techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 12, 2011, 09:29 AM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Intel SSD 510 Series 250 GB

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._Crest_250_GB/

Last edited by W1zzard; Jun 30, 2011 at 06:32 AM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 30, 2011, 02:36 AM   #2
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,288 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 557
Thanked 598 Times in 438 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

Wow i can't believe the Intel does so good, i was thinking it wouldn't do to its slower write speeds. Goes to show that they put quality parts in their SSD.
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 03:07 AM   #3
Maban
1000 Posts
 
Maban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,923 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 802
Thanked 554 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Almost no one is going to buy the 250GB version as its almost $600. And since the 120GB one is slower, this really isn't a good indication of the 510 family.
Maban is online now  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 03:38 AM   #4
ERazer
1000 Posts
 
ERazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 1,421 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 334
Thanked 500 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

imo u buy intel ssd not for raw performance but for reliability
__________________
*Gaming Rig: i7 2600k | ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z Intel Z68 | 8gb Corsair Dominator GT | ASUS ENGTX580 DCII | Intel 510 series 120gb | Corsair 650d
*Daily Rig: i7 860 | GA-P55A-UD6 | 8gb Corsair Dominator III | HD5770 | x2 250gb WD RE4 Raid0 | Haf932 Modded
*Server: i3 540 | GA-H55N-USB3 | 4gb Corsair XMS DDR3 | x4 500gb WD Blue | lian li pc-q08b


| My HeatWare | My For Sale | SteamID |
ERazer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 07:32 AM   #5
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

Review the 600GB version please

EDIT: Oops. I got the wrong series. Sorry!
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 12:46 PM   #6
TiN
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Taipei
Posts: 184 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 68 Times in 35 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to TiN Send a message via Skype™ to TiN

System Specs

No IOmeter?

I bought Intel 320 month ago, much better than 510 as for write/IO performance
TiN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 01:52 PM   #7
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TiN View Post
No IOmeter?
iometer is affected by data deduplication. used wrongly by many reviewers not using it on the physical drive. synthetic benchmarks are useless anyway
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 30, 2011, 01:59 PM   #8
Maban
1000 Posts
 
Maban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,923 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 802
Thanked 554 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

English please?
Maban is online now  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2011, 03:32 PM   #9
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,794 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,675
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Was the latest firmware used with the x25-m ?. As it had a new one a few months ago.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 10:19 AM   #10
treehouse
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

why is the agility 2 faster than the agility 3 in windows startup??
__________________
treehouse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 12:38 PM   #11
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by treehouse View Post
why is the agility 2 faster than the agility 3 in windows startup??
no idea, but the tests were repeated at least 10 times per drive.

it looks like sandforce introduced a change in their new sata 6 gbps drives that makes them a tiny bit slower in bootup compared to the old drives.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 12:40 PM   #12
treehouse
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
no idea, but the tests were repeated at least 10 times per drive.

it looks like sandforce introduced a change in their new sata 6 gbps drives that makes them a tiny bit slower in bootup compared to the old drives.
ah ok, i was thinking it might be due to motherboard chipset but your probably right
__________________
treehouse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 12:42 PM   #13
micropage7
3500 Posts
 
micropage7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,674 (3.19/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 835 Times in 549 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
no idea, but the tests were repeated at least 10 times per drive.

it looks like sandforce introduced a change in their new sata 6 gbps drives that makes them a tiny bit slower in bootup compared to the old drives.
i guess its ok as long as just the driver not the hardware itself and for ssd little bit slower wont noticeable
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear ::

Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have
micropage7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 12:42 PM   #14
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,769 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,216 Times in 3,160 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by treehouse View Post
ah ok, i was thinking it might be due to motherboard chipset but your probably right
i'm using the exact same hardware for testing all ssds
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2011, 01:04 PM   #15
treehouse
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
i'm using the exact same hardware for testing all ssds
sorry i did not make myself clear, i know you use the same hardware for all SSD tests but i was saying that the motherboard chipset might be affecting the Agility 3 more than the Agility 2 because other tests i have seen show the Agility 3 beating Agility 2 in boot up tests
__________________
treehouse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 01:01 PM   #16
Zerofaith
 
Zerofaith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Wizzard... in your opinion

I have read both reviews on the Intel 510 and the ADATA s511, (great job btw)
I am looking to buy a 120gb drive of course I want it to be realiable but I also want preformance... the Price is the price, which one would you suggest out of those 2?
I would concider ocz vertex 3 but too many horror stories

also which controller do you like better? sandforce or marvell

thanks for your thoughts

zero
Zerofaith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 01:40 PM   #17
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

I like SSD reviews where there is more into the real world tests than stupid synthetics that don't mean a thing to me. So i hope TPU will continue to stick with the practical usage more than with theoretical capabilities of the drives...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Announces Third-Generation SSD: Intel Solid-State Drive 320 Series btarunr News 10 Mar 30, 2011 11:17 AM
Intel Announces Next in Solid-State Drive Line Up: Intel SSD 510 Series btarunr News 13 Mar 5, 2011 02:49 PM
Intel 510 Series SATA 6 Gb/s SSD Slated for March 1 btarunr News 34 Feb 22, 2011 08:16 AM
Mini-PCI E and Intel 310 SSD series. alucasa System Builder's Advice 1 Jan 29, 2011 08:56 PM
Mushkin Announces Europa III SSD Series, Intros 250 GB Model btarunr News 6 Jul 15, 2009 04:09 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts