techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Overclocking & Cooling

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 3, 2006, 12:56 AM   #1
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

SUPER PI scores

Just got super pi and decided to run it at the CPU/MEM stock speeds

Edit: can't upload image

the time for the 16K was of 00.279s
and for the 32K was of 00.718s

Is this a good result for a AMD 3000+ at 1800mhz?

Last edited by pt; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:03 AM.
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 01:09 AM   #2
Alec§taar
Banned
 
Alec§taar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach him a lesson
Posts: 3,380 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

One thing to note about "Std." version of SuperPI:

It's a SINGLE-THREADED program, & will NOT fully extoll the abilities/virtues present/inherent in DualCore/SMP/HyperThreaded CPU bearing systems!

(Keep this in mind)

IIRC, there IS a way to "rig" the std. model to fully exploit the virtues of SuperPi std. build, but I cannot recall the specifics needed though... sorry on that account/note!

Could I think of a "rig job"? Sure - when you start 1 instance of it?? Using taskmgr.exe to set its affinity to a particular CPU core prior to starting the test will do it... you would run 2 instances of the single thread model of it this way, 1 to each core...



* There IS a version that IS "multi-threaded" designed, & thus, inherently SMP/DualCore ready & capable coded, but, on a single CPU machine?

ALSO, do keep THIS point in mind as well:

Technically, single threaded code RUNS FASTER, & has less overheads in the process scheduler than multithreaded code would, on a SINGLE cpu system (single core that is). The single threaded model will be the "Best/Better" performer on a single core system!

(InfraRed I am fairly certain, has D/L links for that model... name of file is: SuperPi 2004 (download filename = sp2004exe_20060405.cab) iirc! Double-Check w/ InfraRed)

APK

Last edited by Alec§taar; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:37 AM.
Alec§taar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 01:37 AM   #3
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

i used the one on the TPU download section, i have a single core cpu, so i think it works fine, what i want is to compare times on AMD cpu's, but thanks for the advice
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 03:25 AM   #4
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

50s stock 41s w/ oc -1m
.343s stock .282s w/ oc -16k
.718s stock .594s w/ oc -32k

for a64 3000+ (s754)
2ghz stock ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 266mhz
2.44ghz oc ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 326.6mhz
__________________

Last edited by cdawall; Aug 3, 2006 at 03:32 AM.
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 09:18 AM   #5
dccool879
200 Posts
 
dccool879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 304 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

my amd 3000+ @ 2.6 ghz is 35 sec for 1M, not sure what it is stock
dccool879 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 09:21 AM   #6
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,208 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 473
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

heres my pi score-

tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 09:51 AM   #7
infrared
2000 Posts
 
infrared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 2,878 (0.99/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 185 Times in 156 Posts

System Specs

P4 640 @ 4.88ghz = 27.000 superpi

memory 1:1, 650mhz 4-4-4-9

I can do better still when i get some better memory. My target is 26s

__________________
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it!
infrared is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 01:30 PM   #8
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

for 1m at stock speeds it took 52.9
Pretty good times Infrared, how much did it do at 5.0?
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 01:31 PM   #9
infrared
2000 Posts
 
infrared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 2,878 (0.99/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 185 Times in 156 Posts

System Specs

5ghz isn't stable
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it!
infrared is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 01:46 PM   #10
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

with an overclock it does 35,4 s in 1M, a 17 seconds increase
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 02:16 PM   #11
mikelopez
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 164 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=109515

mikelopez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 02:32 PM   #12
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

Nice overclock and nice CPU, i want one too
It's yours?
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 02:36 PM   #13
magibeg
1000 Posts
 
magibeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,367 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 126
Thanked 200 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

lol, i just find it funny a low end conroe just beat the crap out of everyones scores :P (yes i realize it is overclocked but still!)
__________________
Arguing with the moderators is like shaking your fist at God. There's nobody there; and if there is, he's not listening. And if he's listening, all you're doing is pissing him off
Fold for Tech Power Up!!
magibeg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 02:59 PM   #14
mikelopez
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 164 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pt
Nice overclock and nice CPU, i want one too
It's yours?
Thanks, and yes it is mine. Look here:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=14404

Quote:
Originally Posted by magibeg
lol, i just find it funny a low end conroe just beat the crap out of everyones scores :P (yes i realize it is overclocked but still!)
This isnt even close to what these guys are doing:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=106685&page=2
mikelopez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 03:26 PM   #15
Alec§taar
Banned
 
Alec§taar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach him a lesson
Posts: 3,380 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Well, single-threaded or not (DualCore user here) I gave it a go, w/ diff. builds too

I took this test, single-threaded code or not (see my first post in regards to my thoughts on that), & used the "stock/oem" model 1.4, & ones also geared to speed up its calculations via the SSE2 &/or SSE3 instruction sets for floating point calculations.

Here are my results:

Super-Pi 1.4 stock/oem model:



Super-Pi 1.4 SSE2 enhanced model:



Super-Pi 1.4 SSE3 enhanced model:





* Oddly, though the SSE2 &/or SSE3 enhanced models in theory OUGHT TO HELP imo, more than they did?

Well - I don't see radical increases, yes some (small) but nothing "mind-blowing" either, about 1.1 seconds diff.!

APK

P.S.=> I kept it @ the 1M calculations mark/19 iterations... & MAN!

You guys have some FAST machines boy... whew! apk
Alec§taar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 04:00 PM   #16
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

well you all still beat my crummy best of 41s though i am going to try super pi at 2.5ghz
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 05:15 PM   #17
cjoyce1980
500 Posts
 
cjoyce1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 657 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

see below
cjoyce1980 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 05:24 PM   #18
Lekamies
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Lekamies is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2006, 06:27 PM   #19
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lekamies
What cooling are you using on your 3000?
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 02:05 AM   #20
dccool879
200 Posts
 
dccool879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 304 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

is it safe to go to 1.7 volts on the 3000+???
dccool879 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 03:23 AM   #21
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dccool879
is it safe to go to 1.7 volts on the 3000+???
if you have proper cooling you can go higher than 1.7
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 04:01 AM   #22
dccool879
200 Posts
 
dccool879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 304 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

i thought it was rule of thumb that over 1.6 starts to reduce ur cpu's life
dccool879 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 11:33 AM   #23
Lekamies
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by pt
What cooling are you using on your 3000?
Watercooling like this(only pump is different), Idle temp 26-28c and 100% cpu usage 36-40c (after over 9 hour divx packing temp was 42c)

over 10 months it has been 1,7v 24/7 without problems
Lekamies is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 03:19 PM   #24
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

well i still have a stock amd hsf run at a little over 1.7v and the highest temp i have seen was 55C so you should be plenty safe at 1.7v just dont try what i got witha stock hsf you will toast your s939
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 05:59 PM   #25
Boneface
1000 Posts
 
Boneface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,335 (0.50/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 78 Times in 44 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Boneface Send a message via Skype™ to Boneface

System Specs

heres mine at 38s at 1m
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	superpi.JPG
Views:	282
Size:	148.2 KB
ID:	3268  
Boneface is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts