techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 31, 2011, 04:59 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,908 Times in 5,654 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Intel Identifies Sandy Bridge Chipset Design Error, All Shipments Stopped

As part of ongoing quality assurance, Intel Corporation has discovered a design issue in a recently released support chip, the Intel 6 Series, code-named Cougar Point, and has implemented a silicon fix. In some cases, the Serial-ATA (SATA) ports within the chipsets may degrade over time, potentially impacting the performance or functionality of SATA-linked devices such as hard disk drives and DVD-drives. The chipset is utilized in PCs with Intel's latest Second Generation Intel Core processors, code-named Sandy Bridge. Intel has stopped shipment of the affected support chip from its factories. Intel has corrected the design issue, and has begun manufacturing a new version of the support chip which will resolve the issue. The Sandy Bridge microprocessor is unaffected and no other products are affected by this issue.



The company expects to begin delivering the updated version of the chipset to customers in late February and expects full volume recovery in April. Intel stands behind its products and is committed to product quality. For computer makers and other Intel customers that have bought potentially affected chipsets or systems, Intel will work with its OEM partners to accept the return of the affected chipsets, and plans to support modifications or replacements needed on motherboards or systems. The systems with the affected support chips have only been shipping since January 9th and the company believes that relatively few consumers are impacted by this issue. The only systems sold to an end customer potentially impacted are Second Generation Core i5 and Core i7 quad core based systems. Intel believes that consumers can continue to use their systems with confidence, while working with their computer manufacturer for a permanent solution. For further information consumers should contact Intel at www.intel.com on the support page or contact their OEM manufacturer.

For the first quarter of 2011, Intel expects this issue to reduce revenue by approximately $300 million as the company discontinues production of the current version of the chipset and begins manufacturing the new version. Full-year revenue is not expected to be materially affected by the issue. Total cost to repair and replace affected materials and systems in the market is estimated to be $700 million. Since this issue affected some of the chipset units shipped and produced in the fourth quarter of 2010, the company will take a charge against cost of goods sold, which is expected to reduce the fourth quarter gross margin percentage by approximately 4 percentage points from the previously reported 67.5 percent. The company will also take a charge in the first quarter of 2011which will lower the previously communicated gross margin percentage by 2 percentage points and the full-year gross margin percentage by one percentage point.

Updated 2011 First Quarter and Full Year Outlook
Separately, Intel recently announced that it had completed the acquisition of the Infineon Technologies AG Wireless Solutions business, which will now operate as the Intel Mobile Communications group. The company also expects to complete the acquisition of McAfee by the end of the first quarter.

The effects of the chipset issue and these transactions are incorporated into the company's revised outlook. The company now expects first-quarter revenue to be $11.7 billion, plus or minus $400 million, compared to the previous expectation of $11.5 billion, plus or minus $400 million. Gross margin percentage is now expected to be 61 percent, plus or minus a couple percentage points, compared to the previous expectation of 64 percent, plus or minus a couple percentage points. Spending (R&D plus MG&A) is now expected to be approximately $3.6 billion, compared to the previous expectation of approximately $3.4 billion.

The full-year revenue growth percentage is now expected to be in the mid-to high teens, compared to the company's prior expectation of approximately 10 percent. Full-year gross margin is now expected to be 63 percent, plus or minus a few percentage points, compared to the previous expectation of 65 percent, plus or minus a few percentage points. Spending (R&D plus MG&A) is now expected to be $15.7 billion, plus or minus $200 million, compared to the company's previous expectation of $13.9 billion, plus or minus $200 million. Research and development (R&D) spending is now expected to be approximately $8.2 billion, compared to the previous forecast of $7.3 billion.

All other expectations for the first-quarter and full-year remain unchanged. With the exception of McAfee, the outlook for the first quarter and full year do not include the effect of any acquisitions, divestitures or similar transactions that may be completed after Jan. 31. The acquisition of McAfee is subject to customary closing conditions.
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:00 PM   #2
johnnyfiive
2000 Posts
 
johnnyfiive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,975 (1.60/day)
Thanks: 740
Thanked 856 Times in 537 Posts

System Specs

haha
__________________
[o_0] - GO BUCKEYES!
------------------------------------------------------
HEATWARE /MY KEYBOARD / VIDEO OF MY LGA 2011 RIG

------------------------------------------------------
Steam: johnnyfiive
ORIGIN: johnny5iive
League of Legends: 5iive
johnnyfiive is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:00 PM   #3
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,908 Times in 5,654 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Thanks to DonInKansas for the tip.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:15 PM   #4
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

Holy sh@% that sucks.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:24 PM   #5
overclocker!
25 Posts
 
overclocker!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 43 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

i feel sorry for people who bought it.
overclocker! is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:31 PM   #6
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

All I know is there is a lot of E-peen hurting right now.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:33 PM   #7
hardcore_gamer
200 Posts
 
hardcore_gamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
Posts: 283 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 121 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

See what over-confidence can do
hardcore_gamer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:34 PM   #8
Aleksander
2000 Posts
 
Aleksander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,028 (2.39/day)
Thanks: 648
Thanked 280 Times in 228 Posts

System Specs

That is really normal, it is Intel after all
Aleksander is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:37 PM   #9
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,754 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by overclocker! View Post
i feel sorry for people who bought it.
It isn't so bad, Intel is accepting RMAs on the affected processors. This is why I never buy the first revision of a processor release. Though to be fair, this isn't an issue with the processor, it is a problem with the integrated chipset.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleksander Dishnica View Post
That is really normal, it is Intel after all
It isn't like AMD hasn't had some pretty big issues with their silicon...TLB anyone?
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:40 PM   #10
Reaper83
 
Reaper83's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Thats what happens when your only concern is quantity and not quality...
Reaper83 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:40 PM   #11
happita
2000 Posts
 
happita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 2,044 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 210
Thanked 302 Times in 245 Posts

System Specs

Upgrading from an i7 setup to a sandy bridge now won't get you a huge performance boost such as waiting for the i7 sandys. Then that will be for the highend epeeners
But seriously, it's going to be great to see how it competes with Zambezi.
__________________
co5 is cal i

htpc: work in progress..

HeatWare - http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=71725
happita is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:41 PM   #12
DoomDoomDoom
75 Posts
 
DoomDoomDoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 173 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

It would explain the odd issue I get to where my system doesn't immediately recognize my second hard drive. Intel's partners need to get on the ball about RMAs for affected boards.
DoomDoomDoom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:41 PM   #13
Cheeseball
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 598 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 66 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

So is H67 and P67 affected?
Cheeseball is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:42 PM   #14
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Is this all of the 6 series chip sets? as in everyone who bought them is effected?

Bad news for Intel but I'm sure a $700,000,000 hit won't be too bad for them in the long run.

The share price
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bear jesus For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:49 PM   #15
oily_17
2000 Posts
 
oily_17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 2,056 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 214
Thanked 679 Times in 516 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheeseball View Post
So is H67 and P67 affected?
Yeah both, you can see a list here -

http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollecti...codeName=37529
__________________

oily_17 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:49 PM   #16
Static~Charge
200 Posts
 
Static~Charge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 420 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 76 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
It isn't so bad, Intel is accepting RMAs on the affected processors. This is why I never buy the first revision of a processor release. Though to be fair, this isn't an issue with the processor, it is a problem with the integrated chipset.
Which is even worse, because the chipset is soldered to the motherboard. This will require you to send the board back to the manufacturer for repair/replacement.

Intel has stopped shipment of the defective chipset, but what about those boards already on the shelves? Are they being recalled? Is there any way for end-users to identify if they have the defective chipset on their board?
Static~Charge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:50 PM   #17
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
Is this all of the 6 series chip sets? as in everyone who bought them is effected?

Bad news for Intel but I'm sure a $700,000,000 hit won't be too bad for them in the long run.

The share price
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/i/z5/illo/nw/...le-finance.jpg
It didn't even drop a dollar, lot less than what happened to Apple when Steve Jobs took time off a few weeks ago.

This doesn't seem to be the biggest problem they have had.

Also in before every AMD troll claims victory
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:51 PM   #18
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [H]@RD5TUFF View Post
It didn't even drop a dollar, lot less than what happened to Apple when Steve Jobs took time off a few weeks ago.

This doesn't seem to be the biggest problem they have had.

Also in before every AMD troll claims victory
come on, the stock market is so stupid, a sudden drop of like 25 cents is shocking and the end of the world
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:51 PM   #19
madrooster
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

It still hasn't been confirmed as to which chipsets are affected, it may not be all chipsets.
madrooster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:52 PM   #20
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [H]@RD5TUFF View Post
It didn't even drop a dollar, lot less than what happened to Apple when Steve Jobs took time off a few weeks ago.

This doesn't seem to be the biggest problem they have had.

Also in before every AMD troll claims victory
I agree. Keep the trolling down and leave it to the professionals. This is bad news for a lot of our tech brothers.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:54 PM   #21
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts

System Specs

As it's the chip set is this bad news for the board makers?
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:56 PM   #22
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,773 (4.14/day)
Thanks: 4,496
Thanked 5,234 Times in 3,211 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
As it's the chip set is this bad news for the board makers?
Yes/No. It may affect future purchases, so may have a negative impact on overall P67 board sales, but as this is Intel's problem; it'll be up to them to deal with the OEMs.
__________________
Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp


-Only real men play games THIS way.
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cadaveca For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 05:58 PM   #23
DonInKansas
3500 Posts
 
DonInKansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,261 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 779
Thanked 1,273 Times in 1,007 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DonInKansas Send a message via MSN to DonInKansas Send a message via Yahoo to DonInKansas

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
I agree. Keep the trolling down and leave it to the professionals.
We can't all be as pro as you, MailMan......

Just a blip on the radar. This will only really matter in the longrun to Intel hatin' AMD fanboys and the extreme enthusiasts who push their stuff hard enough that this becomes an issue.
__________________
Sneekypeet on my disappearance from TPU: "He went to school for a while to learn how to deal with douchebags and delight in pastries and exotic coffees....or in English, he is a cop now."

You know what time it is......
DonInKansas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2011, 06:01 PM   #24
xbonez
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Philly, PA (US)
Posts: 1,084 (1.20/day)
Thanks: 277
Thanked 323 Times in 197 Posts

System Specs

As one of the early adopters of Sandy Bridge, I'm not so bothered myself because

Its a chipset problem, not a problem that affects the Processor directly. Motherboards weren't that expensive (I got mine for 150 bucks). yes, 150 isn't cheap if your motherboard dies in a month, but in a video conference with Anandtech, an Intel rep said that Intel believes these errors (regarding the SATA bus) will take 3 years or more to surface for end-users (take it with a pinch of salt), and will affect only about 15% of the customers (also, a pinch of salt).
Early adopters rarely are the ones who stick with a system for 3 years, and 3 years down the line, if my motherboard dies, I wouldn't mind shelling out some more money for a motherboard (God knows how much they'll sell for at that point).
Also, from what I've gathered, these errors do not affect the SATA ports on the Marvell controller, or the SATA 6GBps ports (again, 3 years down the line, chances are we'll all have moved on to them)

Any issues you read about people burning their chips/socket etc etc are almost certainly unrelated and an ID10T error caused by pushing far too much voltage to a 32nm chip.
xbonez is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to xbonez For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 31, 2011, 06:01 PM   #25
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,111 (6.92/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,834 Times in 3,741 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas View Post
We can't all be as pro as you, MailMan......

Just a blip on the radar. This will only really matter in the longrun to Intel hatin' AMD fanboys and the extreme enthusiasts who push their stuff hard enough that this becomes an issue.
Ya see its simple. For every fanboy comment that is made against Intel karma notes. AMD will have something equal or worse happen to them in return. E-peen destruction everywhere. The world of peen will end as we know it.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Sandy Bridge IGP drfelip GPU-Z 4 Jan 3, 2011 05:14 PM
Intel confirms special accelerators in Sandy Bridge CDdude55 General Hardware 0 Nov 30, 2010 05:12 PM
Intel Sandy Bridge Hit 5Ghz with 0.9v on Air Hayder_Master General Hardware 17 Oct 29, 2010 05:55 PM
Intel Speeding Up Sandy Bridge Launch btarunr News 30 Jul 18, 2010 04:45 AM
Intel Sandy Bridge Quad-Core Processor Tested btarunr News 72 Jun 12, 2010 10:02 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts