![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
Seagate Breaks Areal Density Barrier, Unveils First HDD with 1 TB per Platter
Seagate, the leader in hard drives and storage solutions, today unveiled the world’s first 3.5-inch hard drive featuring 1TB of storage capacity per disk platter, breaking the 1TB areal density barrier to help meet explosive worldwide demand for digital content storage in both the home and the office.
Seagate’s GoFlex Desk products are the first to feature the new hard drive, delivering storage capacities of up to 3TB and an areal density of 625 Gigabits per square inch, the industry’s highest. Seagate is on track to ship its flagship 3.5-inch Barracuda desktop hard drive with 3TBs of storage on 3 disk platters – enough capacity to store up to 120 high-definition movies, 1,500 video games, thousands of photos or virtually countless hours of digital music – to the distribution channel in mid-2011. The drive will also be available in capacities of 2TB, 1.5TB and 1TB. “Organizations of all sizes and consumers worldwide are amassing digital content at light speed, generating immense demand for storage of digital content of every imaginable kind,” said Rocky Pimentel, Seagate Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing. “We remain keenly focused on delivering the storage capacity, speed and manageability our customers need to thrive in an increasingly digital world.” GoFlex Desk external drives are compatible with both the Windows operating system and Mac computers. Each drive includes an NTFS driver for Mac, which allows the drive to store and access files from both Windows and Mac OS X computers without reformatting. The GoFlex Desk external drive’s sleek black 3.5-inch design sits either vertically or horizontally to accommodate any desktop environment. Last edited by btarunr; May 3, 2011 at 01:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,423 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,132 Times in 713 Posts
|
Are there even 1,500 games released in the past 10 years? I wonder...
__________________
MSI P67A-GD65 (B3), Intel Core i5 2500K, Corsair H60, 2x MSI GTX 570 Twin Frozr II/OC, G.Skill RipjawsX (2x4GB) DDR3-1600 RAM, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2TB, Corsair AX1200, Corsair Carbide 400R MSI Z68MA-ED55, i5 2500K, Noctua NH-U9B SE2, Inno3D GTX 570, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 1TB, Seasonic X660, Lian Li PC-V600FB The Big Useful List of Free Useful Programs To Use Usually For Free |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,575 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,755
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
Why not offer a 5 TB drive with 5 of those platters? What's with the run on 3-4 platter drives lately? Lemme guess, the industry has priced itself out of shipping 5 platter drives.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
Finally. I've been holding out for 2 platter 2 TB drives. Let's see what WD comes up with and then I'll be replacing both my drives.... well in a perfect world anyways. If these drives turn out like others in the past few years they'll either be prone to massive amounts of noise or horrendous reliability. Let's hope seagate takes a quiet cue from their new samsung tech without the spotty smart data readings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,121 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,956
Thanked 647 Times in 468 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,575 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,755
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
It would hold 66,666 copies of Minecraft (45 MB). XD
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,674 (3.19/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 835 Times in 549 Posts
|
i just can say wow
its kinda fast when first hdd touched 1 tera now is 3 tera. sometimes it looks too much for motherboard to handle
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear :: ![]() Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland,Slask
Posts: 1,107 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 200
Thanked 174 Times in 142 Posts
|
Quote:
I find it kinda sad we still dont get nice TB size SSD's with a decent price. I saw this guy in a movie once and he could store other peoples mind in his neural net !
__________________
"Let me noobilize you"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,116 (1.76/day)
Thanks: 2,301
Thanked 865 Times in 612 Posts
|
Wake me up when they hit 2tb/platter and sell single platter drives for ~$100. Then I'll buy five or six for a nice RAID 5 or 10 or something like that. Single platter drives are sexy.
__________________
HEAT “congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis!
symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others....
Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Performance Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.41/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts
|
hard drives are still improving at a fantastic rate imo. good to have such clear definition between super fast read/write drives, and cheap HUGE storage drives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm not sure why we don't get this tech at home. Quote:
I disagree, improvements have been slow in the past few years. Though this is because the market for huge multi-TB disks is not that big. Not yet anyway. |
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,674 (3.19/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 835 Times in 549 Posts
|
Quote:
although the size is promising, if it fails the pain is kinda 'promising' too, the safest way maybe just place it on raid configuration
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear :: ![]() Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 777 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 109
Thanked 167 Times in 113 Posts
|
I struggle to half-fill my 640GB main drive
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,526 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,606 Times in 1,285 Posts
|
I bet that technology originally belonged to samsung....
__________________
![]() “I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Chief Broken Rig
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,011 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,220 Times in 1,556 Posts
|
dosent matter who it belonged to the better density will push HDD speed up even higher
just look at the performance numbers of samsungs F4 drives of the 7200rpm variety hitting 155mb/s read write speeds. doubling the density of a 1TB drive from 500gb x2 to 1000gb x1 should give a nice bump in speed id say about 15-25mb/s improvement The Spinpoint F3s sequential read writes were around 110-115. id expect upping them to single platter would be a nice 130-145 maybe higher so a short stroked drive 1tb reduced to say 700gb per drive x2 in Raid 0 would make for some damn damn nice numbers for mechanical hdds. as that raises the min read write do to cutting off the slowest part of the disk. so average should go up to 125 + the improvement from a single platter upping that to 150+ oh man, cant wait for the new drives and actual performance numbers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,116 (1.76/day)
Thanks: 2,301
Thanked 865 Times in 612 Posts
|
Have I ever told you that I love you?
__________________
HEAT “congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis!
symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others....
Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 344 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
Aren't single platter drives slower than multiplatter drives? (considering the platters being the same size in both cases, single and multi). It makes me think that a drive with 2 x 1TB platters would perform similary to 2x drives of 1TB (single platter) in RAID 0. This is rational, since there's a kind of RAID 0 in between the platters of a multiplatter drive. internally I mean. But yeah of course improving density will improve performance but I'm not discussing that in this case... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the mountains :) Adirondacks in NY (US)
Posts: 3,708 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 4,542
Thanked 1,447 Times in 1,040 Posts
|
not in general, no. the platters are linked, but the mechanics still have to read individual platters, in different spots. that slows it all down.
__________________
Donate to TPU TeamSpeak Server ![]() TPU TS: ts21.gameservers.com:9207 PSN / XBL / Steam = digibucc | Origin / BF3 = digibuc |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near Canterbury, uk
Posts: 1,889 (1.79/day)
Thanks: 634
Thanked 562 Times in 453 Posts
|
no, the platters do not work the same as hard drives do in a raid set up, the 1tb f3 is actually slightly slowr then the 500gb f3
__________________
“if you run short on cash, theres always that option. dont forget to use vasaline” -Freedomeclipse
“Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.” -repman244
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 344 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
I actually thought the opposite, that more platters would increase speed because the data would have been written sequencially in platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and then platter 1, platter 2, platter 3 and so on. making lower amount if seekings for each spot as all heads are in the desired spot in that single instant. If you know what I mean (at least it this idea would work faster in sequencial readings) Now, if they have to read individual platters in different spots, we are doomed. speeds drops. Unless the heads were independent from each other, which are not. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Thefumigator For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,748 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
The problem with having more than 3 platters is that they hit the height limit of the drive.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 3,116 (1.76/day)
Thanks: 2,301
Thanked 865 Times in 612 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Regardless, I also want single-platter drives because they're sleek and thin and sexy (and I imagine cooler and quieter)
__________________
HEAT “congratulations! you have successfully been inflicted with tpuitis!
symptons include: prolonged computer usage, urge to make tpu your homepage, posting at rapid posts-per-day ratios (also known as post whoring), and the urge to waste lots of money on high end computer hardware that you dont need!” -panchoman
“Modding to me is something best shared with others....
Kind of like a fine wine, but without the drunk driving arrest and hangovers.” -MKmods
“i'm going to punch you in the face now Jesus..” -BumbleBee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,681 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 199 Times in 156 Posts
|
so where is ma 5TB hard drive?
they have the technology :P 5 platters at 1TB earch = 5TB and 5 platters are max in a 3,5" harddrive |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eurocom Breaks the 3TB Barrier in its Notebooks with Seagate Momentus 7200rpm HDDs | btarunr | News | 5 | Aug 17, 2010 08:57 AM |
| Western Digital Ups Platter Density, to Launch 2 TB HDD | btarunr | News | 8 | Jan 13, 2009 11:00 PM |
| Seagate Ships Desktop Hard Drive With World's Highest Areal Density - 500GB Per Disk | malware | News | 5 | Jan 6, 2009 06:36 AM |
| Seagate Ups Storage Density With Single Platter 500GB HDD | btarunr | News | 7 | Dec 31, 2008 02:16 PM |
| Seagate Ships the World's Highest Areal Density 3.5" Desktop Drive | malware | News | 11 | Jun 11, 2007 06:35 PM |