![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts
|
R600 benchmarks???
http://level505.com/2006/12/30/the-f...i-r600-test/1/
Take a look and you be the judge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,129 (1.54/day)
Thanks: 616
Thanked 494 Times in 424 Posts
|
that link seems to go no where
__________________
Asus P6T Deluxe Intel X58/ i7-920CO@4.2GHZ 24/7 <> CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB (3 x 2GB) DDR3 1600.<> ThermalTake ToughPower 1200 WATT PSU
2X ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 <> Asetek Liquid CPU Cooling System 320GBx4 Perpendicular RAID-0/BLU-RAY/HD-DVD Reader / DVD±R/±RW Writer LG 50" 50PK550 1080p 600Hz Plasma/WestingHouse 37 inch @1920X1080/Windows 7 Pro/64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ONTARIO CANADA
Posts: 1,951 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 342
Thanked 261 Times in 224 Posts
|
works for me
__________________
You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline-it helps if you have some kind of a football team,or some nuclear weapons,BUT at the very least you need a BEER!-Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
Not real. They did not even have a real 8800 GTX to test, either. Oh well, proof that if you publish, people will come. Looks like a good way to get some web ads sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: montreal quebec
Posts: 387 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
worked for me! ATI RULES GO ATI
__________________
ATI RULES COME TO NETCORE.2476.65.250.134:28960 COD4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida, where it's hot as hell.
Posts: 4,134 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 697 Times in 524 Posts
|
maybe if they had some pics, i would believe it, but they didnt even have pics of the 8800 or 7950 or 1950's, so how are we supposed to believe them?
__________________
“People just need a reason to live. Some peoples reason is to bitch on the Internet. W1zz is just giving these sad souls a reason to live. Hes like a saint. Saint W1zzard.” -TheMailMan78 “i have no idea what you just said. IM MAKING THIS CRAP OUT OF RUBBISH AND YOU THINK I KNOW WHAT IM DOING?!?!?!??” -Mussels
Mars: Apparently I have been there before, but I don't recall.Not all who wander are lost... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
I believe a few developer cards are out there as of now. In which I would make a guess that this R600 in being one of those cards. I believe this review to be true the only thing buggy about it is that this is the ONLY thing at their site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,129 (1.54/day)
Thanks: 616
Thanked 494 Times in 424 Posts
|
lol it loaded for me this time ...looks and reads like it right but i was expecting more ...this means ATI will be ontop for maybe best 45-60 days cuz I but the compitition already has better than that on the way ...OBL. was impressive though...and sure would like to see some crossfire scores
__________________
Asus P6T Deluxe Intel X58/ i7-920CO@4.2GHZ 24/7 <> CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB (3 x 2GB) DDR3 1600.<> ThermalTake ToughPower 1200 WATT PSU
2X ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 <> Asetek Liquid CPU Cooling System 320GBx4 Perpendicular RAID-0/BLU-RAY/HD-DVD Reader / DVD±R/±RW Writer LG 50" 50PK550 1080p 600Hz Plasma/WestingHouse 37 inch @1920X1080/Windows 7 Pro/64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
Too funny. I guess the ATI fans will believe the scores since they are above the 8800GTX. The only problem is that the 8800 GTX numbers are way too low. So, if those were real ATI card scores, I would be disappointed. And, of all the sites that may have access to an ATI engineering sample, why such a little known, no reputation site would even get one is questionable. And, since the NVIDIA numbers are not even close, it even further invalidates the numbers. Simple BS site with BS numbers. Nothing more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Those 2 are very close to being the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() |
Whether the results are close is not at issue. What is at issue is that the results are too low to be real. Also, just look ar the Croosfire numbers. What's with that? Those are very far off. And, I am not sure where you got the other 8800GTX scores. Is that with a QX6700 at 3.2GHz on a 680i board? Are they at HQ settings or the default quality setting for NVIDIA?
![]() With a QX6700 at 3.2 Ghz, the RAM at 800 Mhz, and the 8800 GTX card at stock clocks with HQ settings, 1600x1200, 4xAA and 16xAF, the real score is 7749 not 6368. So, their fake results are too low. I will have to try 05. Result to follow. Wish I had FEAR to test.
__________________
[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u6925.png[/img] Phase Cooled Tri SLI System Last edited by HeavyH20; Dec 30, 2006 at 10:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
Do you have a bought copy of 3Dmark of 06 to run with AA/AF Heavy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
All mine are bought. 01, 03, 05 and 06. And, if I recall correctly, 05 scores should be more like 12,500.
__________________
[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u6925.png[/img] Phase Cooled Tri SLI System Last edited by HeavyH20; Dec 30, 2006 at 10:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.11/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
Wiz didnt even score that. Every setup will give slightly different scores from one setup to another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() |
Depends on the CPU and motherboard used. Since I have the same setup the site tested, it is relatively easy to compare. And, we are not talking OC results, just stock (aside from the CPU). So, unless Wiz had a QX6700 and a 680i, it is kind of hard to compare like to like. All I know is the results from that site are off a little too much to be written off to simple variance.
EDIT: Well, just ran 3Dmark05 with the cards at stock, HQ settings, 4xAA, 16xAF, 1600x1200 with the CPU at 3.2 GHZ and the RAM at 4-4-4-12 800MHz. The score was close to what I recalled, 12,326. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2489187 And, just ran 3DMark06 again and submitted the result, same settings as the review, 7742 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=891058
__________________
[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u6925.png[/img] Phase Cooled Tri SLI System Last edited by HeavyH20; Dec 31, 2006 at 04:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, US
Posts: 902 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 562
Thanked 237 Times in 130 Posts
|
We'll have to see when the card hits the shelves and reviews from more well known sites start coming in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Czech Rep. - Central Euro
Posts: 31 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2HEAVYH 3DMark06 1600*1280 / AA*4 / AF*16?????
Score 7749??? And driver settings? All for best performance? LOD +24? ///****censored**** top secret... Last edited by fanik; Dec 31, 2006 at 08:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() |
i'm waiting for this card before i build my new pc, i can't wait........ R600 in crossfire, (think i've just creamed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, US
Posts: 902 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 562
Thanked 237 Times in 130 Posts
|
Quote:
Another point is that these are sketchy beta drivers versus nVidia's not-so-beta drivers. Expect the numbers to go up after real drivers come out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee:
Posts: 84 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
It's fake, I have seen this before, they fake some tests and buy a Domain and stick ad's on it and submit it to the Tech sites and Bam. $1500 in Ad hits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() |
Quote:
No, all settings to hurt performance turned up to HQ. No LOD changes (0). Besides, with a little OC (630/990) and the driver settings set to performance, at the same 1600x1200 res and settings, the score is more like 8700. Without AA and AF enabled, 11K. At default benchmark settings, 13K.
__________________
[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u6925.png[/img] Phase Cooled Tri SLI System Last edited by HeavyH20; Dec 31, 2006 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee:
Posts: 84 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() |
LOL,
fanATIcs Because this is mostly an ATI community website it means that its legal to be a fanATIc?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|