techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 10, 2012, 11:33 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

AMD 2012 CPU Roadmap Unveils FX-X300 and A10 Series

AMD is pushing on with a desktop product lineup that's leveraging its Piledriver CPU and Graphics CoreNext GPU architectures in 2012. Apparently, the company will have a faster product development cycle to catch up with Intel's "Tick-Tock", as revealed in a roadmap slide scored by DonanimHaber. The current product lineup will remain unchanged in the first quarter of 2012. Then in the second quarter, AMD will launch a few more socket AM3+ FX-8000, FX-6000, and FX-4000 series eight, six, and four-core processors; along with the much talked about "Trinity" accelerated processing unit.

The fastest "Trinity" APUs will get a new brand identifier, the A10-5000 series. These APUs will pack next-generation "Piledriver" modular cores and Radeon HD 7600D series graphics. Around this time, AMD will also launch the Brazos 2.0 low-power APU for netbooks, nettops, and embedded computing devices. Brazos 2.0 will get the E2-1000 series branding. The big change is reserved for the third quarter of 2012, when AMD launches the successor of its less-than-lucky AMD FX "Bulldozer" processor family.



Codenamed "Vishera", AMD's new FX-x300 family (where x = 8 in case of eight-core, 6 in case of six-core, and 4, in case of quad-core), will likely be built on the same AM3+ platform, but based on the "Piledriver" core architecture, which brings in about 15% IPC increase over Bulldozer. The roadmap slide talks about FX-8350 being the top-end part, followed by FX-8320, FX-6300, and FX-4320. Around that time, AMD will replace its A6 and A4 "Llano" parts with new A6 and A4 "Trinity" ones. The A6-5400 APU features Radeon HD 7540D graphics, while the A4-5300 features Radeon HD 7480D.

Source: DonanimHaber
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 10, 2012, 11:57 AM   #2
NC37
1000 Posts
 
NC37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,059 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 237 Times in 141 Posts

System Specs

Hmm. So they'll still sell Llano alongside Trinity. Curious to see the performance difference.

I just hope they don't get lost in a sea of number revisions. Hopefully they'll focus on the initial model. They seem to have done away with the triple core A6 so that is one potential issue down.
__________________
"We tried to help Intel, but they don’t listen much. We’ve been telling them for years that their graphics suck…" -Steve Jobs
NC37 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 12:56 PM   #3
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,042 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 1,047 Times in 545 Posts

System Specs

Bulldozer modules have a pair of "cores" so no tri-core is possible.
__________________

My other rigs:
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - HIS HD4670 AGP - SB Audigy 2 ZS - BFG PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB OCZ Platinum LV - HIS HD3850 AGP - SB X-Fi - Asus PPU - *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
BLUELINE - H61M-GE - PDC G645 - 8GB DDR3-1333 - Powercolor HD7750 - 2xTV Wonder 650
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 01:11 PM   #4
mamisano
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC37 View Post
Hmm. So they'll still sell Llano alongside Trinity. Curious to see the performance difference.

I just hope they don't get lost in a sea of number revisions. Hopefully they'll focus on the initial model. They seem to have done away with the triple core A6 so that is one potential issue down.
Looks like they will sell both only until the lower-end Trinity is released in Q3. Then it is all Trinity.

A triple core Trinity is not possible. LLano was based on Phenom/Athlon II based "Stars" core so triple was possible. Trinity uses PileDrive modules, each with 2 integer cores, so the core count will always be an even number.
mamisano is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 01:12 PM   #5
Hustler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 15 Posts

"based on the "Piledriver" core architecture, which brings in about 15% IPC increase over Bulldozer."


Great, so that makes them roughly as fast as a Phenom II, but not until nearly 2013....
Hustler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 01:22 PM   #6
CAT-THE-FIFTH
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 62 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
"based on the "Piledriver" core architecture, which brings in about 15% IPC increase over Bulldozer."


Great, so that makes them roughly as fast as a Phenom II, but not until nearly 2013....
The roadmap says Q3 2012. Anyway,a 15% IPC increase is probably going to happen in line with a clockspeed increase too.
CAT-THE-FIFTH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 01:55 PM   #7
robal
200 Posts
 
robal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 476 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
Great, so that makes them roughly as fast as a Phenom II, but not until nearly 2013....
Well... Current Bulldozer IS faster than PII. Only some specific benchmarks are lower.

Still, it is a disappointment.
That's why I keep my PII until Vishera comes out.

Last edited by robal; Feb 10, 2012 at 01:56 PM. Reason: typo
robal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 01:58 PM   #8
Andy77
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 119 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
"based on the "Piledriver" core architecture, which brings in about 15% IPC increase over Bulldozer."

Great, so that makes them roughly as fast as a Phenom II, but not until nearly 2013....

IPC wasn't the only downfall Bulldozer had... there were others, probably due to it being a late architecture picked up from the cellar. What PD will make up in performance won't be just based on IPC.
Andy77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 02:34 PM   #9
naoan
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 292 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy77 View Post
IPC wasn't the only downfall Bulldozer had... there were others, probably due to it being a late architecture picked up from the cellar. What PD will make up in performance won't be just based on IPC.
Indeed, there's this increased power consumption/performance compared to even Phenom II, oh wait...
naoan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 03:04 PM   #10
Hustler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 15 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by robal View Post
Still, it is a disappointment.
Your not kidding, at the current rate of progress the Bulldozer range will be as fast as the i5/i7 by about, what?...2016
Hustler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 03:05 PM   #11
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Hmm, no FX 8170 or any supposed B3 Bulldozer processors on the roadmap. I guess they're going straight to Piledriver.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 03:16 PM   #12
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

*yawn*
Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 03:17 PM   #13
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts

System Specs

I kind of want a laptop with an A10-5700, but the rest of that roadmap looks pretty uninteresting...
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 06:35 PM   #14
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by devguy View Post
Hmm, no FX 8170 or any supposed B3 Bulldozer processors on the roadmap. I guess they're going straight to Piledriver.
AMD either scrapped the FX 8170 Bulldozer based CPU (B3 stepping) or they will release it sometime in the Q2 2012 as it stated in one of there older roadmaps.

Anyhow B3 along with the much needed modifications hopefully should be enough for Piledriver to make a performance leap over today's Bulldozer.

Quote:
AMD may be using TMSC after 2013, though it does depend on which can produce better yields.

This is a well written article, good job. Also, AMD hired an IBM Processor Engineer within closed doors to assist in ensuring that Piledriver performs the way it was meant to, for massive multi-tasking and the ability to outperform the Phenom II line by as much as 50% to 70%. But not in a clock for clock senario due to both designs being quite different.
Take that with a grain of salt. Piledriver has been fixed well enough to replace the complete Bulldozer line. There is no more Enhanced Bulldozer, only Piledriver. AMD wants to leave Bulldozer behind them from what I was told.
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/02/07/f...works-for-amd/
__________________
Super XP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 10:42 PM   #15
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,076 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Hmm AMD A10, They Should Mark the Box with a Fairchild Republic A10 Thunderbolt II on the box and a Case Sticker with the Same CAS Jet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Yo_Wattup View Post
*yawn*

^^
Says The Troll
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 10:54 PM   #16
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,042 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 1,047 Times in 545 Posts

System Specs

I think skipping Zambezi B3 and going straight to Piledriver is a good move. Better spend those precious resources on the optimized core.
__________________

My other rigs:
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - HIS HD4670 AGP - SB Audigy 2 ZS - BFG PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB OCZ Platinum LV - HIS HD3850 AGP - SB X-Fi - Asus PPU - *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
BLUELINE - H61M-GE - PDC G645 - 8GB DDR3-1333 - Powercolor HD7750 - 2xTV Wonder 650
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 10:57 PM   #17
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,076 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRWOV View Post
I think skipping Zambezi B3 and going straight to Piledriver is a good move. Better spend those precious resources on the optimized core.
They could always make those Units for OEM/Business Class CPUs...
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2012, 11:11 PM   #18
seronx
500 Posts
 
seronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA, Arizona, Maricopa
Posts: 938 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 234 Times in 168 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRWOV View Post
Bulldozer modules have a pair of "cores" so no tri-core is possible.
Two cores
Four cores
Eight cores

The Bulldozer family module can have any number of cores and tri-core is possible but not logical

Quote:
Originally Posted by naoan View Post
Indeed, there's this increased power consumption/performance compared to even Phenom II, oh wait...
The FX series has the same power/performance compared to Phenom II in the same usage of threads

Opteron 6174 - $1240
AMD Opteron 6174 Magny-Cours 2.2GHz 12 x 512KB L2 ...
Opteron 6234 - $400
AMD Opteron 6234 Interlagos 2.4GHz 16MB L3 Cache S...

FX isn't the only series which used Bulldozer
seronx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 12:33 AM   #19
mastrdrver
2000 Posts
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,340 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 496
Thanked 491 Times in 395 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by seronx View Post
Two cores
Four cores
Eight cores

The Bulldozer family module can have any number of cores and tri-core is possible but not logical
No.

A module is considered by AMD to be 2 cores. A module is also the smallest working unit and thus a single core can not be disabled. Cores have to be disabled in pairs. Since the smallest unit that can be disabled in an entire module and not individual cores.
__________________
AV-Test reports (updated Quarterly)
Fan sounds, airflow, and voltage/rpm recordings: Martinm210, Cooling Technique, atreviewnet
mastrdrver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 01:19 AM   #20
seronx
500 Posts
 
seronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA, Arizona, Maricopa
Posts: 938 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 234 Times in 168 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mastrdrver View Post
No.

A module is considered by AMD to be 2 cores. A module is also the smallest working unit and thus a single core can not be disabled. Cores have to be disabled in pairs. Since the smallest unit that can be disabled in an entire module and not individual cores.
You can disable cores...

Power gating is allocated to each core and the module(You can have either the whole module turned off or have one or the other core turned off)
seronx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 02:49 AM   #21
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mastrdrver View Post
No.

A module is considered by AMD to be 2 cores. A module is also the smallest working unit and thus a single core can not be disabled. Cores have to be disabled in pairs. Since the smallest unit that can be disabled in an entire module and not individual cores.
Just like seronx you can disable 1 core per module.
__________________
Super XP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 04:51 AM   #22
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by seronx View Post
The FX series has the same power/performance compared to Phenom II in the same usage of threads
Well every review had different power numbers because the FX-8150 was largely inconsistent when it came to power draw. It did seem to use at least as much power as Phenom II's did, which is the complete opposite of Intel where each line seems to use less power...
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 06:26 AM   #23
seronx
500 Posts
 
seronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA, Arizona, Maricopa
Posts: 938 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 234 Times in 168 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xenocide View Post
Well every review had different power numbers because the FX-8150 was largely inconsistent when it came to power draw. It did seem to use at least as much power as Phenom II's did, which is the complete opposite of Intel where each line seems to use less power...
The inconsistency is do variations in benchmarking methodology

Some used 3dmark/game, some used Cinebench, some used a HPC app, and some used LinX/IBT/OCCT/Prime95.

AMD didn't change the socket thus power specification hasn't changed. Intel changes sockets and with that comes changes in power consumption and other components

FM2/C2012/G2012 Komodo/Sepang/Terramar would have brought the power specification change that AMD needed and it would come with an embedded NB and I/O Links but those were killed off for the more "affordable" and much "cheaper" Vishera/Seoul/Abu Dahbi
seronx is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to seronx For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 11, 2012, 12:03 PM   #24
DrunkenMafia
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cairns QLD, Aussie
Posts: 1,868 (0.81/day)
Thanks: 230
Thanked 239 Times in 215 Posts

System Specs

I can't say I am going to be excited over this piledriver considering how much hype was around BD launch..
__________________
DrunkenMafia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2012, 12:36 PM   #25
theoneandonlymrk
2000 Posts
 
theoneandonlymrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: republic of mancunia UK
Posts: 2,202 (1.89/day)
Thanks: 845
Thanked 361 Times in 301 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to theoneandonlymrk

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrunkenMafia View Post
I can't say I am going to be excited over this piledriver considering how much hype was around BD launch..
probably wise, heres hopein though eh
__________________
theoneandonlymrk is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Outlines Its 2012-2013 Client Roadmap, Big Focus is on APUs Cristian_25H News 29 Feb 3, 2012 08:57 AM
Leaked AMD roadmap shows a 10-core 'Piledriver' chip will tip up in 2012 {INQUIRER} twilyth General Hardware 1 Jul 25, 2011 07:19 PM
AMD A-Series APU and FX-Series CPU Launch Schedule Detailed btarunr News 18 May 4, 2011 04:26 PM
AMD Zambezi ''Bulldozer'' Desktop CPU Roadmap Revealed btarunr News 123 Apr 22, 2011 02:52 AM
AMD July 2006 CPU Roadmap malware News 3 Jul 8, 2006 12:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts