![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
SUPER PI scores
Just got super pi and decided to run it at the CPU/MEM stock speeds
Edit: can't upload image the time for the 16K was of 00.279s and for the 32K was of 00.718s Is this a good result for a AMD 3000+ at 1800mhz?
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] Last edited by pt; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach him a lesson
Posts: 3,380 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 101 Posts
|
One thing to note about "Std." version of SuperPI:
It's a SINGLE-THREADED program, & will NOT fully extoll the abilities/virtues present/inherent in DualCore/SMP/HyperThreaded CPU bearing systems! (Keep this in mind) IIRC, there IS a way to "rig" the std. model to fully exploit the virtues of SuperPi std. build, but I cannot recall the specifics needed though... sorry on that account/note! Could I think of a "rig job"? Sure - when you start 1 instance of it?? Using taskmgr.exe to set its affinity to a particular CPU core prior to starting the test will do it... you would run 2 instances of the single thread model of it this way, 1 to each core... ![]() * There IS a version that IS "multi-threaded" designed, & thus, inherently SMP/DualCore ready & capable coded, but, on a single CPU machine? ALSO, do keep THIS point in mind as well: Technically, single threaded code RUNS FASTER, & has less overheads in the process scheduler than multithreaded code would, on a SINGLE cpu system (single core that is). The single threaded model will be the "Best/Better" performer on a single core system! (InfraRed I am fairly certain, has D/L links for that model... name of file is: SuperPi 2004 (download filename = sp2004exe_20060405.cab) iirc! Double-Check w/ InfraRed) APK Last edited by Alec§taar; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
i used the one on the TPU download section, i have a single core cpu, so i think it works fine, what i want is to compare times on AMD cpu's, but thanks for the advice
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
|
50s stock 41s w/ oc -1m
.343s stock .282s w/ oc -16k .718s stock .594s w/ oc -32k for a64 3000+ (s754) 2ghz stock ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 266mhz 2.44ghz oc ram timings 2.5-2-2-6 1T ddr2100 326.6mhz
__________________
Last edited by cdawall; Aug 3, 2006 at 03:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
my amd 3000+ @ 2.6 ghz is 35 sec for 1M, not sure what it is stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I'm the only one
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,208 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 473
Thanked 951 Times in 780 Posts
|
heres my pi score-
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 2,878 (0.99/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 185 Times in 156 Posts
|
P4 640 @ 4.88ghz = 27.000 superpi
![]() memory 1:1, 650mhz 4-4-4-9 I can do better still when i get some better memory. My target is 26s
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
for 1m at stock speeds it took 52.9
Pretty good times Infrared, how much did it do at 5.0?
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 2,878 (0.99/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 185 Times in 156 Posts
|
5ghz isn't stable
__________________
I don't suffer from insanity - I enjoy every minute of it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
with an overclock it does 35,4 s in 1M, a 17 seconds increase
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 164 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
3dMark05: 7,835 w/E6300 @3.0Ghz & X850XT @ 600/657 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
Nice overclock and nice CPU, i want one too
It's yours?
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
lol, i just find it funny a low end conroe just beat the crap out of everyones scores :P (yes i realize it is overclocked but still!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 164 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=14404 Quote:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=106685&page=2
__________________
3dMark05: 7,835 w/E6300 @3.0Ghz & X850XT @ 600/657 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach him a lesson
Posts: 3,380 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 101 Posts
|
Well, single-threaded or not (DualCore user here) I gave it a go, w/ diff. builds too
I took this test, single-threaded code or not (see my first post in regards to my thoughts on that), & used the "stock/oem" model 1.4, & ones also geared to speed up its calculations via the SSE2 &/or SSE3 instruction sets for floating point calculations.
Here are my results: Super-Pi 1.4 stock/oem model: ![]() Super-Pi 1.4 SSE2 enhanced model: ![]() Super-Pi 1.4 SSE3 enhanced model: ![]() ![]() * Oddly, though the SSE2 &/or SSE3 enhanced models in theory OUGHT TO HELP imo, more than they did? Well - I don't see radical increases, yes some (small) but nothing "mind-blowing" either, about 1.1 seconds diff.! APK P.S.=> I kept it @ the 1M calculations mark/19 iterations... & MAN! You guys have some FAST machines boy... whew! apk |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
|
well you all still beat my crummy best of 41s though i am going to try super pi at 2.5ghz
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
see below
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() |
is it safe to go to 1.7 volts on the 3000+???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
not a suicide-bomber
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.23/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
[img disabled]http://apax.eveonlinekb.com/?a=sig&i=39051&s=zealot[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
i thought it was rule of thumb that over 1.6 starts to reduce ur cpu's life
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
over 10 months it has been 1,7v 24/7 without problems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,027 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
|
well i still have a stock amd hsf run at a little over 1.7v and the highest temp i have seen was 55C so you should be plenty safe at 1.7v just dont try what i got witha stock hsf you will toast your s939
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,335 (0.50/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 78 Times in 44 Posts
|
heres mine at 38s at 1m
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|