November 15 Launch Date for Sandy Bridge-E

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 06:08 AM

Even as AMD struggles to get its FX series processors out, and into to the market, Intel seems to be doing the opposite: trying to get Sandy Bridge-E (enthusiast) out as quickly as possible. The new high-end desktop/workstation platform was slated for December, and then there was news that chipset delays could push it into 2012. Fresh news pin-points the launch date to Week 46 of 2011, more specifically, November 15. On that day, Intel will have processors as well as compatible Desktop Board products (Intel-branded motherboards) out in the markets, ready for purchase. Ideally, motherboard vendors should have their socket LGA2011 products stocked up by then, too.

Intel will begin the Sandy Bridge-E platform with Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition 6-core Unlocked processor, Core i7-3930K 6-core Unlocked processor, and Core i7-3820 4-core processor. Intel X79 Express is the De facto desktop chipset. The first compatible Intel Desktop Board products include DX79SI, and DX79TO.

Source: DonanimHaber

BrooksyX · Sep 8, 2011, 06:11 AM

Wow that is really soon. Things are not looking good for AMD right now.

bear jesus · Sep 8, 2011, 06:29 AM

Great news, i can't wait to find out the cost and performance.

Although i assume the i7-3960X will be out of my price range so it's the i7-3930K that has my interest but is there any official details on the differences?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrooksyX

Wow that is really soon. Things are not looking good for AMD right now.

Honestly i don't expect bulldozer and sandy bridge-E to be in the same performance or price range so i would assume it should not have too big of an effect.

pantherx12 · Sep 8, 2011, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

Even as AMD struggles to get its FX series processors out, and into to the market, Intel seems to be doing the opposite: trying to get Sandy Bridge-E (enthusiast) out as quickly as possible. ]

Why is this bit even in a news post?

AMD didn't even release an actual date right so who's to say their struggling, we all get told to stop speculating and yet the speculation is in the very news posts we read

.

Good news about sandy-e though.

Will be an interesting Christmas!

zimbri · Sep 8, 2011, 06:51 AM

Did you guys see the clock settings on the new AMD FX series. 8 core cpu at 3.6 ghz with boos to 4.2 and 4 core cpu at 4.2 ghz. I am very curious to see how hot they run. Intel seems much more conservative.

n-ster · Sep 8, 2011, 06:54 AM

Intel are usually huge Overclockers compared to AMD

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Why is this bit even in a news post?

AMD didn't even release an actual date right so who's to say their struggling, we all get told to stop speculating and yet the speculation is in the very news posts we read

.

Because Bulldozer was slated for 2007, then "next year" till 2011, and then "next month" till today.

And mind you, at no point were those timelines media speculation. They were given out by AMD (official), to the press from time to time. It's AMD that has been giving us timelines, and jumping them each time.

bear jesus · Sep 8, 2011, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Will be an interesting Christmas!

Exactly what i am thinking, either bulldozer or sandy bridge-E whichever way i go there is a nice upgrade at the end of the year

Quote:

Originally Posted by zimbri

Did you guys see the clock settings on the new AMD FX series. 8 core cpu at 3.6 ghz with boos to 4.2 and 4 core cpu at 4.2 ghz. I am very curious to see how hot they run. Intel seems much more conservative.

It is possible that the clock speed does not have to be as high while still performing better, if it's higher performance clock for clock also considering dual threads so 12 threads vs bulldozers 8 so i would hope/assume heat is not the reason for the clock speed but i agree, i'm very curious about the heat as it's not going to be a small chip.

pantherx12 · Sep 8, 2011, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

Because Bulldozer was slated for 2007, then "next year" till 2011, and then "next month" till today.

And mind you, at no point were those timelines media speculation. They were given out by AMD (official), to the press at different points in time.

Not the same thing man, BD is actually all taped out now.

Back then it was due to be taped out but they never done it.

Regardless of that it still shouldn't be in a news story.

The news is that there will be new Sandy-e processors not about how AMD is handling it's self.

repman244 · Sep 8, 2011, 07:14 AM

What's with all the Intel vs AMD crap?

Anyway, anyone remember this? http://www.techpowerup.com/148282/Sa...2-Sources.html

That's why you wait for official launch date.

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Not the same thing man, BD is actually all taped out now.

Back then it was due to be taped out but they never done it.

No, AMD had been claiming market releases all that time. It's they who have been giving us dates for market release (when you can walk into a store and pick up a Bulldozer chip), and jumping them each time.

In many occassions, AMD made those dates public, too. For example, in the recent Bulldozer/Bobcat presentation given out in late 2010, they made 1H 2011 market launch public.

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Regardless of that it still shouldn't be in a news story.

The news is that there will be new Sandy-e processors not about how AMD is handling it's self.

I know my job. Thank you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by repman244

What's with all the Intel vs AMD crap?.

Because someone took issue with an inconvenient truth that is perfectly relevant to the news.

pantherx12 · Sep 8, 2011, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

Because someone took issue with an inconvenient truth that is perfectly relevant to the news.

Someone took issue with this website turning into fudzilla.

(see what I done, made a comment I didn't need too before making my main point

)
Anyway BTA I won't argue here, I've made a complaint so I'll leave it at that.

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Someone took issue with this website turning into fudzilla.

As long as TPU doesn't cite fudzilla (for information without pictures), it won't turn into fudzilla

See, not fudzila.

dieterd · Sep 8, 2011, 07:32 AM

If AMD did things right and releaset this Bulldozer in may and it would be good chip, then right now we would be talking about Ivy Bridge and Sandy bridge price drops and even Sandy-E price drops (if Bulldozer would be great) but it is not and now no one can predict when and in what condition it will apear, so we can forget about any Intel price drops and we can expect Ivy Bride delay and overpriced Sandy-E

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantherx12

Anyway BTA I won't argue here, I've made a complaint so I'll leave it at that.

Let me break it to you: no action will be taken. Why? Because unlike me you have limited understanding of what constitutes to fud, have no background information, don't keep in touch with AMD, haven't been following the mirage that Bulldozer market-launch has been for the past 4 years until now, and hence don't see how mentioning AMD fits perfectly into the context of the news post.

moonlord · Sep 8, 2011, 07:47 AM

I believe Core i7-3820 will be faster than FX-8150 and their price will be almost the same, AMD loosing another battle.

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moonlord

I believe Core i7-3820 will be faster than FX-8150 and their price will be almost the same, AMD loosing another battle.

Platform costs for the i7-3820 will be higher. AM3+ motherboards can be had for under $130. LGA2011 boards will start at $189. And then you'll need 4 memory sticks on X79 motherboards for the i7-3820 to perform optimally (quad-channel).

So you'll be spending anywhere between $50~$150 more on the i7-3820 platform compared to FX-8150.

moonlord · Sep 8, 2011, 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

Platform costs for the i7-3820 will be higher. AM3+ motherboards can be had for under $130. LGA2011 boards will start at $189. And then you'll need 4 memory sticks on X79 motherboards for the i7-3820 to perform optimally (quad-channel).

So you'll be spending anywhere between $50~$150 more on the i7-3820 platform compared to FX-8150.

I agree, but there will be some extra features for that price including more SATA ports and faster memory. A real benefit for enthusiast segment.

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moonlord

I agree, but there will be some extra features for that price including more SATA ports and faster memory. A real benefit for enthusiast segment.

That's true, but then you're not getting more SATA ports and faster memory for the same price as FX/AM3+ platform. There is a premium. You'll pay $60 more for those extra SATA ports (if you decide to run your SnB-E system on dual-channel), because LGA2011 boards start at $189. You'll pay $150 more if you also want faster memory (the $60 costlier motherboard, and two additional 4 GB memory modules).

arnoo1 · Sep 8, 2011, 08:13 AM

Finally some good news for intel, damn i just upgraded to SB 2600k , damn can't wait to see benchmarks

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arnoo1

Finally some good news for intel, damn i just upgraded to SB 2600k , damn can't wait to see benchmarks

http://www.techpowerup.com/149464/Co...90X-Intel.html

Frick · Sep 8, 2011, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

Platform costs for the i7-3820 will be higher. AM3+ motherboards can be had for under $130. LGA2011 boards will start at $189. And then you'll need 4 memory sticks on X79 motherboards for the i7-3820 to perform optimally (quad-channel).

So you'll be spending anywhere between $50~$150 more on the i7-3820 platform compared to FX-8150.

My motherboard is AM3+ and it was €59.

mtosev · Sep 8, 2011, 08:58 AM

I'm really liking this

Name X79
CPU Support LGA 2011
PCIe Configuration 2 × PCIe 3.0 x16 up to 4 × PCIe 3.0 x8
Maximum DDR3 slots 8
Overclocking CPU + Mem
Embedded GPU No
RAID 0/1/5/10 Yes
Maximum USB Ports (USB 3.0) 14 (4)
Maximum SATA Ports (SATA 3.0) 14 (6)
PCIe 2.0 8 (5GT/s)
PCI No
Intel Rapid Storage Technology Yes
Smart Response Technology Yes
Release Date Q4 '11

btarunr · Sep 8, 2011, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frick

My motherboard is AM3+ and it was €59.

Even better.

wolf · Sep 8, 2011, 09:04 AM

cant wait to see this chip benched! still the real meat for me is the 22nm refresh that will hit socket 1155. they will sell a LOT of CPU's there.

Sep 8, 2011, 06:08 AM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	November 15 Launch Date for Sandy Bridge-E Even as AMD struggles to get its FX series processors out, and into to the market, Intel seems to be doing the opposite: trying to get Sandy Bridge-E (enthusiast) out as quickly as possible. The new high-end desktop/workstation platform was slated for December, and then there was news that chipset delays could push it into 2012. Fresh news pin-points the launch date to Week 46 of 2011, more specifically, November 15. On that day, Intel will have processors as well as compatible Desktop Board products (Intel-branded motherboards) out in the markets, ready for purchase. Ideally, motherboard vendors should have their socket LGA2011 products stocked up by then, too. Intel will begin the Sandy Bridge-E platform with Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition 6-core Unlocked processor, Core i7-3930K 6-core Unlocked processor, and Core i7-3820 4-core processor. Intel X79 Express is the De facto desktop chipset. The first compatible Intel Desktop Board products include DX79SI, and DX79TO. Source: DonanimHaber

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

System Name:	Main / Home Media Serever
Processor:	Intel i5 2500k @ 4.75ghz / AMD AM3 5200+ x2
Motherboard:	ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance / Biostar 790GX
Cooling:	Xigmatek Dark Knight / XIGMATEK Apache
Memory:	16gb of G.Skill Value Series DDR3 / 4x 1gb DDR2
Video Card:	XFX Radeon 6870 1gb / Asus Radeon 5450 512mb
Hard Disk:	2x Samsung 830 64gb SSD Raid 0 & 750gb WD Blue HDD / OCZ Vertex 30GB & 8TB of HDD Space
Optical Drive:	Blu-ray Rom & DVD-RW / DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	2x Acer 20" LED 1600x900 / Samsung 40" LED
Case:	Xigmatek Asgard II / APEX PC-389-C
PSU:	OCZ Stealth Power 500w / Antec EArthwatts 380w
Software:	Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 / XBMCBuntu 11.10

System Name:	Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor:	AMD A6 5400k temp, waiting for A10-6700 // A4 5300
Motherboard:	ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling:	stock // stock
Memory:	4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Video Card:	none // none
Hard Disk:	500gb // 64gb sandisk pulse
Optical Drive:	none (no need) //
CRT/LCD Model:	acer 22" 1680x1050 // acer 22" 1680x1050
Case:	none // none, considering Silverstone Milo ML03B
Sound Card:	onboard // onboard
PSU:	430W Corsair CXM //

System Name:	Panther's PC
Processor:	FX8120 4.5 ghz + 0.125 volts over stock
Motherboard:	Gigabyte 990fxa ud3
Cooling:	Ek Supreme, Coolingking Tripple Thick Copper Radiator
Memory:	Hyperx 4x2gb 1600mhz
Video Card:	460 768mb : [
Hard Disk:	WD blue 500gb
CRT/LCD Model:	AOC HD
Case:	Mountain Mods U2-UFO
Sound Card:	Audigy z2
PSU:	Powercool 750w modular PSU ( GAMBLING YAY!)
Software:	Windows SEVEN
Benchmarks:	Pffft benchmarking for me is for the lulz only!

Sep 8, 2011, 06:11 AM	#2
BrooksyX Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, WA Posts: 3,572 (1.82/day) Thanks: 511 Thanked 570 Times in 527 Posts System Specs	Wow that is really soon. Things are not looking good for AMD right now.

Sep 8, 2011, 06:51 AM	#5
zimbri Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 1 (0.00/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	AMD's clock speeds Did you guys see the clock settings on the new AMD FX series. 8 core cpu at 3.6 ghz with boos to 4.2 and 4 core cpu at 4.2 ghz. I am very curious to see how hot they run. Intel seems much more conservative.

Sep 8, 2011, 06:54 AM	#6
n-ster Eligible for custom title Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Posts: 8,304 (5.20/day) Thanks: 1,206 Thanked 1,420 Times in 1,153 Posts System Specs	Intel are usually huge Overclockers compared to AMD __________________ My Heatware

System Name:	Overkill? naaa, browsing TPU with this is extra special :)
Processor:	i7 3930k @ 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard:	AsRock Fatal1ty Pro
Cooling:	Corsair H80 Push-Pull Noctua fans
Memory:	16GB (4x4gb) 2133Mhz CL11 T1 Samsung UDIMM
Video Card:	7970 @ 1050 core
Hard Disk:	240GB Intel 520 SSD + 60GB Vertex 2 + (2+1)TB Seagate
Optical Drive:	Lite-On 24x DVD burner
CRT/LCD Model:	27" 2560x1440 [Korean] PCBANK
Case:	Lian-Li K62 + steelseries Sensei RAW or WoW Catalyst
Sound Card:	iBasso D10 + ATH-AD870 or Shure 750DJ
PSU:	Corsair HX850 + TT Meka G1 or Corsair K60 Mech Kbs
Software:	Windows 7 Professional X64

Sep 8, 2011, 07:14 AM	#10
repman244 Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 965 (1.24/day) Thanks: 227 Thanked 411 Times in 236 Posts System Specs	What's with all the Intel vs AMD crap? Anyway, anyone remember this? http://www.techpowerup.com/148282/Sa...2-Sources.html That's why you wait for official launch date. __________________ Storage server: HP Proliant ML350 G4\|2 x Xeon "Nocona" 3GHz\|4GB DDR1 ECC\|Storage (SCSI): 3x10k 72GB + 10k 300GB + 15k 300GB + Ultrium460 tape drive\|Storage (SATA): Adaptec 2810SA + WD Caviar 250GB + Seagate 250GB\| Other: HP Proliant DL380 G5\|Xeon 5150\|4GB FB DDR2 ECC\|HP Smart Array P400-256MB cache\|3x10k 146GB SAS in RAID 0 + 10k 146GB SAS\|2x800W\|ATi FireGL V7700\| HP Proliant DL320 G5\|Xeon 3150\|1GB FB DDR2 ECC\|2x80GB RAID 0

System Name:	Main
Processor:	Phenom II 1090T @3.5GHz NB @ 2.8GHz (Undervolted)
Motherboard:	ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
Cooling:	Air
Memory:	Corsair 4x2GB 1600MHz
Video Card:	Sapphire HD5870
Hard Disk:	Adaptec 2405 SAS controller> Hitachi SAS 15k 450GB\|F3 1TB\|Seagate 2TB\|WD Black 2TB
Optical Drive:	Plextor PX-880SA
CRT/LCD Model:	HP ZR24w
Case:	Fractal Define XL Black
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar Essence ST (2xTHS4032)>Sennheiser HD600
PSU:	Corsair HX850
Software:	Windows 7 Pro x64

Sep 8, 2011, 07:32 AM	#14
dieterd Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 120 (0.15/day) Thanks: 17 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts System Specs	If AMD did things right and releaset this Bulldozer in may and it would be good chip, then right now we would be talking about Ivy Bridge and Sandy bridge price drops and even Sandy-E price drops (if Bulldozer would be great) but it is not and now no one can predict when and in what condition it will apear, so we can forget about any Intel price drops and we can expect Ivy Bride delay and overpriced Sandy-E

System Name:	The "Average Joe's after work gaming and porn browsing PC"
Processor:	i5-760 @stock speed
Motherboard:	Asus P7P55-whatever
Cooling:	Scythe Mugen2
Memory:	2x2GB
Video Card:	HD6850 Asus
Hard Disk:	1TB 7200
Optical Drive:	DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	23'' samsung
Case:	Nexus one
Sound Card:	nope
PSU:	Nexus RX-630(0)
Software:	Win 7 HP 64bit

Sep 8, 2011, 07:47 AM	#16
moonlord Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Lovrin Romania Posts: 53 (0.05/day) Thanks: 1 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts System Specs	I believe Core i7-3820 will be faster than FX-8150 and their price will be almost the same, AMD loosing another battle.

System Name:	M2
Processor:	AMD FX-8150
Motherboard:	ASUS Crosshair V Formula
Cooling:	AMD FX Water Cooler
Memory:	G.SKILL Ripjaws X 4X4 Gb @ 1866 Mhz
Video Card:	PowerColor AX6950 2Gb
Hard Disk:	1x120 gb OCZ Vertex 3 1x1Tb Hitachi Deskstar
Optical Drive:	Asus DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus VE248H 24"
Case:	Corsair Carbide 500R
PSU:	OCZ Modxstream 700W
Software:	Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit

Sep 8, 2011, 08:13 AM	#20
arnoo1 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Netherlands Posts: 708 (0.54/day) Thanks: 98 Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts System Specs	Finally some good news for intel, damn i just upgraded to SB 2600k , damn can't wait to see benchmarks __________________ intel + nvidia the best amd

System Name:	gaming system/ Moms pc
Processor:	2600k / i5 2300
Motherboard:	MSI Z77 MPower/ Zotac H67ITX-C-E
Cooling:	Thermalright ultra extreme 120 rev.C w/noctua NF-S12B push/pull/ stock
Memory:	8gb corsair vengeance 1600mhz c8 @1.5 v/ 4gb kinston ram 1333mhz
Video Card:	GB gtx670 WF3x @1080/1267/6420(core/boost/mem)
Hard Disk:	corsair F3 120gb SATA 6gb's OS ,2tb wd caviar black 64mb sata 6gb's(storage)/ corsair F3 60 @sata300
Optical Drive:	external samsung se s084/ none
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung Syncmaster P2770FH, asus VH242t/19" lg 1440x900
Case:	tt armor modded 140mm fans 1200rpm@19 db/c m690 adv 2
Sound Card:	onboard/ onboard
PSU:	Corsair HX1050 / corsair cx430 v2
Software:	Windows SEVEN ultimate x64

System Name:	Ongoing scavanging
Processor:	Sempron 140
Motherboard:	MSI 760GM-P23 (FX)
Cooling:	Yes
Memory:	2GB DDR3
Video Card:	Something
Hard Disk:	160GB + 1TB
Optical Drive:	Yes
CRT/LCD Model:	19" 1280 x 1024
Case:	Arctic Cooling Silentium T11
Sound Card:	Creative Audigy 2 ZS with front panel
PSU:	FSP400-60APN
Software:	Windows 7 Pro

Sep 8, 2011, 08:58 AM	#23
mtosev Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Maribor, Slovenia Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day) Thanks: 72 Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts System Specs	I'm really liking this Name X79 CPU Support LGA 2011 PCIe Configuration 2 × PCIe 3.0 x16 up to 4 × PCIe 3.0 x8 Maximum DDR3 slots 8 Overclocking CPU + Mem Embedded GPU No RAID 0/1/5/10 Yes Maximum USB Ports (USB 3.0) 14 (4) Maximum SATA Ports (SATA 3.0) 14 (6) PCIe 2.0 8 (5GT/s) PCI No Intel Rapid Storage Technology Yes Smart Response Technology Yes Release Date Q4 '11 __________________ My notebook: Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset [img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG] CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"

Processor:	Core i7 930
Motherboard:	Asus P6X58D Premium
Memory:	6gb SuperTalent WB200UX6G8
Video Card:	xfx radeon hd 5970 black edition
Hard Disk:	Intel X25-M 80
Optical Drive:	Asus dvd-+rw/ram
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell UltraSharp 2209wa
Case:	Haf 932
Sound Card:	Integreted sound card
Software:	w7

Sep 8, 2011, 09:04 AM	#25
wolf Performance Enthusiast Join Date: May 2007 Location: Enrichment Center for Aperture Laboratories Posts: 5,312 (2.40/day) Thanks: 1,676 Thanked 844 Times in 707 Posts System Specs	cant wait to see this chip benched! still the real meat for me is the 22nm refresh that will hit socket 1155. they will sell a LOT of CPU's there. __________________ “my goal is speed, full ultra, and extreme gaming” -Ephraim “Yeah you can always overclock the 2gb memory to 4gb” -jaredpace

System Name:	MightyX (M-ITX)
Processor:	Core i5 2500K
Motherboard:	Giga H67N-USB3-B3
Cooling:	CoolerMaster Vortex+
Memory:	8gb Geil Corsa 1333
Video Card:	Asus GTX670 DCII oc
Hard Disk:	Corsair Force 3 120gb
Optical Drive:	Zalman ZM-MFC2
CRT/LCD Model:	LCD @ 1080P +TV
Case:	Lain Li PC-Q08B
PSU:	Corsair HX620W

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sandy Bridge-E 2011 Launch Put on Slide, Ivy Bridge in March-April 2012	btarunr	News	20	Aug 9, 2011 05:12 PM
Intel To Still Launch Sandy Bridge-E in 2011, But With Reduced Platform Feature-Set	btarunr	News	30	Jul 20, 2011 06:46 AM
Intel Speeding Up Sandy Bridge Launch	btarunr	News	30	Jul 18, 2010 04:45 AM
AMD Confirms RV670 Launch Date: November 19th	zekrahminator	News	6	Oct 30, 2007 12:05 AM
Core 2 Quad to launch November 2nd, and will be available November 14th.	zekrahminator	News	23	Oct 28, 2006 02:40 AM