techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 22, 2011, 06:08 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,870 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,453 Times in 3,219 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard Send a message via Skype™ to W1zzard

System Specs

Microsoft Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Graphics Performance

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/M...s_Performance/

Last edited by W1zzard; Feb 22, 2011 at 06:49 PM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:04 PM   #2
Ra97oR
200 Posts
 
Ra97oR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 304 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 60 Times in 55 Posts

System Specs

Woah that was quick. I am only just downloading it right now. Thanks to show there is no performance degradation in games.
Ra97oR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:11 PM   #3
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,904 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

I've been running it for well over a month now on all my systems with no problems whatso ever.

Good to know there isn't any performance loss, and thanks W1z for the informative review.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
25 Million points folded for TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:18 PM   #4
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

I noticed that SP1 has made my single core s754 rig at work a bit snappier. The graphs show that at lower resolution (where things are more CPU dependant) that there is a bit of an increase in FPS. Perhaps SP1 actually makes CPU utilization better after all.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:21 PM   #5
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,870 (4.17/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,453 Times in 3,219 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard Send a message via Skype™ to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I noticed that SP1 has made my single core s754 rig at work a bit snappier. The graphs show that at lower resolution (where things are more CPU dependant) that there is a bit of an increase in FPS. Perhaps SP1 actually makes CPU utilization better after all.
then the performance summary would show some kind of increase at low resolution
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:22 PM   #6
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,284 (4.27/day)
Thanks: 1,219
Thanked 2,789 Times in 1,801 Posts

System Specs

ive been running it for almost 3 months now on all 15 rigs and have not had any problems so far. good to know performance has improved.
Easy Rhino is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:24 PM   #7
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
then the performance summary would show some kind of increase at low resolution
Didn't look at the summary, just at some of the individual tests. I'm probablly suffering from a placebo effect. Either way, I'm pleased with it.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:27 PM   #8
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Its been running flawlessly on six of my 25 blade servers. Thanks W1zz!
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:36 PM   #9
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMailMan78 View Post
Its been running flawlessly on six of my 25 blade servers. Thanks W1zz!
What about the other 19?
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:48 PM   #10
Aleksander
2000 Posts
 
Aleksander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 653
Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I noticed that SP1 has made my single core s754 rig at work a bit snappier. The graphs show that at lower resolution (where things are more CPU dependant) that there is a bit of an increase in FPS. Perhaps SP1 actually makes CPU utilization better after all.
That happens even in Windows Xp
I have a 754 socket too
It does not mean anything. The lower the resolution the less the graphic card utilization will be.
The cpu does the job better because there is not much trafic with the pci-express
Aleksander is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 07:49 PM   #11
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aleksander Dishnica View Post
That happens even in Windows Xp
I have a 754 socket too
It does not mean anything. The lower the resolution the less the graphic card utilization will be.
The cpu does the job better because there is not much trafic with the pci-express
I understand what you are saying, but I'm not talking about gaming, just general usage that has nothing to do with the video card.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:01 PM   #12
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
What about the other 19?
Well I didn't want to risk my entire array. NASA gets upset when I do that. Noobs.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:13 PM   #13
dsdsdk
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 65 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Nice review as always. :-)

Some more info...

AVX is introduced in Win 7 SP1 and supported only by Sandy B and upcoming Bulldozer cpus.

"Suitable for floating point-intensive calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications (integer operations are expected in later extensions). Increases parallelism and throughput in floating point SIMD calculations. Reduces register load due to the non-destructive instructions."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions

(Not that it would change anything in this review...)
dsdsdk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 08:46 PM   #14
rpsgc
500 Posts
 
rpsgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 677 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 129 Times in 94 Posts

System Specs

Just an FYI, the "Reviews" RSS feed doesn't include a link to the reviews anymore, not since the "PowerColor HD 6950 PCS++ 2 GB Review".
The "Front Page News" feed is fine so it mustn't be a problem at my end.
__________________


IDE free since April/2007
SSD user since September/2009
rpsgc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 09:01 PM   #15
douglatins
2000 Posts
 
douglatins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,626 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 271 Times in 205 Posts
Send a message via MSN to douglatins Send a message via Skype™ to douglatins

System Specs

I loled at performance summary, but great tests
__________________

douglatins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 09:32 PM   #16
freebie
75 Posts
 
freebie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Walsall
Posts: 171 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Just installed, tried COD Black OPS and saw no difference at all. All seems good!
freebie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 09:33 PM   #17
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

well I'm always glad to see a sp released without performance drop. I guess i'll have to try it out. hopefully it doesn't break sli or something retarted like that.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 09:51 PM   #18
Aleksander
2000 Posts
 
Aleksander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,038 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 653
Thanked 283 Times in 229 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I understand what you are saying, but I'm not talking about gaming, just general usage that has nothing to do with the video card.
That is why every mobo gets out with integrated graphics
They are not to play, just to open general programs
So applications use the graphics
Still, i was not talking only about gaming
Aleksander is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2011, 10:19 PM   #19
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.04/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Ok TPU team, you can breathe a sigh of relief! Your existing benchmark database is good, and you don't have to rebench everything just because your rig is now on SP1 and all new reviews are SP1

Imagine if there had been a 5% difference! We throw our buns around for 5% between model numbers, ATI vs. nV, driver revisions, and OC's etc. How long would it have taken you to re-bench the whole database? (Thats a rhetorical question - I dont want an answer)
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 12:39 AM   #20
thunderising
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 685 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 52 Posts

System Specs

expected this, tweaktown did this review weeks ago, same, no gains..

bummer
thunderising is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 12:54 AM   #21
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,721 (4.31/day)
Thanks: 4,216
Thanked 3,335 Times in 1,971 Posts

System Specs

Oh, fantastic, a nice bonus review!

Having had a quick look at the review, I'm glad to see that it doesn't hurt graphics performance. However, even if it had, I would still have felt compelled to install it anyway, because Windows must be kept up to date with the latest updates.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 01:02 AM   #22
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,733 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

When I initially installed SP1 a month or so ago it Used AMD's Fusion Power modes....
So I had to remove Fusion as my PC wouldn't recover from S3..other than that it's been flawless
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 02:55 AM   #23
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,133 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 848
Thanked 934 Times in 763 Posts

System Specs

Am pleased at the review, then surprised at the results... did MS claim a DX11 runtime performance increase with the SP? EDIT: just read the tag line that they didn't suggest any improvements! Duh...

Also surprised no tests with IG hardware.
__________________
"It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing milkbone underwear.” ― Norm
Heatware
Sasqui is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 03:26 AM   #24
kirtar
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 42 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts

Depending on what "no SP" means, it's not that surprising, since the SP is basically just a large cumulative update of what's already been done since the original release.
kirtar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2011, 04:20 AM   #25
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,871 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 389
Thanked 641 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

great review w1zzard, that's was quick move
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft RTM of Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 Announced malware News 53 Apr 30, 2009 10:41 PM
Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) Released to Web and Windows Update malware News 66 Jun 6, 2008 04:05 AM
Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 (SP2) malware News 6 Mar 14, 2007 11:30 PM
Microsoft ends support for Windows XP Service Pack 1 zekrahminator News 20 Oct 11, 2006 02:44 PM
Microsoft Delays Windows XP Service Pack 3 Dark Ride News 0 Jan 17, 2006 01:40 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts