techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:13 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Intel Introduces Core i7 960 Processor

Intel silently made its newest addition to the Core i7 desktop processor family official: the Core i7 960. This socket LGA-1366 processor is designed to work on motherboards with the Intel X58 Express chipset. After Intel's gradual replacement of the Core i7 965 Extreme Edition with the Core i7 975 Extreme Edition, there remained a scope for a non-XE Core i7 model with the same clock-speed as the i7 965 XE, albeit with an upwards locked bus frequency multiplier.

The Core i7 960 comes clocked at 3.20 GHz (24.0 x 133 MHz), with a maximum Turbo Boost speed of 3.43 GHz. It has four processing cores, and with the HyperThreading Technology, provides the operating system with eight logical CPUs. It comes with a QuickPath Interconnect speed of 4.8 GT/s, and supports up to 24 GB of memory with its triple-channel (192-bit wide) DDR3 memory interface. Each processing core has a dedicated L2 cache of 256 KB, while an 8 MB L3 cache is shared between all four cores. It is built on the 45 nm HKMG process, with a TDP of 130W.

The Core i7 960 is touted to displace the Core i7 950 from its existing price-point of around US $562 (in 1000 unit tray quantities). As evidence of that, popular American retailer Newegg.com has listed the OEM part (chip-only) at $589.99, a mere $10 higher than the retail box of the Core i7 950 listed on the same store.

Last edited by btarunr; Oct 20, 2009 at 12:23 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 12:56 PM   #2
locoty
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 52 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

C'mon, release i7 930 too, give LGA 1366 some breath, and encourage mobo maker to release x58 mobo with sata III and usb 3.0
__________________
http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/6995/sigfinished.jpg
locoty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 02:55 PM   #3
gumpty
500 Posts
 
gumpty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 564 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 229
Thanked 135 Times in 96 Posts

System Specs

Only $60 more than an i7 870. Kind of makes me wonder why anyone would buy the 870. The platform costs aren't THAT different. If you're spending £400+ on a processor you've probably got enough £$£$ to pay for the small increase in platform cost.
__________________
"It's going to install and overwrite the OS. It will kill all your family pets and everything in the 'fridge will go bad. The shingles on your roof will curl and ants will infest your underwear drawer."Kreij

gumpty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 03:17 PM   #4
cauby
75 Posts
 
cauby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Brazil
Posts: 121 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 18 Times in 9 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to cauby

System Specs

Next on line is what??The i7 985???
That would be sick!

And i agree with gumpty,the i7 870 is not really worth it's price...the 860,on the other hand is way better.
cauby is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 03:20 PM   #5
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,919 (3.51/day)
Thanks: 1,597
Thanked 2,044 Times in 1,600 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

Wow, stocked at 3.2Ghz. Thats nice. Should be able to hit 5.0Ghz under some good cooling. And for a 5Ghz chip $500 isnt that bad, considering a QX9650 was sold here for $350 just a few days ago.
__________________
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 20, 2009, 10:23 PM   #6
3volvedcombat
1000 Posts
 
3volvedcombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South California, The desert.
Posts: 1,352 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 263 Times in 221 Posts

System Specs

This getting very sad what they are doing right now with the lga 1366 platform. I mean come on there making every processor around this socket way to dam expensive its pathetic to.....
If you wanted to go lga 1366 then grab at least 500 dollars because its so expensive to grab the platform for some people. If 1366 Is going to be a high end platform HOW ABOUT YOU PUT SATA 3 AND USB 3.0 on those motherboards first, im noticing that lga 1156 is going to have these techs before lga 1366 and yet its a p55 not a x58 ........ Im confused, if you want crazy system with tripple channel mem get a core i7 x58 setup, but if you want a i7 still for even cheaper but with dual channel mem get a p55 setup FOR ABOUT HALF THE COST. Rediculas crap im seeing here....
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
3volvedcombat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2009, 06:46 AM   #7
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,859 (2.62/day)
Thanks: 388
Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by locoty View Post
C'mon, release i7 930 too, give LGA 1366 some breath, and encourage mobo maker to release x58 mobo with sata III and usb 3.0
i see i7 920 and i7 950 only enough , you now intel every 100mhz core speed mean increase 100$ more
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2009, 06:58 AM   #8
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.41/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

I was hoping a i7 930 @ 2.8ghz could phase out the 920 and replace its price point, they mayaswell keep moving forward.
__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2009, 07:00 AM   #9
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,562 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,751
Thanked 2,593 Times in 1,958 Posts

System Specs

SATA 6 Gb/s and USB 3.0 won't be until the x6# series of chipsets. Only LGA-1366 will see a hexa-core processor (maybe LGA-1567 will). LGA-1366 is also two-way with an appropriate motherboard (QPI, anyone?).
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2011, 06:28 PM   #10
markivmariaj
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

i7 960 Processor

MicroCenter had the i7 960 processor for $200, which is a deal because I have been watching this processor on the market for a long time. Just built a monster box that I have been waiting to build for a long, long time.

* 24G of Corsair memory (DDR3 1800 6 X 4G),
* Intel DX58S02 Motherboard
* 2 X 60GB OCZ Agility SATA3 SSD in RAID 0 for OS
* 5 X 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM HDD for Data
* 2 X nVidia GeForce 550 TI Graphics cards in SLI
* 2 X HANNS-G 1920 X 1280 28" HH281 Monitors
* Corsair H60 Liquid Cooling Kit
* Intel I7 960 3.2GHz CPU

The 960 is identical to the 965 except for the fact that it is an extreme chip and that the System Bus for the i7 960 is 4.8 GT/s and the i7 965 is 6.4 GT/s. Just wondering if that will make a big difference. Mostly using this RIG as a server for my business and I only get to make this big purchase once every 3 years. Not planning on changing anything. The new rig works great. Just wondering what the GT/s difference is?
markivmariaj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2011, 10:11 PM   #11
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

I've tried various bus rates on my Core i7 920 @ 3,3GHz and honestly i couldn't notice the difference. I've tested stock 4.6 GT/s and 7.9 GT/s and it felt the same. Of course i prefer to have higher numbers though...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Introduces Core i7, Xeon 3400 and First Core i5 Processors btarunr News 39 Sep 12, 2009 06:06 AM
Intel to Introduce Core i7 960 in Q4 btarunr News 15 Jun 16, 2009 12:57 AM
Intel Cuts Core 2 Prices, Introduces Core 2 Quad Q8400 and Q8400S malware News 11 Apr 21, 2009 08:04 AM
Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz LGA 1366 Quad-Core Processor for $199.99 @Micro Center sata_mata Hot Deals 7 Apr 3, 2009 07:38 PM
Intel Introduces New Mobile Dual-core and Quad-core Processors malware News 5 Dec 30, 2008 05:59 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts