techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:02 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,033 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

AMD Readies "Tahiti" Based Radeon HD 7800 Series Product

AMD is reportedly working on a new performance-segment GPU in the Radeon HD 7800 series, based on the 28 nm "Tahiti" silicon (which goes into making HD 7900 series products). The so-called "Tahiti-LE" silicon could help AMD plug a hole between the HD 7870 GHz Edition and HD 7950, getting close to the performance-level of GeForce GTX 660 Ti, at a lower cost. According to a HT4U.net report, AMD is deciding against referring to the new chip as "HD 7930," since the 7900 series is already crowded with five models, and would rather name it something along the lines of "HD 7870 OC."

A similar approach was adopted by NVIDIA in the recent-past, when it created the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448-cores, using higher-end GF110 silicon to create an SKU traditionally based on GF114. At this time, one can only speculate what the new HD 7870 specifications sheet could look like. Since "Pitcairn" already achieves clock speeds in the 1 GHz range, AMD is left with other features to tinker with. 1536 GCN stream processors seem like a middle ground between the 1280 SP-laden HD 7870 "Pitcairn," and 1792 SP HD 7950. Memory bus width is another component. The new desktop SKU could launch in mid-November. The new SKU could even be a "limited-edition" for the winter shopping season, much like the GTX 560 Ti 448-core.



Source: HT4U.net
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:03 AM   #2
dude12564
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 458 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 640
Thanked 216 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

7890?
__________________
FREE ARMA III KEYS!
dude12564 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:04 AM   #3
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,033 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude12564 View Post
7890?
hd 7870.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:04 AM   #4
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dude12564 View Post
7890?
That's what I was thinking it should be.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:08 AM   #5
dude12564
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 458 (0.83/day)
Thanks: 640
Thanked 216 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
hd 7870.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
That's what I was thinking it should be.
Hoping they'll go for 7890 - make people think it's different!
__________________
FREE ARMA III KEYS!
dude12564 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:25 AM   #6
james888
2000 Posts
 
james888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,397 (3.31/day)
Thanks: 497
Thanked 476 Times in 355 Posts

System Specs

The 7870 and 7950 are so close in performance as is
__________________
My Heat
Natural Selection 2 (NS2) - FPS/RTS with depth. Link.
Studios and publishers seem to have forgotten that games are supposed to be games, not CG films with playable action scenes. Link.
james888 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:30 AM   #7
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,709 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 405 Times in 298 Posts

System Specs

Not sure they really need to do this. As mentioned, 7870 and 7950 aren't too far apart, a 7870 with a medium overclock can hit 7950 performance levels iirc.
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:51 AM   #8
buggalugs
500 Posts
 
buggalugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 748 (0.42/day)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 114 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

The 8 series cant be too far away....... maybe they have a bunch of tahiti cores that didnt make spec for the 7950-7970. Or maybe they just want to kill the 660, mid-range gpus are very important for both companies.
__________________
Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe /Intel 3770K@4.4Ghz/ TRUE Cooler /Corsair Dom 2X4GB 1866Mhz /Intel 520 240GB SSD/ / Samsung 1TB F3 HD / MSI 680 Lightning /Corsair AX850 PSU/ Aurora 570 Case /Samsung S23A950D 120Hz Monitor/AudioEngine A2 Speakers/Osmium Aivia Mechanical Keyboard/Krypton mouse/Pioneer Blu-Ray 206BK
buggalugs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 03:58 AM   #9
Norton
WCG Team Assistant
 
Norton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northeast, USA
Posts: 5,395 (9.87/day)
Thanks: 5,637
Thanked 10,674 Times in 3,328 Posts

System Specs

A Tahiti LE that can unlock shaders to a 7950/7970 at a decent price would be nice IMHO
__________________
Why sit on the Bench when you can get in the game and Crunch!!!- World Community Grid (FTW)
CPU crunchers- FX-8350(4.4)/FX-8150(4.0)/FX-6200(4.0)/ PII 1045T/PII 1045T/i7-920/Xeon (6c/12t)....(44 cores/54 threads)
GPU crunchers- no WCG GPU work available
Folding@Home- 2x GTX 580's/Radeon 7870

Helping the world one digit at a time...stop by our WCG Team thread and see what we do!
Norton is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 04:03 AM   #10
james888
2000 Posts
 
james888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,397 (3.31/day)
Thanks: 497
Thanked 476 Times in 355 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by buggalugs View Post
The 8 series cant be too far away....... maybe they have a bunch of tahiti cores that didnt make spec for the 7950-7970. Or maybe they just want to kill the 660, mid-range gpus are very important for both companies.
This sounds much more plausible to me.
__________________
My Heat
Natural Selection 2 (NS2) - FPS/RTS with depth. Link.
Studios and publishers seem to have forgotten that games are supposed to be games, not CG films with playable action scenes. Link.
james888 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 04:52 AM   #11
NC37
1000 Posts
 
NC37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,068 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 238 Times in 142 Posts

System Specs

How bout designing there to be no hole from the beginning? Just nuts there was that huge of a hole there to begin with. Come on AMD, you can do better...except on drivers :P
__________________
"We tried to help Intel, but they don’t listen much. We’ve been telling them for years that their graphics suck…" -Steve Jobs
NC37 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 05:02 AM   #12
HumanSmoke
500 Posts
 
HumanSmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 606 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 144 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton View Post
A Tahiti LE that can unlock shaders to a 7950/7970 at a decent price would be nice IMHO
Can't unlock any 7000 series card afaia. No reason to think that the 7930 will be any different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buggalugs View Post
The 8 series cant be too far away......
Closer to March 2013 than today, and they certainly wont be here for the holiday buying season
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton View Post
. maybe they have a bunch of tahiti cores that didnt make spec for the 7950-7970. Or maybe they just want to kill the 660, mid-range gpus are very important for both companies.
Yes and Yes. Although I wouldn't rush out and buy one. The HD 5830 and GTX 465 should represent what kind of white elephant you end up with when trying to wring too much out of a salvage GPU...top tier power consumption allied with third tier (or fifth, taking into account the GHz Ed.'s) performance, and leprosy tier resale value.

Last edited by HumanSmoke; Nov 6, 2012 at 05:13 AM.
HumanSmoke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 05:11 AM   #13
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Yeah, call it 7930, or GTFO.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 05:39 AM   #14
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

drivers are fine for me and several users here
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2

Last edited by eidairaman1; Nov 6, 2012 at 05:46 AM.
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to eidairaman1 For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 6, 2012, 05:48 AM   #15
Covert_Death
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 289 (0.43/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 80 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

to be completely honest, AMD GPU naming scheme is too damn complicated hahaha...

the way i understand it they have a 7950 and a 7870 and now they want a 7930 buts its gonna be squished right in betweeen the two mentioned and could also be a 7890 or whatever the hell they want as long as the number falls inbetween ?????? i don't get it lol

I just don't get the need for 4 digits, yes NVIDIA did it but they only utilized the first 2 and the 3rd COULD be used to designate a modification... that made sense

a 690>680>670>660>650>640>630 THIS MAKES PERFECT SENSE

7970>7950>7930>7870>7850>7780 this is dumb, yes they are in numerical order buts its like what were they smoking when deciding to increment by 20's when your model number is in the 1,000's LOL
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Covert_Death is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:00 AM   #16
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Covert_Death View Post
to be completely honest, AMD GPU naming scheme is too damn complicated hahaha...

the way i understand it they have a 7950 and a 7870 and now they want a 7930 buts its gonna be squished right in betweeen the two mentioned and could also be a 7890 or whatever the hell they want as long as the number falls inbetween ?????? i don't get it lol

I just don't get the need for 4 digits, yes NVIDIA did it but they only utilized the first 2 and the 3rd COULD be used to designate a modification... that made sense

a 690>680>670>660>650>640>630 THIS MAKES PERFECT SENSE

7970>7950>7930>7870>7850>7780 this is dumb, yes they are in numerical order buts its like what were they smoking when deciding to increment by 20's when your model number is in the 1,000's LOL
i just say call it a 7860.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:09 AM   #17
Ghost
200 Posts
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 205 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

HD 7870 Ti.

j/k

HD 7870 PRO it is.

Last edited by Ghost; Nov 6, 2012 at 06:17 AM.
Ghost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:22 AM   #18
Tarkhein
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 27 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Covert_Death View Post
to be completely honest, AMD GPU naming scheme is too damn complicated hahaha...

the way i understand it they have a 7950 and a 7870 and now they want a 7930 buts its gonna be squished right in betweeen the two mentioned and could also be a 7890 or whatever the hell they want as long as the number falls inbetween ?????? i don't get it lol

I just don't get the need for 4 digits, yes NVIDIA did it but they only utilized the first 2 and the 3rd COULD be used to designate a modification... that made sense

a 690>680>670>660>650>640>630 THIS MAKES PERFECT SENSE

7970>7950>7930>7870>7850>7780 this is dumb, yes they are in numerical order buts its like what were they smoking when deciding to increment by 20's when your model number is in the 1,000's LOL
Are you serious? Nvidias' naming scheme makes sense to you despite the numerous Ti and variants in between the product lineup (none of which use the third number by the way) and AMDs' naming scheme which has no such thing does not?
Tarkhein is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tarkhein For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:24 AM   #19
HumanSmoke
500 Posts
 
HumanSmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 606 (0.93/day)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 144 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Covert_Death View Post
to be completely honest, AMD GPU naming scheme is too damn complicated hahaha...
A bit late to be worrying about it now. Can't be any more confusing than the XT, XTX, Pro and XL suffixes of yore. Not to mention the untruth in advertising for both Nvidia and AMD/ATI:

LE : Limited (appeal) Edition
SE : Special (needs) Edition
PE : PR only Edition
HumanSmoke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:27 AM   #20
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumanSmoke View Post
A bit late to be worrying about it now. Can't be any more confusing than the XT, XTX, Pro and XL suffixes of yore. Not to mention the untruth in advertising for both Nvidia and AMD/ATI:

LE : Limited (appeal) Edition
SE : Special (needs) Edition
PE : PR only Edition
how lucky you were you could have a SE that was a 9800 Pro that was locked to meet certain market criteria
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 06:27 AM   #21
Ghost
200 Posts
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 205 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Covert_Death View Post
to be completely honest, AMD GPU naming scheme is too damn complicated hahaha...

the way i understand it they have a 7950 and a 7870 and now they want a 7930 buts its gonna be squished right in betweeen the two mentioned and could also be a 7890 or whatever the hell they want as long as the number falls inbetween ?????? i don't get it lol

I just don't get the need for 4 digits, yes NVIDIA did it but they only utilized the first 2 and the 3rd COULD be used to designate a modification... that made sense

a 690>680>670>660>650>640>630 THIS MAKES PERFECT SENSE

7970>7950>7930>7870>7850>7780 this is dumb, yes they are in numerical order buts its like what were they smoking when deciding to increment by 20's when your model number is in the 1,000's LOL
It's simple:
First number: generation
Second number: class
Third number: modification
Ghost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 07:19 AM   #22
The Von Matrices
200 Posts
 
The Von Matrices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 453 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

I'm setting my expectations really low. AMD's third-tier chips usually are third tier for a reason and don't make sense to buy. They in the past have had horrible performance/watt compared to similar performance cards (HD 4830, HD 5830) or are so close in performance to the next lowest card that they don't justify their price (HD 6790). NVidia has been hit-or-miss with third tier chips (GTX 465 and GTX 460/560 SE were bad, GTX 560 TI 448 and GTX 660 TI were good), but considering AMD's record, I can't get excited.
__________________
The Von Matrices is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 07:22 AM   #23
okidna
200 Posts
 
okidna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 366 (0.68/day)
Thanks: 496
Thanked 271 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HumanSmoke View Post
A bit late to be worrying about it now. Can't be any more confusing than the XT, XTX, Pro and XL suffixes of yore. Not to mention the untruth in
Don't forget the SE, GT and GTO suffixes.

X800, X800 SE, X800 GT, X800GTO, X800 Pro, X800XL, X800XT, X800XT Platinum Edition.

Brilliant..
okidna is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 07:23 AM   #24
The Von Matrices
200 Posts
 
The Von Matrices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 453 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by okidna View Post
Don't forget the SE, GT and GTO suffixes.

X800, X800 SE, X800 GT, X800GTO, X800 Pro, X800XL, X800XT, X800XT Platinum Edition.

Brilliant..
Don't forget that there was an X800 GTO2, and AGP and PCIe versions of each card you mentioned as well. Whoever thinks that naming today is extremely confusing doesn't remember the past.
__________________
The Von Matrices is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2012, 07:24 AM   #25
ViperXTR
1000 Posts
 
ViperXTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pasig City, Philippines
Posts: 1,034 (1.19/day)
Thanks: 111
Thanked 339 Times in 190 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ViperXTR

System Specs

and nVidia once used teh XT as well on their GeForce FX 5600 XT and 5900 XT
ViperXTR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD "Oland" Radeon HD 8800 Series SKUs Unveiled btarunr News 93 Oct 10, 2012 10:18 PM
AMD "Trinity" A-Series APUs Competitive with Desktop Core i3 "Ivy Bridge" btarunr News 26 Sep 5, 2012 07:50 PM
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition "Tahiti XT2" Detailed btarunr News 112 Jul 19, 2012 09:33 PM
AMD "Tahiti" Successor is Codenamed "Tenerife"? btarunr News 29 Mar 6, 2012 05:25 AM
AMD Readies Opteron "Dublin" and "Macau" Processors for Launch in 2013 - Slide. twilyth General Hardware 4 Aug 4, 2011 04:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts