techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 21, 2007, 10:17 PM   #1
Bastieeeh
200 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 459 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Bastieeeh

System Specs

Recently showed 8600 GTS scores are a fake

On last Sunday we reported about PCOnline who were showing the worlds first 8600GTS benchmark figures. A few guys nicknamed 'kemo6600' and 'Gam3Ra' over at the XtremeSystems (scroll down to post 15) point out there is something wrong with these figures and the pictures. Admittedly there is something wrong with the pictures in question. There are 4 of them in the thread at XtremeSystems and all of them have a ACDSee EXIF-tag in it (probably for some cropping reasons) besides one! Coincidentally this one picture is the one that states the 3DMark 06 score. If you look carefully at the provided picture you will see the different sub-category scores at the front center and the right window at the back. Look at the picture at the end of this post where I enframed the parts in red.
Anyway there is another way to bust this picture as a fake even if the numbers weren't manipulated. Check out the 3Dmark2006 Score Calculator by M3kk which calculates the final '06 score based on given SM02, SM03 and CPU scores in the same way the real deal arithmetics behind 3DMark06 are doing it. If you enter SM2.0 3249, SM3.0 2070 and CPU 937 you will get 5212 3DMarks only. Now if you calculate using the other values (SM2.0 2356, SM3.0 N/A, CPU 940) it comes up with 3902 3DMarks. The last picture I added show what happens when you combine the most convincing scores (SM2.0 2837, SM3.0 2070, CPU 940) - the 3DMark2006 Calculator v1.2 now renders 4598 3DMarks which is in fact nowhere close to the stated 5488 3DMarks.
You might wonder why I didn't link to the pictures of the source story. That is because the PCOnline is down at the moment and I would really be astounded if the story is still up by the time they go online again. The other reason is that our own picture-upload engine get's rid of the EXIF tags so our own article doesn't give any evidence.



Source: XtremeSystems

Last edited by zekrahminator; Mar 21, 2007 at 10:31 PM.
Bastieeeh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 12:18 AM   #2
tofu
200 Posts
 
tofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GTA
Posts: 460 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

8600GTS is not so hot anymore. Scoring ~4600 in 3DM'06 is on par with stock 7900GS.

Which leads me to believe that the current rumors about the R600, X2900XTX, are false
tofu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 05:00 AM   #3
caveman_1990
200 Posts
 
caveman_1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 228 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

System Specs

You are properly right.
__________________
MY MODING : http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=27967
---------------------------------------------------
"DUDE" uR noT heLPinG mE !!!!!!!

Oh im srY uR onE oF thosE RetarD whO doNt wriTe novEls
caveman_1990 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 09:23 AM   #4
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,222 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,775 Times in 1,793 Posts

System Specs

haha i hope this isnt surprising to anyone. and who the hell has time to fake a benchmark score and post it on the internet?
Easy Rhino is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 10:16 AM   #5
Dark Ride
Mushkin Rep
 
Dark Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 534 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 29 Times in 7 Posts

A Radeon X1950PRO 256MB scores around 5300 in 3DMark06

__________________

Last edited by Dark Ride; Mar 22, 2007 at 02:39 PM.
Dark Ride is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 05:04 PM   #6
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Just fanbois trying to show one upmanship. Listen folks, Nvidia isnt the god of graphics cards. For that matter, neither is ATI. So, lets go ahead and get that out of the way. Secondly, why would they fake a score? Honestly, some people are just too retarded for their own good. Now, on to ATI. I dont think there are any benchmarks for the X2800XTX yet (that I know of) Only thing I heard is, its about 300 points higher than the 8800 GTX. Thats a huge margin if you ask me.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts