![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts
|
Gigabit lan differences
heya,
I'm planning on getting a few gigabit pci cards for a home router build using linux and i had a few questions. a) Is cat 6 worth it over cat5/5e? b) are all gigabit cards built the same? (specifically: http://www.msy.com.au/product.jsp?productId=4194 and http://www.msy.com.au/product.jsp?productId=4238) thanks -ona
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
All network cards aren't built the same (e.g. high end cards of network processors on them that take load off the system to handle the network stack) but those two pretty much are. I've heard of TP-LINK before, not EDIMAX; thereofre, I'd gravitate towards TP-LINK. The only major difference I see between them is the TP-LINK supports a boot ROM chip and EDIMAX does not.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
Last edited by <<Onafets>>; Mar 31, 2012 at 07:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,747 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts
|
Cat6 is not necessary for gigabit, Cat5e will handle gigabit just fine for distances of ~100m(Cat6 doesn't increase this distance any). Do not use regular Cat5, it will not work with gigabit, you must use Cat5e.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
CAT6 supports 10/100/1000 up to 100m and 10,000 up to 55m. 10 gigabit is rare though so don't worry too much about it unless you have interferance/crosstalk issues. CAT6 is quite a bit more expensive than CAT5e because the cable has more components (there's a plastic divider running the length of the cable keeping the 4 twisted pairs isolated) and the connectors are more difficult to assemble (instead of being 8 in a row, it's 4 on 4--they often don't like hitting the right hole).
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
|
I have used Cat6 for years, oddly enough Comcast installed my internet at home with Cat6 which surprised me. I know it doesn't really matter, but eh.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Phusius For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts
|
Thanks guys
Im gonna go with 5e and the 5 dollar pci cards
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,870 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 863 Times in 631 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jetster For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#9 |
|
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,882 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 1,076
Thanked 1,445 Times in 1,151 Posts
|
if it's a more permanent install i would go with cat6 actually.
__________________
Typemachine: Acer Aspire One D250 | Atom N280 1.6 Ghz | 1GB DDR2 | 160GB SATA | 10.1' 1024 x 600 | Lubuntu 12.10 Oldbox: HP D530 | Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz | 1GB DDR | 40GB | Windows XP "The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' " |
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frick For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
Yeah, leaves the door open to 10 gigabit in the future without running new cable (assuming the distances aren't too great).
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to FordGT90Concept For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 476 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to robal For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 757 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 490
Thanked 77 Times in 73 Posts
|
I suppose future proofing wouldn't be too much of a bad idea, I may as well pickup the cat 6 then. Is there any reduction in latency for cat 6?
__________________
“As long as you bypass the quantum septicular rings and interconnect the transmission module 3/4 the way down the flux capacitor you'll do just fine.” -Soylent Joe
“Don't go all flash. Your website would be a resource hog, slow down people's browsers and kill little baby seals.” -xbonez
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,574 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,752
Thanked 2,596 Times in 1,960 Posts
|
No, but might be fewer lost packets.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume. try { SteamDownload(); } catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); } |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 699 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 410
Thanked 231 Times in 131 Posts
|
Quote:
I would surely go with cat 6. For sure, the price of the cable aren't the same, well from the last time I bought some. All my cables are now Cat 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,551 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
just remember that PCI will bottleneck gigabit, you only get 133MB/s shared between all PCI devices, and gigabit theoretically goes to 125MB/s, so you'll be limited.
but yes, limited at even 50MB/s is still better than 100Mb connections 12.5MB/s
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
You're not planning on connecting all 3 hosts to the router are you?
If so then it is probably pointless using gigabit NIC's due to the aforemention PCI bittleneck. It is also pointless to have a gigabit NIC if you are only routing your internet connection as it's unlikely an internet connection would fill a fast ethernet interface, let alone gigabit. My 2c: Purchase a cheap, unmanaged gigabit switch. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 Gigabit LAN through Teaming | Meltdown | Networking & Security | 8 | Mar 28, 2009 01:07 AM |
| How to take advantage of Dual Gigabit LAN? | KBD | Networking & Security | 9 | Jul 21, 2008 06:46 PM |
| Dual Gigabit Lan | alracer | Networking & Security | 11 | Mar 7, 2008 01:47 AM |