of processors which are very hard to find new or are overpriced, not to mention the fact that some of them are not being manufactured any more.
Futureproofing is shit. Get whatever you need when you need and save the rest. Spebding 150 pounds right now when he already has a CPU+MB that is more than capable of running current games is complete waste. Save those 150 and in 1-2 years when he really needs a faster CPU, because games changed radically, because he got a better GPU, whatever... only then, take those 150 pounds and buy the best you can for the price. That thing, whatever is going to be its name or brand, that thing is going to be much much faster than the X3. Besides buying an X3 now just to buy another CPU later on == bad idea all over again.

I could almost agree with you if he didn't have anything, but since he already has a capable CPU there's no need to waste money. I tell you again if for whatever reason he decided to spend 150 pounds more than his original budget, he must spend them on a better GPU and more ram, not on a crappy AM3 setup/Core i5/i3 setup that will hardly be faster than the Core2 he already has (as I have demostrated). Period.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2010, 11:52 PM   #23
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Wolfdale was a whooping 5% faster than Conroe clock for clock. You don't have a point.

Where is the link to prove the 5%.

Whether there is a 5% or a 500% difference it is not ethical to say the Allendale with 2MB cache and Wolfdale with 8MB cache are equivalent and pass them off as the same CPU.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
180 pounds wasted.

150 pounds wasted.

300 wasted.

oh yeah
Wasted. You say "wasted" like if the one word explains your argument. The OP has already spend £70 on a socket 775 motherboard and a E6400 CPU, he has to spend another £40-45 for 2GBs of DDR2 ram to complete the build. That is a total of £110-115.

£30-40 ontop of the initial £70 investment and he would of had new components with a fresh warranty. He would of had a faster CPU, a cooler CPU based on 45nm technology, higher memory bandwidth of DDR3 with overclockability for low timings and a upgrade path. Whether you believe in future proofing or not the upgrade path AM3 has can not be denied.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Spending 150 pounds right now when he already has a CPU+MB that is more than capable of running current games is complete waste.
The thing is you never read or comprehended what I said which is why you've got your panties in a twist.

I am not telling the OP to spend £150 extra. I told the OP in plain English that he should KEEP his motherboard and overclock his CPU and buy some DDR2 memory and a good PSU. - I said that it was the wrong decision as AM3 route was better since he initially had a £370 budget. However since he missed the deal he should KEEP his components.

If you read you would of understood me telling him to KEEP his components.

Last edited by Dent1; Jul 16, 2010 at 12:03 AM.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 16, 2010, 12:08 AM   #24
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
Where is the link to prove the 5%.

Whether there is a 5% or a 500% difference it is not ethical to say the Allendale with 2MB cache and Wolfdale with 8MB cache are equivalent and pass them off as the same CPU.
I lied:

http://www.techspot.com/espanol/arti...e/pagina6.html

It was a wooping 0-1% faster. Now yes, now you do have a point do you?
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 16, 2010, 12:15 AM   #25
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
£30-40 ontop of the initial £70 investment and he would of had new components with a fresh warranty. He would of had a faster CPU, a cooler CPU based on 45nm technology, higher memory bandwidth of DDR3 with overclockability for low timings and a upgrade path. Whether you believe in future proofing or not the upgrade path AM3 has can not be denied.
You simply cannot understand that since he would have to buy everything, AM3 is NOT the best upgrade path? At all? Not buying anything and being able to buy whatever you want (Core i6? i8? AM4? whatever) in the future is his best upgrade path BY FAR!

Besides the X3 is NOT a faster CPU for gaming as I have repeteadly demostrated.

Last edited by Benetanegia; Jul 16, 2010 at 12:20 AM.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Build - What case should I get? b82rez Cases, Modding & Electronics 16 May 7, 2010 09:54 PM
What new sound card should I get? quasar923 General Hardware 14 Jan 15, 2010 02:02 AM
new ram what should i get exodusprime1337 System Builder's Advice 4 Feb 29, 2008 04:08 PM
What Pre-build PC brand should I get? -1nf1n1ty- General Hardware 98 Jan 13, 2007 11:40 PM
What new game should I get? Azn Tr14dZ Games 40 Sep 25, 2006 06:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts