![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
2400 MHz Memory Upgrade
I am waiting for NewEgg to send the Kingston HyperX Beast 2400 MHz (8 GB kit) I ordered, and it occurred to me that maybe I'm wasting my money, because I'm already getting over 20,000 MB/s now with cheap 1600 sticks. Some reviews of the Beast 2400 kit show about the same throughput (around 25,000 MB/s), but the latency is much lower 32 ns instead of the 52 ns I'm getting now. My question is, can you really feel the difference in responsiveness, or can you only tell the difference in benchmarks? Will memory-intensive tasks get done quicker? Hoping that some of you who have done this upgrade can tell the difference. Thanks in advance for any replies.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hood For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 | |
![]() |
Quote:
I would suggest you get yourself a good 1600kit and OC it to 1866 or 2100 with low latency. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,517 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 336 Times in 276 Posts
|
All you get is more bandwidth and real world apps don't benefit a whole lot. I use GSkill Tridents 2400MHz cas 10 only because it was free... and looks cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,517 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 336 Times in 276 Posts
|
Why not
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,288 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 431 Times in 321 Posts
|
I think this review sums it up nicely
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4503/s...-the-best-ddr3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,517 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 336 Times in 276 Posts
|
With good memory and low cas and high frequencies, you can get down to low 30's for Latency in Aida and read/write speeds of 26,000Mb/s. Anandtech shows low 40's for latencies. Just sayin
Last edited by drdeathx; Feb 2, 2013 at 03:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
Well, they look better than my old sticks! I'll at least have the satisfaction of better benchmark scores. Time to save my pennies towards a GTX 670 or two and open up my last bottleneck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,066 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 913 Times in 746 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Not really a fair comparison, as I didn't exclude the GPU scores. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...postcount=1539
__________________
Heatware |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
I just got done installing and tweaking the new Beast 2400 memory, and you guys were right, it's not a huge jump, but it's there, all my benchmarks saw a slight increase. In Aida64 memory test, read-24466 MB/s, write-23087, copy-27343, latency 34.0 ns. Even WEI went from 8.0 to 8.2 for memory. I'm satisfied, knowing that my system is just a little bit faster/closer to peak performance. In a month or two, 2400 kits might be only $50 - if so, I may buy another of these for total 16 GB.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hood For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire, England
Posts: 2,642 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 332
Thanked 857 Times in 604 Posts
|
Should of bought some Gskill 1600mhz, they oc to 2133 easily at stock volts, anywho enjoy your new temp e-peen upgrade
__________________
![]() Bioshock Infinite, FC3, Crysis 3, Shogun 2, Dirt Showdown AMD bundle keys for sale:
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=182837 |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to NdMk2o1o For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 228 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
|
For what it's worth, I have been doing a lot of experimenting with memory speeds/timings, and I haveffound that the biggest difference is (perhaps obviously) in benchmarks.
However, contrary to the popular notion that memory speed is LIMITED to benchmarks, I have found that there is indeed an advantage to having high speed memory for gaming. The faster your memory (assuming everything else remains the same), the higher your minimum in-game frame rate. The higher the min fps, the more likely that you will have a smooth gaming experience, as you won't suffer any/as many slow-downs or stuttering. The sweet spot is 2133 with the tightest timings you can get, which for me with my Ripjaws Z 16GB 4x4 2133 9-11-10-28 1.65v kit is 2133 8-10-9-26 1T 1.705v. I have some quick numbers for you, from testing a few recent games... (RAM Speed, Timings, Min FPS for Games 1-3): DDR3-1333 6-7-6-15 = 25.2 29.3 39.5 DDR3-1600 7-8-7-21 = 25.9 31.2 40.8 DDR3-1866 9-9-9-24 = 27.4 35.3 44.1 DDR3-2133 9-11-10-28 = 30.1 38.1 47.8 DDR3-2133 8-10-9-26 = 32.0 39.7 48.7 DDR3-2400 9-12-10-28 = 32.7 40.3 48.9 DDR3-2560 9-12-11-31 = 33.4 40.9 49.7 DDR3-2666 10-13-12-32 = 33.7 41.2 49.9 DDR3-2666 10-12-11-31 = 33.9 41.5 50.1 These benchmarks are averaged between my 3930K (4.8Ghz) + Rampage 4 Extreme, and 3770K (4.8Ghz) + GA-Z77X-UP7, except for the 2666 runs as the IMC on SNB-E just can't get up there. The games I've used are BF3, Far Cry 3, Metro2033, BF3, and a half dozen others. Every game has shown improvements, some more drastic and some less so. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to nleksan For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,708 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 783
Thanked 422 Times in 326 Posts
|
I'd to say thank you hood for this thread as I was about to do the same thing....
Now I know....just go 1866 or 2133 low cas...as they run about the same price +/- $10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
I almost bought the Patriot Intel Extreme Masters 2133 kit ($65), because it has a good bit of headroom (should easily OC to 2400+ at 1.65v) and I've always had good luck with Patriot. The same kit in 1866 MHz is only $47, so if you're on a tight budget like me, that's a great deal as well.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hood For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,708 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 783
Thanked 422 Times in 326 Posts
|
Yeah I'm trying to stay under $500...
I can get a I5-3570 and an Asrock Extreme6 at Microcenter for $239...($254 after tax) I think I'm going with an Intel 330 120gb $110 ($116 after tax) Which leaves $130 for cooling and memory...knowing that 1866 or 2133 is good enough really saves me a lot...The egg carries both 1866 & 2133 8gb kits certified for that board (cas 9) for $55 each but only carries 1 set of 1866 @ 16gb for $75...The 2400 kit was $130 This thread helped me out a lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
|
Ram faster then 1600 does not make gaming any better correct? I just want to be 100% sure because that is mostly all I do and don't want to waste money upgrading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,708 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 783
Thanked 422 Times in 326 Posts
|
I can't say for 100% sure but 1866 seems to be about the same price so why not get it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 341 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 82 Times in 70 Posts
|
I wouldn't worry too much about QVLs - all the major players (Corsair, Patriot, GSkill, Kingston, Crucial, etc.) test their sticks in all mainstream boards, and it's rare that there's a compatibility problem, especially on the last 3 generations of chipsets. For example, on my Asus P8Z77-V, the QVL is now showing RAM as high as 2600, and more vendors are added with each update, so the 2400 list gets bigger, and so on down the line. It's fairly safe to assume, therefore, that any name-brand 2400 sticks will run on my motherboard. The Kingston HyperX Beast 2400 DIMMs I just installed weren't on the list, and they run perfect. So do your search starting from lowest price, limit it by total memory size (8 GB [2 x 4 GB]) and desired speed (2133 MHz) and you'll see that the list starts at $44.99 for Kingston HyperX 2133 with tall blue heat spreaders, a solid name brand, and actually very good RAM if you have room for the absurdly tall heat sinks. I guarantee it will work with your motherboard, as will anything probably at that speed.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Hood For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,708 (1.77/day)
Thanks: 783
Thanked 422 Times in 326 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Memory kiti GSkill TridentX 2400 MHz part I - Crosshair V Formula (AM3+) | FlanK3r | Motherboards & Memory | 0 | May 31, 2012 08:54 PM |
| Kingmax Announces First DDR3-2400 MHz Memory Module Without Heatsink | btarunr | News | 13 | Dec 29, 2010 09:03 AM |
| Apacer Introduces ARES DDR3-2400 MHz Overclocking Memory Modules | btarunr | News | 14 | Dec 1, 2010 02:13 AM |
| Kingston Creates 2400 MHz DDR3 Memory Kit, Certified by Intel | btarunr | News | 4 | Mar 16, 2010 12:07 PM |
| Elpida, Buffalo Release Prototype DDR3 2400 MHz Memory | btarunr | News | 11 | Sep 28, 2008 06:46 AM |