techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 8, 2010, 12:28 PM   #26
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Big problem: can't RAID it for extra speed. LOL
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2010, 01:05 PM   #27
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

^ Giving up so easily?

Software RAID, with what's need to boot on another drive/flash stick.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2010, 01:43 PM   #28
IceCreamBarr
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 72 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 22 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Goodbye RAM?

Are we seeing the first baby step towards replacing RAM with the hard drive? DDR400 had read/write of 6,000 and an access time of 50ns... 0.1ms is 100,000ns so certainly not there yet but i imagine for an SSD, the access time doesn't make much of a difference anymore at 0.1ms; not until it is re-purposed as "RAM" or until SATA/PCIe can accommodate such speeds.

Exciting time... we've reached an era of diminishing returns on hardware so the software guys are going to have to step it up hard in the near future.
IceCreamBarr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2010, 01:52 PM   #29
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,904 Times in 5,653 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceCreamBarr View Post
Are we seeing the first baby step towards replacing RAM with the hard drive? DDR400 had read/write of 6,000 and an access time of 50ns... 0.1ms is 100,000ns so certainly not there yet but i imagine for an SSD, the access time doesn't make much of a difference anymore at 0.1ms; not until it is re-purposed as "RAM" or until SATA/PCIe can accommodate such speeds.

Exciting time... we've reached an era of diminishing returns on hardware so the software guys are going to have to step it up hard in the near future.
Triple DDR3-1333 is 32,000 MB/s. So no, RAM is here to stay.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9, 2010, 07:07 PM   #30
OneCool
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Look behind you!!
Posts: 799 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 61 Times in 41 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
Big problem: can't RAID it for extra speed. LOL

I dont see why they couldnt put some type of connection on it to make a array.

Crossfire,Sli are just 2 that come to mind.
OneCool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2010, 03:51 PM   #31
tkpenalty
Eligible for custom title
 
tkpenalty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Triple DDR3-1333 is 32,000 MB/s. So no, RAM is here to stay.
hmm... 32 terabytes per second...

DDR3 RAM drive raided....

-drools-

that is naughty fast.
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse

“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
tkpenalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2010, 11:46 PM   #32
KaelMaelstrom
25 Posts
 
KaelMaelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 64 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkpenalty View Post
hmm... 32 terabytes per second...

DDR3 RAM drive raided....

-drools-

that is naughty fast.
you mean 32 GB not TB.
KaelMaelstrom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OWC Announces Mercury Extreme Pro 480 GB SandForce-Driven SSD btarunr News 2 Jul 17, 2010 11:58 AM
OWC Announces Mercury Pro SandForce-Driven SSDs With Up To 480 GB Capacity btarunr News 13 May 16, 2010 02:52 AM
OWC Announces Mercury Elite-AL Pro - 2.5 inch 1.0TB External Storage Solutions btarunr News 4 Mar 10, 2010 09:39 PM
OWC Announces Mercury Extreme Enterprise SSD btarunr News 3 Jan 30, 2010 11:11 PM
OWC Announces Mercury On-The-Go Pro Portable Storage Solution btarunr News 13 May 31, 2009 03:19 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts