techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Networking & Security

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 31, 2012, 06:16 AM   #1
<<Onafets>>
500 Posts
 
<<Onafets>>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Gigabit lan differences

heya,
I'm planning on getting a few gigabit pci cards for a home router build using linux and i had a few questions. a) Is cat 6 worth it over cat5/5e? b) are all gigabit cards built the same? (specifically: http://www.msy.com.au/product.jsp?productId=4194 and http://www.msy.com.au/product.jsp?productId=4238)
thanks
-ona
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
<<Onafets>> is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 07:23 AM   #2
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts

System Specs

All network cards aren't built the same (e.g. high end cards of network processors on them that take load off the system to handle the network stack) but those two pretty much are. I've heard of TP-LINK before, not EDIMAX; thereofre, I'd gravitate towards TP-LINK. The only major difference I see between them is the TP-LINK supports a boot ROM chip and EDIMAX does not.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 07:26 AM   #3
<<Onafets>>
500 Posts
 
<<Onafets>>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
All network cards aren't built the same (e.g. high end cards of network processors on them that take load off the system to handle the network stack) but those two pretty much are. I've heard of TP-LINK before, not EDIMAX; thereofre, I'd gravitate towards TP-LINK. The only major difference I see between them is the TP-LINK supports a boot ROM chip and EDIMAX does not.
Would a boot rom chip be of any use to me? and im not worried too much about the power because the box is a dedicated P4 2.8 with 2gb of ram. All its doing is running untangle for 3 machines (maybe 4 later) unless you still believe that will be an issue.
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez

Last edited by <<Onafets>>; Mar 31, 2012 at 07:44 AM.
<<Onafets>> is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 07:29 AM   #4
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by <<Onafets>> View Post
Is cat 6 worth it over cat5/5e?
Cat6 is not necessary for gigabit, Cat5e will handle gigabit just fine for distances of ~100m(Cat6 doesn't increase this distance any). Do not use regular Cat5, it will not work with gigabit, you must use Cat5e.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 07:39 AM   #5
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts

System Specs

CAT6 supports 10/100/1000 up to 100m and 10,000 up to 55m. 10 gigabit is rare though so don't worry too much about it unless you have interferance/crosstalk issues. CAT6 is quite a bit more expensive than CAT5e because the cable has more components (there's a plastic divider running the length of the cable keeping the 4 twisted pairs isolated) and the connectors are more difficult to assemble (instead of being 8 in a row, it's 4 on 4--they often don't like hitting the right hole).
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 07:47 AM   #6
Phusius
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,262 (2.98/day)
Thanks: 621
Thanked 380 Times in 208 Posts

System Specs

I have used Cat6 for years, oddly enough Comcast installed my internet at home with Cat6 which surprised me. I know it doesn't really matter, but eh.
Phusius is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phusius For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:07 AM   #7
<<Onafets>>
500 Posts
 
<<Onafets>>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Thanks guys Im gonna go with 5e and the 5 dollar pci cards
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
<<Onafets>> is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:24 AM   #8
Jetster
2000 Posts
 
Jetster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,870 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 863 Times in 631 Posts

System Specs

This is a great site to look at review.

http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/
Jetster is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jetster For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:31 AM   #9
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
 
Frick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,882 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 1,076
Thanked 1,445 Times in 1,151 Posts

System Specs

if it's a more permanent install i would go with cat6 actually.
__________________
Typemachine: Acer Aspire One D250 | Atom N280 1.6 Ghz | 1GB DDR2 | 160GB SATA | 10.1' 1024 x 600 | Lubuntu 12.10
Oldbox: HP D530 | Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz | 1GB DDR | 40GB | Windows XP
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "
Frick is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frick For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:18 PM   #10
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts

System Specs

Yeah, leaves the door open to 10 gigabit in the future without running new cable (assuming the distances aren't too great).
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:24 PM   #11
robal
200 Posts
 
robal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 476 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by <<Onafets>> View Post
Is cat 6 worth it over cat5/5e
Yes it is.
Not now, but in future, new ethernet standards will emerge that will not work on 5e, but will on 6.
Your house wiring will be ready.
robal is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to robal For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 31, 2012, 11:14 PM   #12
<<Onafets>>
500 Posts
 
<<Onafets>>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

I suppose future proofing wouldn't be too much of a bad idea, I may as well pickup the cat 6 then. Is there any reduction in latency for cat 6?
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
<<Onafets>> is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 11:38 PM   #13
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts

System Specs

No, but might be fewer lost packets.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2012, 01:17 AM   #14
ChristTheGreat
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 699 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 410
Thanked 231 Times in 131 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGT90Concept View Post
CAT6 supports 10/100/1000 up to 100m and 10,000 up to 55m. 10 gigabit is rare though so don't worry too much about it unless you have interferance/crosstalk issues. CAT6 is quite a bit more expensive than CAT5e because the cable has more components (there's a plastic divider running the length of the cable keeping the 4 twisted pairs isolated) and the connectors are more difficult to assemble (instead of being 8 in a row, it's 4 on 4--they often don't like hitting the right hole).
That is all correct. That plastic in the cable reduces crosstalk. Cat 6 support 10 gigabit and is able to operate at up to 250 MHz.

I would surely go with cat 6. For sure, the price of the cable aren't the same, well from the last time I bought some. All my cables are now Cat 6.
ChristTheGreat is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2012, 01:22 AM   #15
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

just remember that PCI will bottleneck gigabit, you only get 133MB/s shared between all PCI devices, and gigabit theoretically goes to 125MB/s, so you'll be limited.


but yes, limited at even 50MB/s is still better than 100Mb connections 12.5MB/s
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2012, 07:11 AM   #16
Rhyseh
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 65 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

You're not planning on connecting all 3 hosts to the router are you?

If so then it is probably pointless using gigabit NIC's due to the aforemention PCI bittleneck. It is also pointless to have a gigabit NIC if you are only routing your internet connection as it's unlikely an internet connection would fill a fast ethernet interface, let alone gigabit.

My 2c: Purchase a cheap, unmanaged gigabit switch.
Rhyseh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 Gigabit LAN through Teaming Meltdown Networking & Security 8 Mar 28, 2009 01:07 AM
How to take advantage of Dual Gigabit LAN? KBD Networking & Security 9 Jul 21, 2008 06:46 PM
Dual Gigabit Lan alracer Networking & Security 11 Mar 7, 2008 01:47 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts