![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
W1zzard's Sidekick
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 2,461 (0.86/day)
Thanks: 33
Thanked 706 Times in 245 Posts
|
Intel ships first quad-core Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Intel has begun shipping its first quad-core processor "Kentsfield" to system builders for system testing. They will be available in very limited quantities by mid November and are not (yet) bound to show a large performance jump in games, but should give you your moneys worth in multimedia applications. Kentsfield will ship with 8 MB of L2 cache and a clock speed of 2.67 GHz to keep the processor within a 110 watt power envelope - up from 65 watts of the dual-core Core 2 Duo E6700 with the identical clock speed.
Source: TG Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
Whos buying me one for X-MASS?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: at my pc
Posts: 429 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
phooey.
My uncle works for a computer complny called Klafters and says the system /w theprocessor most identical to mine (mine - 2.8ghz socket 478, system - 3.0ghz socket 478) performs better than thier dual-core 3.0ghz systems. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
So you really think you can beat a Quad-Core? OK!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
By these CPU's coming out will they drop their prices on the Conroe's? Probably not I am guessing...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden (08-Stockholm)
Posts: 307 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Im waiting for the cheaper QE6600 with 4x2.4ghz cores, coming next year instead. It will be cheaper and more valueble, atleast for me.
__________________
Break´n the law... Break´n the law...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: at my pc
Posts: 429 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
Well you said "Phooey"...and then you said that your comp is better than 3.0Ghz Dual-Cores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
tdp of 110 over 65 from the conroe...hmm i wonder if the second cpu die has anything to do with it..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
its well annoying how intel just glues to dies together... it's just no where near as good as the way AMD does it or indeed the Conroes/allendales do it. I think I'll hold out until K8L in which I will most likely switch bcak to AMD if what people are saying has any truth to it
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz (400Mhzx8) 1.52V (set in bios, 1.47v real) | 4GB GeIL PC6400 4-4-4-12 @ 800Mhz 4-4-4-12 | Gigabyte DQ6 @ 1600Mhz | Sapphire HD2900XT 1GB | Enermax Infiniti 720W | Silverstone TJ07-B with custom watercooling | BenQ FP241WZ
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/9zggs/ GPUZ Validation 1060/1443 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() |
i dunno, what have people been saying about the amd k8l? according to the few articles i read on it a lot of people dont expect it to best the kentsfield.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 300 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Is any game going to take advantage of 4 cores?
I dont think so, cause thats not fair to all the high-end users with a 1000$ Conroe. Alan Wake is rumoured to, but i dont know. And we dont really need them for physics either with the X1k series doing it so much better then a CPU could. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach him a lesson
Posts: 3,380 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 101 Posts
|
Currently & DIRECTLY? No... Quake 4 SMP spawns 2 threads w/ r_useSMP = 1 enabled in its configuration file... so, @ most? It DIRECTLY uses 2 cores @ most.
BUT, indirectly, GAMES & OTHER PROGRAMS RUNNING CONCURRENTLY @ THE TIME might get some 'boost' out of more than 2 CPU cores present, because other running processes threads can be run on other CPU's present & LESS SATURATED than the one a game is running on, lessening the load on the CPU the game is being run on! (ESPECIALLY IF other running programs on your system bear 2-N threads that is, & MOST of what you run does nowadays! Taskmgr.exe can bear this out for you in its PROCESSES tab, & using the VIEW menu, SELECT COLUMNS submenu item, & being sure "THREADS" is checked off as a visible column)... However, even IF other running processes are single-threaded only (the minority nowadays)? They can be run/started up on on less saturated CPU's, other CPU's where the game (or its threads) are NOT running... * The OS kernel subsystem PROCESS SCHEDULER component should, in theory, send other running processes threads to the LEAST USED/SATURATED CPU present of 2-N cpu's, &/or a game's threads to another less saturated CPU on the game startup... ![]() (Thus, giving a game you are playing MORE cycles on the CPU it is running on, by sending other running process' threads to other CPU's present that are less saturated). APK Last edited by Alec§taar; Oct 16, 2006 at 03:34 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|