![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
His hd6850 cfx vs hd5850 toxic cfx
Hi guys, i need your help on that one...
i got a refund from a store and i can get neither of those pairs witch one you think would give me the best performance overall? consider OC abilities dont forget drivers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta/Marietta, GA
Posts: 759 (0.65/day)
Thanks: 209
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
|
A 5850 > a 6850, but 6000 series have better CFX scaling. In the end I'd go w/ the 6850 since 11.4 gives the 6000 series a nice bump and they are more power efficient.
If you can squeeze, I'd go for a pair of 6870s. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
lets just say HIS HD6850 900MHZ~ CFX VS HD5850 TOXIC 1GHZ CFX?
its tricky.... damn.... and no i cant get 6870s |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts
|
It's not difficult. Buy whatever is cheaper. You'll be happy with either setup.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
i can get then with the exact same price, these are the only options
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts
|
Get the 6850's they are newer and work better with newer drivers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
even when Sapphire's HD5850 shreds with overclocking?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts
|
Yes. 6850's "shred" with overclocking too.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
try compering the 37% freq increase over stock at HD5850 against HD6850's 20%, its not that easy you know.
TOXIC HD5850 can give me 1Ghz core easily no questions asked. but with HD6850 even 925MHZ is tricky |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts
|
So? Flip a coin.
When you are comparing them in CrossFire (regardless of overclock) the 6850 wins in scaling alone.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta/Marietta, GA
Posts: 759 (0.65/day)
Thanks: 209
Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
|
I vote for the 6850s too. Newer process, more efficient.
You won't see performance difference b/t the two setups when gaming or using the computer. But if you're set on the 5850s then go w/ that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 708 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts
|
Hd68** are better in dx11 so get those 6870's they are better
__________________
intel + nvidia the best amd
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
i just asked them what other options i have and they say Sapphire HD6850
SAPPHIRE 100315L Radeon HD 6850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 ... what do you think about that option? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,556 (2.19/day)
Thanks: 1,540
Thanked 1,596 Times in 1,137 Posts
|
Yes but again as was mentioned in the first post the scaling is better on 6000 and this is KEY as we are talking about Crossfire. Thus you will "get more" out of the second card in a 6000-series setup compared to 5000-series. This is what made me go through the hassle of selling my 5850 (for only $140 too) and getting two 6850s. Very happy with them for the price especially when I see them tear through Crysis, for example, at 55-70 fps at 1920x1200 4X AA Very High (+ 16X AF using ZPOMAF mod) due to the fact it is using damn near 100% of my second GPU as well. All games won't be that "good" but generally the scaling is a lot better.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The need for SLI/CFX | motasim | Graphics Cards | 21 | Aug 27, 2010 04:07 AM |
| GTX 460 sli v.s HD 5870 cfx | Achilles1600 | Graphics Cards | 27 | Aug 15, 2010 07:08 PM |
| Core i7 @ 4.4ghz + CFX 4870x2 new scores | Unknown Team | Overclocking & Cooling | 21 | Jul 16, 2009 10:48 PM |
| 4870x2 cfx not enabled? | iamajunky | AMD / ATI | 4 | Jul 5, 2009 02:28 AM |
| 4850 + 2x 4870 CFX questions | Fitseries3 | AMD / ATI | 36 | Aug 17, 2008 02:42 PM |