![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
Intel to Push for Higher Resolution PC Displays, Arrive in 2013
Come 2013, and PC consumers could finally break the shackles of regressive PC resolution "standards" such as 1366x768 and 1920x1080, if Intel has its way. At a presentation at IDF Beijing, Intel expressed its desire to see much higher resolution displays for all computing devices, not just PCs, which could in true terms be "retina-matched" display resolutions. At an optimal (comfortable) viewing distance, the resolution of a computing device's screen should match that of your eyes.
If Intel has its way, a 21" all-in-one desktop PC, and a 15" notebook PC screen will have a resolution of 3840x2160 pixels; a 13" Ultrabook PC could have a resolution of 2800x1800 pixels, a 11" Ultrabook and 10" tablet with 2560x1440, and 5" handheld/smartphone with 1280x800. Compare these to the $500+ 27" 1920x1080 monitors that are still sold in the market! A very bold proposal, but one only a company with the industry prominence of Intel can pull off. ![]() Source: Liliputing |
|
|
|
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
Many Thanks to NHKS for the tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 529 (0.76/day)
Thanks: 170
Thanked 22 Times in 13 Posts
|
good news ........
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to hhumas For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
Posts: 279 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 119 Times in 58 Posts
|
Bring in 4K displays !!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
This opens floodgates of pee on EIZO's $35,000 4K monitor media event at NAB'12. Let's hope by 2013, Intel has an IGP that's capable of smooth 4K (four TMDS links) video playback.
|
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,361 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts
|
Shouldn't they figure out a VGA solution that could accommodate that themselves first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,735 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 1,082 Times in 797 Posts
|
why? don't know about the lesser hardware's cpabilities, but intel's 1155 socket and up are hdmi equipped
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”
“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,361 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,579 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 643 Times in 300 Posts
|
Ill be happy with "just" 2160P on my 24-26" monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Turenki, Finland
Posts: 99 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
Finally! Been stuck on 1920x1200 on my 24" for far too long.
I just hope they bring high res monitors with 16:10 since it's far superior to 16:9 imo.
__________________
Wannabe 2d/3d artist |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,419 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts
|
Many pixels you are welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
My thoughts exactly.......as always with intel this is only part of of a larger move so gonna have to wait and see on this one........ Who knows they might have found a fix for old Larrabee.
__________________
![]() 1 Corinthians 6:20 |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ensabrenoir For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,592 (1.48/day)
Thanks: 4,306
Thanked 1,096 Times in 625 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to AlienIsGOD For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
first of all.. we need a graphic card on the >200usd range that can run smoothly all games on 1080p.. then we will be avaible to talk about a higher resolution, like 2560. it's gonna be a long way to the 4k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 572 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 375 Times in 199 Posts
|
Quote:
but for professional/workstation & studio design & media editing, the IGP seems to be on track and higher res 'might' not be a problem..
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to NHKS For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,735 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 1,082 Times in 797 Posts
|
Quote:
)
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”
“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BarbaricSoul For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,060 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 237 Times in 141 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Seriously, the only ones who would really care about high resolutions are gamers and professionals. Regular users don't know the difference between 720 and 1080 other than that one is a higher number than the other. I don't mind an effort by the industry to boost resolutions, but coming from Intel it means nothing unless they can supply an IGP that can at least compete in the midrange segment.
__________________
"We tried to help Intel, but they don’t listen much. We’ve been telling them for years that their graphics suck…" -Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,361 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not trying to be an ass but I have my priorities. I'll just chalk this up to a loss for my concerns. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 535 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 56 Times in 46 Posts
|
The new virtu software is doing amazing things for high resolutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.16/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts
|
About damn time. Considering stupid iPads are up to 2048x1536, you'd think dedicated monitors would be up to at least 2560x1440 as a standard, with upwards of 4K being offered for additional costs...
__________________
“If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card.” -MatTheCat
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to xenocide For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 303 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
|
YES YES YES
thank you intel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts
|
You could always play at 1080p in a 3840x2160 display no problem. Hell even many non-native resolutions in the middle would work on such a high resolution display, unlike in a 1080p or 1200p display where anything but native looks awful.
Also game developers and/or AMD/Nvidia could work out a feature similar to MLAA or FXAA where the input is 1080p and the output is 2160p, performing anti-aliasing a lot better than they do now while keeping all the details that are now lost with those algorithms. Or color/textures could be sampled at 2160p, while lighting/shaders are calculated at lower res (many game engines already do this anyway) or many other techniques that would allow for 2160p on current gen cards no problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() |
I wouldn't mind at all,because I'd never bought it.
I'm comfortable enjoying my dvd and bluray movie on both 720p and 1080p display. Playing a dvd or 720p movie on 3k res=eye cancer. but if this gigantic res could push the standard HD video to match the res,I'd be glad to jump ship. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Hardcore Monkey Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
Posts: 12,113 (5.27/day)
Thanks: 591
Thanked 5,492 Times in 2,936 Posts
|
Why does anyone need more than 800x600?
![]() This is good news. I'll stay on the bleeding edge of res if the monitors are affordable.
__________________
Cloud (noun, singular): A dynamic arrangement of multiple potential single points of failure, with a user at one end and their data at the other. Get more tech news on a wide variety of topics at NextPowerUp
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kreij For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Haswell and Lynx Point Chipset Arrive in March 2013: Report | btarunr | News | 20 | Mar 16, 2012 01:23 PM |
| Intel Haswell In Bound for March-June 2013 | btarunr | News | 29 | Feb 16, 2012 12:33 AM |
| what's better for playing at higher resolution? | HossHuge | Graphics Cards | 17 | Dec 24, 2008 02:34 AM |
| Dell Adds High-resolution Displays for XPS M1530 | malware | News | 7 | Dec 23, 2007 04:07 PM |
| higher resolution=less cpu usage? | a111087 | General Hardware | 17 | Aug 13, 2007 08:42 PM |