techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 12, 2012, 01:55 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Point of View TGT GeForce GTX 680 Ultra LLS 4096 MB

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/P...GT_Ultra_4_GB/

Last edited by W1zzard; Aug 23, 2012 at 07:56 AM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 01:19 PM   #2
damric
200 Posts
 
damric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

Thanks for testing video memory. Was that also with AA/AF?

Since they claim a low leakage chip, did you happen to check the ASIC quality?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
damric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 01:21 PM   #3
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

yes 4xAA where supported, 16x AF when supported

GPU-Z has no support for Kepler ASIC quality reading yet
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 02:01 PM   #4
Bahmanvidia
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
yes 4xAA where supported, 16x AF when supported

GPU-Z has no support for Kepler ASIC quality reading yet
are you sure about ASIC quality reading of kepler ?

i have 2 gtx 670 s ( one referrence and one asus dcu ii ) and i can see ASIC quality of both of them in gpu-z and one has 90.6 % and the other has 100 % ASIC Quality
Bahmanvidia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 02:03 PM   #5
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bahmanvidia View Post
are you sure about ASIC quality reading of kepler ?

i have 2 gtx 670 s ( one referrence and one asus dcu ii ) and i can see ASIC quality of both of them in gpu-z and one has 90.6 % and the other has 100 % ASIC Quality
it can read the raw data but not make much sense of it. i'm still collecting data to map the raw values onto proper percentages

Last edited by W1zzard; Aug 15, 2012 at 02:42 PM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 03:43 PM   #6
tacosRcool
500 Posts
 
tacosRcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: WR, Georgia
Posts: 770 (2.06/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 58 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

another great review!
__________________
I like nachos and frozen yogurt.
-Fred Fredburger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haoqEv9q_eo

tacosRcool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 05:27 PM   #7
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.68/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

TriSlot Coolers= suckage for SLI Users
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 05:40 PM   #8
Samskip
5 Posts
 
Samskip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Our benchmarks show no visible improvement from 4 GB memory over a typical 3 GB GTX 680.

A GTX 680 has 2GB of memory, am I right?
Samskip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 05:51 PM   #9
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samskip View Post
Our benchmarks show no visible improvement from 4 GB memory over a typical 3 GB GTX 680.

A GTX 680 has 2GB of memory, am I right?
typo. fixed. thanks. 3 staff people read it and nobody noticed it ^^
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 05:55 PM   #10
damric
200 Posts
 
damric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
yes 4xAA where supported, 16x AF when supported

GPU-Z has no support for Kepler ASIC quality reading yet
So it seems like the sweet spot is 2GB video RAM for single HD display, 3GB for above, but 1GB still ok if at a lower res or AA/AF turned down some.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
damric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:00 PM   #11
Assimilator
200 Posts
 
Assimilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 425 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Great review as always, pity about the nonexistent bundle. I would disagree that 2GB of memory is sufficient, IMO 3GB is the sweet spot (ATI got that right at least).

"I am, personally, a big fan of triple slot cooling designs..."

I am not a fan of bad puns.
__________________
<html> <code> <style>

The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4
4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5)
Assimilator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:09 PM   #12
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by damric View Post
So it seems like the sweet spot is 2GB video RAM for single HD display, 3GB for above, but 1GB still ok if at a lower res or AA/AF turned down some.
I disagree. 2 GB is enough for everything. Only when you run 3x 30" 2560x1600, buying multiple cards with 3 GB might be worth considering, but even in that case 2 GB shouldn't be much slower. But if you can spend 4k$ on monitors and graphics cards, some extra money for the memory won't matter. Everybody else - stick with 2 GB, or 1 GB on HD 7800 and below.

We recently had a 1 GB Club3D HD 7850 review where we saw that there is almost no performance penalty from going 2 GB -> 1 GB

Quote:
Originally Posted by Assimilator View Post
I am not a fan of bad puns.
didn't even notice it until you wrote it
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 07:37 PM   #13
damric
200 Posts
 
damric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: In a troll cave
Posts: 295 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

Thanks for clearing that up with a very specific answer
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
damric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 07:53 PM   #14
BigMack70
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 393 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 91 Times in 54 Posts

System Specs

9.5 seems pretty high to me in light of the nice custom 7970 GHz edition cards sitting on the market at $450-470...

Nice review, though. Surprised to see how far you can go on just 2GB of vram!
BigMack70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 10:18 PM   #15
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,789 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,259 Times in 3,173 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMack70 View Post
7970 GHz edition
compared to gtx 680, ghz edition fails power/heat/noise. i'd get a 680 any day
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 02:40 AM   #16
beautyless
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: No sign of life, I'm look like the machine.
Posts: 43 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to beautyless

System Specs

It's just funny that almost of AMD previous generation graphics have better efficiency in power usage per performance. What happen to AMD.
__________________
beautyless is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 02:53 PM   #17
Black Panther
Senior Moderator™
 
Black Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,059 (3.23/day)
Thanks: 2,169
Thanked 1,837 Times in 1,103 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by review
Extra memory doesn't yield any performance improvements
In vanilla games yes.
And only for now.
Black Panther is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2012, 05:27 PM   #18
BigMack70
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 393 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 91 Times in 54 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
compared to gtx 680, ghz edition fails power/heat/noise. i'd get a 680 any day
I doubt that the custom models (which is all that's available) have heat/noise issues... reviews I've seen only complain about those things when they are reviewing cards with the reference cooler.

I know that power is a big deal to some... I just have a hard time believing that many people buying $500 GPUs care about 30-50W of power draw. It's not like the GHz edition is drawing 400W of power or something crazy like that. It's only pulling ~30W more than this card
BigMack70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Point of View and TGT Announce GTX 680 UltraCharged 4 GB Graphics Card btarunr News 2 Aug 9, 2012 07:06 AM
Point of View Launches the GeForce GT 640 TGT Ultra Charged Graphics Card btarunr News 11 Jul 17, 2012 03:52 PM
Point of View and TGT are Announcing POV/TGT GeForce GTX 680 UltraCharged Cristian_25H News 4 May 24, 2012 12:03 AM
Point of View and TGT Announce POV/TGT GeForce GTX 560 1 GB Series btarunr News 0 May 19, 2011 07:47 AM
Point of View and TGT Announces POV/TGT GeForce GTX 560Ti TFC Series btarunr News 9 Jan 31, 2011 09:11 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts