![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
On-board VS add-in
Is it true that on-board items are of lower performance than add-in item?
for example:- 1) add-in sound card is better in CPU utilization and quality 2) add-in LAN card is better in CPU utilization and handling heavy traffic 3) add-in SATA/IDE controller has own memory and processor I have a on-board Marvell gigabit LAN. I also have a 3Com gigabit LAN card, using same Marvell chip. I observe the 3Com card has much more ICs & chips on it. What does that mean actually? I observe also expensive LAN card has 2-3 times more ICs & chips compared to cheap LAN card, although bandwidth rating is the same. What make the difference? Sorry for tonnes of questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Seņor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Sometimes it is, depends on the items you're comparing. In cheap motherboards cheap chips are used. Though onboard Intel CSA or 3com chips perform quite well. Nforce 2 (or 3?) had a great soundchip on board. Some add-in cards even use AC'97 chips. Which are worse than some on board solutions.
Though on average onboard stuff can't cope with high end add-in cards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,866 (2.98/day)
Thanks: 1,073
Thanked 1,442 Times in 1,148 Posts
|
2. It r0xx0red my world.
I miss you, NF7-S.
__________________
Typemachine: Acer Aspire One D250 | Atom N280 1.6 Ghz | 1GB DDR2 | 160GB SATA | 10.1' 1024 x 600 | Lubuntu 12.10 Oldbox: HP D530 | Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz | 1GB DDR | 40GB | Windows XP "The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' " |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,708 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
|
you cant compare onboard sound to a creative x-fi
but the between a onbard land and a pci lan card there is no difference 1)nope only a good add in sound card is better 2)nope the onboards are most time better because they are attached on there own irq to the southbridge 3)only expensive raid cards are better the average cheap ones will use your onboard ram and your cpu to work |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Seņor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Actually when talking about Gbit the PCI bus is often a bottleneck, onboard reigns here. Sure there is PCI-X and PCI-e, but most people don't have PCI-X slots and most NICs aren't PCI-e.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts
|
Actually onboard is pretty good, the only real skeptical factor is onboard sound, onboard is getting better and better very quickly though, onboard solution providers just need to learn to produce good drivers, once they do this, their solutions really become formidable. just remember if you want to use onboard solutions, do research into the parts used to ensure their good onboard solutions
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems. Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
|
whats the diff. between onboard sound and an add-in card? like what does the add in card do 'extra'? (lol sorry bout the nooby question but never had an add on card, and the on-board sound always works fine with me
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Seņor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Sometimes they have more input/output options. CPU load might be lower. Some have better sound quality.
I like my onboard card as well, works just fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
|
yeah i get the input/output options.
Would it really make THAT much of a diff on CPU load ?And with sound quality, what if im getting 100% sound quality on my onboard, like i dont notice any crackling or issues and isnt sound quality based on the speakers?Like, what im amazed at, is people spending $100+ on a sound card, that i personally couldnt tell the difference with their onboard... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Benevolent Dictator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
|
when you use a gige card on pci bus your maximum throughput is about 40-50 megabytes/sec. tested with intel pci gige nic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ashentech.com
Posts: 1,699 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
|
Pinchy and others, onboard sound use to be VERY poor back in the days when ac97 was invented, tiny and cheezy sounding making evena 300$ speeker set sound like they are 10$ speekers that came with an emachiens cyrex computer.
now things have changed massivly, onboard sound in my oppenion is just as good as most addin cards now days, infact the only diffrance is the imputs and that some addin cards support some new fetures(mostly stuff for audiofiles/people who edit/record audio for a band/movies) the x-FI cards and all creative cards in my oppenion have poorer driver support then most onboard, cmedia and realtek make most commonly used onboard sound chips, and the are VERY good solutions, drivers avalable for 64bit(cmedia check the cmedia forums for updated drivers as the sites hard to update from what the driver programer has said) with the addition of HD audio to the nforce5 chipsets we have STELLER audio that uses sub 1% cpu power even under the heavyest loads(8ch audio anybody?) it works great, now the x-fi has had driver problems, hardware/firmware problems, and creative is still trying to work them out, creative still hasnt made a good/reliable sblive driver for 64bit windows dispite having said they would have one within weeks of 64bit windows being avalable..... so my oppenion from years of tech work and gaming is stick with onboard unless you need it for editing/recording sound then try the onboard and if it dosnt sufice check out azentech(sp) hdaudio cards, they are tops for recording without breaking the bank and support full dolby encoding, something even the x-fi at a far higher price dosnt support
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,708 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
|
lol@
come on the driver for the creative cards were poor, but the x-fi driver works like a charm you can notice the difference even on a cheap soundsystem the x-fi brings me (when i had it for two days) something like 15-20fps more in bf2 and other games so far the onboard resolution has no chip to render sound on its own and for what do you need digital encoding or even why would you like to hear sound in digital when your sound system is analog? rendering in dolby digital is a thing the x-fi can do |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ashentech.com
Posts: 1,699 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
|
*shakes head* ok u dont get it i understand that, encoding to dolby is something the x-fi cant do, its not designed for it, infact dolby wouldnt certify it if creative tryed to get them to.
x-fi has alot of problems with nforce4 and some 3 boards due to a creative screwup, nf3/4 boards can be updated via bios to work around it in most cases, or u can rma your sound card and have them send you one with updated firmware(at your expence for the shiping) if you got higher fps from a sound card change u must have had a pathetic board or pathetic cpu, i havent had a drop in fps from onboard vs high end cards in years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
hmm, i am using X-Fi too. There is drop in game performance when i switch to on-board audio (Asus A8R32-MVP), about 2% with latest driver.
About LAN, what i observe, cheap card has lower performance in P2P program (over thousand threads). However this could be caused by lousy modem too, so no confirmed words on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,650 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 360 Times in 344 Posts
|
i agree with ashensugar about the sound quality, cus i really cant noyice a difference b/w onboard and addin...btw thanks for clearing it up, about the olden days and stuff
![]() About the cpu usage and the fps in games, etc, i cant make a judgement cus ive never tried it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,708 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
|
in a way yes in a way no
the gain in games is real maybe you should try it on 2 different windows? and the question behind it was for what do you need dolby encoding?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ashentech.com
Posts: 1,699 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
|
nope, but what i said was IF you do need it then you need a 3rd party addin card, otherwise current onboard is plenty of power, only problems i have run into tend to be that people use the drivers that come with there motherboards insted of downloading the latest drivers from the chip makers sites(dont use the nvidia drivers, they SUCK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,708 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts
|
clearly yep the cd rom drivers most times suck^^
why would the let people work on a new driver if there would be no reason for it? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|