techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 3, 2011, 10:22 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,896 Times in 5,648 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

TSMC Reiterates 28 nm Readiness by Q4 2011

TSMC reiterated that it will be ready with a 28 nanometer manufacturing process by Q4 2011. The semiconductor company handles manufacturing of graphics processors for both AMD and NVIDIA. After the current 40 nm process, 32 nm, the next milestone process, was canceled for GPU makers to leap to 28 nm, this caused the foundry transition to the next process to take longer than usual. The current 40 nm process already seems to be saturated by GPUs with over 3 billion transistors, which are barely able to maintain acceptable thermal specs without using some sort of power-load throttling mechanism.

TSMC Chairman and CEO, Morris Chang, confirmed that tape-outs will be starting as early as in Q3, and production of 28 nm chips will start in Q4. Chang expects that up to 3% of TSMC's revenues will be made from 28 nm chips by the end of the year. "We plan to have around 2% or 3% of our total revenue in the fourth quarter [to] be 28nm. The tape-outs of the 28-nanaometer will start to ramp in the second half, starting in the third quarter and then more in the fourth quarter. But the real momentum [for 28nm], we believe, will be next year," Chang said. Apart from GPUs, the 28 nm process will also benefit ARM processors, with multi-core ARM chips clocked at 3 GHz being on cards. The 28 nm bulk process will also dish out AMD's next generation accelerated processing units (APUs).

Source: X-bit Labs
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 10:34 AM   #2
TAViX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

I don't trust TSMC. Even today, they still have problems with yields on 40nm process. (nvidia knows why... )
Besides, Intel is already aiming for 22nm this year, so 28nm doesn't seems that spectacular.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 10:51 AM   #3
laszlo
500 Posts
 
laszlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 66 feet from the ground
Posts: 825 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 107 Times in 70 Posts

System Specs

lower the nm higher the losses & errors ....
__________________
laszlo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 10:56 AM   #4
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,016 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 831 Times in 588 Posts

System Specs

... but increase the yield per wafer?

Speaking of, I was just looking at a 1155 chip without the heatspreader. Seems full up. Is there any room left for adding more cores to 1155?
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LAN_deRf_HA For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 3, 2011, 11:44 AM   #5
streetfighter 2
1000 Posts
 
streetfighter 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,599 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 1,004
Thanked 765 Times in 539 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAViX View Post
I don't trust TSMC. Even today, they still have problems with yields on 40nm process. (nvidia knows why... )
Besides, Intel is already aiming for 22nm this year, so 28nm doesn't seems that spectacular.
What do you mean nvidia knows why? As I recall nvidia was greatly disadvantaged by TSMCs problems with 40nm.

So far as I know there isn't a whole hell of a lot stopping AMD from switching to GlobalFoundries or other closely allied fabs (can't remember names right now...).

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
Speaking of, I was just looking at a 1155 chip without the heatspreader. Seems full up. Is there any room left for adding more cores to 1155?
I didn't believe you until I checked out the pics for myself:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4118/a...ndy-bridge-die

Those are some packed chips! Nevertheless I'm pretty sure I heard that 1155 would still be getting some Ivy Bridge chips (with more cores).
streetfighter 2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 12:20 PM   #6
TAViX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetfighter 2 View Post
What do you mean nvidia knows why? As I recall nvidia was greatly disadvantaged by TSMCs problems with 40nm.
LOL

That's what I've said )
 
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 03:20 PM   #7
robal
200 Posts
 
robal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 476 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetfighter 2 View Post
I didn't believe you until I checked out the pics for myself:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4118/a...ndy-bridge-die
Lol, where are the times when CPUs used to be a 'dot_on_a_plate': http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...n_Spitfire.jpg

Last edited by robal; Feb 3, 2011 at 03:22 PM. Reason: CRLF
robal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 08:36 PM   #8
happita
2000 Posts
 
happita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 2,041 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 210
Thanked 302 Times in 245 Posts

System Specs

This is a step in the right direction. I cannot wait for next gen 22nm CPUs and 28nm graphics cards! Sooooooooooo exciting!!
__________________
co5 is cal i

htpc: work in progress..

HeatWare - http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=71725
happita is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2011, 11:07 PM   #9
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts

System Specs

I was kind of hoping that the tape-outs would start around Q2 then start to ramp in Q3 for product releases at the end of Q3/start of Q4 but i guess from this the release times of the next gen 28nm chips will be around the same kind of time frames as the past two 40nm product generations, something like mid Q4.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2011, 02:31 AM   #10
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,743 (5.78/day)
Thanks: 1,270
Thanked 1,078 Times in 831 Posts

System Specs

KEPLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TSMC better not bend nvidia over backwards and F*** them again!
MxPhenom 216 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2011, 02:59 AM   #11
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nvidiaintelftw View Post
KEPLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TSMC better not bend nvidia over backwards and F*** them again!
And Nvidia better not screw me and many others by only allowing 2 active displays per GPU

I really want Nvidia to be a viable option to users who want to run three monitors from a single card, i also hope both AMD and Nvidia can bring out their 28nm cards pretty close together so it's easier/little waiting time to chose between them.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2011, 03:02 AM   #12
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,743 (5.78/day)
Thanks: 1,270
Thanked 1,078 Times in 831 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear jesus View Post
And Nvidia better not screw me and many others by only allowing 2 active displays per GPU

I really want Nvidia to be a viable option to users who want to run three monitors from a single card, i also hope both AMD and Nvidia can bring out their 28nm cards pretty close together so it's easier/little waiting time to chose between them.
yeah i hear ya.
MxPhenom 216 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2011, 12:02 PM   #13
largon
2000 Posts
 
largon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tre, Suomi Finland
Posts: 2,696 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 437 Times in 335 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
nanaometer
Nana-o-meter!
__________________
You were not supposed to see this.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Suum cuique pulchrum est.
largon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TSMC Achieves 28 nm SRAM Yield Breakthrough btarunr News 10 Aug 26, 2009 08:29 PM
Intel and TSMC Collaborate malware News 3 Mar 2, 2009 11:38 PM
Dresden FAB 38 is superior to TSMC wolf2009 AMD / ATI 4 Aug 20, 2008 03:09 PM
FS: Retail Vista Ultimate 32/64bit w/ Business Sales Readiness Kit thebeephaha Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 6 Sep 29, 2007 07:22 AM
TSMC ready with 65 nanometre D_o_S News 0 Jul 25, 2006 01:03 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts