techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:18 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

NVIDIA to Name GK110-based Consumer Graphics Card "GeForce Titan"

2013 started off on a rather dull note for the PC graphics industry. NVIDIA launched its game console platform "Project: Shield," while AMD rebranded its eons-old GPUs to Radeon HD 8000M series. Apparently it could all change in late-February, with the arrival of a new high-end single-GPU graphics card based on NVIDIA's GK110 silicon, the same big chip that goes into making the company's Tesla K20 compute accelerator.

NVIDIA may have drawn some flack for extending its "GTX" brand extension too far into the mainstream and entry-level segment, and wants its GK110-based card to stand out. It is reported that NVIDIA will carve out a new brand extension, the GeForce Titan. Incidentally, the current fastest supercomputer in the world bears that name (Cray Titan, located at Oak Ridge National Laboratory). The GK110 silicon physically packs 15 SMX units, totaling 2,880 CUDA cores. The chip features a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface.



Source: SweClockers

Last edited by btarunr; Jan 21, 2013 at 02:55 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:28 PM   #2
Naito
75 Posts
 
Naito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Terra Australis
Posts: 182 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

A possible late-February launch? Very interesting indeed.

Geforce Titan doesn't quite roll with me. Nvidia has lost the plot even further with their naming conventions.

Rumour of only 14 out of 15 shader clusters is a little disappointing considering how long they have been producing Kepler chips, but I guess it is a much larger core. Is this going to remain branded as 600 series (not mentioned in article)? If so, it could be possible the core may be hitting a performance range that might not slot in well with the future 700 series performance targets, thus they trimmed an SMX unit off.

Edit: Maybe it will slot in near the GTX 690 or even supersede it? GTX 690 3072 shaders vs GK110 2688 shaders without possible SLI overhead? If not, might just slot in under, as to not annoy the people who bought the GTX 690.

Edit 2: Checked original article. Claims 85% of the performance of the GTX 690. Possibility of limited edition card? (when considering naming): "Partner companies must comply with Nvidias reference design to the letter and may not even put their stickers on graphics cards."

Last edited by Naito; Jan 21, 2013 at 12:54 PM.
Naito is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Naito For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:41 PM   #3
tastegw
200 Posts
 
tastegw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 273 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 139 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

Cores: 1536->2638
Interface: 256->384
Ram: 2/4->6 (overkill but nice)
I think I'll take two

So this isn't the 780?
__________________
tastegw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:54 PM   #4
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

"The same sources claim that Geforce Titanium released in late February and has a suggested retail price of 899 USD." holly Jesus
__________________
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:55 PM   #5
sc
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 63 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 16 Times in 5 Posts

Time to put my 690 up for sale. Damn consumerism...
sc is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sc For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 21, 2013, 12:56 PM   #6
Optimis0r
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Not an average consumer gaming graphics card then.
Optimis0r is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:00 PM   #7
kniaugaudiskis
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vilnius
Posts: 10 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Well, with such a price tag and a non-GTX branding this card may be a limited production enthusiasts' dream.

Last edited by kniaugaudiskis; Jan 21, 2013 at 01:10 PM.
kniaugaudiskis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:04 PM   #8
Fluffmeister
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 280 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 124
Thanked 80 Times in 32 Posts

Fluffmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fluffmeister For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:14 PM   #9
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 487 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Anyone interested in a cheap Kidney?
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:28 PM   #10
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,644 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,173
Thanked 3,302 Times in 1,942 Posts

System Specs

I'll bet it will perform similarly to a GTX 690 and be priced extortionately between £800 to £1000.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:41 PM   #11
1c3d0g
500 Posts
 
1c3d0g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 615 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 2,255
Thanked 47 Times in 38 Posts

Awesome! This fucker will be an incredible asset for us BOINC/Folding@Home enthusiasts, enabling us to achieve even better results for battling nasty diseases, researching black holes/entire galaxies, understanding vague physics processes and more!
1c3d0g is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 01:53 PM   #12
Samskip
5 Posts
 
Samskip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

If it really packs 6GB of RAM it would be an awsome card for driving 4K displays.
Samskip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:04 PM   #13
Filiprino
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 66 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 5 Posts

Whoa, 6 GB of GDDR5 is great. A TDP of 235W isn't.
At least make it SLI friendly with only 1 slot of connectors instead of two. In that way you can use a waterblock and have 1 more PCIe connector of your motherboard available.
Filiprino is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:13 PM   #14
Dj-ElectriC
1000 Posts
 
Dj-ElectriC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,578 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 643 Times in 300 Posts

System Specs

Waiting for the SuperFunTime ill have with this card
__________________


Battletag: HolyDiver#1664
Dj-ElectriC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:13 PM   #15
the54thvoid
2000 Posts
 
the54thvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,053 (1.64/day)
Thanks: 329
Thanked 854 Times in 504 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sc View Post
Time to put my 690 up for sale. Damn consumerism...
Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naito View Post
...Checked original article. Claims 85% of the performance of the GTX 690
Lose performance....
the54thvoid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:29 PM   #16
Fluffmeister
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 280 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 124
Thanked 80 Times in 32 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by the54thvoid View Post
Why?



Lose performance....
Single GPU is always going to preferable, sure the 690 is a wonderful piece of kit, but it still relies on decent SLI profiles to perform at it's best, and even then not every title will scale that well.

Throw in some extra functionality and still packing the same amount of CUDA cores as TWO 670's and I'd think you'd be on to a winner.

Last edited by Fluffmeister; Jan 21, 2013 at 02:38 PM.
Fluffmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:38 PM   #17
BigMack70
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 382 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 84 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

Hmmmmmmmmmm... depending on what actually happens with price/performance I could see myself selling off my 7970 Lightnings and going for one of these bad boys... If I can get anywhere near 7970 CF performance from a single GPU, I'm in.

Multi-GPU is a hassle comparatively.
BigMack70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:42 PM   #18
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,112 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,952
Thanked 644 Times in 466 Posts

System Specs

I've got a biiig pair of Titans!! Wanna see them?

But can it run Battlefield 4 @ 2560x1600 & 16xAF & 4xAA & Ultra settings?














_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:42 PM   #19
blibba
500 Posts
 
blibba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 774 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 109
Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts

System Specs

Given the increased memory bandwidth, this might only manage 85% of the throughput of the 690, but I bet it'll have lower 99th percentile frame times.
__________________
Heatware.
eBay feedback.
blibba is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 02:49 PM   #20
sc
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 63 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 16 Times in 5 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by the54thvoid View Post
Why?
Lose performance....
Because... there will be a dual GK110 board.
sc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 03:06 PM   #21
Kaynar
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 286 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 68 Times in 52 Posts

System Specs

What is the broad estimation of release date for these cards? Easter? Summer? Autumn?
Kaynar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 03:07 PM   #22
the54thvoid
2000 Posts
 
the54thvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,053 (1.64/day)
Thanks: 329
Thanked 854 Times in 504 Posts

System Specs

Google translated from Sweclockers:

Quote:
When NVIDIA released the GeForce GTX 680 in March 2012 it was clear that the new flagship was not based on the full version of the GPU Kepler (GK110). Instead, a cut-down version (GK104) to hold down the manufacturing costs. Now, almost a year later, full-fledged Kepler be heading to a Geforce in consumer class.
Multiple independent sources say the SweClockers to GK110 appears in Geforce Titan - an upcoming graphics cards in high-end class. The name alludes to the world's fastest supercomputer Cray Titan at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the USA, which is based on 18,688 pieces of Nvidia Tesla K20X with just GK110.

Calculation Card Nvidia Tesla K20X based on GK110 with 2688 CUDA cores, 384-bit memory bus, and 6 GB of GDDR5 memory. The circuit actually contains 2880 units, but NVIDIA has disabled a cluster (SMX), presumably for production reasons. While stopping the clock frequencies at relatively low 732 MHz GPU and 5.2 GHz GDDR5.

According SweClockers sources the launch of the GeForce Titanium to resemble that of the GeForce GTX 690th Partner Manufacturers must follow Nvidia's reference design to the letter and can not even put their own stickers on graphics cards. The performance is estimated at about 85 percent of a Geforce GTX 690th

The same sources claim that Geforce Titanium released in late February and has a suggested retail price of 899 USD.
the54thvoid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 03:22 PM   #23
Fluffmeister
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 280 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 124
Thanked 80 Times in 32 Posts

Sounds like it's gonna be another sexy reference design card using magnesium alloys and the like.

Bring it on.
Fluffmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 03:34 PM   #24
ThE_MaD_ShOt
3500 Posts
 
ThE_MaD_ShOt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hi! I'm from the Internet
Posts: 3,743 (6.95/day)
Thanks: 2,537
Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,468 Posts

System Specs

900 bones is a little steep for most to justify. Wow
__________________
Crunchers : Phenom II x6 1090t / 2x Phenom II x6 1055t / Phenom II x4 970BE /
“I always succed in my mission tho. Beer just delays it!” -ChaoticAtmosphere
“TPU is very mild, and I love to tell people I love them when they are being retarded, it makes me feel special in my special places. What was the point of this thread again? Oh well, I love all of you.” -Steevo

ThE_MaD_ShOt is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2013, 03:36 PM   #25
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 487 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filiprino View Post
Whoa, 6 GB of GDDR5 is great. A TDP of 235W isn't.
At least make it SLI friendly with only 1 slot of connectors instead of two. In that way you can use a waterblock and have 1 more PCIe connector of your motherboard available.
Don't get greedy now, the ol' GF110 was rated at 244w when fitted to a GTX 580, the current 680's rated at 190-ish, and the current GTX 690's given a 300w TDP.

235w isn't much IMO if it packed the processing power it promises.
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ORNL Debut of Cray XK7 "Titan" AMD and NVIDIA-Powered Supercomputer Cristian_25H News 18 Oct 30, 2012 10:12 AM
NVIDIA Launches the GeForce GTX 680 "Kepler" Graphics Card btarunr News 9 Mar 23, 2012 06:56 AM
Albatron releases "Blue Ray" Decoder Card based on 8500 GT W1zzard News 20 Jul 13, 2007 04:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts