![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
AMD's Bulldozer to use new AM3+ socket
I thought i share this, Not sure where to post though
"The existing G34 and C32 server infrastructure will support the new Bulldozer-based server products. In order for AMD’s desktop offering to fully leverage the capabilities of Bulldozer, an enhanced AM3+ socket will be introduced that supports Bulldozer and is backward-compatible with our existing AM3 CPU offerings." "When we initially set out on the path to Bulldozer we were hoping for AM3 compatibility, but further along the process we realized that we had a choice to make based on some of the features that we wanted to bring with Bulldozer. We could either provide AM3 support and lose some of the capabilities of the new Bulldozer architecture or, we could choose the AM3+ socket which would allow the Bulldozer-base Zambezi to have greater performance and capability. The majority of the computer buying public will not upgrade their processors, but enthusiasts do. When we did the analysis it was clear that the customers who were most likely to upgrade an AM3 motherboard to a Bulldozer would want the features and capability that would only be delivered in the new AM3+ sockets. A classic Catch-22. Why not do both you ask? Just make a second model that only works in AM3? First, because that would greatly increase the cost and infrastructure of bringing the product to market, which would drive up the cost of the product (for both AMD and its partners). Secondly, adding an additional product would double the time involved in many of the development steps. So in the end, delivering an AM3 capability would bring you a less featured product that was more expensive and later to market. Instead we chose the path of the AM3+ socket, which is a path that we hope will bring you a better priced product, with greater performance and more features - on time. When we looked at the market for AM3 upgrades, it was clear that the folks most interested in an AM3-based product were the enthusiasts. This is one set of customers that we know are not willing to settle for second best when it comes to performance, so we definitely needed to ensure that our new architecture would meet their demanding needs, for both high performance and overclockability. We believe they will see that in AM3+."
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to MicroUnC For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the mountains :) Adirondacks in NY (US)
Posts: 3,705 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 4,534
Thanked 1,442 Times in 1,038 Posts
|
nice
anyone know anything about AM4 then? any plans for it yet? sounds like they just made AM3+ as an afterthought, so idk... my next build will have to be one of the two though
__________________
Donate to TPU TeamSpeak Server ![]() TPU TS: ts21.gameservers.com:9207 PSN / XBL / Steam = digibucc | Origin / BF3 = digibuc |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 4,976 (3.39/day)
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 930 Times in 739 Posts
|
That's fine with me! It really isn't that big of a deal that Bulldozer isn't compatible with current motherboards since that's how things should be, AMD simply spoiled us the past few years. On the plus side, AM3+ will support Phenom II's.
__________________
Heatware |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
Uughh
i was really hoping for a completely different socket, since AM3+ will be able to shelter the current phenoms, That's not likely to happen.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,273 Times in 7,814 Posts
|
Where is this information from? I heard this a while ago, but more recent reports have Bulldozer using a new socket that is not backwards compatible.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta/Marietta, GA
Posts: 759 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 209
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
|
Waiting for AM4 then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tre, Suomi Finland
Posts: 2,696 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 437 Times in 335 Posts
|
Oh crap. This is bad.
It's still only dual-channel DDR3 and no more. I was hoping tri-channel just that I'd get 6 RAM slots. That is, if the news piece is accurate.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this. ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Suum cuique pulchrum est. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to largon For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Here is the source: http://www.planet3dnow.de/cgi-bin/ne...?id=1282840508
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Old news is old.
But ya, i personally don't see a problem with them moving onto a new socket. It's about time imo.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,896 Times in 5,648 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,703 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 420 Times in 324 Posts
|
So the Boards can take AM3 cpu's but AM3 boards will not take the new CPU's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 392 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
|
I am sure AMD will offer people chips for the AM3 socket or at least for 890 FX/GX chipset. Its not like AMD to completely can a chipset and socket as soon as they offer new processors.
I am certain they will offer an 8 core for the 890fx/gx chipset for the very least.
__________________
![]() I hate people that say "worth every penny" on reviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
I would expect the new boards to have more pins on the socket, so if that's the case then no they wouldn't be able to use the older AM3 CPU's. But yes AM3 boards will not be able to take the new CPU's according to what AMD has been saying.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 392 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
|
We will have to wait for an actual release, some sites are providing info that is hypocritical to another sites info.
__________________
![]() I hate people that say "worth every penny" on reviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Quote:
I just hope they show some specs soon!!
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,703 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 420 Times in 324 Posts
|
Eh... Well at least my last 2 AM3 boards were free...
Maybe that should have been a sign to me... Like why Stores like Microcenter are so willing to simply give away AM3 boards or sell really nice 8xx series boards for $10-$20 with the purchase of a AM3 cpu |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 392 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
|
Quote:
Yea some sites are claiming they are going to "bulldoze" i7's other say it will be bulldozed by the i7's who knows.... I have always been a fan of Intel and AMD hence why I usually own both in my rigs but I am certain AMD might make a comeback and still offer great chips to the existing platforms.
__________________
![]() I hate people that say "worth every penny" on reviews. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to $immond$ For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts
|
I don't mind buying a new mobo with the new chipset for Bulldozer. I really can't see i7 standing in Bulldozer's way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
It shouldn't, i mean in the past two years they failed to beat the i7's, so i definitely expect this to exceed the i7's. Especially if it's 8 core with there own version of HT. Then again it could turn out where Intel releases something better a few months after Bulldozer, but who knows..
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
1.21 Gigawatts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,448 (2.78/day)
Thanks: 2,687
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts
|
Bring it on!!! Bulldozer is going to crush Intel (I hope
)Amd indeed has spoiled us for sure with no socket changes in some time, unlike Intel changing there socket every cpu build lol.... Hello!!! PPL hate changing boards for new chips... But I welcome the change from AMD and hope the bulldozer breaks all the expectations that many of us are hoping for....
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,273 Times in 7,814 Posts
|
Intel will meet/beat anything AMD comes out with. They have the money to do it and AMD certainly does not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
1.21 Gigawatts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,448 (2.78/day)
Thanks: 2,687
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts
|
Quote:
In some marks amd beat i7's ![]() Ask Mussels, He loves the speed his X6 encodes video compared to his buddies I7
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
1.21 Gigawatts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,448 (2.78/day)
Thanks: 2,687
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts
|
Quote:
Shut up Erocker!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Quote:
I to hope Bulldozer does comes out with good reviews and reception. And i hope Intel comes out with some great to. That way, the prices will be low for all, and we will have two manufacturers making some fast chips for us consumers.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (3.01/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Quote:
The i7's have proven to beat the AMD 6 core CPU's in the majority of tasks. Encoding video is one task that utilizes the 6 cores within the X6, im definitely not surprised it caught up with his friends i7. It has already been benched in a verity of games and benchmarks and have proven to be slower the majority of the time compared to the i7's. Though they are cheaper and are still great chips to run with.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to CDdude55 For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bulldozer, AM3 or new socket? | Fourstaff | General Hardware | 85 | Aug 29, 2010 12:41 AM |
| Use socket 478 CPU's in socket 775 boards | Mussels | General Hardware | 4 | May 30, 2010 07:01 AM |
| Use 775 cooler on AM3 socket mobo, is possible ??? | DaC | Overclocking & Cooling | 9 | Nov 1, 2009 01:18 AM |
| [WTB] LF:Socket 775 p45 up & AM3 Mobo | topdog5252 | Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum | 7 | Oct 30, 2009 10:23 PM |
| MSI Unveils New AM3 Socket 790FX and 790GX Motherboards | btarunr | News | 42 | Jan 25, 2009 08:20 PM |