techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 22, 2011, 09:51 PM   #51
Steven B
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 572 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 50 Times in 33 Posts

yea i am sure your right lol. Its either that, or its becuase their revenue is so much less than Intel that they don't bother, or can't.

And yes you can be limited by a socket, by its # of pins just for vcc and ground for a CPU with so much more TDP is a big deal, add a few more cores, some PCI-E controller, IMC to quadchannel, and so on.

if you notice with LGA1366 intel has a IOH(northbridge) and ICH(southbridge), with LGA2011 and LGA1155 there is only a PCH, like the A75 chipset(called FCH) if you are familiar with AMD.

So AMD is still using a two part chipset, while Intel has moved to all single chipset. These moves, such as the testing of this with LGA1156, and then sticking with two for LGA1366, shows Intel has the ability to heavily modify the substructure other than the cores, while with lets say Phenom 2 they couldn't add an onboard PCI-E controller, they are limited to the NB, same with BD, they have to use that NB, they are also limited to power package, and thus they came out with true AM3+ boards, AM3 board will be limited and so on.

Its a lot of confusion, Intel doesn't bring out new sockets every year.
Steven B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 09:57 PM   #52
Pestilence
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 556 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 68 Times in 60 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven B View Post
yea i am sure your right lol. Its either that, or its becuase their revenue is so much less than Intel that they don't bother, or can't.

And yes you can be limited by a socket, by its # of pins just for vcc and ground for a CPU with so much more TDP is a big deal, add a few more cores, some PCI-E controller, IMC to quadchannel, and so on.

if you notice with LGA1366 intel has a IOH(northbridge) and ICH(southbridge), with LGA2011 and LGA1155 there is only a PCH, like the A75 chipset(called FCH) if you are familiar with AMD.

So AMD is still using a two part chipset, while Intel has moved to all single chipset. These moves, such as the testing of this with LGA1156, and then sticking with two for LGA1366, shows Intel has the ability to heavily modify the substructure other than the cores, while with lets say Phenom 2 they couldn't add an onboard PCI-E controller, they are limited to the NB, same with BD, they have to use that NB, they are also limited to power package, and thus they came out with true AM3+ boards, AM3 board will be limited and so on.

Its a lot of confusion, Intel doesn't bring out new sockets every year.
Socket 2011 should be good till atleast 2013 as well as 1155. With Ivy Bridge and IB-E looming next year.. Its a great time to be an Intel fan
Pestilence is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 11:19 PM   #53
Platibus
75 Posts
 
Platibus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 88 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

With all the talk about the sockets I have to ask: will Ivy Bridge requiere yet another socket?
Platibus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 11:27 PM   #54
Pestilence
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 556 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 68 Times in 60 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platibus View Post
With all the talk about the sockets I have to ask: will Ivy Bridge requiere yet another socket?
No Ivy Bridge will be on Socket 1155
Pestilence is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2011, 11:32 PM   #55
micropage7
3500 Posts
 
micropage7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,674 (3.18/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 835 Times in 549 Posts

System Specs

yeah its the same thing that said over and over again
faster only seen in benchmark, and there many things that affect that in real life
40 some percent? its a nice improvement but we dont only pay for processor to build a rig
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear ::

Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have
micropage7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:11 AM   #56
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,080 (4.68/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by micropage7 View Post
yeah its the same thing that said over and over again
faster only seen in benchmark, and there many things that affect that in real life
40 some percent? its a nice improvement but we dont only pay for processor to build a rig
dont forget another motherboard
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:43 AM   #57
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,473 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence View Post
No Ivy Bridge will be on Socket 1155
Huh? I thought Ivy Bridge was set to release with LGA 2011 mobos as the high end option for consumers
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:46 AM   #58
Steven B
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 572 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 50 Times in 33 Posts

no iv y bridge will first be on LGA1155 probably in 4 core form. As IV is just a die-shrink of SB, it will be supported on the same socket. Supposedly IB will then go on lGA2011.

Honestly if Intel doesn't fix their cold bug issues with SB-E they will have a problem with enthusiasts buying older x58 stuff.
Steven B is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Steven B For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 23, 2011, 01:49 AM   #59
random
2000 Posts
 
random's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,473 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 1,248
Thanked 627 Times in 407 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven B View Post
no iv y bridge will first be on LGA1155 probably in 4 core form. As IV is just a die-shrink of SB, it will be supported on the same socket. Supposedly IB will then go on lGA2011.

Honestly if Intel doesn't fix their cold bug issues with SB-E they will have a problem with enthusiasts buying older x58 stuff.
Good new for me as I cbf changing mobos again ....this year...
random is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 02:22 AM   #60
kid41212003
2000 Posts
 
kid41212003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,559 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 312
Thanked 533 Times in 435 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by random View Post
Good new for me as I cbf changing mobos again ....this year...
Lolz, i haven't changed my mobo for 3 years now.

And for upgrade's sake, i still can get the 6 cores on my mobo.
__________________
kid41212003 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kid41212003 For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 23, 2011, 02:25 AM   #61
lashton
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 63 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts

lol eah intel where is thew 100MB L3 cache coming, all they do it whack up the L3 cache and call it a new CPU
lashton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 02:33 AM   #62
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.33/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lashton View Post
lol eah intel where is thew 100MB L3 cache coming, all they do it whack up the L3 cache and call it a new CPU
Maybe AMD does, but Intel actually takes the time to make a new architecture.
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 03:00 AM   #63
Pestilence
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 556 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 68 Times in 60 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by random View Post
Huh? I thought Ivy Bridge was set to release with LGA 2011 mobos as the high end option for consumers


How many times are we going to have to go over this?

Socket 2011 - Sandy Bridge Enthusiast - Q4 2011, Ivy Bridge Enthusiast - Q1 2013
Socket 1155 - Sandy Bridge - Q1 2011, Ivy Bridge - Q2 2012

Before anyone asks.. Haswell Q3 2013 will be 22nm and might work on Socket 1155
Pestilence is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 03:47 AM   #64
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,800 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,680
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Assimilator View Post
It's as if AMD's Bulldozer architecture cried out in terror, and was suddenly silenced.

By a curbstomp.

From a mech.
Thing is INTEL want your pay checks for a month for their stuff.

Whats turning me of INTEL is noit just the price is they keep changing the sockets every time some one farts.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 04:06 AM   #65
Pestilence
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 556 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 68 Times in 60 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by AsRock View Post
Thing is INTEL want your pay checks for a month for their stuff.

Whats turning me of INTEL is noit just the price is they keep changing the sockets every time some one farts.
A month? I can purchase an 990X processor with 1 weeks paycheck. Do you think everyone on TPU works at Mcdonalds?
Pestilence is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 09:07 AM   #66
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
 
HammerON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,371 (2.83/day)
Thanks: 3,987
Thanked 2,883 Times in 1,546 Posts

System Specs

This looks like it could be a massive crunching cpu (World Community Grid or folding@home)! Will just have to wait for real-world results when released...
HammerON is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 09:29 AM   #67
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence View Post
A month? I can purchase an 990X processor with 1 weeks paycheck. Do you think everyone on TPU works at Mcdonalds?
Apparently, your job pays well: not everyone's as lucky.

I would need 2 month's paycheck to be able to afford it.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HTC For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 23, 2011, 09:31 AM   #68
NC37
1000 Posts
 
NC37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,061 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 237 Times in 141 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence View Post
A month? I can purchase an 990X processor with 1 weeks paycheck. Do you think everyone on TPU works at Mcdonalds?
Some people are dealing with less hours and corporations which are refusing to allow overtime anymore. Its not simply working at McDonalds for minimum wage. Heck I'm making roughly half what I used to because of such tricks. Just haven't been good openings elsewhere to transfer out.

When you are working with such constraints, the money saved from not going Intel can be better used towards other parts. Why spend everything on the CPU and nerf the rest when you can afford to go better parts all together by going AMD?
NC37 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 09:36 AM   #69
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.47/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC37 View Post
Some people are dealing with less hours and corporations which are refusing to allow overtime anymore. Its not simply working at McDonalds for minimum wage. Heck I'm making roughly half what I used to because of such tricks. Just haven't been good openings elsewhere to transfer out.

When you are working with such constraints, the money saved from not going Intel can be better used towards other parts. Why spend everything on the CPU and nerf the rest when you can afford to go better parts all together by going AMD?
Because I'd rather not nerf anything at all, and just save longer for what I want.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 10:07 AM   #70
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,704 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 587
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence View Post
A month? I can purchase an 990X processor with 1 weeks paycheck. Do you think everyone on TPU works at Mcdonalds?
Many people have family to feed and children who needs school.
Not every one have the spare cash for this stuff.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 10:09 AM   #71
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.47/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
Many people have family to feed and children who needs school.
Not every one have the spare cash for this stuff.
Save longer.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 10:48 AM   #72
pr0n Inspector
1000 Posts
 
pr0n Inspector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,193 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 139 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

"No!! Why is the DBS so expensive?! I NEED one but I only make 3000 dollars a month! WTF Aston Martin!"

Un-fuck your priorities please.
__________________
Are you sure you want to cancel this action?

OK / Cancel
pr0n Inspector is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 11:31 AM   #73
Trackr
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 265 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
From these test results, the Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is pitched to be about 47.25% faster on average, compared to Core i7-990X Extreme Edition.


Wow, you took the results of 4 realistic tests (10-30%), and averaged it out with the results of 4 COMPLETELY UNREALISTIC tests yielding 110% improvement..

Then you postered it as the title of this thread.

CANNOT .. HOLD .. BACK .. FACEPALM
Trackr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 23, 2011, 12:21 PM   #74
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
 
wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories
Posts: 5,312 (2.40/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence View Post
How many times are we going to have to go over this?

Socket 2011 - Sandy Bridge Enthusiast - Q4 2011, Ivy Bridge Enthusiast - Q1 2013
Socket 1155 - Sandy Bridge - Q1 2011, Ivy Bridge - Q2 2012
my only question about this is will current H67 and P67 chipsets support Ivy Bridge 1155 chips, or will we need a new 1155 board becuase it has a new chipset.

as for this new i7.... freakin wow. ~47% faster with the same amount of logical/physical cores, and a lower clock speed, bar turbo.

Intel you've done it again.

__________________


“my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim

“Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace
wolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wolf For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 23, 2011, 02:28 PM   #75
dr emulator (madmax)
1000 Posts
 
dr emulator (madmax)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: the uk that's all you need to know ;)
Posts: 1,107 (0.75/day)
Thanks: 757
Thanked 181 Times in 169 Posts

System Specs

is this chip going to have a intergrated graphics processor built in? if it has i'll stick with what i've got
dr emulator (madmax) is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bulldozer 50% Faster than Core i7 and Phenom II btarunr News 424 Nov 13, 2011 11:36 PM
Eurocom Launches Intel Core i7-990X Extreme Processor in its Panther 2.0 Notebook btarunr News 35 Feb 26, 2011 05:30 PM
Intel to Release Core i7 990X Extreme Edition Six-Core Processor in Q4 2010 btarunr News 33 Jun 14, 2010 06:35 AM
Intel Plans Core i7 and Core i5 Dual-Core Ultrathin Notebook Processors in 2010 btarunr News 4 Nov 12, 2009 07:17 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts