techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Overclocking & Cooling

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 15, 2011, 06:59 AM   #1
Zaspera
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mapleville, RI
Posts: 500 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zaspera Send a message via Skype™ to Zaspera

System Specs

1090t & i7 2600k Temps

I just replaced my 1090t with a 2600k and I recorded the temp differences pre-i7 and post-i7. With the 1090t my cores were all running at 24°C and the CPU was running 37. With the 2600k, all 4 cores are different (31,36,34,35), but the CPU is running 36°C. I'm using a brand new Corsair H80 with the i7. The 1090t was running with an H70. Is this a good temp for the i7? It's running 3.6GHz right now. Is it normal for all 4 cores to measure differently?
Zaspera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:14 AM   #2
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,514 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 823
Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,280 Posts

System Specs

thats fine. my 2500k@4.9Ghz idles at 30-35'c
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:22 AM   #3
LDNL
200 Posts
 
LDNL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 428 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 104 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaspera View Post
I just replaced my 1090t with a 2600k and I recorded the temp differences pre-i7 and post-i7. With the 1090t my cores were all running at 24°C and the CPU was running 37. With the 2600k, all 4 cores are different (31,36,34,35), but the CPU is running 36°C. I'm using a brand new Corsair H80 with the i7. The 1090t was running with an H70. Is this a good temp for the i7? It's running 3.6GHz right now. Is it normal for all 4 cores to measure differently?
Youre temps are just fine. AMD chips do run alot cooler than intels.
The max temp stated by AMD for the 1090T is ~60 and for the intel 2600k ~75
LDNL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:26 AM   #4
Zaspera
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mapleville, RI
Posts: 500 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zaspera Send a message via Skype™ to Zaspera

System Specs

Good to know. I've never used Intel until tonight. Also, is the 4 different core temps normal?
Zaspera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:28 AM   #5
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,514 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 823
Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,280 Posts

System Specs

Their all normal
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:46 AM   #6
John Doe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Yes, you won't see AMD kinda low temps on Intel. They have higher temp tolerances. One more thing is core temp differences. They can get stuck, and software is not reliable anyway.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:56 AM   #7
LDNL
200 Posts
 
LDNL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 428 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 104 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

Now get to overclocking
LDNL is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:59 AM   #8
Zaspera
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mapleville, RI
Posts: 500 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Zaspera Send a message via Skype™ to Zaspera

System Specs

I'm already at 4.2GHz. Passed the Intel Burn Test and now using PCMARK7 to compare this setup to my 1090t that was at 4GHz.
Zaspera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 08:55 AM   #9
kg4icg
25 Posts
 
kg4icg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Herndon,Va
Posts: 72 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

I7-2600k max temp is 98'C, not 75'C. I have a H100 on mine running 24/7 folding at 4.2ghz and my max temp hasn't gone over 59'C according to coretemp.
kg4icg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 09:07 AM   #10
puma99dk|
2000 Posts
 
puma99dk|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denmark WTF xD
Posts: 2,061 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 450 Times in 317 Posts

System Specs

if u use programs that uses HyperThreading (HT) than i7-2600kr is faster bcs it got 8threads even 6 real cores shouldn't be bad either, but overall i7-2600k is faster i think even if u disable HT.

i choose the i5-2500k bcs in games u don't feel that much difference and in most of them non bcs they don't support HT, and i don't use heavy programs anymore for convertions or something anymore :/

i am running 4378mhz on my 24-7 on air ^^;

i don't got any fancy prebuild or home build watercooling.
puma99dk| is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 09:14 AM   #11
Dent1
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,353 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 738
Thanked 683 Times in 582 Posts

System Specs

^
Also the i5 2500K has 6MB L3 cache, whereas the i7 2600K has 8MB L3 cache.
Dent1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 10:32 AM   #12
puma99dk|
2000 Posts
 
puma99dk|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denmark WTF xD
Posts: 2,061 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 233
Thanked 450 Times in 317 Posts

System Specs

still u should see the vs tests in games same fps
puma99dk| is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 10:45 AM   #13
de.das.dude
3500 Posts
 
de.das.dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wild Wild East
Posts: 4,487 (4.19/day)
Thanks: 2,293
Thanked 1,307 Times in 895 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to de.das.dude

System Specs

amd chips are a lot cooler than intels, so its consdered the other way round by some people.
__________________
Cheers!
de.das.dude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 10:57 AM   #14
John Doe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Cache is not a determining factor as it plays little role in performance nowadays. It is the architecture that matters. More cache will only result in minor performance gains. It was somewhat useful back when we had Celerons and Pentiums, not much anymore. A Paxville Xeon 7000 (based on P4/Nutburst) has 16 MB of L3, that does not make it faster than an E8500 with 6 MB L2.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2011, 11:06 AM   #15
slyfox2151
2000 Posts
 
slyfox2151's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,515 (1.59/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 528 Times in 470 Posts

System Specs

max temp before damage for 1090T is really 95-100 degrees as reported by an AMD rep.
__________________
“it's still EA.. they will F*** it up. F***ing up games is the only thing they do consistently.” -TRIPTEX_MTL
slyfox2151 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 12:37 AM   #16
Irony
500 Posts
 
Irony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: COC WhiterunOrigin
Posts: 984 (1.63/day)
Thanks: 370
Thanked 243 Times in 197 Posts

System Specs

I've got a 1090T at 4.2 and have never gone higher than 41c on air. AMD chips are just cooler than intel.
__________________
My Heatware

When life gives you lemons, burn Life's house down.
Irony is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 12:42 AM   #17
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.29/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
max temp before damage for 1090T is really 95-100 degrees as reported by an AMD rep.


Source?

Because I've seen Phenom chips have voltage degradation problems when running over 60c.

( as in they need more volts for the same clocks)
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 12:53 AM   #18
Irony
500 Posts
 
Irony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: COC WhiterunOrigin
Posts: 984 (1.63/day)
Thanks: 370
Thanked 243 Times in 197 Posts

System Specs

AMD chips definitely need more voltage for the same clocks as intel, but stay cooler. I have to have 1.635v to get to 4.3
__________________
My Heatware

When life gives you lemons, burn Life's house down.
Irony is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 12:59 AM   #19
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.29/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irony View Post
AMD chips definitely need more voltage for the same clocks as intel, but stay cooler. I have to have 1.635v to get to 4.3
Okay you'll be getting voltage degradation from running to many volts through the chip


What sort of temps do you get with that ( remember to add 10-12 degrees to temps because the probes jib out when the cpu is overclocked)
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 01:02 AM   #20
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,013 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 830 Times in 587 Posts

System Specs

Do they really stay cooler? I thought their sensors just sucked ass and where in a funny location. Kinda like their funky way of measuring TDP.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 01:20 AM   #21
Irony
500 Posts
 
Irony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: COC WhiterunOrigin
Posts: 984 (1.63/day)
Thanks: 370
Thanked 243 Times in 197 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Okay you'll be getting voltage degradation from running to many volts through the chip


What sort of temps do you get with that ( remember to add 10-12 degrees to temps because the probes jib out when the cpu is overclocked)


Those voltages were only temporary, just long enough to stress test for a while. And even adding 10-12 degrees, thats only 51-53c
__________________
My Heatware

When life gives you lemons, burn Life's house down.
Irony is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 01:32 AM   #22
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.29/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irony View Post
Those voltages were only temporary, just long enough to stress test for a while. And even adding 10-12 degrees, thats only 51-53c
Ahh I thought you were running that 24/7


I've seen a lot of people on these forum aim straight for a big overclock and just put silly amounts of volts through without even trying to see how far they get on stock voltages.

Has to be said, that Noctua cooler is an impressive piece of kit if those were your temps

I get 46c with prime 95 @3.64ghz* so I was expecting closer to 60 with that amount of voltage XD

Or do temperatures not go up much with extra voltage?



*Need an extra 0.150v for 4ghz the speed boost isn't worth the voltage increase + I have turbo enabled still so get 4030mhz on 3 cores when needed anyway : ]
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 04:36 AM   #23
Irony
500 Posts
 
Irony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: COC WhiterunOrigin
Posts: 984 (1.63/day)
Thanks: 370
Thanked 243 Times in 197 Posts

System Specs

My max temps only change about 3c from stock to 4.3, I am forever a Noctua fan.

Is your 1055t a Black Edition?
__________________
My Heatware

When life gives you lemons, burn Life's house down.

Last edited by Irony; Oct 17, 2011 at 04:44 AM.
Irony is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 04:44 AM   #24
Covert_Death
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 273 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

may i just ask how you all are getting such low Idle temps??????? im running a PII x4 955 with an H60 closed loop cooler, my idles are 34*C (stock clocks) and around 37*C(ocd to 4.1Ghz) why are my temps so high! they have always been this hi at idle, my apartment is 75*F all day long and my case has great circulation
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Covert_Death is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2011, 05:18 AM   #25
LagunaX
500 Posts
 
LagunaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 953 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 273 Times in 185 Posts

System Specs

If you use offset for vcore in overclocking vs. a set vcore then you'll idle cooler and use overall less juice but yes the 4 cores tend to vary a little even by 9 degrees...
__________________
i7-3770k 4.8ghz 1.21-1.24v Delidded 3231B415
i7-2600k 4.8ghz L041C108 1.32v PLL off Venomous-X Push/Pull
Asus P8P67 Vanilla
Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3D/US 2x4GB @ 9-10-10-28 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v
Diamond HD 7970
Corsair TX750W
CM 690 II Advanced
LagunaX is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FS] I7 2600k dumo Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 4 Aug 9, 2011 07:31 PM
[WTB] i7 2600K (FIH) The Don Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 0 Jul 23, 2011 06:08 PM
2600k@stock/NH-D14 high temps. Any suggestions? mesh Overclocking & Cooling 34 May 15, 2011 08:42 PM
[WTB] i7 2600K {uZa}DOA Buy/Sell/Trade/Giveaway Forum 0 Apr 27, 2011 07:35 PM
X6 1090t 4.0 oc headshot119 Overclocking & Cooling 13 Apr 8, 2011 05:38 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts